@The_Chosen @rfnarchive @RadioFreeNorthwest
I have no idea where this clown is getting his ideas. But we know there is a severe problem of logical dependency that radically increases as IQs drop below 100. I have traditionally attributed this lack of ability to intellectual dishonesty, moral terpitude, psychological problems, or mental defects. But the truth is half of the population can’t draw a logical inference or maintain logical dependencies. And even then only very few can follow a chain of reasoning. And I use long chains of reasoning to describe and teach causality.
And unfortunately these poor idiots are ostracized in real life, but we can’t as easily avoid and silence them online. This is why we need to clean house of the idiots or we have to write off social media, becasue they destroy every adult conversation by vomiting their stupidity on it.
Let me help others:
LAWS:
1) Laws of Nature: Scientific Laws, Behavioral Laws, Evolutionary Laws, and the Logical Laws we use to describe them.
2) Laws of Man: Natural Law, Constitutional Law, FIndings of the Court (Judicial Law), Legislative Law, Regulatory Law, Command Law.
As far as I can tell, the above accusatory imbecile must be confusing the Law of Reciprocity, that is a Behavioral Law, within the Laws of Nature, which is means scientific law, with a Law of man.
Now, It’s pretty hard for me to imagine being that stupid and ignorant. But you know, I have ‘smart people disease’ which is a common inability to symathize or empathize across more than 30 IQ points (two standard deviations) of ability. That means that If you can’t get a college education in the STEM fields I probably can’t imagine how dumb you are. Ok? So I can’t anticipate what you would think. This is why knowledge ‘trickles down’ and is translated about every standard deviation from the scientific to the colloquial by a hierarchy of communicators.
General Rule in such matters.
1) I am very good at what I do. I don’t know anyone living or dead that’s even close. Though there are at least four emerging, one in mathematics, two in physics, and one in artificial intelligence. This is because if you don’t know tne limits of mathematics, the problems of AI and what we have learned from Behavioral Economics, you are the equivalent of a theologian in scientific age. You’re ‘behind’. You lack a fundamental literacy for understanding contemporary modernity. So don’t pretend overconfidence. Especially if you’ve malinvested in ideology of philosophy or theology, or especially 20th century behavioral pseudoscience.
2) Ergo, before you assume I am wrong, just fucking use good manners and ask a question rather than make an accusation. It’s called agency. It’s called responsibility. It’s called adulthood. And that’s civil behavior. I am one of the only people that will spend time with the public. And moreover, I’m the only one actually working in the interests of the Right …. even the nitwit right. Fk.
Signed
Exasperated
