@pragueblues Ironically, the same experience. and listening to both of these scumbags misrepresent the founders was a fascinating exercise in the jewish abilty to create alternate history.
@roger_penrose Ukrainian people claim Ukraine for themselves. We insure their right to self-determination by self-determined means free of imposition of hardship on others, just as we insure our own, and every other we possibly can. Because that is the first right of natural rights, and the foundation necessary for all human rights.
WHether you understand it or not the foundation of our entire civilization and the reason for our continuous rapid evolution faster than all the rest, is our reciprocal insurance of self-determination by self-determined means by sovereignty in demonstrated interest, reciprocity in display word and deed, including truth before face, and duty and loyalty before self. This was developed on the steppe, but first manifested by the greeks, and is a tradition that is 6000 years old.
Ukraine is not special. They have chosen self-determination by self-determined means. And if we wish others to defend their and our self-same right we must defend theirs.
NOTES: Listening to an interview. I don’t perceive many people as particularly intelligent. I do perceive some intelligent people spending more time learning to communicate than others. In the intellectual stratosphere outside the academy, I don’t perceive Langan as extraordinarily intelligent in written or spoken venues, but if he is performing on IQ tests at that level he has far superior associative memory to mine. My ‘talent’ is more that I remember everything, see deep patterns, and I make very few errors because I only can ‘tolerate’ consistency with all other information in memory. Conversely, I don’t have strong lateral associative memory, and I don’t have strong working memory. I am not even sure how I would score on executive function. The people I can observe are quite a bit smarter than I am, fall into two camps at both ends of the spectrum: the working memory of mathematicians and the working memory of verbal contexts: Edward written has extraordinary working memory in mathematics, and Chomsky has extraordinary working memory in narrative construction, and say, Terrance Tau in the middle, and some grandmasters in chess who can do both. In other words, I think of myself as talented. And I think of those men as intelligent. Because, in my opinion, it’s the amount of information and the time held in working memory that constitutes intelligence. I’m more in the Einstein and Darwin camp that one needs a modicum of superior intelligence, but after that, it’s personality traits, and every major accomplishment is just doing more hard work than anyone else is willing to in that field, when there has been a few generations of unsolved problems and hard work by others before you.
@RadioFreeNorthwest I don’t disagree with Doug on anything. I just have a different specialization and so different emphasis, interests, and responsibilities: I have to create a government that can operate in modernity and into the future that protects us in perpetuity. I want to solve the problem of the enemy’s strategy and tactics – even if our own people try to use them. Doug is also my friend and I consider him one of the only viable leaders on the right.
THE CONTEMORARY SOCIAL COST OF THE EVOLUTIONARY NECESSITY OF IGNORING WOMEN’S UNDERMINING
— “Men only recently noticed that women also speak. That they undermine and we dont listen was a good compromise when we got our boys full time at 7 years old. Now that they have our sons until 18 (or later) we have a problem.” — Coach Noah Revoy – Twitter: @noahrevoy
Background: I asked how me and my (small) organization would differ from Bannon and his (large).
ENDING THE FALSE DICHOTOMY BETWEEN CIVIC AND ETHNONATIONALISM.
(The supermajority of Europeans can practice scientific social, economic, political, and group evolutionary strategy that the enemies pejoratively call ‘whiteness’. Only a super-minority of non-Europeans can do so.)
I don’t do ideology. I do science. The science says what it says. Restore scientific law, we call the constitution of natural law, and in doing so restore a ‘scientific’ civilization, including the unscientific method by which christianity indoctrinates the common folk into the scientific basis of optimum social order: the solution to the prisoner’s dilemma: the exhaustion of forgivness by the extension of kinship love.
The thing is, you need a homogenous ethnocentric polity to pay the cost of the purely scientific european group evolutionary strategy of continuous innovation, application, and adaptation to the continuous discovery the laws of the universe: the only laws any god if there is one ever made.
All we have to so is raise our standards (which my work on restoring the constitution and completing what’s missing from it), and we will drive out the enemy and the inferior simply because they cannot tolerate the demand for people of good character that put family, society, polity, nation, and race before their individual hedonism.
@Mallan@MAGA1488 There won’t be. They will select out of it. That’s part of the beauty of it. Becuase it proves white supremacy. We are the only people who can pay the cost of evolutionary velocity because we’re the only people who institutionalized it long enough that it became genetic as well as cultural.
@rfnarchive@RadioFreeNorthwest That’s why scale matters. It’s why ‘small’ fails. Scale provides incentive for trade, threat for not trading, and resources to fight for not trading, and population to conquer not-traders.