Curt Doolittle

Theme: Civilization

  • God -> Universalism. Ancestor Worship -> Nationalism. That’s Your Answer

    God -> Universalism.

    Ancestor Worship -> Nationalism.

    That’s Your Answer.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-03 06:19:00 UTC

  • THE HISTORICITY OF JESUS I am not unique, in the assumption that the following w

    THE HISTORICITY OF JESUS

    I am not unique, in the assumption that the following would need to be true in order for the myth to originate:

    – a jewish preacher existed

    – he had followers (disciples)

    – the temple event turned him into a problem.

    – he was crucified for creating that problem.

    – his ‘strategy’ was adopted by his followers (Saul)

    I suspect also that:

    – the betrayal occurred – but i can see that being added.

    – ‘love expansion’ argument was his innovation and an important one.

    And the rest evolved from there.

    That is all that is needed for the formation of the entire mythos.

    THE EVOLUTION AND THE CONSEQUENCES

    – The old testament was added to give the character legitimacy in historical context.

    – The single event was integrated into the then-evolving sun-god cults dominant in the empire but with egyptian, roman, and persian variations. In other words, the new-jews produced a jewish version of the sun god mythos.

    – The sun god mythos was turned against the empires rather than assisting people in integrating into those empires.

    – This strategy of undermining the empires from within through a resistance movement by the women and the underclasses was more successful in the period where empires were powerful.

    – The muslims evolved from a christian cult, and their strategy was more effective in the period when the empires were weak from the plague and the persian – byzantine wars.

    – The Marxist (jewish), postmodernist (christian), and islamist(muslim) techniques evolved as resistance movements – in no small part due to a fear of the darwinian/spencerian/pareto-weber-durkheim/nietzchean/maxwellian revolution. And were conceived as a resistance and rebellion movement (Jewish marxism), a method of undermining the empire in period of weakness (christian postmodernism), and an outright attack on the great civilizations of modernity by invasion, territory claiming (temples/churches), reproduction (depopulation), and terrorism(warfare).

    – The answer to the ancient world and the modern is simply to preserve civilization and prevent jewish and marxist, christian and postmodernism, and muslim and islamicist dark ages, just as we prohibited the communist revolution, and just as the romans tried during the christian prosecutions.

    HISTORICITY

    So far as i can tell, scholarly opinion on the historical figure seems to coalesce on a preacher (storyteller), baptism, followers, temple event, crucifixion.

    This could have been a very, very, minor person, and the events only known to followers, and much like Arthur or Gilgamesh, continually embellished for the purpose of claiming greater wisdom and authority to the speaker, embellished by expansion into a prophet, embellished through the appropriation of the various old world sun god myths, until it was able to spread reliably through anchoring (replacing ) larger earlier figures, rather than originating a new narrative.

    So by appropriating the sun god cult story that had been evolving from its oldest form in egypt to its persian form (mithras) to its third iteration in the roman for (sol invictus) it could turn the sun god cuts from positives that assisted people in integrating into the ancient empires, into a resistance movement that sought to destroy those empires.

    And without the licensing of the rebellion by constantine, and ending the persecution of rebels, and the forcible conversion of rome to it later, and the closure of the schools, and the collapse of rome eighty years later, the project would not have been successful.

    And we might have been weakened by the plagues, but never been defeated by the muslims and never had such a dark age, and the spread of abrahamic ignorance across the entire old world.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-03 02:21:00 UTC

  • Western civilization evolved to assist in the reproduction of good FAMILIES and

    Western civilization evolved to assist in the reproduction of good FAMILIES and to constrain the reproduction of bad families. We have spent more than a century reversing that trend.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 16:53:00 UTC

  • THE JQ AND THEIR TRANSFORMATION IN THE USA Jews that immigrated to the USA from

    THE JQ AND THEIR TRANSFORMATION IN THE USA

    Jews that immigrated to the USA from the borderland (Russian / eastern european) and from the various urban ghettos were absurdly superstitious unclean, people and considered barbarous and ignorant – lots of documentation. Their intellectual capital was (as is always under abrahamic ignorance) frozen. That is why despite being the most literate population they achieved nothing in all of history. WHat liberated their human capital was western rule of law and aristotelianism – just as it liberated western capital after the superstition of the church was overthrown with empiricism and the printing press. (just as conversely, the roman empire collapsed within 80 years of the forcible conversion of the polity to christianity in order to destroy the influence of the aristocracy – because the aristocracy performed civic religious rituals – not a specialized priesthood.)

    The criticism of the jews at that time was correct. The mid century criticism of jewish immorality in business was correct. The current criticism of specializing in the ‘immoral’ trades (advertising, media, film, pornography, ‘lawyering’, financialism, propaganda, and academy) is also true. The question is whether that is their fault for specializing in immorality, or our fault for allowing them to immigrate and not legislating against the ability to exploit high trust populations by various forms of hazard creation – it’s not like they had not specialized in hazard creation in money lending, and rent seeking sectors throughout their history. They have always concentrated capital then used it against host populations. It is the most profitable industry ever invented by man after conquering and taxation. Deception and moral hazard free of warranty, are far more profitable industries that truth, warranty and productivity.

    The fact that we let spread the industrialization of lying using propaganda to create moral hazard because it was advantageous in the sale of the conquered continent, and advantageous of the expansion of military power prior to the wars, and advantageous in the conquest of the european empires during their civil war, and advantages when we translated it into expansion of the working classes in the post war era to promote consumption, is just utilitarian. The problem is that we’re stuck with the consequences now until we are willing to suppress the abuse of public speech as we did prior to the first world war.

    So you can blame subsaharan africans for a standard deviation lower intelligence, greater socialization needs, and more rapid and deeper sexual maturity, or you can blame white northeastern americans for defeating the south and killing half a million kinsmen instead of one of the options of buying the slaves back and paying to send them home to africa, or giving them their own agrarian territory so that they could form their own communities and take care of themselves; and never relocating them using the soviet method to white industrial centers and destroying their families and culture that had just taken root in the south. THe same for jews: if you import a group of people who have evolved over a few thousand years without going through the agrarian phase of self domestication, and instead who have specialized in financial and other forms of parasitism upon host communities, then whose fault is it that people behave ase they do? When you give women an the underclass the franchise without demanding evidence that they will not put it to misuse (parasitism) then whose fault is it? I mean, yo don’t beat a dog for being a dog. You train the owner so that he does not give opportunity to be revolting in the presence of civilized humans.

    The fact that white europeans (according to Lynn – I’ve talked to him about it directly) have lost the same iq points as jews hold in advantage over whites at the moment, is due to the profiteering we have used under commercial capitalism to expand the reproduction of the lower and underclasses, and thereby reversed at least a thousand years of aggressively hanging every criminal possible, winter starvation, cold, plague, prevention from reproduction by domestic service, prevention of reproduction by manorialism by limiting access to land. Prevention of reproduction by late marriage under manorialism. And of course, war.

    The single best method of improving the genetic, normative, social, economic, and political conditions of a people is to reduce the size of the underclass until there is sufficient labor shortage that there is demand for young and old in the labor pool.

    While western civilization has always been eugenic, we have reversed it in the capitalist era – to our detriment, and to, apparently, the planet’s.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 16:24:00 UTC

  • You aren’t oppressed. You’re under domestication until capable of Sovereignty of

    You aren’t oppressed. You’re under domestication until capable of Sovereignty of Reason, Emotion, and Action in Adult Civilization

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 15:06:00 UTC

  • YOU WANT TO KNOW HOW THE CHURCH LIED? THE CRIMES OF CHRISTIANITY? THE LAST WORD.

    YOU WANT TO KNOW HOW THE CHURCH LIED? THE CRIMES OF CHRISTIANITY? THE LAST WORD.

    (be careful. these words are dangerous.)

    But I’ll make a few technical and unavoidable statements.

    1) Gods exist only as literary characters for the purpose of anthropomorphic communication of phenomenon that cannot be explained due to ignorance, using ideal(symbolic and non causal) or real(existential and causal) terms. In other words, anthropomorphic characters provide decidability through empathy with the unit of measurement requiring the least use of reason available to man.

    2) The organizations and leaders of the churches and temples, or their constituent priests, rabbis, and imams do not, will not, and have not stated this. And instead state exactly the opposite.

    3) The bible is pure myth and wisdom which we can choose to use to but is, was represented, and was intended to be presented as history and law which we must obey or suffer punishment.

    4) Jesus was probably a real figure, but everything attributed to his birth and rising is a restatement of ancient astrology, where the transition between stellar descent (minimum) and ascent requires three days. Everything that jesus said is reducible to “regardless of who rules, do not be divided, and instead, extend kinship love to non kin, and in doing so, exhaust tolerance, because it is by this degree of forgiveness trust is built among our disparate peoples with different customs.” This is a far more scientific explanation of the golden and silver rules.

    5) Christianity was produced from the teachings of Jesus by Paul (Saul) and his adherents, just as the works of Marx in the dogmas of marxism and postmodernism was spread by the Frankfurt School, Alinsky school, and Postmodern school. The ‘oppression’ literature of christianity was evolved and argumentatively transformed and expanded just as the ‘oppression’ literature of marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and identitarianism have been evolved and argumentatively transformed in the present era. Just as precisely the same was done with Islam and Judaism.

    4) From the tolerance of christianity to the forcible conversion to christianity and the persecution of pagans, it took only eighty years to destroy the empire. What had been a minority cult of the slaves and women, largely via women, was used to destroy the heroic and temporal civilization of the ancients. The consequence of christianity and the church was the destruction of the aristocracy both in rome and on the continent, the destruction of knowledge, the intentional hoarding of literacy, and the incremental accumulation and misallocation of and freezing of capital that prevented the recovery from the invasions and the plagues, and kept europe in a dark age until it was cast off again by the enlightenment as the scholars in the muslim world fled the spread the cancer of islam to the common people just as the church and byzantines spread the cancer of christianity to the common people. And the church, having transformed the warrior people of europe who desired to be ‘romans’ in adopting roman law and commerce into people who desired to be christians in christian mysticism and deceit, was too weak to resist both the rise of the North Sea Trade (Far from its reach), and the use of re-popularized greek (european) thought as a means of rebelling against the enslavement by poverty and ignorance of the church.

    The church was not only instrumental in the creation of the dark age by the attacks on the aristocracy and the thought of the aristocracy, but the cause of its prolongation.

    5) There is no difference between Judaism + Christianity + Islam, and marxism + postmodernism + feminism. It is precisely the same tactic repeated in the modern era as was used in the ancient era: immigrate, population, convert, resist, undermine, replace, and the successful return of Neolithic Feminine Equalitarianism that the Aristocratic (Aryan) Revolution evolved to resist and transform all mankind out of ignorance.

    The church is anti-western. To the degree that it is western it is only that the west resisted it. (See “Germanization of Christianity”)

    There is no reason that all of the goods of any religion cannot be provided without such institutionalization of lies and the consequential manufacture of ignorance.

    It is painfully obvious from intelligence data that the primary benefit of modernity has been the exchange of superstition and many small functional rules, to science and a few general descriptive rules, and the consequence has been the release of human intellectual capital imprisoned from the origins of abrahamism to its most recent death throws under abrahamic marxism, boazianism, freudianism, cantoranism, feminism, postmodernism, and identitarianism.

    CLOSING

    Abrahamism, in its three ancient, and three modern forms, was, is, and always will be, the source of ignorance, by which human intellectual, experiential, genetic, and material, and territorial capital is frozen dead.

    if there exist any gods, then the jury is in: The god of abraham is most certainly none other than the demon Lucifer – the Morningstar.

    Cheers.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 14:56:00 UTC

  • AMERICANS LIVE ON THE BALLS AND BRAWN OF PRIOR GENERATIONS —“Westerners strugg

    AMERICANS LIVE ON THE BALLS AND BRAWN OF PRIOR GENERATIONS

    —“Westerners struggle to define even the most basic forms of deception, let alone the sort of complexity that the Kremlin has been skull fucking you with for the past half-century. America, in particular, is living off the balls and brawn of prior generations while childishly and cowardly believing that appeasement, the NAP, negotiation with extortionists, and cooperation with terrorists (more so domestic than foreign) can end in anything other than a bloodbath.”—Emil Prelic

    (priceless)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 13:28:00 UTC

  • MISES INSTITUTE BEGINS TO RETURN TO WESTERN CIVILIZATION (thanks for the alert t

    https://mises.org/blog/new-libertarianTHE MISES INSTITUTE BEGINS TO RETURN TO WESTERN CIVILIZATION

    (thanks for the alert to the post via @Kier Martland)

    Jeff,

    Very Inspiring. Congratulations. Thank you for what you’re doing. It’s profoundly important for lovers of liberty everywhere.

    Thank you for bringing the reformation to the Mises Institute and the restoration of liberty to the western rule of law. You are taking the first steps toward producing a necessary reformation of libertarianism – the one I have been aggressively working to force by criticism, and the one I hoped the Mises Institute would finally – against all institutional memory, embrace.

    I realize that reformation is challenging, and that it has taken time to change from radical individualism advocating separatism and hostility to commons, to radical civil society that preserves individualism by the production of commons. That was a hard transition to make. It restores liberty to the western and specifically anglo-germanic and greco-roman tradition of civil society. It’s important because separatism in the absence of institutions, commons, and territory means one ends up a diasporic people at the mercy of host civilizations, or survivors on a borderland in an age of man where no more borderlands exist.

    And while changing values from individual separatism to community membership is difficult, I also realize that completing that restoration of liberty to the argumentative western tradition is even more challenging, and that it will take time to correct the Institute’s accumulated overinvestment in anti-western philosophy: (a) Rothbardian ethics of volition (allowing blackmail and externalities) instead of the natural law of reciprocity (not provoking retaliation), (b) The test of reciprocity using the NAP against intersubjectively verifiable property instead of non-imposition against demonstrated investment in homesteading or exchange (property-in-toto), (c) praxeology as a conflation of science and logic, instead of a logic within the scientific method by which we test rationality and reciprocity(morality) of transfers:, (d) argument by Rabbinical and Kantian Hermeneutic Justification (law and morality post agreement to cooperate) instead of Darwinian Survival from Scientific Criticism (continuous rational choice between predation, cooperation, and boycott prior to agreement to cooperate).

    And I expect it will be even harder to swallow that western aristocracies profited from the domestication of the animal man by millennia of normative (access to opportunity), reproductive(access to reproduction), manorial (access to property and therefore food), and prosecutorial (legal), suppression of impulsive, immoral, unethical, and criminal behavior, and thereby applying the same aggressive eugenic domestication to man as he had to animal and plant. Ergo, man was not oppressed but domesticated until he could demonstrate equal sovereignty over mind, body, kin and possessions as his domesticators.

    As far as I know, libertarianism remains a form of rebellion against the warriors and soldiers who create sovereignty by the organized application of non-substitutable violence to prevent alternative orders other than sovereignty. And that liberty movements arose as appeals for incremental sovereignty as the protected middle class sought to retain the proceeds of their production, as providing value in the preservation of sovereignty equal in all but risk to the peerage of the warriors.

    Once libertarians are willing to pay the cost of their liberty, rather than rally and shame others for not giving it to them, the libertarian movement will be complete. And the conservative and libertarian movements united in all but demand for behavioral norms and reliance on argument and choice rather than ritual and obedience – which is the only material difference between us: libertarians with higher ambitions for novelty and opportunity, and higher ambitions for predictability and security.

    At that point you will cease needing to struggle for donations, and the aged remains of ‘hopeful’ conservatism, and revel in the position of the central agent of change that restores western civilization.

    Someone will profit from it and achieve it if you don’t. (wink)

    I’m happy you’ve made the journey. I’d be happier if you led that journey, rather than require the institute continue to be dragged, kicking, rallying, ignoring, prevaricating, and shaming into the western tradition: Nomocracy: Incremental suppression of the animal, Evolution through reproduction, Transcendence via reason.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    https://mises.org/blog/new-libertarian

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 13:03:00 UTC

  • MISES INSTITUTE BEGINS TO RETURN TO WESTERN CIVILIZATION (followers: please shar

    https://mises.org/blog/new-libertarianTHE MISES INSTITUTE BEGINS TO RETURN TO WESTERN CIVILIZATION

    (followers: please share enthusiastically everywhere, and let me know you have.)

    Jeff,

    Very Inspiring. Congratulations. Thank you for what you’re doing. It’s profoundly important for lovers of liberty everywhere.

    Thank you for bringing the reformation to the Mises Institute and the restoration of liberty to the western rule of law. You are taking the first steps toward producing a necessary reformation of libertarianism – the one I have been aggressively working to force by criticism, and the one I hoped the Mises Institute would finally – against all institutional memory, embrace.

    I realize that reformation is challenging, and that it has taken time to change from radical individualism advocating separatism and hostility to commons, to radical civil society that preserves individualism by the production of commons. That was a hard transition to make. It restores liberty to the western and specifically anglo-germanic and greco-roman tradition of civil society. It’s important because separatism in the absence of institutions, commons, and territory means one ends up a diasporic people at the mercy of host civilizations, or survivors on a borderland in an age of man where no more borderlands exist.

    And while changing values from individual separatism to community membership is difficult, I also realize that completing that restoration of liberty to the argumentative western tradition is even more challenging, and that it will take time to correct the Institute’s accumulated overinvestment in anti-western philosophy: (a) Rothbardian ethics of volition (allowing blackmail and externalities) instead of the natural law of reciprocity (not provoking retaliation), (b) The test of reciprocity using the NAP against intersubjectively verifiable property instead of non-imposition against demonstrated investment in homesteading or exchange (property-in-toto), (c) praxeology as a conflation of science and logic, instead of a logic within the scientific method by which we test rationality and reciprocity(morality) of transfers:, (d) argument by Rabbinical and Kantian Hermeneutic Justification (law and morality post agreement to cooperate) instead of Darwinian Survival from Scientific Criticism (continuous rational choice between predation, cooperation, and boycott prior to agreement to cooperate).

    And I expect it will be even harder to swallow that western aristocracies profited from the domestication of the animal man by millennia of normative (access to opportunity), reproductive(access to reproduction), manorial (access to property and therefore food), and prosecutorial (legal), suppression of impulsive, immoral, unethical, and criminal behavior, and thereby applying the same aggressive eugenic domestication to man as he had to animal and plant. Ergo, man was not oppressed but domesticated until he could demonstrate equal sovereignty over mind, body, kin and possessions as his domesticators.

    As far as I know, libertarianism remains a form of rebellion against the warriors and soldiers who create sovereignty by the organized application of non-substitutable violence to prevent alternative orders other than sovereignty. And that liberty movements arose as appeals for incremental sovereignty as the protected middle class sought to retain the proceeds of their production, as providing value in the preservation of sovereignty equal in all but risk to the peerage of the warriors.

    Once libertarians are willing to pay the cost of their liberty, rather than rally and shame others for not giving it to them, the libertarian movement will be complete. And the conservative and libertarian movements united in all but demand for behavioral norms and reliance on argument and choice rather than ritual and obedience – which is the only material difference between us: libertarians with higher ambitions for novelty and opportunity, and higher ambitions for predictability and security.

    At that point you will cease needing to struggle for donations, and the aged remains of ‘hopeful’ conservatism, and revel in the position of the central agent of change that restores western civilization.

    Someone will profit from it and achieve it if you don’t. (wink)

    I’m happy you’ve made the journey. I’d be happier if you led that journey, rather than require the institute continue to be dragged, kicking, rallying, ignoring, prevaricating, and shaming into the western tradition: Nomocracy: Incremental suppression of the animal, Evolution through reproduction, Transcendence via reason.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    https://mises.org/blog/new-libertarian

    (thanks for the alert to the post via @Kier Martland)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 13:02:00 UTC

  • Fortress, Manor, or Church? Germany, Britain, or France? Sparta, Athens or Troy?

    Fortress, Manor, or Church?

    Germany, Britain, or France?

    Sparta, Athens or Troy?

    Rome, Venice, or Constantinople?

    Alexander, Marco Polo, Mohammed?

    Achilles, The Blacksmith, or Jesus?

    Warrior, Producer, or Priest?

    Law, Contract, Norm?

    Truth, Exchange, or Fiction?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 12:05:00 UTC