Yes russian can dugginize as soon as western europe falls and provide europe with an army and cause the rest of europe to fall down to russian standards of incompetence and poverty.
Yes I expect that something like this might happen because Germany is weak, and France not strong.
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4
Source: Original Site Post
-
Yes russian can dugginize as soon as western europe falls and provide europe wit
-
In the end, you are still saying that a military organization of production by p
In the end, you are still saying that a military organization of production by peasants unable to organize by trust and law, can do anything other than bring a backward country into parity, before converting from forced labor to incentives to maintain competitive advantage.
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4 -
RU empire fell because the J’s convinced the peasants that they could be saved f
RU empire fell because the J’s convinced the peasants that they could be saved from poverty and war if they fell for the false promise they were oppressed and could rule. Had the whites succeeded, the czar survived,and the Hohenzollern taken DU throne Russia could have caught up.
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4 -
The Russian empire failed for the same reason the nazi’s failed: conversion of r
The Russian empire failed for the same reason the nazi’s failed: conversion of religious into ideological zeal, so that preserving the system of lies was more important than reacting to the empirical evidence on the ground. Hitler, Soviets, Chinese, Jews, Muslims, xians failed.
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4 -
I played in those Red Blue war games in the 80’s. I understood that we could nev
I played in those Red Blue war games in the 80’s. I understood that we could never win a ground war, but russia could never win an economic and technological one.
We were sifting thru data on russian production. It was obvious. Just as the Stalin vs Kruchev era build quality.
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4 -
And they were wrong, right? Those economists were wrong? I was there in the 70’s
And they were wrong, right? Those economists were wrong? I was there in the 70’s when the soviet failure was obvious, 80’s when we chose to bankrupt it, and 90’s when everything fell apart, and they said ‘well, we didn’t see that coming’ – but we did.
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4 -
So no, it was Russian under-development, rapid industrialization using militariz
So no, it was Russian under-development, rapid industrialization using militarization of the economy, the failure to grasp that while states can concentrate capital to form industries they must immediately be managerially privatized or they turn parasitic. That is a law of econ.
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4 -
There is no evidence of that. And I am certain I now the economics of it better
There is no evidence of that. And I am certain I now the economics of it better than you do. The quality declined rapidly generation by generation as people learned ‘to do the minimum’. Only the military could function and did. Hence your instincts of militarization of economics.
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4 -
The condition for victory was that everything RU touched went backward by a cent
The condition for victory was that everything RU touched went backward by a century. Every RU immigrant had the same effect on ukraine, latvia, lithuania etc as africans did on the usa. Even today RU are all ‘Glopnkis’. We make fun of them in UA. Lazy, violent, criminal, corrupt.
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4 -
Russia had about the same # people, more resources, but Russian people are low t
Russia had about the same # people, more resources, but Russian people are low trust, lazy, production quality was trash, and (STILL) can’t form large organizations because of low trust. (same as Muslims). Russians used cheap(forced) labor, US/CN used credit. Incentives mattered.
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4