—“I wonder what percentage of people just want to be comfortable with their master?”—Andrew M Gilmour
It’s a lot easier for certain, and this is why we must have hierarchies, competing classes, but a market for cooperation between the classes as we increase in scale, to compete with those doing the same.
More on Lying https://t.co/dZ2h4x2TQy
—“What is the argument against selfish lying if it serves my self interest, assuming the majority of people don’t lie to burst the language bubble.”– Gyeff @Gyeff
SPECTRUMTransparent Lies – Signal Conformity White Lies – provide comfort to the psyche Grey Lies – protect from consequences of accident, impropriety, or folly Black Lies – Pursue gains by means of deceit Evil Lies – Pursue harm for the sake of harm. People are amoral, and immoral or moral as suits their interests. People conspire ie, cheat, steal, harm and murder as suits their interests.We have just worked very hard to create institutions such that it doesn’t suit their interests. Lying is one of the hardest crimes to limit… …because we continually shift techniques such that we need only raise the cost of truth discovery by creating ambiguity such that lie is indistinguishable from ignorance, error, or natural limitations in judgement and prediction. As such only westerners have succeeded in such suppression of falsehood, that we are able to produce high trust commons, and the means by which we evolved that tradition is almost impossible to replicate without intentionally designing a legal system for it (which I did.) So like manythings, truth telling is just a tax. Truth Before Face, Before Gain, Before All, regardless of impact to the competence-dominance hierarchy is uniquely western. But it is the primary reason for our sovereignty, liberty, freedom, prosperity, and dominion over nature.
—“What is the argument against selfish lying if it serves my self interest, assuming the majority of people don’t lie to burst the language bubble.”– Gyeff @Gyeff
SPECTRUMTransparent Lies – Signal Conformity White Lies – provide comfort to the psyche Grey Lies – protect from consequences of accident, impropriety, or folly Black Lies – Pursue gains by means of deceit Evil Lies – Pursue harm for the sake of harm. People are amoral, and immoral or moral as suits their interests. People conspire ie, cheat, steal, harm and murder as suits their interests.We have just worked very hard to create institutions such that it doesn’t suit their interests. Lying is one of the hardest crimes to limit… …because we continually shift techniques such that we need only raise the cost of truth discovery by creating ambiguity such that lie is indistinguishable from ignorance, error, or natural limitations in judgement and prediction. As such only westerners have succeeded in such suppression of falsehood, that we are able to produce high trust commons, and the means by which we evolved that tradition is almost impossible to replicate without intentionally designing a legal system for it (which I did.) So like manythings, truth telling is just a tax. Truth Before Face, Before Gain, Before All, regardless of impact to the competence-dominance hierarchy is uniquely western. But it is the primary reason for our sovereignty, liberty, freedom, prosperity, and dominion over nature.
Origins of The NAP in Separatism https://t.co/ese45RmKd3
ORIGINS OF THE NAP IN SEPARATISM
—“NAP evolved out of the Jewish Ghetto ethic of being able to do whatever you want to people, provided you don’t engage in physical violence. So the NAP in theory does not recognize feminine means of coercion by undermining as aggression.”— John Smith
(NOTE: I’ve probably said something of this nature five thousand times and never put it that simply. That’s perfect. Damn. Monarchies gave ‘liberty’ to subgroups to practice their ‘traditional custom’ in ghettos or ‘quarters’ and only kept the PHYSICAL peace between them. )
ORIGINS OF THE NAP IN SEPARATISM
—“NAP evolved out of the Jewish Ghetto ethic of being able to do whatever you want to people, provided you don’t engage in physical violence. So the NAP in theory does not recognize feminine means of coercion by undermining as aggression.”— John Smith
(NOTE: I’ve probably said something of this nature five thousand times and never put it that simply. That’s perfect. Damn. Monarchies gave ‘liberty’ to subgroups to practice their ‘traditional custom’ in ghettos or ‘quarters’ and only kept the PHYSICAL peace between them. )
Yes. Men work in packs. That’s fine. “Leadership” across the spectrum understands the packs, and the class organization of the packs.
We have a plan. It will work if people show up. And I think they will.
Reply addressees: @TruthRespecter
Libertarian Means ‘Useful Idiot” https://t.co/sWrkqWqupl
PLEASE STOP BEING A USEFUL IDIOT ON BEHALF OF THE LEFT: LIBERTARIAN MEANS ‘USEFUL IDIOT”
—“For me the last part best manifests itself within the ideas of libertarianism.”—psionin @psionin
Libertarianism is just common property marxism. So “For me” means you don’t understand that the only source of Sovereignty, Liberty, Freedom and Prosperity is rule of law, producing markets for everything, including commons, or what we call ‘government’. Rothbardians turned ‘libertarianism’ from Classical Liberalism under Rule of Law to Ghetto Ethics of diasporic peoples having no, and taking no, responsibility for commons. It’s just common property parasitism rather than private property parasitism. So Rothbardians destroyed the term liberty as the left destroyed the term liberal. Either we have a militia in which every man holding the franchise defends rule of law under sovereignty and reciprocity, and produces commons necessary for survival of the polity – or not. If not, then the polity cannot survive competition in the market for territories, population and social, economic, and political order. Which is why there are no libertarian polities, and never will be. Libertarianism is just demand for a commune of private rather than common property at best, or an excuse to fool high trust european peoples into hosting parasitic peoples who specialize in profit from baiting into moral hazard, under the pretense of doing no harm. So please stop being a useful idiot. I use Sovereigntarian, or rule of law of reciprocity, or rule of law monarchy, or classical liberal. Libertarian in the hayekian sense means Classical Liberalism. Libertarianism in the Rothbardian sense just means “useful idiot”. Edit OCTOBER 5