So as yet we don’t know how many genes regualate the expression of (a) neoteny (slow development), and (b) class (quality). And africans least, austronesians next. middle eastern next, central asian next, indians next, eruopeans next, and east asians last is the hierarchy.
Reply addressees: @aptest_eve @JadeBai85455803 @SPQRIUS
Source: Original Site Post
-
So as yet we don’t know how many genes regualate the expression of (a) neoteny (
-
For example, as in the well-known example of domestication of foxes, just select
For example, as in the well-known example of domestication of foxes, just selecting for testosterone levels (one change) will produce domestication. In humans it’s the same basic developmental difference: 1) neoteny and 2) selection pressure: class size.
Vast racial differences.
Reply addressees: @aptest_eve @JadeBai85455803 @SPQRIUS -
This fallacy is so well known in science that it has a name: Lewontin’s fallacy.
This fallacy is so well known in science that it has a name: Lewontin’s fallacy. It takes advantage of human ignorance of the size and functional composition of our genes, few of which are declarative and most of which are regulatory. In other words, tiny variation = huge effect.
Reply addressees: @aptest_eve @JadeBai85455803 @SPQRIUS -
No sense in repeating myself. You have to produce something worth debating. And
No sense in repeating myself. You have to produce something worth debating. And I have to be convinced of your intellectual honesty. So far you don’t know what my work advocates, and you don’t understand why communism, socialism, bolshevism were death marches. So in public only. https://t.co/NSkoFtaYgp
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4 -
Our movement is fine w/o you. We’re the adults in the room & get along fine with
Our movement is fine w/o you. We’re the adults in the room & get along fine with the left. I’ll negotiate with them all day long if they’re willing, b/c govt’s the enemy & separation is in both our interests. At least they have guts and show up – and cowards like you don’t.
Reply addressees: @CONTENTINOPLE_ -
Why Can’t Right Win? Vanity: Belief in supernatural magic men is impossible for
Why Can’t Right Win? Vanity: Belief in supernatural magic men is impossible for intelligent people. Tolerance for the hard truth is impossible for the meek, dim, and weak. Courage for Civnats. Discipline for the angry impulsive NS. Uncertainty for timid but capable WN/Patriots.
Reply addressees: @CONTENTINOPLE_ -
Exept that we know what “Chinese nationalist fascist expansionist, state capital
Exept that we know what “Chinese nationalist fascist expansionist, state capitalist, mixed economy” means because it exists and is possible. If you want to try to legitimize antique labels that’s just intellectual dishonesty. China is reverting to WORLD HISTORICAL NORMS.
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4 -
I’m educating the audience. And I’m establishing the terms of the debate. So far
I’m educating the audience. And I’m establishing the terms of the debate. So far, all I know is that you’re arguing for state capitalism and haven’t read my seconddeclaration and how the state is organized, or how the financial sector is absorbed by the state
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4 -
Well, I got you to say Chinese (Nationalist) Intolerant (fascist) state-capitali
Well, I got you to say Chinese (Nationalist) Intolerant (fascist) state-capitalist (State as primary investor) instead of some silly ideological bullshit so now we are at least talking like adults. And yes that is the wave of the future as far as I can tell. So what?
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4 -
These re just truths. How do they apply to your people? Well, that’ depends on t
These re just truths. How do they apply to your people? Well, that’ depends on the level of sophistication of your people. Russians are smart educatied but trust noone.
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4