—“There’s no way to be ruthless enough to defend the gains of hundreds of thousands of years of evolution, representing thousands of lifetimes spent braving the ice, war, and plagues, to produce a healthier, smarter genome.”—@[11804727:2048:Steve Pender]
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 13:19:00 UTC
I’ve seen this somewhere before. The entire aristocratic project “…never included more than 25000 people…., or 250,000 in total.”
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 13:03:00 UTC
HARMONY VIA HIERARCHY OR SOVERIEGNTY
Sorry man. I knew when I wrote it I was being lazy and leaving too much up to the reader, but I was tired….
here:
1) yes asian harmony is a commons paid for by NOT speaking truth regardless of the consequences, in order to preserve the harmony created by the hierarchy, under the presumption of the balance between humans and nature, man and woman, parent and children, rulers and people.
2) european (northern) disharmony (truth) is a commons paid for BY speaking and paying the costs to the dominance hierarchy.
Soldiers REPORT to officers. OODA Loops (Maneuver) requires initiative within the limits of contract. Warriors volunteer for war as opportunity (booty).
Serfs OBEY rulers. Children OBEY parents. And each maintains the contract for harmony by holding formation so to speak (and asians hold formation almost as well as we do). Sefs are recruited for war out of obligation and are paid.
3) So we produce sovereignty and property and commons, and they produce harmony and property and commons.
And we develop faster than they do for that reason. Hence why they have adopted our means of rapid adaptation in POLITICS (law, accounting, industry, science) but not in NORMS (heroism, confrontation, demonstration of fitness by truth to power vs their demonstration of fitness by obedience and conformity).
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 11:41:00 UTC
—“I lived in Japan for five years. Pet peeve. “face” is a weak male pretending to be dominant. Only weak males give a shit about “face.”—Richard Nikoley
Western civilization is heroic (and we are the subject of worldwide ridicule for it.)
Honor (telling truth regardless of the consequences) is our promise we are NOT weak. And because we are not weak, peers rather than subjects.
We pay a high cost to create the high trust society we live in, and we actively suppress ‘the weak’, their parasitism, their behavior, and reproduction because of it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 08:29:00 UTC
The only way to suppress them is with violence. only martial civilizations can produce enough violence. The more martial the civilization the more easily are rents suppressed. The longer rents are suppressed the longer the middle class grows, the more rents suppressed.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-29 21:51:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057027101856055296
Reply addressees: @GeolibGeorge @Septeus7 @Slysneak @Lord_Keynes2 @jappleby123 @Noahpinion @ProfSteveKeen
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057026708002537472
IN REPLY TO:
@GonzoGeorgism
@curtdoolittle @Septeus7 @Slysneak @Lord_Keynes2 @jappleby123 @Noahpinion @ProfSteveKeen I‘m a Georgist; I‘m all about suppressing unnatural market rents that are distorting economic self-interest. Protectionist trade policy also gives rise to such rents and serves the self-interest of protected firms at the expense of consumers (including other businesses).
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057026708002537472
October 29th, 2018 10:31 AM ABRAHAMISM > MARXISM > POSTMODERNISM > FEMINISM: THE DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY IN ALL ITS FORMS AS MEANS OF RESTORING THE HERD (MONOPOLY) (important concept) [M]arxism: use of pseudoscience (labor theory of value), sophism (pilpul – Dialectical materialism), gossip and reputation destruction(critique alienation, class warfare) to undermine a social order (trust and cooperation) by the promise of a utopia (for a class), in exchange for allying in numbers. 1 – Marxism-Communism-Socialism : suppression of private property in the means of production, vs, 2 – Libertarianism: suppression of common property as the means of production, vs, 3 – Neo-conservatism: suppression of nations as the means of production. Marxism of 1 – private property, 2 – common property, 3 – institutional property. Covers the Entire Scale. followed by the french contribution: 4 – Postmodernism, identity-race property. In other words, suppression of each class of property in order to create a class monopoly (underclass communism, middle class libertarian, political class neo conservatism). This requires little more than the academic use of the female reproductive and competitive strategy, which is to: DESTROY THE INSTITUTION OF PROPERTY AT DIFFERENT SCALES.
October 29th, 2018 9:57 AM SPECIATE by Brandon Hayes
The “go with the flow” leftists/hippies/(peace and love)/”can’t we all get along” types can’t see that the flow (of reality) IS to separate and speciate … ….So we can ALL get along!. They can’t see the flow through the globalist herd. For the first time in history we can choose to NOT shovel against the tide of reality (because we can measure it properly) but still we are encouraging the picking-up of shovels and readying the shit shovellers for deadly work, it’s sad.
October 29th, 2018 10:31 AM ABRAHAMISM > MARXISM > POSTMODERNISM > FEMINISM: THE DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY IN ALL ITS FORMS AS MEANS OF RESTORING THE HERD (MONOPOLY) (important concept) [M]arxism: use of pseudoscience (labor theory of value), sophism (pilpul – Dialectical materialism), gossip and reputation destruction(critique alienation, class warfare) to undermine a social order (trust and cooperation) by the promise of a utopia (for a class), in exchange for allying in numbers. 1 – Marxism-Communism-Socialism : suppression of private property in the means of production, vs, 2 – Libertarianism: suppression of common property as the means of production, vs, 3 – Neo-conservatism: suppression of nations as the means of production. Marxism of 1 – private property, 2 – common property, 3 – institutional property. Covers the Entire Scale. followed by the french contribution: 4 – Postmodernism, identity-race property. In other words, suppression of each class of property in order to create a class monopoly (underclass communism, middle class libertarian, political class neo conservatism). This requires little more than the academic use of the female reproductive and competitive strategy, which is to: DESTROY THE INSTITUTION OF PROPERTY AT DIFFERENT SCALES.
October 29th, 2018 9:57 AM SPECIATE by Brandon Hayes
The “go with the flow” leftists/hippies/(peace and love)/”can’t we all get along” types can’t see that the flow (of reality) IS to separate and speciate … ….So we can ALL get along!. They can’t see the flow through the globalist herd. For the first time in history we can choose to NOT shovel against the tide of reality (because we can measure it properly) but still we are encouraging the picking-up of shovels and readying the shit shovellers for deadly work, it’s sad.
UM. DIVERSITY IS THE WORST POSSIBLE OPTION
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-29 15:47:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056935526887030786