CHRISTIANITY WAS A GAMBLE. by Daniel Jordan Christianity was a gamble. Like all things ironically we can judge them by their results (by their fruits). The good that we see is largely confirmation bias. The harm is in the category of unknown for most people due to chaos of measurement. But for those committed to truth and logic it’s hard not to see the sophistry as a major step back from the path Aristotle and Pythagoras were on. The group strategy as it turns out is probably more a biological strategy of high trust peoples evolving over time. Why do we label it as Christian when we have empirical evidence of optimum group strategies from Rome and Greece?
Source: Original Site Post
-
Fallacy of White Privilege: Demanding Ingroup Benefits While Maintaining Outgrou
Fallacy of White Privilege: Demanding Ingroup Benefits While Maintaining Outgroup Status. https://t.co/ciz9f2fmfH
-
Fallacy of White Privilege: Demanding Ingroup Benefits While Maintaining Outgrou
Fallacy of White Privilege: Demanding Ingroup Benefits While Maintaining Outgroup Status. https://t.co/p7Y1lxxtVK
-
Fallacy of White Privilege: Demanding Ingroup Benefits While Maintaining Outgroup Status.
FALLACY OF WHITE PRIVILEGE: DEMANDING INGROUP BENEFITS WHILE MAINTAINING OUTGROUP STATUS. by Bill Joslin (via Justin Allred) (canon) Better stated as in-group members pay for membership via opportunity cost to not betray in-group trust. The incentive is clear. The benefits of maintaining membership outweighs the opportunity costs of not betraying trust of the in-group. This framing now includes class. Lower classes are on the cusp of this equation where betraying ingroup trust outweighs membership (i.e. crime and fraud). And outgroup members have no benefit of membership so have no incentive to take on the opportunity cost. “White privilege” distills down to outgroup con-artistry for why they should have ingroup benefits without paying the cost of membership…. And now we have the crux of the liberal philosophy and the common interests between lower class, migrants, academics and unassimilated sub-groups… All demanding ingroup benefits while maintaining outgroup status. Edit
-
Fallacy of White Privilege: Demanding Ingroup Benefits While Maintaining Outgroup Status.
FALLACY OF WHITE PRIVILEGE: DEMANDING INGROUP BENEFITS WHILE MAINTAINING OUTGROUP STATUS. by Bill Joslin (via Justin Allred) (canon) Better stated as in-group members pay for membership via opportunity cost to not betray in-group trust. The incentive is clear. The benefits of maintaining membership outweighs the opportunity costs of not betraying trust of the in-group. This framing now includes class. Lower classes are on the cusp of this equation where betraying ingroup trust outweighs membership (i.e. crime and fraud). And outgroup members have no benefit of membership so have no incentive to take on the opportunity cost. “White privilege” distills down to outgroup con-artistry for why they should have ingroup benefits without paying the cost of membership…. And now we have the crux of the liberal philosophy and the common interests between lower class, migrants, academics and unassimilated sub-groups… All demanding ingroup benefits while maintaining outgroup status. Edit
-
We Can only Be Equal in Morality and The Law to Enforce It
We Can only Be Equal in Morality and The Law to Enforce It https://t.co/4leduxS30M
-
We Can only Be Equal in Morality and The Law to Enforce It
WE CAN ONLY BE EQUAL IN MORALITY AND THE LAW TO ENFORCE IT by Dr. Richard T. Hünerkoch Equality is an artifice, it’s a concept, an “ideal” and the problem with ideals is that they are not obtainable by mortals. Perfection does not exist in the mortal realm. Equality in it’s most literal definition is an impossibility it’s an idealistic but unrealistic goal. —“If you start with a faulty premise and try to solve problems within that premise you find that none of your solutions work. The faulty premise is “equality” and everyone proposes solutions within that world view. The people you call “racist” are trying to explain this to you.”— The best thing that you can hope to achieve is as much legal equality as you possibly can but make no mistake it’s not the similarities that make us similar it’s the differences that make us different. Men are not even equal to other men so how could women possibly measure up? Equality as the left defines it means iniquity between “privileged” and “victims.” They want to make you dumb, hamstring your physicality and put a paper bag over your head so that the smart, strong and beautiful are “equal” to the stupid, weak and ugly. That’s what they mean. Equality is a worthy goal in and of itself but the only way things can be equal is through homogeneity. The closer we get to a homogenous culture, the closer we can get to equality. If the United States has the homogeneity of Iceland, we could be closer to equals. However though, because of diversity and heterogeneity, we have to adjust our target baseline of equality because we have to account for many extraneous variables. If we didn’t need to adjust for IQ differences that are miles apart, we could all be more equal. The only kind of equality that exists on Earth is the equality of mortality. We will all die someday and while we all have that in common, that is where the similarities end. The social terrorist left is trying to make us all “mortally equal” because that’s the only equality that truly exists in the mortal realm. Needless to say, the fact that we will all die someday is not enough reason to throw away our culture with reckless abandon. In case I haven’t made my point enough. Equality, as defined by the social terrorist left, is simply just communism masquerading as compassion. Don’t fall for this facade, the true visage behind the mask is the ugly bloated face of Karl Marx himself.
-
We Can only Be Equal in Morality and The Law to Enforce It
WE CAN ONLY BE EQUAL IN MORALITY AND THE LAW TO ENFORCE IT by Dr. Richard T. Hünerkoch Equality is an artifice, it’s a concept, an “ideal” and the problem with ideals is that they are not obtainable by mortals. Perfection does not exist in the mortal realm. Equality in it’s most literal definition is an impossibility it’s an idealistic but unrealistic goal. —“If you start with a faulty premise and try to solve problems within that premise you find that none of your solutions work. The faulty premise is “equality” and everyone proposes solutions within that world view. The people you call “racist” are trying to explain this to you.”— The best thing that you can hope to achieve is as much legal equality as you possibly can but make no mistake it’s not the similarities that make us similar it’s the differences that make us different. Men are not even equal to other men so how could women possibly measure up? Equality as the left defines it means iniquity between “privileged” and “victims.” They want to make you dumb, hamstring your physicality and put a paper bag over your head so that the smart, strong and beautiful are “equal” to the stupid, weak and ugly. That’s what they mean. Equality is a worthy goal in and of itself but the only way things can be equal is through homogeneity. The closer we get to a homogenous culture, the closer we can get to equality. If the United States has the homogeneity of Iceland, we could be closer to equals. However though, because of diversity and heterogeneity, we have to adjust our target baseline of equality because we have to account for many extraneous variables. If we didn’t need to adjust for IQ differences that are miles apart, we could all be more equal. The only kind of equality that exists on Earth is the equality of mortality. We will all die someday and while we all have that in common, that is where the similarities end. The social terrorist left is trying to make us all “mortally equal” because that’s the only equality that truly exists in the mortal realm. Needless to say, the fact that we will all die someday is not enough reason to throw away our culture with reckless abandon. In case I haven’t made my point enough. Equality, as defined by the social terrorist left, is simply just communism masquerading as compassion. Don’t fall for this facade, the true visage behind the mask is the ugly bloated face of Karl Marx himself.
-
And You Will Know Good and Evil
And You Will Know Good and Evil https://t.co/Qrq4Gu7vH8
-
And You Will Know Good and Evil
AND YOU WILL KNOW GOOD AND EVIL by Predmetsky Rosenborg Early Gnostic texts portray the serpent and Eve (sometimes almost conflating them) as positive messengers of truth and God as evil. In the case of Marcion, at least, it was the Old Testament God who was evil. What’s interesting is that the New Testament portrays Satan as a liar and the father of lies, but in the text of Genesis, God seems to acknowledge that Satan was telling the truth after all. “For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil” (Gen. 3:5) “Then the Lord God said, “Behold, the man has become like one of us in knowing good and evil. Now, lest he reach out his hand and take also of the tree of life and eat, and live forever—”(Gen. 3:22).