Aristotelianism (truth testimony),
Confucianism(harmony, reasonableness),
Abrahamism(deceit, submission)
LYING (hard)
https://t.co/6tqd8cqT5l
GSRRM (easy)
https://t.co/5SxYeoRHDj
BAITING INTO HAZARD (medium)
https://t.co/jdIMgNClLm
ABRAHAMISM (hard)
https://t.co/AZfgxx4Fs6
Reply addressees: @noxaxis1
Source: Original Site Post
-
Aristotelianism (truth testimony), Confucianism(harmony, reasonableness), Abraha
-
Man is only narrowly malleable Man is varied and immutable. Scarcity never ends
Man is only narrowly malleable
Man is varied and immutable.
Scarcity never ends
And each of these are long topics
Reply addressees: @noxaxis1 -
Version Two: monotheistic -> pseudoscientific. Version two: common tort law -> r
Version Two: monotheistic -> pseudoscientific.
Version two: common tort law -> reason, empiricism, science. Science is just legal testimony outside of courts, by the same criteria; realism, naturalism, operationalism by means, motive, opportunity.
That’s why Euros discovered it.
Reply addressees: @noxaxis1 -
This is why Judaism, Christianity, Islam in the ancient world, and marxism(Judai
This is why Judaism, Christianity, Islam in the ancient world, and marxism(Judaism), postmodernism-feminism(Christianity), and Islamism (Islamic fundamentalism) are constructed by the same means(arguments), for the same purpose, differing only in supernatural vs pseudoscientific.
Reply addressees: @noxaxis1 -
These ‘great lies’ to deny physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, are sold by
These ‘great lies’ to deny physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, are sold by the Abrahamic technique of bating into hazard, via false, unwarrantable promise, pilpul (sophistry, postmodernism) critique (undermining, GSRRM), the myth of oppression vs domestication.
Reply addressees: @noxaxis1 -
The False promise of nature of man (amoral), variation in man (vast in races, cl
The False promise of nature of man (amoral), variation in man (vast in races, classes), of the malleability of man (non-blank slate), in the possibility of endless growth (end of scarcity), escaping reciprocity, hierarchy, low hanging fruit of discovery, markets, market eugenics.
Reply addressees: @noxaxis1 -
That they are a problem? 😉 Opposing grp strategies. Genetic difference. Unresol
That they are a problem? 😉 Opposing grp strategies. Genetic difference. Unresolvable. European/East Asian advantage was eugenics, and the left’s program is a revolt against Darwin’s explanation for the success of western civ: discovering, adapting to, applying, laws of nature.
Reply addressees: @noxaxis1 -
The post is to the right? Are you on the left or right?
The post is to the right? Are you on the left or right?
Reply addressees: @noxaxis1 -
“Everyone agrees on [the problem of the left]”
“Everyone agrees on [the problem of the left]”
Reply addressees: @noxaxis1 -
Philosophy: a system (paradigm) of organization and decidability for preferences
Philosophy: a system (paradigm) of organization and decidability for preferences.
Science: a system (paradigm) of organization and decidability for descriptions
Law: a system (paradigm) of organization and decidability for resolving disputes
Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11