The “go with the flow” leftists/hippies/(peace and love)/”can’t we all get along” types can’t see that the flow (of reality) IS to separate and speciate …
….So we can ALL get along!.
They can’t see the flow through the globalist herd. For the first time in history we can choose to NOT shovel against the tide of reality (because we can measure it properly) but still we are encouraging the picking-up of shovels and readying the shit shovellers for deadly work, it’s sad.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/44940605_10156740909417264_7117218975108300800_n_10156740909412264.jpg THE PLAN (from elsewhere)Raymond WarnerBut what about the caliphate?Oct 29, 2018, 9:05 AMAyham NedalI’ve been seeing this on Arabic conspiracy-theory -saturated Facebook pages since years lolOct 29, 2018, 9:11 AMCurt Doolittleyep. ( Makes good bait for nationalist arguments.. 😉 )Oct 29, 2018, 9:14 AMMorgan James MorrisonLook like Islamic Sacred State has that coveredOct 29, 2018, 10:01 AMFreyr BjörnssonIs this a good or bad plan?Oct 29, 2018, 10:37 AMCurt Doolittleit’s conquest. they need their separation just as protestant, catholic, old europe, russia(orthodoxy). We (america) are trying to do that without turning iran to glass as a pre-requisite. Problem is, and this map illustrates it, there are definitely borders that are problematic. and oil makes it worse.
we have the ethnicity problem
and the (bad) multiculturalism problem (intermingling in territory)
and religious denomination problem
and the oil problem
and the border problemOct 29, 2018, 10:43 AMCurt DoolittleOct 29, 2018, 10:43 AMWaqas AhmadI like this map . Wish it was like this.Oct 29, 2018, 10:44 AMWaqas AhmadCurt Doolittle Afghanistan isn’t middle EastOct 29, 2018, 10:45 AMWaqas AhmadHerat isn’t persian at allOct 29, 2018, 10:46 AMMorgan James MorrisonHere’s a better resolution version.
http://kamilpasha.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/2133_Mid_East_Ethnic_lg.jpegOct 29, 2018, 11:03 AMArne TorbkornssonHow about greater Persian empire plan instead ?Oct 29, 2018, 11:29 AMEric GroseIsrael looks pretty punyOct 29, 2018, 11:33 AMFreyr BjörnssonSo this map would be preferable to the one we have today..Oct 29, 2018, 11:54 AMWaqas AhmadFreyr Björnsson You people need to learn proper GeographyOct 29, 2018, 12:10 PMSteven KolpekSaudi
Homelands
Independent
Territories
?Oct 29, 2018, 12:29 PMFreyr BjörnssonWell, the ME is a messy place and most of its politics is beyond me.
Hence I ask in good faith my dude.Oct 29, 2018, 12:47 PMJon JonathanIsrael losing territory? Good luck with that.Oct 29, 2018, 1:02 PMAndrew ClaytonPre ’67 Israel is fine with meOct 29, 2018, 4:51 PMNick DahlheimColonel Ralph Peters drew this map back in about 2006Oct 29, 2018, 4:56 PMJacob DodsonWhen Persia gonna revert back to Zoroastrianism and do Cyrus round 2?Oct 29, 2018, 5:45 PMEric GroseIf anyone tries to force Israel to withdraw from territory they do Sampson Option.Oct 29, 2018, 6:16 PMDominic DeLucaFrom my experience in the region, this looks about right, based upon the ethnic and religious divides.Oct 29, 2018, 6:22 PMTHE PLAN (from elsewhere)
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/44940605_10156740909417264_7117218975108300800_n_10156740909412264.jpg THE PLAN (from elsewhere)Raymond WarnerBut what about the caliphate?Oct 29, 2018, 9:05 AMAyham NedalI’ve been seeing this on Arabic conspiracy-theory -saturated Facebook pages since years lolOct 29, 2018, 9:11 AMCurt Doolittleyep. ( Makes good bait for nationalist arguments.. 😉 )Oct 29, 2018, 9:14 AMMorgan James MorrisonLook like Islamic Sacred State has that coveredOct 29, 2018, 10:01 AMFreyr BjörnssonIs this a good or bad plan?Oct 29, 2018, 10:37 AMCurt Doolittleit’s conquest. they need their separation just as protestant, catholic, old europe, russia(orthodoxy). We (america) are trying to do that without turning iran to glass as a pre-requisite. Problem is, and this map illustrates it, there are definitely borders that are problematic. and oil makes it worse.
we have the ethnicity problem
and the (bad) multiculturalism problem (intermingling in territory)
and religious denomination problem
and the oil problem
and the border problemOct 29, 2018, 10:43 AMCurt DoolittleOct 29, 2018, 10:43 AMWaqas AhmadI like this map . Wish it was like this.Oct 29, 2018, 10:44 AMWaqas AhmadCurt Doolittle Afghanistan isn’t middle EastOct 29, 2018, 10:45 AMWaqas AhmadHerat isn’t persian at allOct 29, 2018, 10:46 AMMorgan James MorrisonHere’s a better resolution version.
http://kamilpasha.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/2133_Mid_East_Ethnic_lg.jpegOct 29, 2018, 11:03 AMArne TorbkornssonHow about greater Persian empire plan instead ?Oct 29, 2018, 11:29 AMEric GroseIsrael looks pretty punyOct 29, 2018, 11:33 AMFreyr BjörnssonSo this map would be preferable to the one we have today..Oct 29, 2018, 11:54 AMWaqas AhmadFreyr Björnsson You people need to learn proper GeographyOct 29, 2018, 12:10 PMSteven KolpekSaudi
Homelands
Independent
Territories
?Oct 29, 2018, 12:29 PMFreyr BjörnssonWell, the ME is a messy place and most of its politics is beyond me.
Hence I ask in good faith my dude.Oct 29, 2018, 12:47 PMJon JonathanIsrael losing territory? Good luck with that.Oct 29, 2018, 1:02 PMAndrew ClaytonPre ’67 Israel is fine with meOct 29, 2018, 4:51 PMNick DahlheimColonel Ralph Peters drew this map back in about 2006Oct 29, 2018, 4:56 PMJacob DodsonWhen Persia gonna revert back to Zoroastrianism and do Cyrus round 2?Oct 29, 2018, 5:45 PMEric GroseIf anyone tries to force Israel to withdraw from territory they do Sampson Option.Oct 29, 2018, 6:16 PMDominic DeLucaFrom my experience in the region, this looks about right, based upon the ethnic and religious divides.Oct 29, 2018, 6:22 PMKevin WuLONG LIVE GLORIOUS BALUCHISTAN!Oct 30, 2018, 9:55 PMTHE PLAN (from elsewhere)
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/44940605_10156740909417264_7117218975108300800_n_10156740909412264.jpg THE PLAN (from elsewhere)Raymond WarnerBut what about the caliphate?Oct 29, 2018 9:05amAyham NedalI’ve been seeing this on Arabic conspiracy-theory -saturated Facebook pages since years lolOct 29, 2018 9:11amCurt Doolittleyep. ( Makes good bait for nationalist arguments.. 😉 )Oct 29, 2018 9:14amMorgan James MorrisonLook like Islamic Sacred State has that coveredOct 29, 2018 10:01amFreyr BjörnssonIs this a good or bad plan?Oct 29, 2018 10:37amCurt Doolittleit’s conquest. they need their separation just as protestant, catholic, old europe, russia(orthodoxy). We (america) are trying to do that without turning iran to glass as a pre-requisite. Problem is, and this map illustrates it, there are definitely borders that are problematic. and oil makes it worse.
we have the ethnicity problem
and the (bad) multiculturalism problem (intermingling in territory)
and religious denomination problem
and the oil problem
and the border problemOct 29, 2018 10:43amCurt DoolittleOct 29, 2018 10:43amWaqas AhmadI like this map . Wish it was like this.Oct 29, 2018 10:44amWaqas AhmadCurt Doolittle Afghanistan isn’t middle EastOct 29, 2018 10:45amWaqas AhmadHerat isn’t persian at allOct 29, 2018 10:46amMorgan James MorrisonHere’s a better resolution version.
http://kamilpasha.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/2133_Mid_East_Ethnic_lg.jpegOct 29, 2018 11:03amArne TorbkornssonHow about greater Persian empire plan instead ?Oct 29, 2018 11:29amEric GroseIsrael looks pretty punyOct 29, 2018 11:33amFreyr BjörnssonSo this map would be preferable to the one we have today..Oct 29, 2018 11:54amWaqas AhmadFreyr Björnsson You people need to learn proper GeographyOct 29, 2018 12:10pmSteven KolpekSaudi
Homelands
Independent
Territories
?Oct 29, 2018 12:29pmFreyr BjörnssonWell, the ME is a messy place and most of its politics is beyond me.
Hence I ask in good faith my dude.Oct 29, 2018 12:47pmJon JonathanIsrael losing territory? Good luck with that.Oct 29, 2018 1:02pmAndrew ClaytonPre ’67 Israel is fine with meOct 29, 2018 4:51pmNick DahlheimColonel Ralph Peters drew this map back in about 2006Oct 29, 2018 4:56pmJacob DodsonWhen Persia gonna revert back to Zoroastrianism and do Cyrus round 2?Oct 29, 2018 5:45pmEric GroseIf anyone tries to force Israel to withdraw from territory they do Sampson Option.Oct 29, 2018 6:16pmDominic DeLucaFrom my experience in the region, this looks about right, based upon the ethnic and religious divides.Oct 29, 2018 6:22pmTHE PLAN (from elsewhere)
October 28th, 2018 8:38 AM
GRAMMARS MATTER: COMPACT MONOPOLY CONFLATIONARY STAGNANT DYSGENIC VS DIFFERENTIATED MARKET DEFLATIONARY EVOLUTIONARY, EUGENIC SOCIAL ORDERS
(important concepts)
—“You might want to take a look at Eric Voegelin’s distinction between “compact” and “differentiated” symbolic systems.”– Chip Sills
[I] understand it but it’s psychological not scientific and I work with the scientific model instead. In the end we face problems of computational cost (neural economy), and the grammars (models, objects, relations, values) that allow us to calculate (make comparisons, judgements, plans), offset by the frictions of status(face), and our order’s demand for either status(public/economic) or face (familial/personal), and local competition (homogeneity vs heterogeneity) and the institutions(norms, traditions, values, formal institutions) that arise from those conditions in the geography we sustain ourselves within.
Simple people need simple anthropomorphic means of computation by free association (dream state, imagination, intuition) and more sophisticated people require means of calculation and computation that are increasingly more precise than the limits of human scale present in anthropomorphic models(grammars).
So simple people and civilizations use high context/low precision grammars, and more complex civilizations use low context/high precision grammars. And our languages slowly evolve into “pidgins’ for high context, and large vocabulary nouns in low context for lower cognitive load, and for higher precision at the cost of higher cognitive load.
So what Vogelin refers to as compact vs differentiated is an insightful version, rendering the choice psychological or arbitrary, where I use more precise, higher precision, terms and definitions, that expose the causes and consequences, and the non-arbitrariness of the relationship. Moreover, the CONFLATIONARY structure of MONOPOLY (monotheistic) religions and the MARKET structure of western civilization (poly grammatical) provides some of the best evidence of how monotheism (compact, monopoly, conflationary) models are easier to understand, but produce of necessity ignorance , stagnation, decline, and dysgenia.
I hope this helps.
October 27th, 2018 4:31 PM
–“WHY ARE WESTERN EUROPEANS SO NAIVE?”–
By Rahim Taghizadegan
Rahim was the only guy I met at PFS that brought substantial intellectual capacity to the table.
Good talk at pfs.
http://propertyandfreedom.org/2018/10/rahim-taghizadegan-why-are-western-europens-so-naive-pfs-2018/
October 28th, 2018 8:38 AM
GRAMMARS MATTER: COMPACT MONOPOLY CONFLATIONARY STAGNANT DYSGENIC VS DIFFERENTIATED MARKET DEFLATIONARY EVOLUTIONARY, EUGENIC SOCIAL ORDERS
(important concepts)
—“You might want to take a look at Eric Voegelin’s distinction between “compact” and “differentiated” symbolic systems.”– Chip Sills
[I] understand it but it’s psychological not scientific and I work with the scientific model instead. In the end we face problems of computational cost (neural economy), and the grammars (models, objects, relations, values) that allow us to calculate (make comparisons, judgements, plans), offset by the frictions of status(face), and our order’s demand for either status(public/economic) or face (familial/personal), and local competition (homogeneity vs heterogeneity) and the institutions(norms, traditions, values, formal institutions) that arise from those conditions in the geography we sustain ourselves within.
Simple people need simple anthropomorphic means of computation by free association (dream state, imagination, intuition) and more sophisticated people require means of calculation and computation that are increasingly more precise than the limits of human scale present in anthropomorphic models(grammars).
So simple people and civilizations use high context/low precision grammars, and more complex civilizations use low context/high precision grammars. And our languages slowly evolve into “pidgins’ for high context, and large vocabulary nouns in low context for lower cognitive load, and for higher precision at the cost of higher cognitive load.
So what Vogelin refers to as compact vs differentiated is an insightful version, rendering the choice psychological or arbitrary, where I use more precise, higher precision, terms and definitions, that expose the causes and consequences, and the non-arbitrariness of the relationship. Moreover, the CONFLATIONARY structure of MONOPOLY (monotheistic) religions and the MARKET structure of western civilization (poly grammatical) provides some of the best evidence of how monotheism (compact, monopoly, conflationary) models are easier to understand, but produce of necessity ignorance , stagnation, decline, and dysgenia.
I hope this helps.
October 27th, 2018 4:31 PM
–“WHY ARE WESTERN EUROPEANS SO NAIVE?”–
By Rahim Taghizadegan
Rahim was the only guy I met at PFS that brought substantial intellectual capacity to the table.
Good talk at pfs.
http://propertyandfreedom.org/2018/10/rahim-taghizadegan-why-are-western-europens-so-naive-pfs-2018/
October 28th, 2018 4:29 PM
[C]hina had little effect on the catastrophe of the abrahamic dark age created by the jews christians and muslims.
The battle between masculine eugenic aristocracy, and feminine dysgenic equality continues its 3500 year cycle.
China built a wall. They traded beating european colonization for keeping out the muslims. This wasn’t a bad decision.
—“Currently, who are the best right wing philosophers/thinkers? Iâm a leftist, and I believe that itâs important to challenge the beliefs you hold, so Iâm mostly looking for authors/public speakers thatâll give me something worthwhile to engage with.”— Quora User
(repost, for educational value)
CONSERVATISM UNDERSTOOD
A conservative questions the overestimation of reason, and above all questions consensus. Conservatism is familial, stoic, pragmatic, and empirical. In other words risk averse to capital.
As a means of questioning, a conservative requires reciprocity (tort): american < british < anglo saxon < germanic < european < norther indo european in law. That law evolved from the oath (tell the truth, never steal, never flee, in combat).
A Conservative requires empirical results – and where empirical fails, the traditional is adequate, since traditional survived empirical tests in competition in reality.
A Conservative accumulates genetic, cultural, normative, institutional, physical, and territorial capital – attempting to pass on to future generations of his family, more than he himself inherited.
Conservatism is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy that increases accumulated capital through intergenerational transfer, using intergeneration lending, in order to produce increasingly noble families.
Ergo successful individuals in the market for craftsmanship, successful purchase of the franchise through military service, successful individuals in the market for marriage and child rearing, successful individuals in the market for industry, successful families in the market for noble (intergenerational) families.
In other words, conservatism(aristocracy) is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy. And while bipartite manorialism was practiced from 700, and aggressive hanging of up to 1% of the population every year after 1000, and an attempt to escape church-state nobility, and create an entrepreneurial nobility (meritocracy), succeeded by 1600, there was a great reaction to the english revolution, and a greater reaction to the french revolution. Thus while Locke,smith,hume,adams, and jefferson promised an aristocracy available to everyone, Burke, after the french revolution, and germans after that, recognized that the peasantry was even worse at rule (see russia) than the nobility.
The problem with today’s conservatism is that darwin and spencer were famous before the war, after the second world war, conservatism and eugenics were effectively banned from discourse, academy, and science.
As such conservatives never (until perhaps 2000) restored empirical discourse to conservatism, because eugenics are antithetical to the experiment with democracy. This changed incrementally beginning in 76, through the 80s, and aggressively since 2000, and more aggressively since 2008.
1 – Soveriengty requires reciprocity
2 – Reciprocity requires rule of law (tort), jury(thang, senate, house of lords, supreme court), and an independent judiciary.
3 – Rule of law forces markets, since it incrementally suppresses each innovation in parasitism.
4 – Markets cause hierarchies, because they are necessary to voluntarily organize production.
5 – Markets are eugenic, because they are empirical means of testing industry and impulse.
6 – But they make possible liberty for those with property, freedom for those who labor, and subsidy for those who impose no costs on sovereignty, liberty, freedom, or property.**
DOMESTICATION
Man domesticated the human animal after he had learned to domesticate the non-human animal. And he did so by the same means. And the result in both domestication of the human and non human animal is the same: eugenics.
CONSERVATIVES
Most conservatives do not write philosophy, they run businesses, or write history, economics, science, and law. (I write because I was successful enough in multiple businesses to spend my time writing full time.) Conservatives also are actively suppressed in academy and media.
This has been true since the end of the war and teh rise of the Frankfurt School, and the Postmodern school, both of which were necessary after the failure of marxist pseudoscience. (a pseudoscience marx died knowing, since he stopped writing as soon as he read the Mengerians, and kept silent only to keep the checks coming in from Engels.)
AUTHORS TO READ
Burke, Hayek, Burnham, Sowell, Buchanan, Murray, and maybe Nietzsche. Veblen.
(The essayists are nonsense)
Anyone in Hoover or Heritage institutions.
READING LIST
Propertarianism’s Reading List (https://propertarianinstitute.com/reading-list/).
My reading list (above) contains most of the science weâve been looking for, while the pseudosciences dominated the mid to late 20th century under the marxist-postmodernists.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.
