Curt Doolittle

Theme: Civilization

  • ISLAM LIKE CHRISTIANITY AND JUDAISM IS JUST ANOTHER ABRAHAMIC LIE. Islam is just

    ISLAM LIKE CHRISTIANITY AND JUDAISM IS JUST ANOTHER ABRAHAMIC LIE.

    Islam is just another of the abrahamic lies, that dooms jews to the diaspora and persecution, christians to invasion and dark ages, and muslims to ignorance and genetic devolution. Abrahamism was invented to resist evolution in the ancient world and in the modern. A destructive degenerate political order masquerading as a religion, propagated by elaborate lies wishful thinking, and self deception through chanting.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 10:56:00 UTC

  • HOW DO WE EQUILIBRATE MOSCOW AND STOCKHOLM? —“The climate in Moscow and Stockh

    HOW DO WE EQUILIBRATE MOSCOW AND STOCKHOLM?

    —“The climate in Moscow and Stockholm is roughly the same, yet masculinity is very different.”–Anatoly Voronin

    So is trust. So is economic velocity. This is the problem. How do we get both? That’s the problem for both Moscow and Stockholm.

    How do we have both?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-11 17:52:00 UTC

  • THE ORIGIN OF ATHENIAN LAW WAS RECIPROCITY —“The decisions of the Athenian cou

    THE ORIGIN OF ATHENIAN LAW WAS RECIPROCITY

    —“The decisions of the Athenian courts were not originally based on laws. They arose from the injured party trying to compensate for their loss.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-10 23:42:00 UTC

  • THE RISE OF EUROPEAN ROME & COLLAPSE UNDER PERSIAN BYZANTIUM -Roman Monarchy …

    THE RISE OF EUROPEAN ROME & COLLAPSE UNDER PERSIAN BYZANTIUM

    -Roman Monarchy … 753 – 510BCE

    -Roman Republic ….. 510–27BCE

    Historians traditionally date the end of the Roman Republic in 27BCE, when Octavian is proclaimed Augustus (the defeat of Mark Antony and Cleopatra at the battle of Actium takes place in 31BCE).

    -Roman Empire……… 27BCE-395CE

    The beginning of the crisis of the Roman Republic that culminated in the advent of the Roman Empire is usually dated in 134BCE, with the inauguration of Gracchus as tribune.

    69CE is named “the year of the four emperors”, in which four emperors ruled in succession: Galba, Otho, Vitelius and Vespasian. It is the end of the Julio-Claudian dynasty, after the suicide of Nero in 68CE, and the beginning of the Flavian dynasty.

    In 285CE, Diocletian introduces the Tetrarchy (four emperors at once). This arrangement is unsuccessful, leading to a civil war that was finally ended by Constantine I, who defeated his rivals and became once again sole ruler of the Empire.

    The Roman Empire splits permanently into Eastern and Western halves in 395CE, after the death of Theodosius I, the last emperor to rule over both parts of the Roman Empire and who made Christianity the official religion of the Empire (Edict of Thessalonica).

    I don’t like the expression ‘Roman Federation’ for that period of the Roman Empire. I haven’t found any historian using it.

    -Roman Church………306CE is not properly the year the Roman Church forms, but Constantine is proclaimed Emperor on that date.

    -Roman Tolerance …. 313CE (Edict of Milan).

    -Forcible Conversion…..380CE (Edict of Thessalonica).

    -Roman Fall …………… In 476CE Odoacer deposed Romulus Augustulus.

    Note: Why do you quote Evan Andrews? He doesn’t seem to favor the theory that the spread of Christianity was a major factor in the fall of Rome.

    Also on the question of the decline of Ancient Rome, have you read about the research conducted in Rome by Tenney Frank at the beginning of the XXth century? He was one of the first classical scholars arguing that Roman expansion brought in masses of foreign peoples and slaves that over time changed the ethnic make-up of the Roman populace and contributed to the empire’s ruin.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-10 13:52:00 UTC

  • THE ORIGINAL TEMPLES The very first, original temples, as far as I can tell, wer

    THE ORIGINAL TEMPLES

    The very first, original temples, as far as I can tell, were the equivalent of ‘roadside haunted houses’ (entertainment) that evolved into ‘safe houses’ for meetings between parties that might be in conflict. It turned out that ‘Safe Places’ were a highly desirable commodity. And vacation trips to the amusement park were just as popular in prehistory as they are today.

    Then priests came along and figured out how to make money at it.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-09 10:54:00 UTC

  • ORIGINS OF MAN AND WOMAN (sketch) ( … ) The Sun burned and the planets turned,

    ORIGINS OF MAN AND WOMAN

    (sketch)

    ( … )

    The Sun burned and the planets turned, the seas churned, the seasons waxed and waned – and ape knew to stand upright.

    And apes chased the beasts of the earth and killed them.

    The Sun burned and the planets turned, the seas churned, the seasons waxed and waned – and ape knew cooperation.

    And man walked the earth.

    The Sun burned and the planets turned, the seas churned, the seasons waxed and waned – and man knew tools.

    And men knew murder.

    The Sun burned and the planets turned, the seas churned, the seasons waxed and waned – and man knew fire.

    And man knew war.

    The Sun burned and the planets turned, the seas churned, the seasons waxed and waned – and man knew speech.

    And man knew deceit.

    The Sun burned and the planets turned, the seas churned, the seasons waxed and waned – and man knew his woman and children.

    And man knew property.

    The Sun burned and the planets turned, the seas churned, the seasons waxed and waned – and man knew the husbandry of animals.

    And man knew wealth.

    The Sun burned and the planets turned, the seas churned, the seasons waxed and waned – and man knew the fruits of toiling the earth.

    And man knew slavery.

    The Sun burned and the planets turned, the seas churned, the seasons waxed and waned – and man knew crafts of making things.

    And men knew their differences.

    The Sun burned and the planets turned, the seas churned, the seasons waxed and waned – and man knew trade.

    And man knew villages, towns and cities.

    ( … )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-09 10:18:00 UTC

  • AFRICA vs THE STEPPE vs THE WATERWAYS Africa seems to have been one crucible of

    AFRICA vs THE STEPPE vs THE WATERWAYS

    Africa seems to have been one crucible of evolution, and the steppe another, and the peoples of the waters another.

    I haven’t given that comparison much thought, but those three axis probably explain the differences between ‘the peoples along the waters”, the people of the steppe, and the people of africa.

    I mean, those three conditions put very different selection pressures on each group. and the difficulty of travel in africa vs water and steppe explains the diversity.

    If you can follow and hold the waters you will have it easier than the steppe. if you have the steppe you have it easier than you have in africa.

    And the deserts are something to be avoided at all costs.

    Africa would lead to deeper more rapid maturity, the steppe to greater aggression and opportunism, and the waters to domestication. And that is what we see.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-09 09:03:00 UTC

  • WHY WE ARGUE AGAINST CHRISTIANITY (ALL OF ABRAHAMISM) –“… you dismiss religio

    WHY WE ARGUE AGAINST CHRISTIANITY (ALL OF ABRAHAMISM)

    –“… you dismiss religion and marxism as a time saver…”—Parker Salingers

    Smart, and close. But…We don’t brush it off, we can answer it, but as you say, it’s a time sink, and it takes an intellectually honest opponent. And both time, energy, and intellectually honest opponents are scarce. So we weigh our investments in argument carefully.

    ABRAHAMISM AND DECEPTION VS LITERATURE AND TRUTH

    So, because monotheistic religions make use of the techniques of abrahamism (conflation, lies, falsehoods, denialism), And because prior to monotheism, law (truth) which is a literature of limits, was separated from mythical ‘religions’ (parables) – which are simply literature of pedagogy (opportunities) – we see no reason why people must be taught lies and superstition, rather than truth and literature, other than that they are not human – only half-domesticated animals, who, like our livestock and our pets, therefore cannot possible have a place in law and politics.

    SEEDING LETS US CHEAPLY SEARCH FOR HONEST OPPONENTS

    So we settle for repeating the ‘seeds’ of “if it’s good then why must you lie about it?’ And conversely, why has christianity failed to defend us? Why is christianity universalist? Why did vatican II double-down on universalism and conversion rather than personal acts of charity to neighbors? Why did protestant evangelicalism double down on fundamentalism and conversion rather than truth?

    THE CONSEQUENCES OF ABRAHAMISM

    It’s not that imitating the jesus myth if stated without supernatural connotations is a bad thing. It’s that the consequences of judaism were the loss of a homeland the adoption of parasitism and near extermination; the consequences of christianity were a dark age, our near conquest by arabs, mongols, and turks – and our rescue by our own ‘northern european pagans’ and our inability to resist them like we could not resist arabs, mongols, and turks; and the consequences of islam and the loss of all the great civilizations of the ancient world – byzantium, persia, phoenicia, egypt, and their decent into ignorance, mysticism, poverty – and worse of all: dysgenia.

    JESUS’ IDEA DEFLATED INTO TRUTH

    When I analyze (deflate) christianity into operational terms it is nothing more than *assuming the incentive to cooperate exists, overinvestment in cooperation will develop sufficient rewards and trust that cooperation without investment, and the high returns of cooperation can be produced*. This strategy is *counter to instinct*, so it must be trained into us. It can be trained into us by superstition (lies), storytelling (analogy), description(science), or discipline (training). So if the *wrapper* around christianity consists of lies, especially those leading to fundamentalism (use of religion in argument and politics) and therefore producing denialism and ignorance, and therefore damaging, then why perpetuate the the lies, and not simply teach the science as we have in every other discipline.

    THE RESTORATION OF THE WEST

    The restoration of western civilization will not be complete until abrahamism(lying) in all its supernatural forms: jewish, christian, islam, and abrahamism in its modern forms marxism(jewish-pseudoscientific), postmodernism(catholic-pseudorational), and anglo-keynesian (pseudoscientific) and judaism, christianity and Islam (supernatural fundamentalism) have all been extinguished from our lands, our institutions, our laws, our norms, and the people who inhabit them.

    THE RESTORATION OF OUR SUCCESS: TRUTH

    Because then we will return to our ancient strategy: truth above all else, and truth as the preferred means of climbing the dominance hierarchy.

    THE EXISTENTIAL (REAL) TRANSCENDENCE OF MAN

    Because truth is power over the falsehoods of man, the vicissitudes of nature, and the brutality of the physical universe.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-08 09:39:00 UTC

  • by Eli Harman The two biggest lies of Christianity are monotheism (one God, one

    by Eli Harman

    The two biggest lies of Christianity are monotheism (one God, one truth, one law, one way, one life) and universalism (for EVERYONE.)

    This is a recipe for limitless mischief and most of it has actually come to pass.

    It’s a justification for centralization of power, authority, and everything else. And while it may have produced gains for a time from economies of scale, it’s long since passed the point where diseconomies come to the fore.

    Add to this the conflation of myth and superstition with ACTUAL history and science and you have an enfeebling, stultifying, regressive, backwards, mind-hobbling, faith rather than an ennobling, empowering, enlightening, one.

    It’s a retreat into fictionalism, NOT archetypes, metaphors, or analogies that serve as useful heuristics for navigating the real world (although it still has an aspect of that.)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-07 16:36:00 UTC

  • USA VS EUROPE I mean, is it that simple: We are Legal and Europe is Literary? Ye

    USA VS EUROPE

    I mean, is it that simple: We are Legal and Europe is Literary? Yep.

    USA: Commercial Legal Analytic Deflationary vs. EU: Religious Moral Literary Conflationary.

    And so Canada and UK are backsliders, AUS less so, and USA not so.

    Europe attacked the churches but evolved into them in the french model.

    USA continued the practice of deflation and separated public law from private religion, with the problem being that morals were not left to the regions and localities. Thereby leaving open the door for the restoration of religious rule that occured in europe to occur in the federal governent – which, for an ‘old europe of the americas’ to form required analytic government of commerce.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-07 12:50:00 UTC