Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • #CRYPTOCRASH AND THE FUTURE OF #CRYPTO The #cryptocrash is not yet severe. It’s

    AND THE FUTURE OF

    The is not yet severe. It’s driven by the fact that most holders are techies, and tech stocks are taking the hit,so they are moving with tech stocks. However,non-tech is down 50% already meaning all tech stocks are hyperinflated as people try to time market exits.

    It’s not possible to predict whether crypto stocks will restore, disentangle from tech stocks, or if when tech stocks reach margin calls, that people will sell crypto. It’s possible that they will flee to crypto if brave. I suspect in panic they will flee to cash.

    Y’all can hate me for this but as I said, crypto is simply free offbook research and development for the state that will impose even more economic intervention using Fedcoins. Thursday the Fed asked for input on Fedcoin. Today Russia bans crypto. This is just the beginning.

    Like I’ve been saying for a decade now: the money in crypto is provisioning tech to governments the way Blackrock and Visa provision tech for the state. They will outlaw by closing in and out doorways all competing digital coins, and will convert all to Fedcoin as I predicted.

    And FWIW, as I predicted, it’s not money. Each coin is just a divisible share in the coin’s network. As such it will not behave like money, it will behave like shares, and mirror the share market not serve as a defense from it. This is what we are seeing in the markets.

    Again – I’m not anti crypto. Just the opposite. I just don’t think that it results in money substitute. Everything else but. The problem is the FEDCOIN is specifically not what we need – fed managed.

    My concern with crypto over the past decade is that discourse on crypto is not based on first principles of monetary instruments, and instead on sophistic and pseudoscientific analogy with extraordinary bias. I’ve been criticized for truthiness – but I was correct

    If you understand that the crypto innovation is that it’s a stock in an asset-less, unbacked, uninsured corporation(technically a voluntary partnership) that it’s relatively difficult to steal shares from, and as such a divisible share of token money, you can predict behavior.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 20:22:07 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107662313240172163

  • CURT: Q: Potential World War 3!? Not immediately. Over time. Russia->Ukraine 1st

    CURT: Q: Potential World War 3!?

    Not immediately. Over time.

    Russia->Ukraine 1st, China->Taiwan 2nd, Iran-NE saudi oil fields 3rd. Turkey->Greek Islands 4th. Instantaneous end of postwar era and european dominance in world evolutionary direction. France has opportunity to militarily take over europe. America must retreat to its hemisphere. China expands to the sea of japan. Gets aggressive with india. Pakistan and China aggress against india. Russia defensively moves to divide khazakstan north russian south turkic. North Korea ->South Korea.

    Somewhere in there someone lets loose nukes, eliminating the taboo, and then fucking chaos.

    To take out the entire USA requires nothing but a few air bursts to wipe out electricity and electronics. The only thing left is subs and radio. The chinese and russians let loose with anti-sattelite weapons. Something on the order of a third of the planet dies from collapse of world security finance and trade and resulting disease, starvation, uprising and war.

    Very fragile world we built here…

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 17:42:30 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107661685602350847

  • @Sargonofakkad100 @Timcast @lotuseaters_com SARGON: The male-conservative axis p

    @Sargonofakkad100@Timcast@lotuseaters_com SARGON: The male-conservative axis places intolerance, loyalty-hierarchy, and purity-disgust (pack) as a higher value than female-consumptive tolerance, inclusiveness-equality (herd). This leads to purity spiraling in the community that prevents the libertarian, centrist, rightist side of right-male spectrum from organizing around a strategy. In other words, these nitwits virtue signal by pissing on minor differences in means of organizing. This is why the left wins. They are more cohesive (herd) than the right (packs).

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 17:08:37 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107661552362695012

  • @Rebel_Bill (I am a supporter of the Identyty Dixie movement)

    @Rebel_Bill (I am a supporter of the Identyty Dixie movement)

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 17:03:42 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107661533017553054

  • DARK HUMOR You know, in the past, in anticipation of a vast civil war, we’ve dis

    DARK HUMOR

    You know, in the past, in anticipation of a vast civil war, we’ve discussed using shrunken heads as a money-substitute, and skull pyramids as a national monument, but the ‘green’ equivalent is wood chippers that make fertilizer. 😉

    (PS: if you want to read my posts on shrunken head economics you can search our website. naturallawinstitute.com/?s=shrunken+head 😉
    Net-Net? Turns out that tribesmen had something going on there. Shrunken heads make an excellent high denomination (high value) currency. 😉 )

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 17:02:55 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107661529962360076

  • FROM: Helikzhan @curtd We continue as we have. 1. Informing 2. Boycotting 3. Wit

    FROM: Helikzhan
    @curtd We continue as we have.

    1. Informing
    2. Boycotting
    3. Withdrawing from their orgs
    4. Reorganizing under our own banners, economy and culture.
    5. Providing the existential threat to their survival by simply not engaging with it.

    RESPONSE BY:
    Curt Doolittle (PRO) @curtd Original Gabber

    @Helikzhan All of those strategies have however consistently failed over the past century and a half, because they are entirely passive – we lack teh monarchy and universal military as means of organizational defense against the female means of social destruction of knowledge, tradition, and institutions. What you’re suggesting is a repetition of the libertarian fantasy that incremental separation is possible. It’s not. Libertarians are always wrong. Just as much as marxists are always wrong. For the same reason. There is no means of voluntary separation from kelptoparasites who depend on that parasitism and absence of competition.

    1) The first existential threat to the enemy is forcible political separation, or forcibile political domination. Separation is superior becuase it eliminates the cost of spending the next 1000 years genetically pacifying their instinct for feminine kleptoparasitism. We simply separate, restore our evolutionary velocity and high trust by restoring society-as-army, under rule of law, and family as the purpose of policy, and leave them behind. There is no downside to this strategy because it takes the moral high ground.

    2) The second existential threat is conquest and rule – which honestly is something we don’t want. Let them suicide into favellas. The problem with this strategy is that it makes the entire planet fear you and boycott you.

    3) The third existential threat is one we find morally reprehensible – which is the even higher cost of deportation, displacement, or elimination. The problem with this method is that it makes the entire planet war with you.

    Those are our choices. They are the only choices. Everything else is wet-dreams of adolescent boys afraid to pay the high cost of obtaining their sovereignty by the only means sovereignty is ever produced: the organized application of violence we call an ‘army’.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 16:54:11 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107661495572644959

  • @Helikzhan All of those strategies have however consistently failed over the pas

    @Helikzhan All of those strategies have however consistently failed over the past century and a half, because they are entirely passive – we lack teh monarchy and universal military as means of organizational defense against the female means of social destruction of knowledge, tradition, and institutions. What you’re suggesting is a repetition of the libertarian fantasy that incremental separation is possible. It’s not. Libertarians are always wrong. Just as much as marxists are always wrong. For the same reason. There is no means of voluntary separation from kelptoparasites who depend on that parasitism and absence of competition.

    The first existential threat to the enemy is forcible political separation, or forcibile political domination. Separation is superior becuase it eliminates the cost of spending the next 1000 years genetically pacifying their instinct for feminine kleptoparasitism. We simply separate, restore our evolutionary velocity and high trust by restoring society-as-army, under rule of law, and family as the purpose of policy, and leave them behind. There is no downside to this strategy because it takes the moral high ground.

    The second existential threat is conquest and rule – which honestly is something we don’t want. Let them suicide into favellas. The problem with this strategy is that it makes the entire planet fear you and boycott you.

    The third existential threat is one we find morally reprehensible – which is the even higher cost of deportation, displacement, or elimination. The problem with this method is that it makes the entire planet war with you.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 16:51:42 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107661485843813618

  • Boost of @Rebel_Bill Stop loving an empire that hates you

    Boost of @Rebel_Bill Stop loving an empire that hates you.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 16:41:54 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107661531240216728

  • ENDING THE FEMALE-JEWISH MEANS OF CRIMINALITY, SEDITION, AND WAR I’ve explained

    ENDING THE FEMALE-JEWISH MEANS OF CRIMINALITY, SEDITION, AND WAR

    I’ve explained in detail why we are vulnerable to the feminine means of undermining by seduction. So, now we have the ‘science’ of female-jewish destruction available. Fundamentally, this means that it’s genetic as well as cultural. And that the jewish destruction from within, first by supernatual christianity, and second by pseudoscientific marxism-neomarxism-pomo-pc/woke both make use of the female means of anti-social conflict and warfare.

    So, the question of their intrinsic evil, and the source of their intrinsic evil, is settled. But so is why our unique trifunctional high-trust civilization is vulnerable to warfare against our institutions of cultural production, using the female means of antisocial behavior.

    The thing is – that by knowing what makes us vulnerable, we can as equally suppress their means of crime, sediction, and war against our culture, as we have the male methods of anti-social behavior and warfare. It’s not even hard.

    That is. … it’s not even hard if we sieze sufficient political power to implement the necessary legal and economic reforms.

    -cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 14:49:27 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107661005121345146

  • @DouglasMercer I’ve explained in detail why we are vulnerable to the feminine me

    @DouglasMercer I’ve explained in detail why we are vulnerable to the feminine means of undermining by seduction. So, now we have the ‘science’ of female-jewish destruction available. Fundamentally, this means that it’s genetic as well as cultural. ANd that the jewish destruction from within, first by supernatual christianity, and second by pseudoscientific marxism-neomarxism-pomo-pc/woke both make use of the female means of anti-social conflict and warfare. So, the question of their intrinsic evil, and the source of their intrinsic evil, is settled. But so is why our unique trifunctional high-trust civilization is vulnerable to warfare against our institutions of cultural production, using the female means of antisocial behavior. The thing is – that by knowing what makes us vulnerable, we can as equally suppress their means of crime, sediction, and war against our culture, as we have the male methods of anti-social behavior and warfare. It’s not even hard. That is. … it’s not even hard if we sieze sufficient political power to implement the necessary legal and economic reforms. -cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 14:48:19 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107661000660922590