Theme: Agency

  • You cannot help me. Because I will outwit you. Because I cannot stop outwitting

    You cannot help me. Because I will outwit you. Because I cannot stop outwitting you. Because all I know how to do is outwit you. I would not know what to do without trying to outwit you. I do not know what is inside of me but what is inside of me that protects me and the inner me are two different things.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-01 14:58:00 UTC

  • SOURCE OF MOST UNHAPPINESS? Most of unhappiness in life is caused by the desire

    SOURCE OF MOST UNHAPPINESS?

    Most of unhappiness in life is caused by the desire that people behave as we wish them to, rather than to behave as they do, as they prefer to do, and as it is in their interest to do. People are rational. They act in their own interests, to the best of their ability to comprehend their interests, when offset by the risk and reward of pursuing alternative interests.

    Philosophers are as guilty of this error as any other person.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-30 06:18:00 UTC

  • (diary – self improvement) Talked to a female friend yesterday. Trying to find s

    (diary – self improvement)

    Talked to a female friend yesterday. Trying to find some way to improve myself – given fact that I definitely mollify, misdirect, or mislead people so that I have time to gather more information or solve an issue later on – because I have great comfort with my ability to obtain and make use of information, and solve problems later on, and less concern over their comfort with the lack of it, and more comfort with seizing opportunities at a discount rather than diverting resources at a premium. I have been doing this my whole career. Probably my whole life. I do not do it consciously. I do a lot of “just keep at it, I am still trying to figure out whats best, and there is no better thing to do than keep at it in the meantime.” This process of ‘keeping at it no matter what’ has been extremely successful for me in almost everything. But it has also been problematic and caused me issues. Or better said, it works when it works, but when it doesn’t work it’s often bad because there is no record of my thinking – which is why I try to over-communicate and create a record of my thinking. If I know a problem is solvable I will happily not solve it now, and instead seize an opportunity to solve it when it presents itself. This is one strategy I’ve advocated often: the Napoleonic Strategy: master the territory then seize opportunities, rather than create a plan and hope it works – plans are just ways of understanding the territory. Once you understand the territory you just seize opportunities. But as my partner Max and Jim have told me, this can be hard on others. You just sort of learn to trust each other’s strategies after a while, and each of you do what you’re good at. If you just take the moral high ground and try to do the right thing, then in the end, most everything works out. Not always. But mostly. HOWEVER, I am still stuck with acknowledging the fact that I definitely take discounts on communication and try to put people off because I just think they’re silly or stupid or wasting my time, or worried about trivialities. And I know this is my rather grandiose ego doing its thing: “please don’t be an idiot and bother me.” So I want to see if I can somehow figure out how to intervene in that subconscious process and take the time to explain to people why I am doing what I am doing. I just can’t imagine that I can change that behavior. But I have to try. I have this switch that is ‘be kind to people’, but it’s a ‘low cost’ to just humor them somehow. To actually take the time to explain all this stuff to people…. I just can’t imagine that’s possible unless I drastically reduce my problem set. “it will be fine. We don’t need to know or solve that right now. we can figure it out later. we can fix it later. just stay on mission for now. an opportunity to handle it will arrive and we’ll seize it.” I guess this goes along with the scientific method that I subconsciously process at all times: we never know, we only try. Anyway. I have clearly got to work on this issue. I can’t always treat people as children. It’s not really ‘fair’. And so I gotta learn a way around it.

    She says “Everyone does it”. And I think, yes, well everyone does it in what capacity? Mostly they do it to be kind or lazy. I do it out of arrogance in order to save myself effort.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-29 11:34:00 UTC

  • I saved Ascentium in the crisis with a Hail Mary play that should be the subject

    I saved Ascentium in the crisis with a Hail Mary play that should be the subject of grad school discussions. Amid cancer and divorce.

    But afterward, then the investors pulled out the cash and set us back to zero so that the company was broke again, betraying my agreements with Microsoft and the acquired party. It was then that I realized their intention had been to take control by forcing it under.

    I quit and worked a severance package that was in my favor.

    What is the rumor the gossips started? ( I know who they were) That I took the money myself somehow. ( emphasis on somehow ). I wish it was true. But you know, audited financial statements and tax returns put those kind of idiotic fantasies in the same camp as all other gossip.

    Now I always look at it from this perspective. Do you really think if I wanted to fuck people over, they would even know it? Seriously.

    Ask Sidney Golub. Ask Elliot Koenig. Ask Wayne Seminoff. I participated in ruining these people. Golub via the fbi/treasury. Koenig through a racketeering suit. Seminoff via the IRS. In fact. I was building a career out of infiltrating and reporting scumbags. And if I had been married to a less moral woman I would have continued that tradition of using tech to catch scumbags. It was fulfilling. It want economically rewarding. But it was fulfilling.

    So I returned to entrepreneurship. We did excel data. I did red-tech. I did DDI, then c-hub, then Ascentium.

    We operate on different wavelengths given our different levels of experience. But one has to remember that mastery of some niche is not transferrable to the broader sphere. Hence why it’s is always best to work with people with similar levels of experience. Hence why one should always assume one is naive and ignorant rather wise and cunning.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-28 09:12:00 UTC

  • Man is not moral or immoral, but rational. It is only that morality is a better

    Man is not moral or immoral, but rational. It is only that morality is a better investment for most. But Parasitism is rational


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-28 06:24:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/725571331069218816

    Reply addressees: @BillKristol

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/725290299581448192


    IN REPLY TO:

    @BillKristol

    Conservatives once stood athwart History, yelling Stop. And trying to change the course of history, against the odds. They had courage then.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/725290299581448192

  • In many things, I’m just as stupid as the next guy. In some things I’m far more

    In many things, I’m just as stupid as the next guy. In some things I’m far more stupid than the next guy. Thankfully we have friends who understand us better than we understand ourselves, to show us where we’re stupid. Unfortunately, some of us are a bit thicker than others. And some of us are terribly thick. And it takes hearing the right words at the right time to see our stupidity for what it is.

    ( thanks RA Skaskiw and Ліля Шпур )


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-27 08:24:00 UTC

  • So do not attribute motives to man for ‘virtue signals’. Man acts rationally. Si

    So do not attribute motives to man for ‘virtue signals’. Man acts rationally. Signaling Morality is Privilege of Wealth.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-26 18:21:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/725027157156728833

    Reply addressees: @SarasvuoJari

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/724983462529273856


    IN REPLY TO:

    @SarasvuoJari

    Brilliant.
    However, as the study implies, we seem to be both moral and comptetetive species. Predominantly moral. https://t.co/2baaHn2mAn

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/724983462529273856

  • It is a fallacy to state that man is one or the other. Man is a rational actor.

    It is a fallacy to state that man is one or the other. Man is a rational actor. He chooses the rational option at all times.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-26 18:19:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/725026498634207232

    Reply addressees: @SarasvuoJari

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/724983462529273856


    IN REPLY TO:

    @SarasvuoJari

    Brilliant.
    However, as the study implies, we seem to be both moral and comptetetive species. Predominantly moral. https://t.co/2baaHn2mAn

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/724983462529273856

  • Unfortunately, here is reality: we are able to cooperate (moral), but we also co

    Unfortunately, here is reality: we are able to cooperate (moral), but we also compete, parasite, and prey. Man is rational.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-26 18:18:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/725026276323524609

    Reply addressees: @SarasvuoJari

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/724983462529273856


    IN REPLY TO:

    @SarasvuoJari

    Brilliant.
    However, as the study implies, we seem to be both moral and comptetetive species. Predominantly moral. https://t.co/2baaHn2mAn

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/724983462529273856

  • Plans consist of a set of steps that will produce an outcome, not outcomes witho

    Plans consist of a set of steps that will produce an outcome, not outcomes without a set of steps to produce it. 🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-25 14:33:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/724607354407424006

    Reply addressees: @adissidentright

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/724606768022740992


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/724606768022740992