(venting) [I] will be happy when all these 60’s scions are settled in the earth, and I don’t have to hear one more time how great the sixties were. I was there. They sucked. It was the proletarian generation. The first chance the proles had at participating in higher education and consumer society, and look what they did with it. … Yeah, I’m sure you’re impressed by the rapid expansion of folk, prole, and dance music. Sorry. It’s the hot-dog of the artistic diet. Dished up in heaping piles for the bread and circus of the half human beasts that destroyed our great artistic civilization. Thankfully, your forgettable audio and visual dysentery will be forgotten, and dismissed as another product of the second attempted conversion of the west, and the century of pseudoscience, propaganda, outrightlying, and neo-mysticism. So die already. Thanks. Signed The Future (vent off)
Source: Original Site Post
-
Hang ’em Early and Often (Really)
(In response to news that Duarte will reinstitute the death penalty and hold weekly hangings, I’ve reluctantly agreed that this is an important tradition) [T]he death penalty is probably one of the most positive influences of all traditional institutions when used aggressively against violent career criminals. Particularly if they are young and have not reproduced. Sterilisation of females is probably even better since their constant ‘invisible’ crimes are moral and indirect thefts rather than ethical and direct thefts. So whether we hang or sterilize we make the world a better place. And the way to prevent hanging and sterilizing is to control reproduction by upward redistribution of rates of reproduction, rather than the downward that we have been conducting for the past century and a half – thereby losing a standard deviation in IQ. Hang early and often.
—“You’re psycho.”—Todd Saunders
Actually I have been forced to change to and hold this opinion by the evidence. Sorry. I’m a scientist not a priest.
-
Hang ’em Early and Often (Really)
(In response to news that Duarte will reinstitute the death penalty and hold weekly hangings, I’ve reluctantly agreed that this is an important tradition) [T]he death penalty is probably one of the most positive influences of all traditional institutions when used aggressively against violent career criminals. Particularly if they are young and have not reproduced. Sterilisation of females is probably even better since their constant ‘invisible’ crimes are moral and indirect thefts rather than ethical and direct thefts. So whether we hang or sterilize we make the world a better place. And the way to prevent hanging and sterilizing is to control reproduction by upward redistribution of rates of reproduction, rather than the downward that we have been conducting for the past century and a half – thereby losing a standard deviation in IQ. Hang early and often.
—“You’re psycho.”—Todd Saunders
Actually I have been forced to change to and hold this opinion by the evidence. Sorry. I’m a scientist not a priest.
-
How and Why The Collapse of Britain Mirrors The Collapse of Rome: Pseudoscience Over Mysticism – But Still The Same Lie
(some important insights) [P]eter Hitchens (all), If you put the ‘dumbing down’ of the British population in historical context, it is an attempt to establish a secular version of christianity under pseudo-scientifc argument, and the closure of the church, and the extermination of the aristocracy, using forcible conversion by the state, using the same aggressive means that christianity was a successful attempt to establish a mystical christianity, using forcible conversion by the state, and the closure of the pagan temples and stoic schools, and the extermination of the aristocratic families. In the modern era, feminism and socialism and the attack on marriage and family have caused a population collapse as great as any plague in history. In the ancient era, the transfer of rates of reproduction from the middle and upper class to the lower classes, plus rapid immigration by the lower classes, was followed by devastating plagues that left the western roman empire indefensible. Our middle ages did not experience immigration, so we survived that plague. IN the ancient and modern world we did not, and may not unless we learn from it. In this context there is no difference between the prelude to the dark ages in the collapsing roman empire, and the prelude to another dark age in the collapse of the British empire. There is no talk necessary. We will destroy, fight and kill, or be little more than the priests at Lindesfarne as the boat people come to steal from us. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sV3rfd0JqGA
-
How and Why The Collapse of Britain Mirrors The Collapse of Rome: Pseudoscience Over Mysticism – But Still The Same Lie
(some important insights) [P]eter Hitchens (all), If you put the ‘dumbing down’ of the British population in historical context, it is an attempt to establish a secular version of christianity under pseudo-scientifc argument, and the closure of the church, and the extermination of the aristocracy, using forcible conversion by the state, using the same aggressive means that christianity was a successful attempt to establish a mystical christianity, using forcible conversion by the state, and the closure of the pagan temples and stoic schools, and the extermination of the aristocratic families. In the modern era, feminism and socialism and the attack on marriage and family have caused a population collapse as great as any plague in history. In the ancient era, the transfer of rates of reproduction from the middle and upper class to the lower classes, plus rapid immigration by the lower classes, was followed by devastating plagues that left the western roman empire indefensible. Our middle ages did not experience immigration, so we survived that plague. IN the ancient and modern world we did not, and may not unless we learn from it. In this context there is no difference between the prelude to the dark ages in the collapsing roman empire, and the prelude to another dark age in the collapse of the British empire. There is no talk necessary. We will destroy, fight and kill, or be little more than the priests at Lindesfarne as the boat people come to steal from us. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sV3rfd0JqGA
-
The Right Is Happy With Truth and Trade. It’s The Left That Wants Lies and Takings
[T]he reason the right likes my solutions to political economy, despite being fairly progressive innovations of on classical liberalism, are because they disallow lying in the construction of exchanges. And the fact that progressives are dependent upon lies and conservatives desirous of truth telling should be enough of an insight for any moral man: progressivism feminine socialism is authoritarian, and conservative masculine aristocracy is egalitarian. Just true. So deal with it. Progressives are liars and thieves, and it’s that simple.
-
The Right Is Happy With Truth and Trade. It’s The Left That Wants Lies and Takings
[T]he reason the right likes my solutions to political economy, despite being fairly progressive innovations of on classical liberalism, are because they disallow lying in the construction of exchanges. And the fact that progressives are dependent upon lies and conservatives desirous of truth telling should be enough of an insight for any moral man: progressivism feminine socialism is authoritarian, and conservative masculine aristocracy is egalitarian. Just true. So deal with it. Progressives are liars and thieves, and it’s that simple.
-
Empirical Evidence of the Superiority of Western Truthfulness
[T]he Chosen People is an argument to supremacy. Islamism is an argument to supremacy. Evidence is of european supremacy whether pagan or christian. Actually, its against christian mysticism, and in favor of pagan science, independence and testimony. If we look at RATES of evolution (development) instead of earliest development, it’s pretty obvious that the superior people, the superior system of government, the superior system of production of the arts and sciences, is european. A small backward people on the edge of eurasia outperform every civilization in history in both the prehistoric (british isles), the ancient (greco-roman-danubian), and modern (anglo-german) eras. This is merely empirical. “Who did it first” is just a dishonest framing. The more important question is, who consistently does it faster. And in the ancient and modern periods the philosophy of aristocracy (truth) has defeated every competitor. The only challenge came from the jews in both eras: christian mysticism extended Egyptian authoritarianism using babylonian mythos. And in the modern era, jewish pseudoscience: boaz, freud, marx, cantor, mises, Frankfurt, rothbard, and rand. The reason it worked in both eras: WOMEN and SLAVES united with JEWISH argument against us. The only challenge came from lies.
-
Empirical Evidence of the Superiority of Western Truthfulness
[T]he Chosen People is an argument to supremacy. Islamism is an argument to supremacy. Evidence is of european supremacy whether pagan or christian. Actually, its against christian mysticism, and in favor of pagan science, independence and testimony. If we look at RATES of evolution (development) instead of earliest development, it’s pretty obvious that the superior people, the superior system of government, the superior system of production of the arts and sciences, is european. A small backward people on the edge of eurasia outperform every civilization in history in both the prehistoric (british isles), the ancient (greco-roman-danubian), and modern (anglo-german) eras. This is merely empirical. “Who did it first” is just a dishonest framing. The more important question is, who consistently does it faster. And in the ancient and modern periods the philosophy of aristocracy (truth) has defeated every competitor. The only challenge came from the jews in both eras: christian mysticism extended Egyptian authoritarianism using babylonian mythos. And in the modern era, jewish pseudoscience: boaz, freud, marx, cantor, mises, Frankfurt, rothbard, and rand. The reason it worked in both eras: WOMEN and SLAVES united with JEWISH argument against us. The only challenge came from lies.
-
Why So Much Time And Effort On Anti-Racism? Self Correction.
[A]LL, My job is to come up with a solution. You either help me do that or you don’t. Bitching about other races and groups with competing strategies is just masturbation. I love my race and my kin and my culture because all men must love their tribe for it to persist in the great climb to godhood. But I see a world of aristocracies: of small nation states – extended tribes – trying to raise their gene pools – their kin – into godhood. This is my vision of the world. I am against multi-culturalism as a form of polylogism – the logically impossible, legally undecidable, and the means by which we increase demand for authority. It is counter rational, It is pseudoscientific. It is a lie. Plain and simple. There is a limited value to cultural assimilation of invention, and cultural assimilation of the best most aristocratic genes. Everything else is pollution of the genetic, normative, and material economies. It’s not subjective opinion but fact. So sorry if I am not a racist in the sense that I hate others. I merely seek an institutional solution whereupon on group CANNOT PREY UPON another, and must survive by merit only. I am not even so much of a separatist as requiring full assimilation in exchange for benefitting from a superior commons. It doesn’t help me or us if you whine about others. It helps if you get up and demonstrate, or punish, or even kill those who allow others to conquer us. But it does nothing to criticize others for wanting a better life at our expense. The state is a for profit self-serving enterprise at the expense of the families it preys upon. It is time to kill a lot of people. Those in the Academy, State, Media complex. Thank goodness rope is cheap, and guillotines are efficient. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy
—“There is little honor in picking on the weak and inferior, but there is still less in allowing them to be established as the standard of value, to accomplish the total inversion of virtues. It is not their enablers alone, who merit ridicule and criticism, though they do merit the lion’s share”—Eli Harman