Theme: Agency

  • Is Abrahamism Human Nature?

    “ABRAHAMISM SHOULD BE CALLED HUMAN NATURE?”

    —“You talk around the issue rather than the issue it self, what you call abrahamism should be called human nature, it rests in each of us and we have the choice to choose which side we feed, what i love about p is it spells out the law to where no one can wiggle around it, the thing i hate about p is yall talk yourselves out of it.”— Justin Coone

    Everything humans do is human nature. Math, science, engineering, medicine, law and economics are human constructs: systems of reasoning that describe the world. Aristotelianism, Platonism, Confucianism, Abrahamism and less so Buddhism and Hinduism are systems of reasoning (logic in the lesser sense), that persist group strategies. The question is why europeans developed Math, science, engineering, medicine, law and economics and other people developed judaism, christianity, islam, and marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and universalism. Group strategy. That said, we can use the law to peacefully suppress the use of science to create physical weapons of mass destruction, and suppress the use of abrahamism to create informational weapons of mass destruction. Using P-Law we can create heterogeneous or homogenous localities, counties, and states to serve the wants of any and all. And the markets will justify or falsify our ‘theories of social organization.’ We just can’t lie about it. And we don’t need to have a civil war to see who wins. P-law is the solution.

  • So, to deal with pinker’s assertion that it’s purely genetic, sure. The question

    So, to deal with pinker’s assertion that it’s purely genetic, sure. The question then is whether we are just more aware of it, just prosecute it more, increasing dysgenia, or we are failing to mask it with institutions.

    ie: My original comment’s suggestion: institutions failing.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-02 16:37:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234518291487612929

    Reply addressees: @JayMan471 @Mywifesson4

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234517602921259008


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @JayMan471 @Mywifesson4 I read the same papers everyone else does. the disputes are generally categorized as misinterpretation of the top down correlative and categorical; bottom up constructive and individual; and incentives in the constructive that test both. Unfortunately, full accounting is rare.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1234517602921259008

  • 1) Mothers do not remarry(control, infantilization) or permit others to parent,

    1) Mothers do not remarry(control, infantilization) or permit others to parent, fathers do.
    2) Single mothers don’t cohabit with grandparents as substitute.
    3) Single mothers transfer insecurity to children (instability)
    4) Increase in female psychosis under feminism. Tolerance?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-02 16:19:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234513548094660608

    Reply addressees: @Mywifesson4 @JayMan471

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234501921940992006

  • Low social, sexual, economic market value desperately seeking Attention-by-Drama

    Low social, sexual, economic market value desperately seeking Attention-by-Drama-Queen. This is why we will separate. It’s not that we wan’t to rule you psychopaths, it’s that we don’t want you to take us down with you. You’re the christians of the modern world, destroying Rome.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-01 19:20:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234196846823821312

    Reply addressees: @TheAliceSmith

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234112235611545600

  • We are excessively vulnerable to the female technique because our optimum status

    We are excessively vulnerable to the female technique because our optimum status is obtained by heroism. The jewish technique of baiting into hazard using the female strategy is the optimum way of manipulating western civ.
    False promise (unwarrantable), Bait (seduce) into hazard


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-29 17:58:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233813804498214919

    Reply addressees: @Semiogogue @PeterAl09732414 @lcltz @JRNyquist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233812351838773249

  • How many christians who care, will show up to fight?

    How many christians who care, will show up to fight?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 00:01:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233180396558471170

    Reply addressees: @RickyBobby_USA @ToneUnknown

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233179963735629825

  • Let me add a little clarity though: (a) Humans have very little agency (self awa

    Let me add a little clarity though:
    (a) Humans have very little agency (self awareness)
    (b) All groups have a competitive strategy
    (c) The jewish group strategy is the female strategy
    (d) The jewish method of war is female (undermining)
    (e) Reform our law for BOTH women and jews.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-27 16:26:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233065912217079809

    Reply addressees: @DriftedA

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233064198797746179

  • ‎Michelle German‎ to Curt Doolittle Hi Curt, I’ve been contemplating something t

    ‎Michelle German‎ to Curt Doolittle Hi Curt, I’ve been contemplating something that you spoke about not too long ago. That when we die, there is nothing else afterwards. And that legacy is through the bloodlines (meaning no spirit, no other side, etc). In my line of work as a death doula, one thing I’ve noticed across all belief systems (atheists included) is when the dying are in their eleventh hour, many speak about how they see (deceased) loved one(s). With the passing of my father recently, it’s quite challenging for me because it hurts like hell. When I contemplate that his spirit is with us, there seems to be comfort. But I’m not tried to delude myself. When the dying are talking about seeing their loved ones, is it the mind fabricating this? I don’t mean to state they’re delusional. I’m genuinely curious to know if the mind has some form of mechanism to shield itself, etc. Would love to hear your understanding of it. And pardon if I misunderstood anything about your previous post. ❤️

    pW]ell, as I understand it, and as I think I explained, our current understanding of the universe is that it consists of information, and that we, as part of that universe, consist of information too, and that we, as information, live on as information in the minds of all others who remember us, in display, word, deed, or consequence, either intentionally or not. Do the spirits (patterns of information) of our ancestors live on in us? Of course they do. Are they conscious in any meaningful way? Only in how they affect our thoughts and behaviors. Can we sense that information after they have passed? Of course we can. Are we, at the end (having been there myself) more concerned with those others whose ‘information they will now join in common condition”? Then yes. Furthermore I would not deny myself or others that joy. Some things are true enough, because they need only be true enough for our spirits and the spirits of others past present and future. This is one of them. There is no irreciprocity there. And if we make no truth claims, no falsehood.

    Michelle German Curt thank you.

  • ‎Michelle German‎ to Curt Doolittle Hi Curt, I’ve been contemplating something t

    ‎Michelle German‎ to Curt Doolittle Hi Curt, I’ve been contemplating something that you spoke about not too long ago. That when we die, there is nothing else afterwards. And that legacy is through the bloodlines (meaning no spirit, no other side, etc). In my line of work as a death doula, one thing I’ve noticed across all belief systems (atheists included) is when the dying are in their eleventh hour, many speak about how they see (deceased) loved one(s). With the passing of my father recently, it’s quite challenging for me because it hurts like hell. When I contemplate that his spirit is with us, there seems to be comfort. But I’m not tried to delude myself. When the dying are talking about seeing their loved ones, is it the mind fabricating this? I don’t mean to state they’re delusional. I’m genuinely curious to know if the mind has some form of mechanism to shield itself, etc. Would love to hear your understanding of it. And pardon if I misunderstood anything about your previous post. ❤️

    pW]ell, as I understand it, and as I think I explained, our current understanding of the universe is that it consists of information, and that we, as part of that universe, consist of information too, and that we, as information, live on as information in the minds of all others who remember us, in display, word, deed, or consequence, either intentionally or not. Do the spirits (patterns of information) of our ancestors live on in us? Of course they do. Are they conscious in any meaningful way? Only in how they affect our thoughts and behaviors. Can we sense that information after they have passed? Of course we can. Are we, at the end (having been there myself) more concerned with those others whose ‘information they will now join in common condition”? Then yes. Furthermore I would not deny myself or others that joy. Some things are true enough, because they need only be true enough for our spirits and the spirits of others past present and future. This is one of them. There is no irreciprocity there. And if we make no truth claims, no falsehood.

    Michelle German Curt thank you.

  • They don’t think longer than they feel. They are not conscious beings with agenc

    They don’t think longer than they feel. They are not conscious beings with agency:
    So,
    Dysgenic Reproduction
    Population Expansion.
    Resource Exhaustion.
    Conflict.
    Extinction.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-26 18:39:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232736898038276097

    Reply addressees: @MartianHoplite

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232729806242033666