That’s because you’re a conservative.
We’re the civilization’s white blood cells.
We’re oversensitive.
Resist your impulses. lol
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-26 00:52:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232468419225608192
Reply addressees: @relocateromania @paleofuture
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232466640081575937
by Brandon Hayes
—“The Conflict’s not so much race, but agency, resulting class, class size, and resulting subculture. Race is just a convenient low resolution proxy that obscures the problem.” – Curt Doolittle
The claim isn’t that it’s a proxy for agency but it’s a proxy for this sequencing of phenomena: “agency, resulting class, class size, and resulting subculture” And replacing that higher resolution chain with “race” dilutes the information to be gleaned. LESS re-ordering is most expedient. Where tooling and training will do separation and conflict can be avoided.
by Brandon Hayes
—“The Conflict’s not so much race, but agency, resulting class, class size, and resulting subculture. Race is just a convenient low resolution proxy that obscures the problem.” – Curt Doolittle
The claim isn’t that it’s a proxy for agency but it’s a proxy for this sequencing of phenomena: “agency, resulting class, class size, and resulting subculture” And replacing that higher resolution chain with “race” dilutes the information to be gleaned. LESS re-ordering is most expedient. Where tooling and training will do separation and conflict can be avoided.
“We need leadership!”— The Right
“We need leadership!”— The Right
[Y]ou don’t use P-logic to argue with your wife, girlfriend – even if you probably should use it with your daughters. You use P to UNDERSTAND your wife or girlfriend, so that you can ask the right questions and give the right answers.
—“I can only imagine the fallout from telling a significant other during a heated discussion that her emotions were simply a response to a perceived change in property.”—Michael Churchill
The most important of which isn’t to tell her her feelings are wrong, or her desires are wrong, but whether they are possible or not, and whether they would achieve desired ends or not. Women need you to listen while they work through suppressing the emotion and impulse. They need you to support them as they work through those thoughts impulses and emotions so that you relieve them of the burden of doing it alone. And they need you to help them come to a conclusion on their own – just as they help you through your male anger or frustration when it clouds your vision. And they need you to say ‘no’ when it’s your fking job to say ‘these are the limits’ beyond which you are not willing to go – and not apologize for it. Be a man. Give her room to exercise emotional frustration by emotional expression like you exercise emotional frustration by physical expression.
[Y]ou don’t use P-logic to argue with your wife, girlfriend – even if you probably should use it with your daughters. You use P to UNDERSTAND your wife or girlfriend, so that you can ask the right questions and give the right answers.
—“I can only imagine the fallout from telling a significant other during a heated discussion that her emotions were simply a response to a perceived change in property.”—Michael Churchill
The most important of which isn’t to tell her her feelings are wrong, or her desires are wrong, but whether they are possible or not, and whether they would achieve desired ends or not. Women need you to listen while they work through suppressing the emotion and impulse. They need you to support them as they work through those thoughts impulses and emotions so that you relieve them of the burden of doing it alone. And they need you to help them come to a conclusion on their own – just as they help you through your male anger or frustration when it clouds your vision. And they need you to say ‘no’ when it’s your fking job to say ‘these are the limits’ beyond which you are not willing to go – and not apologize for it. Be a man. Give her room to exercise emotional frustration by emotional expression like you exercise emotional frustration by physical expression.
by Curt Doolittle and Stephen Wells -by Stephen Wells: The mistake in reasoning of those who “give it up to God” is generally one of falsely assuming that any higher power operates like a magic wand. Author Napoleon Hill who spent years studying successful people noted that the spiritual difference of successful over non successful people was that successful people assigned their faith to God to provide solutions for for them to take action on themselves, rather than for God to simply make their problems go away. In short, God was to be found within their own subconscious and expressed by acting on their intuition, which itself was disciplined and directed by conscious thought and continuous action towards a clearly defined goal. -by Curt Doolittle [Y]es, this is the correct(scientific) definition of god. Gods exists as information.That information is trained into your intuitionThat training organizes and filters your intuition.Primarily it prevents self deception or, (and this is true) deception by your genes, old, and middle brains. And for very obvious reasons, anthropomorphizing that information is more effective at extracting truthfulness from your intuition than you are able to do without it – because intuition will let your genes influence you chaotically while anthropomorphized intuition falsifies your intuition (your auto association) to predict how that character would interpret your thoughts. In other words, we can use our social instincts to override our chaotic intuition by creating a framework for truthful prediction. This is pretty obvious once you think it thru. Our bodies and faculties are our only system of measurement. But since we are human and evolved consciousness with enough recursion to predict others’ actions, feelings, thoughts, and wants, we can use other people (archetypes) as systems of measurement as well. Is there a difference between what would god want me to do, what would Jesus want me to do, what would Gandalf or Aristotle, me to do, and what would my grandmother want me to do? No there isn’t other than a god is a proxy for your social order. Systems of measurement to provide a neural economy superior predictive power.
by Curt Doolittle and Stephen Wells -by Stephen Wells: The mistake in reasoning of those who “give it up to God” is generally one of falsely assuming that any higher power operates like a magic wand. Author Napoleon Hill who spent years studying successful people noted that the spiritual difference of successful over non successful people was that successful people assigned their faith to God to provide solutions for for them to take action on themselves, rather than for God to simply make their problems go away. In short, God was to be found within their own subconscious and expressed by acting on their intuition, which itself was disciplined and directed by conscious thought and continuous action towards a clearly defined goal. -by Curt Doolittle [Y]es, this is the correct(scientific) definition of god. Gods exists as information.That information is trained into your intuitionThat training organizes and filters your intuition.Primarily it prevents self deception or, (and this is true) deception by your genes, old, and middle brains. And for very obvious reasons, anthropomorphizing that information is more effective at extracting truthfulness from your intuition than you are able to do without it – because intuition will let your genes influence you chaotically while anthropomorphized intuition falsifies your intuition (your auto association) to predict how that character would interpret your thoughts. In other words, we can use our social instincts to override our chaotic intuition by creating a framework for truthful prediction. This is pretty obvious once you think it thru. Our bodies and faculties are our only system of measurement. But since we are human and evolved consciousness with enough recursion to predict others’ actions, feelings, thoughts, and wants, we can use other people (archetypes) as systems of measurement as well. Is there a difference between what would god want me to do, what would Jesus want me to do, what would Gandalf or Aristotle, me to do, and what would my grandmother want me to do? No there isn’t other than a god is a proxy for your social order. Systems of measurement to provide a neural economy superior predictive power.
Doolittle vs Dennett on Consciousness https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/25/doolittle-vs-dennett-on-consciousness/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 20:12:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232398009276784640