Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Religion Solved a Calculation Problem

    RELIGION SOLVED A CALCULATION PROBLEM (core) Religion provides mindfulness. mindfulness is produced by personal sedation of powerlessness, interpersonal accounting of reciprocity, social accounting of position in hierarchy, and economic accounting of proportionality, and political insurance (defense). So to say a religion provides morality is false. A religion provides the means of instructing us on a given strategy for the preservation of reciprocity and proportionality which always and everywhere describes morality. So while we demand mindfulness across that spectrum, the only one that is not reproducible by law is personal sedation of powerlessness – which can be produced by any ritualistic means – the most scientific of which is what we call the stoic method of self construction, or what is called, cognitive behavioral therapy, and the epicurean objective (living within your means), and the social experience of collective feast, oath, sport, and festival. The ‘evil’ in the abrahamic religions is insidious on at least the following counts: abrahamic lying, denial of reality, submission instead of achievement, surrender instead of action, and the falsehood of equality, the falsehood of man as fallen angel among evil humans, rather than man as risen beast domesticated by his betters. Religion solves a problem native to consciousness which is the evolution of man in small groups where he and she have agency and full knowledge of one another and insurance of one another instead of anonymity in a chaotic world with none of the above. Institutional religion evolved as a pre-literate law code that could be taught by recitation of parables and stories, which was the only means of teaching in the era. So religion evolves into law evolves into science. And in science (Truth) we are the gods – there are none other. And those we call gods are but the memories of those who came before us, and the visions of what we wish to become. Because that is all our brains are capable of creating. I don’t err often and as far as I know all improvement in understanding of religion will simply continue to increase the precision of this description. Cheers

  • The Postwar Narrative in Historical Context

    THE POSTWAR NARRATIVE IN HISTORICAL CONTEXT

    1. Prussia was the completion of the restoration of western civilization to its origins after the roman collapse, Carolingian failure, Church failure, The French Failure b/c of church influence. The British failure b/c of french influence.

    2. French Socialism and Jewish Marxism were a reformation from supernatural religion to pseudoscientific religion to compete with Prussia, Darwin, and finally Nietzsche.

    3. Nazi Germany was an attempt to convert monarchical Prussianism to political prussianism to resist marxism.
      The German upper classes, at least in prussia, and then in broader germany, had been trying to restore western civilization, to its foundations.

    4. The postwar french, jewish, and less so english attempt to end prussianization was successful, largely through thought leadership in pseudoscience by marxists feminists and postmodernists.

    5. I see the current conflict between those of us who are ahead of the curve (again) restoring the prussian aristocratic ethic, the english who are trying to restore the british empire, and the protestants who are trying to restore the church, and the catholics who are in sympathy with the marxists, the underclasses who are the new postmodernists as well as marxists, and the jews and muslims who are seeking to undermine all of the above.

    6. We must restore our aristocracy, our rule of law, our military, our militia, and our family, and we can easily do so by depoliticization, definancialization, and re-familializtion.

  • The Postwar Narrative in Historical Context

    THE POSTWAR NARRATIVE IN HISTORICAL CONTEXT

    1. Prussia was the completion of the restoration of western civilization to its origins after the roman collapse, Carolingian failure, Church failure, The French Failure b/c of church influence. The British failure b/c of french influence.

    2. French Socialism and Jewish Marxism were a reformation from supernatural religion to pseudoscientific religion to compete with Prussia, Darwin, and finally Nietzsche.

    3. Nazi Germany was an attempt to convert monarchical Prussianism to political prussianism to resist marxism.
      The German upper classes, at least in prussia, and then in broader germany, had been trying to restore western civilization, to its foundations.

    4. The postwar french, jewish, and less so english attempt to end prussianization was successful, largely through thought leadership in pseudoscience by marxists feminists and postmodernists.

    5. I see the current conflict between those of us who are ahead of the curve (again) restoring the prussian aristocratic ethic, the english who are trying to restore the british empire, and the protestants who are trying to restore the church, and the catholics who are in sympathy with the marxists, the underclasses who are the new postmodernists as well as marxists, and the jews and muslims who are seeking to undermine all of the above.

    6. We must restore our aristocracy, our rule of law, our military, our militia, and our family, and we can easily do so by depoliticization, definancialization, and re-familializtion.

  • (ESSENTIAL) HOW DOES PROPERTARIANISM ADDRESS (FILL IN THE BLANK) PROBLEM OR PROB

    (ESSENTIAL) HOW DOES PROPERTARIANISM ADDRESS (FILL IN THE BLANK) PROBLEM OR PROBLEMATIC/PARASITIC GROUP? https://t.co/5wnwCyzlBV

  • (ESSENTIAL) HOW DOES PROPERTARIANISM ADDRESS (FILL IN THE BLANK) PROBLEM OR PROBLEMATIC/PARASITIC GROUP?

    (ESSENTIAL) HOW DOES PROPERTARIANISM ADDRESS (FILL IN THE BLANK) PROBLEM OR PROBLEMATIC/PARASITIC GROUP? A good (and common category of) question from a reader: “How does propertarianism address: 5G? The jewish meddling and takeovers of governments through TECH FREEMASONRY DEEP STATE METHODS AND TACTICS The Chemical Industry PARASITISM FROM THE GOVERNMENT AND BIG BUSINESS AND CORPS perpetrated against the public!?” (Etc etc) My response: All these enemies would not be able to operate at all in a polity where propertarian rule of law is in place. Any citizen (say, you!) could go into court to stop these people/groups from operating in any non-reciprocal way. That’s the whole beauty of it. We don’t have to make a long list of enemies and say, “we’ve gotta deal with them, and them, and them, and them, and them…” Instead we just give the people the ability to challenge ANY violation of reciprocity by ANY person or group (including rich people, corporations, foreign-initiated groups, government officials/workers/groups, anybody), in court. If you’re still asking “but how are you gonna deal with x group or y movement or z lie”, you don’t understand propertarian rule of law. It gives ANY citizen the ability to use the court system to STOP and PUNISH ANY violation of reciprocity and false public speech by ANYONE. The simple answer to “how are you going to enforce it?” is just to impeach judges who depart from enforcing reciprocity (obviously requires vigilance but not hard – oversight mechanisms with layers, militia and/or monarch as “judge of last resort” – not an “all-powerful monarch rather one with very limited powers – with ultimate responsibility for deciding tough cases). This constitutional/law solution also solves a major problem for the winning right: we probably don’t have enough time to fully redpill the whole grassroots Right on everything, for example, jooish influence, before ultimate crisis point where we have to coalesce around a solution. Saying “all joos must go!” is gonna be rejected by huge numbers of grassroots rightwingers. The propertarian constitution solves this problem by punishing the parasitic behavior. When any of our enemies can’t get away with parasitic behavior and are punished for it in court the same way I’d be punished in court if I stole a car or sold a product that killed people, most of them will leave or stay away of their own accord. (Don’t think this is impossible – the reason they’re attracted like flies to exploit our current system is cuz our current system is s**t. They operate where there is opportunity. Propertarian law shuts down the opportunity to be a parasite. Under P law, if you don’t like what, say, a jooish group is doing, something parasitic, you can go sue them and you will win. And if you think the jooish group will win, you don’t understand P law.) Also, with P law in place, it will be light years easier to redpill people and create a new renaissance by applying the (currently suppressed) science we already have about humanity to the social & political realms. Because our enemies will literally not be able to speak lies about “equality” without losing millions in court. The likes of Curt Doolittle, Kevin MacDonald and Ricardo Duchesne will be household-name heros and Tahesi Coates (or whatever the hell his name is) will be flipping burgers. (Or telling his lies in a blue city-state with his books banned in our polities, IF the Left is lucky enough to still have some land.) Curt has thought through his stuff folks. People who say “we just need to get rid of the joos!” or some variation of a super-simple solution, never take into account that they would need to SELL that solution to the entire grassroots Right. Which they can’t do. Not nearly as fast as would be needed given how soon we’re gonna need a solution ready to go. YOU ARE IN CONTACT WITH A GROUP OF PEOPLE (LED BY CURT) WHO THINK THROUGH THINGS VERY, VERY THOROUGHLY.

  • (ESSENTIAL) HOW DOES PROPERTARIANISM ADDRESS (FILL IN THE BLANK) PROBLEM OR PROBLEMATIC/PARASITIC GROUP?

    (ESSENTIAL) HOW DOES PROPERTARIANISM ADDRESS (FILL IN THE BLANK) PROBLEM OR PROBLEMATIC/PARASITIC GROUP? A good (and common category of) question from a reader: “How does propertarianism address: 5G? The jewish meddling and takeovers of governments through TECH FREEMASONRY DEEP STATE METHODS AND TACTICS The Chemical Industry PARASITISM FROM THE GOVERNMENT AND BIG BUSINESS AND CORPS perpetrated against the public!?” (Etc etc) My response: All these enemies would not be able to operate at all in a polity where propertarian rule of law is in place. Any citizen (say, you!) could go into court to stop these people/groups from operating in any non-reciprocal way. That’s the whole beauty of it. We don’t have to make a long list of enemies and say, “we’ve gotta deal with them, and them, and them, and them, and them…” Instead we just give the people the ability to challenge ANY violation of reciprocity by ANY person or group (including rich people, corporations, foreign-initiated groups, government officials/workers/groups, anybody), in court. If you’re still asking “but how are you gonna deal with x group or y movement or z lie”, you don’t understand propertarian rule of law. It gives ANY citizen the ability to use the court system to STOP and PUNISH ANY violation of reciprocity and false public speech by ANYONE. The simple answer to “how are you going to enforce it?” is just to impeach judges who depart from enforcing reciprocity (obviously requires vigilance but not hard – oversight mechanisms with layers, militia and/or monarch as “judge of last resort” – not an “all-powerful monarch rather one with very limited powers – with ultimate responsibility for deciding tough cases). This constitutional/law solution also solves a major problem for the winning right: we probably don’t have enough time to fully redpill the whole grassroots Right on everything, for example, jooish influence, before ultimate crisis point where we have to coalesce around a solution. Saying “all joos must go!” is gonna be rejected by huge numbers of grassroots rightwingers. The propertarian constitution solves this problem by punishing the parasitic behavior. When any of our enemies can’t get away with parasitic behavior and are punished for it in court the same way I’d be punished in court if I stole a car or sold a product that killed people, most of them will leave or stay away of their own accord. (Don’t think this is impossible – the reason they’re attracted like flies to exploit our current system is cuz our current system is s**t. They operate where there is opportunity. Propertarian law shuts down the opportunity to be a parasite. Under P law, if you don’t like what, say, a jooish group is doing, something parasitic, you can go sue them and you will win. And if you think the jooish group will win, you don’t understand P law.) Also, with P law in place, it will be light years easier to redpill people and create a new renaissance by applying the (currently suppressed) science we already have about humanity to the social & political realms. Because our enemies will literally not be able to speak lies about “equality” without losing millions in court. The likes of Curt Doolittle, Kevin MacDonald and Ricardo Duchesne will be household-name heros and Tahesi Coates (or whatever the hell his name is) will be flipping burgers. (Or telling his lies in a blue city-state with his books banned in our polities, IF the Left is lucky enough to still have some land.) Curt has thought through his stuff folks. People who say “we just need to get rid of the joos!” or some variation of a super-simple solution, never take into account that they would need to SELL that solution to the entire grassroots Right. Which they can’t do. Not nearly as fast as would be needed given how soon we’re gonna need a solution ready to go. YOU ARE IN CONTACT WITH A GROUP OF PEOPLE (LED BY CURT) WHO THINK THROUGH THINGS VERY, VERY THOROUGHLY.

  • “But You Are Counting Your Legions Before They Are Hatched?”

    “But You Are Counting Your Legions Before They Are Hatched?” https://t.co/iW6dEeHEcJ

  • “But You Are Counting Your Legions Before They Are Hatched?”

    “BUT YOU ARE COUNTING YOUR LEGIONS BEFORE THEY ARE HATCHED” They will hatch because they will have extremely, extremely strong incentive to hatch. They will have no choice. Also it doesn’t take anywhere near all of them to hatch, to accomplish the objective of separating from the left & parasitic elites. (Because of fragility of system & ease of 4G warfare.) In addition, telling people “it’s not possible” (besides the fact that it’s a lie) just projects weakness & accomplishes the exact opposite of what is needed – for our enemies to FEAR us and FEAR the consequences of not letting us separate. There is only one way out of this. Voting in 2020 is at best a temporary stopgap (if that). We have been colonized by hostile foreigners in league with a minority of hostile traitors in our own group. Together they outnumber us for voting purposes (or will, irreversibly, very soon). The only way out of this is for our enemies to be so afraid of the consequences of not letting us separate, that they agree to let us separate. And the more we TALK about those consequences (in direct or indirect ways), (stating our demands and painting a picture of the consequences for our enemies if they are not met), the more fear we quicker and easier our victory is likely to be. The more fear instilled (in normies, anybody/everybody that could be hurt or inconvenienced by a conflict) by TALKING, the less need the grassroots Right would feel the need to instill fear by other means. TALKING ABOUT CIVIL WAR INCREASES EASE OF REACHING OUR GOALS AND THE REDUCES THE LIKELY SEVERITY OF IT. WEAK TALK (BLACKPILLING) IS TOTALLY COUNTERPRODUCTIVE.

  • “But You Are Counting Your Legions Before They Are Hatched?”

    “BUT YOU ARE COUNTING YOUR LEGIONS BEFORE THEY ARE HATCHED” They will hatch because they will have extremely, extremely strong incentive to hatch. They will have no choice. Also it doesn’t take anywhere near all of them to hatch, to accomplish the objective of separating from the left & parasitic elites. (Because of fragility of system & ease of 4G warfare.) In addition, telling people “it’s not possible” (besides the fact that it’s a lie) just projects weakness & accomplishes the exact opposite of what is needed – for our enemies to FEAR us and FEAR the consequences of not letting us separate. There is only one way out of this. Voting in 2020 is at best a temporary stopgap (if that). We have been colonized by hostile foreigners in league with a minority of hostile traitors in our own group. Together they outnumber us for voting purposes (or will, irreversibly, very soon). The only way out of this is for our enemies to be so afraid of the consequences of not letting us separate, that they agree to let us separate. And the more we TALK about those consequences (in direct or indirect ways), (stating our demands and painting a picture of the consequences for our enemies if they are not met), the more fear we quicker and easier our victory is likely to be. The more fear instilled (in normies, anybody/everybody that could be hurt or inconvenienced by a conflict) by TALKING, the less need the grassroots Right would feel the need to instill fear by other means. TALKING ABOUT CIVIL WAR INCREASES EASE OF REACHING OUR GOALS AND THE REDUCES THE LIKELY SEVERITY OF IT. WEAK TALK (BLACKPILLING) IS TOTALLY COUNTERPRODUCTIVE.

  • Criticizing the Flaccid Right

    Criticizing the Flaccid Right. https://t.co/xBYcyJHd0P