Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Liberalism Isn’t Intellectual – It’s An Excuse For An Impulse

    —“Liberalism isn’t intellectual. It is merely the rabbit’s r-selected Reproductive Strategy, intellectualized in humans who exhibit it instinctually. Its only purpose is to exploit a resource excess in our society. This information kills Liberals, if you point it out to them, because it strips Liberalism of any intellectual justification, leaving it as merely a conglomeration of r-selected urges that K-selected humans oppose instinctually. This work is what we were waiting for, and it will alter our political debates forever.”—Anon Conservative.

    [I]n other words “all human language is negotiation on behalf of our reproductive strategies.” Humans start out rather androgenous, and we grow either male or female – from a lighter to a stronger version of each, in a spectrum from one end to the other. From r to k. From solipsistic to autistic.

  • Scientific Method In Everything

    Seek out combat: Intellectual, romantic, social, economic, and physical. Not to win, but to improve until you can no longer find a way to lose. Love the fight. Revel in it. It’s your heritage. Celebrate it. Heroes all – whether words, heart, work, money, stick, spear, sword or rifle. He who fights regardless of rank is a brother in arms.

    Famous household phrase I’d hear, “that’s okay, at least I’ll die trying.” Anecdotal. Nostalgic. Usually it was spoken in reference to a physical contest (street scuffle) and rebuffing an opponents boastful challenge.— William Benge

    Also pick intellectual fights with people with similar belief structure using arguments you do not agree with… great for hashing out third ways and new perspectives.–Delian

  • Scientific Method In Everything

    Seek out combat: Intellectual, romantic, social, economic, and physical. Not to win, but to improve until you can no longer find a way to lose. Love the fight. Revel in it. It’s your heritage. Celebrate it. Heroes all – whether words, heart, work, money, stick, spear, sword or rifle. He who fights regardless of rank is a brother in arms.

    Famous household phrase I’d hear, “that’s okay, at least I’ll die trying.” Anecdotal. Nostalgic. Usually it was spoken in reference to a physical contest (street scuffle) and rebuffing an opponents boastful challenge.— William Benge

    Also pick intellectual fights with people with similar belief structure using arguments you do not agree with… great for hashing out third ways and new perspectives.–Delian

  • The Secret Of Their Half Truths – Some Groups are Just Really Really Good Liars

    OMG. Appealing to altruism is an act of suggesting future shaming – of shaming pre-shaming… That’s why it works. They tell a half truth and suggest the rest. Some groups are just really, really, really good liars. They have weaponized lying in order to take advantage of altruism. damn. Gypsies and Desert Arabs: set up camp near by, remain mobile, with little or no fixed assets, and conduct raids, then return to camp. Other groups conduct theft by redirection: incentive to break norms. Other groups conduct theft by obscurant fraud: financialization. Some groups conduct theft by ‘farming’ a population (statists and such) Scary when you just reduce human behavior to productive or parasitic.

  • The Secret Of Their Half Truths – Some Groups are Just Really Really Good Liars

    OMG. Appealing to altruism is an act of suggesting future shaming – of shaming pre-shaming… That’s why it works. They tell a half truth and suggest the rest. Some groups are just really, really, really good liars. They have weaponized lying in order to take advantage of altruism. damn. Gypsies and Desert Arabs: set up camp near by, remain mobile, with little or no fixed assets, and conduct raids, then return to camp. Other groups conduct theft by redirection: incentive to break norms. Other groups conduct theft by obscurant fraud: financialization. Some groups conduct theft by ‘farming’ a population (statists and such) Scary when you just reduce human behavior to productive or parasitic.

  • I Figured it Out. The Method Of Lying In The Religious and Pseudoscientific Eras

    [I] think it was 2013 that I questioned whether I had to solve the problem of Truth or not. And I was pretty stressed about it. But I just felt like I couldn’t put an end to postmodern deceit unless I did so. So reluctantly I started working on it. And it took me a while. It was fairly hard. Easier thanks to the work on critical rationalism and the current state of the foundation of mathematics. Then, once there, I asked myself, if I could end lying. In January of this year (2015) I posted this on my web site: “If You Can Name a Thing, You Can Kill A Thing”. Meaning that things have ‘true names’ (operational names). And if you know its true name you can defeat it. I wasn’t sure I could solve the technique by which the monotheistic and cosmopolitan lies were constructed. But I did. And now I understand why they had to close the Stoic Schools: they make you impervious to the technique of using half truths to conduct pre-shaming, and to invoke altruistic responses as substitutes rather than skepticism. In other words, liars take advantage of a social cognitive bias. And through repetition convince us that a convenient lie is necessary when it is not. I’ve also begun to understand why western traditionalists think god is the subject of spirituality rather than an excuse to make use of spirituality for totalitarian purposes against the genetic interests of a people. So I know how to kill that too. I thought this would take me longer than a year. In a year I will have religion so deconstructed that I will match the precision of my deconstruction of morality. I will unify religion along with every other discipline. I am confident now. I can do it. RE:http://www.propertarianism.com/2015/01/04/if-you-can-name-a-thing-you-can-kill-a-thing/

  • I Figured it Out. The Method Of Lying In The Religious and Pseudoscientific Eras

    [I] think it was 2013 that I questioned whether I had to solve the problem of Truth or not. And I was pretty stressed about it. But I just felt like I couldn’t put an end to postmodern deceit unless I did so. So reluctantly I started working on it. And it took me a while. It was fairly hard. Easier thanks to the work on critical rationalism and the current state of the foundation of mathematics. Then, once there, I asked myself, if I could end lying. In January of this year (2015) I posted this on my web site: “If You Can Name a Thing, You Can Kill A Thing”. Meaning that things have ‘true names’ (operational names). And if you know its true name you can defeat it. I wasn’t sure I could solve the technique by which the monotheistic and cosmopolitan lies were constructed. But I did. And now I understand why they had to close the Stoic Schools: they make you impervious to the technique of using half truths to conduct pre-shaming, and to invoke altruistic responses as substitutes rather than skepticism. In other words, liars take advantage of a social cognitive bias. And through repetition convince us that a convenient lie is necessary when it is not. I’ve also begun to understand why western traditionalists think god is the subject of spirituality rather than an excuse to make use of spirituality for totalitarian purposes against the genetic interests of a people. So I know how to kill that too. I thought this would take me longer than a year. In a year I will have religion so deconstructed that I will match the precision of my deconstruction of morality. I will unify religion along with every other discipline. I am confident now. I can do it. RE:http://www.propertarianism.com/2015/01/04/if-you-can-name-a-thing-you-can-kill-a-thing/

  • More On Race. Sorry. I don’t Do Racism. I do Aristocracy for Every Clan, Tribe, and Nation.

    [I] am an aggressive supporter of kin-preference, aristocratic families, paternal aristocracies, and as many of them as man can make. My position on the friction between the races is that democracy and multiculturalism causes conflict between them. And that nationalism, aristocracy, paternalism and local separatism improve everyone. My position on the cause of the *meaningful* differences between the races is the degree of suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses over long periods of time. My means of criticizing other groups is whether their group evolutionary strategy is objectively more or less moral than some others. My demand for changes is not to place it upon others, but to change our weaknesses so that we are no longer subject to the damage of the less moral, yet can reap the benefits of the more moral. I am very fond of my non-kin friends. I want to help them raise themselves and their families, as all aristocracy should assist other aristocracies in raising themselves and their families. So I don’t really want to lose those friends because you choose to criticize others successful reproductive strategies, rather than to criticize and repair your (our) own failed reproductive strategies. I don’t do racism. I might agree or disagree with you on some criticism or other. But my goal is the evolution of man. I prefer every tribe evolve together, not that any tribe be subsumed by another. I want to see a world of many tribes – of many extended aristocratic families, raising their extended families. I do not seek to dominate others, only to preserve my tribe and to advance it and mankind’s tribes in the long journey to becoming gods. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • More On Race. Sorry. I don’t Do Racism. I do Aristocracy for Every Clan, Tribe, and Nation.

    [I] am an aggressive supporter of kin-preference, aristocratic families, paternal aristocracies, and as many of them as man can make. My position on the friction between the races is that democracy and multiculturalism causes conflict between them. And that nationalism, aristocracy, paternalism and local separatism improve everyone. My position on the cause of the *meaningful* differences between the races is the degree of suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses over long periods of time. My means of criticizing other groups is whether their group evolutionary strategy is objectively more or less moral than some others. My demand for changes is not to place it upon others, but to change our weaknesses so that we are no longer subject to the damage of the less moral, yet can reap the benefits of the more moral. I am very fond of my non-kin friends. I want to help them raise themselves and their families, as all aristocracy should assist other aristocracies in raising themselves and their families. So I don’t really want to lose those friends because you choose to criticize others successful reproductive strategies, rather than to criticize and repair your (our) own failed reproductive strategies. I don’t do racism. I might agree or disagree with you on some criticism or other. But my goal is the evolution of man. I prefer every tribe evolve together, not that any tribe be subsumed by another. I want to see a world of many tribes – of many extended aristocratic families, raising their extended families. I do not seek to dominate others, only to preserve my tribe and to advance it and mankind’s tribes in the long journey to becoming gods. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • (venting) Boomers: So Die Already.

    (venting) [I] will be happy when all these 60’s scions are settled in the earth, and I don’t have to hear one more time how great the sixties were. I was there. They sucked. It was the proletarian generation. The first chance the proles had at participating in higher education and consumer society, and look what they did with it. … Yeah, I’m sure you’re impressed by the rapid expansion of folk, prole, and dance music. Sorry. It’s the hot-dog of the artistic diet. Dished up in heaping piles for the bread and circus of the half human beasts that destroyed our great artistic civilization. Thankfully, your forgettable audio and visual dysentery will be forgotten, and dismissed as another product of the second attempted conversion of the west, and the century of pseudoscience, propaganda, outrightlying, and neo-mysticism. So die already. Thanks. Signed The Future (vent off)