Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Retaliation Rules without Restitution

    (by Brandon Hayes @ThruTheHayes)

    1. Natural law prevents retaliation cycles by requiring all acts, words, & displays to be due diligent & warrantied with promise of restitution for damages. Without restitution comes unmeasured retaliation in seek of Nash equilibration. — Brandon Hayes @ThruTheHayes
    2. The ideology of human rights posits unified humanity at once as a given fact and as an ideal, as something that is and something that should be; in other words, as a sort of potential truth that cannot be verified and would appear fully only when it is realised. — @alaindebenoist

    3. Human rights were developed to force states to internal production rather than conquest. The LEFT twisted this yet again as The False Promise of Freedom from Physical Natural and Evolutionary Laws, given the vast difference in group demographics (eugenics). — Curt Doolittle
    4. The feminine can only manifest as an ideology (the left) when it is itself the beneficiary of freedom from physical nature and evolutionary laws – to offer anything other than that false promise would be to self destruct. — @LukeWeinhagen
    5. But there is no beneficiary of freedom from the laws of physics, nature, and evolution. Because that’s absurd. Wait, that’s his precise point.—@TruthQuest11
    6. It’s insurance from them. A father, a husband or whole social group can insure a woman from effects of nature. It’s stable as long as women don’t get to make decisions about what needs to be insured and how much in place of their insurers. —@WorMartiN

  • Retaliation Rules without Restitution

    (by Brandon Hayes @ThruTheHayes)

    1. Natural law prevents retaliation cycles by requiring all acts, words, & displays to be due diligent & warrantied with promise of restitution for damages. Without restitution comes unmeasured retaliation in seek of Nash equilibration. — Brandon Hayes @ThruTheHayes
    2. The ideology of human rights posits unified humanity at once as a given fact and as an ideal, as something that is and something that should be; in other words, as a sort of potential truth that cannot be verified and would appear fully only when it is realised. — @alaindebenoist

    3. Human rights were developed to force states to internal production rather than conquest. The LEFT twisted this yet again as The False Promise of Freedom from Physical Natural and Evolutionary Laws, given the vast difference in group demographics (eugenics). — Curt Doolittle
    4. The feminine can only manifest as an ideology (the left) when it is itself the beneficiary of freedom from physical nature and evolutionary laws – to offer anything other than that false promise would be to self destruct. — @LukeWeinhagen
    5. But there is no beneficiary of freedom from the laws of physics, nature, and evolution. Because that’s absurd. Wait, that’s his precise point.—@TruthQuest11
    6. It’s insurance from them. A father, a husband or whole social group can insure a woman from effects of nature. It’s stable as long as women don’t get to make decisions about what needs to be insured and how much in place of their insurers. —@WorMartiN

  • France Is The Obstacle To European Cooperation

    Is A Unified Europe Necessary? Response to Alain De Benoit Sovereignty in the Russian apolitical? French political, authoritarian and socialist? Sovereignty in the German Holy Roman Empire and pre-war American states? Sovereignty In the British and American individual? The reason Britain leaves the EU and that the Anglosphere is incompatible with Europe is the common law makes individuals and the law sovereign, not the parliament, nor the state, and thereby forcing the people, the parliament, the state to exhaust all possible means of preserving individual and legal sovereignty before they can produce commons. The French model that presumes her feminine authoritarian false consensus bias, and limited adversarialism is best despite her failure as a world power, failure as a scientific and industrial power, cause of endless european wars, undermining of all other european alliances, and postwar tolerance for Islam given the 1500 year history of its war on civilization. So Russian authoritarian? French authoritarian unification? German, British, and American federation of states? France has been the PROBLEM for Europe. The Germans, Italians, East Europe, and Russia would readily organize if it were not for French attempts to undermine the greater German people for centuries and continue her long running program of first trying to seize papal then european power, despite being the most backward government in Europe, launching the authoritarian revolutions, and giving birth to socialism and communism. Other than France the rest of Europe only joins the EU for economic and military reasons. Economic reasons provided by Germans, military reasons provided by the USA, and it’s despite the French authoritarianism that the rest of Europe fears. The USA is very close to a second civil war that will result most likely in a restoration of her original design as a mirror of the HRE with traditional Germanic law as that law. Was preserved in England and never subject to the corrupting influence of Napoleonic law that deprived the people and the law of sovereignty. The rest of Europe should fear a unified Europe that contains Paris more than it should fear a unified Europe that contains Moscow. At least Moscow works in Russian people’s interests. Paris does not. So perhaps the French should look more objectively at the problem. It’s not that Europe fears integration. it’s that the French history of undermining european peoples, and the French authoritarian model rather than the Holy Roman Empire, British, and American model, is a threat to european civilization – as it always has been. That is the cause of the failure of european coherence. Humility would serve Paris better than ambitions to rule.

  • France Is The Obstacle To European Cooperation

    Is A Unified Europe Necessary? Response to Alain De Benoit Sovereignty in the Russian apolitical? French political, authoritarian and socialist? Sovereignty in the German Holy Roman Empire and pre-war American states? Sovereignty In the British and American individual? The reason Britain leaves the EU and that the Anglosphere is incompatible with Europe is the common law makes individuals and the law sovereign, not the parliament, nor the state, and thereby forcing the people, the parliament, the state to exhaust all possible means of preserving individual and legal sovereignty before they can produce commons. The French model that presumes her feminine authoritarian false consensus bias, and limited adversarialism is best despite her failure as a world power, failure as a scientific and industrial power, cause of endless european wars, undermining of all other european alliances, and postwar tolerance for Islam given the 1500 year history of its war on civilization. So Russian authoritarian? French authoritarian unification? German, British, and American federation of states? France has been the PROBLEM for Europe. The Germans, Italians, East Europe, and Russia would readily organize if it were not for French attempts to undermine the greater German people for centuries and continue her long running program of first trying to seize papal then european power, despite being the most backward government in Europe, launching the authoritarian revolutions, and giving birth to socialism and communism. Other than France the rest of Europe only joins the EU for economic and military reasons. Economic reasons provided by Germans, military reasons provided by the USA, and it’s despite the French authoritarianism that the rest of Europe fears. The USA is very close to a second civil war that will result most likely in a restoration of her original design as a mirror of the HRE with traditional Germanic law as that law. Was preserved in England and never subject to the corrupting influence of Napoleonic law that deprived the people and the law of sovereignty. The rest of Europe should fear a unified Europe that contains Paris more than it should fear a unified Europe that contains Moscow. At least Moscow works in Russian people’s interests. Paris does not. So perhaps the French should look more objectively at the problem. It’s not that Europe fears integration. it’s that the French history of undermining european peoples, and the French authoritarian model rather than the Holy Roman Empire, British, and American model, is a threat to european civilization – as it always has been. That is the cause of the failure of european coherence. Humility would serve Paris better than ambitions to rule.

  • The Masculinization of Christianity: Forbearance  Forbearance Not Tolerance

    THE MASCULINIZATION OF CHRISTIANITY: FORBEARANCE  FORBEARANCE NOT TOLERANCE By: Bill Joslin;  @LukeWeinhagen @curtdoolittle @ThruTheHayes Any religion must produce Mindfulness (Self), Humility (Others), Piety (The Universe). The Best religion produces Excellence (investment), Truth (word), reciprocity (action), Duty (Compensation), Charity (Insurance). The reason Christianity spread is that until then the underclasses and women had no means of obtaining virtue. Christianity provides virtue or the illusion of virtue, even if you do nothing except refrain from doing bad. CHRISTIANITY, PRISONERS DILEMMA, AND FORBEARANCE Jesus represents the active statefulness of Christianity for the virtue of forgiveness. “Exhaustive forgiveness (tit-for-tat) solves the prisoner’s dilemma game. In other words, it is the optimum strategy for identifying and sorting the pervasively immoral from the potentially Moral. In almost all cases, including the most addicted and criminal, people who are not otherwise mentally ill, will eventually fall to ‘seduction’ into Cooperation.” Passive statefulness is how the parasite leverages a high-trust group’s virtues against itself. Passive is poison. tolerance is the passive statefulness of the virtue forgiveness, tolerance must be endured – which is why the left loves it. It exposes our empathy to the parasites. Christianity fails where it makes excuses for sin and shortcomings and endures their effects – tolerance. Forbearance is the active state of the virtue “forgiveness”. It is active, meaning it can be withdrawn should violations of reciprocity occur. Forgiveness is important as it is the only way to preserve trust in a high-trust group through the Reality of Human imperfection and accommodating graceful failure at scale. Christianity succeeds where it specifically and intentionally acknowledges sin and shortcomings and then forgives – forbearance. Also: I use tolerance to mean allowing costs to be assessed against non-consenting parties as ambiguity makes it unclear what additional party is specifically responsible for costs. It’s a passive state. No Agency. I use Forbearance to mean I intentionally take responsibility for the cost to allow someone else not to (ex. my children, my disabled kin, my employee that has not matured fully yet). It is an active state. Allows Agency. Furthermore: Where are you (your Church/belief/community) accepting of others living outside of the model of Christ without repentance? “Repentance is the activity of reviewing one’s actions and feeling contrition or regret for past wrongs, which is accompanied by a commitment to and actual actions that show and prove a change for the better.” – it does not change your mind, it changes your behavior – it is a change in mindfulness itself. Repentance is the Christian restoration of Agency over action, over self. Even hanging from the cross his message to the thief was – own your actions. Do not seek the acknowledgment of your excuses. restore mindfulness. You can not be forgiven for what you did not do of your own accord, so own your choices and repent and you are forgiven. How much of the application of faith today offers “forgiveness” to those who do not yet own their actions? This is not the virtuous forgiveness of forbearance – it can not be – it is tolerance. You literally can nor forbear a sin that has not been owned in repentance – you can only tolerate as ownership has not been claimed. From the perspective of costs: – Actions have associated costs. – Immoral action imposes involuntary costs on others. – Tolerance allows these costs to go unclaimed. – Forbearance requires the costs to be claimed. – Repentance is the claim of ownership over costs an individual previously imposed on others. – Restitution is the covering of costs by the individual that created the costs. – Forbearance is the cover of costs by anyone, not the individual that created the costs – Forgiveness bridges the gap when an individual imposed a cost on others acknowledges ownership of that cost, but can not cover the costs either because they are unable or the cost is one that can not be restored – Virtuous forgiveness is forbearance, it covers the cost without any loss of ownership nor ambiguity of ownership.

  • The Masculinization of Christianity: Forbearance  Forbearance Not Tolerance

    THE MASCULINIZATION OF CHRISTIANITY: FORBEARANCE  FORBEARANCE NOT TOLERANCE By: Bill Joslin;  @LukeWeinhagen @curtdoolittle @ThruTheHayes Any religion must produce Mindfulness (Self), Humility (Others), Piety (The Universe). The Best religion produces Excellence (investment), Truth (word), reciprocity (action), Duty (Compensation), Charity (Insurance). The reason Christianity spread is that until then the underclasses and women had no means of obtaining virtue. Christianity provides virtue or the illusion of virtue, even if you do nothing except refrain from doing bad. CHRISTIANITY, PRISONERS DILEMMA, AND FORBEARANCE Jesus represents the active statefulness of Christianity for the virtue of forgiveness. “Exhaustive forgiveness (tit-for-tat) solves the prisoner’s dilemma game. In other words, it is the optimum strategy for identifying and sorting the pervasively immoral from the potentially Moral. In almost all cases, including the most addicted and criminal, people who are not otherwise mentally ill, will eventually fall to ‘seduction’ into Cooperation.” Passive statefulness is how the parasite leverages a high-trust group’s virtues against itself. Passive is poison. tolerance is the passive statefulness of the virtue forgiveness, tolerance must be endured – which is why the left loves it. It exposes our empathy to the parasites. Christianity fails where it makes excuses for sin and shortcomings and endures their effects – tolerance. Forbearance is the active state of the virtue “forgiveness”. It is active, meaning it can be withdrawn should violations of reciprocity occur. Forgiveness is important as it is the only way to preserve trust in a high-trust group through the Reality of Human imperfection and accommodating graceful failure at scale. Christianity succeeds where it specifically and intentionally acknowledges sin and shortcomings and then forgives – forbearance. Also: I use tolerance to mean allowing costs to be assessed against non-consenting parties as ambiguity makes it unclear what additional party is specifically responsible for costs. It’s a passive state. No Agency. I use Forbearance to mean I intentionally take responsibility for the cost to allow someone else not to (ex. my children, my disabled kin, my employee that has not matured fully yet). It is an active state. Allows Agency. Furthermore: Where are you (your Church/belief/community) accepting of others living outside of the model of Christ without repentance? “Repentance is the activity of reviewing one’s actions and feeling contrition or regret for past wrongs, which is accompanied by a commitment to and actual actions that show and prove a change for the better.” – it does not change your mind, it changes your behavior – it is a change in mindfulness itself. Repentance is the Christian restoration of Agency over action, over self. Even hanging from the cross his message to the thief was – own your actions. Do not seek the acknowledgment of your excuses. restore mindfulness. You can not be forgiven for what you did not do of your own accord, so own your choices and repent and you are forgiven. How much of the application of faith today offers “forgiveness” to those who do not yet own their actions? This is not the virtuous forgiveness of forbearance – it can not be – it is tolerance. You literally can nor forbear a sin that has not been owned in repentance – you can only tolerate as ownership has not been claimed. From the perspective of costs: – Actions have associated costs. – Immoral action imposes involuntary costs on others. – Tolerance allows these costs to go unclaimed. – Forbearance requires the costs to be claimed. – Repentance is the claim of ownership over costs an individual previously imposed on others. – Restitution is the covering of costs by the individual that created the costs. – Forbearance is the cover of costs by anyone, not the individual that created the costs – Forgiveness bridges the gap when an individual imposed a cost on others acknowledges ownership of that cost, but can not cover the costs either because they are unable or the cost is one that can not be restored – Virtuous forgiveness is forbearance, it covers the cost without any loss of ownership nor ambiguity of ownership.

  • Boost of @wmwoodward Take some really good advice and listen to Curt’s podcast.

    Boost of @wmwoodward Take some really good advice and listen to Curt’s podcast. He provides the problem we face as natives of Western civilization, and the solution. Pay very close attention to the solutions starting around 19 minutes.

    And this is Curt at his best just telling what he always does: Truth.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-12-03 05:19:33 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105324452044387324

  • “Curt: Were the National Socialists on the right track when trying to create a b

    —“Curt: Were the National Socialists on the right track when trying to create a better world?”—

    I don’t know what ‘national socialists’ or ‘fascist’ mean when people ask that question.

    If you ask me instead, if the militarization of the state, economy, and polity in a total war against the ancient european enemies of judaism, chrstianity, islam, or their new pseudoscientific equievalent of communism, liberalism, progressivism by imposing a intolerant, nationalistic, ethnocentric, state-religion of nation and kin, with policy enforcing eugenic reproduction and strong stable families, high employment, mixed economy, with a prohibition on privatization of commons by finance and industry, and devoting proceeds of core industry to the production of commons rather than prive consumption, then yes that was the optimum political order. The chinese have adapted that order. And they have modernized it without the inspirational, emotionally rewarding but destructive ‘cult’ or ‘hero’ false promise that cannot be maintained.

    If you mean that such an authoritarian, cult of personality political system, the modern equivalent of an authoritarian monarchy, or the attempt to use ideology like religion that also replaces empirical evidence – why the Fascists failed – then no, that was their f–king demise. They were not de-christianized enough to make the transition even though they thought they were.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-12-02 16:08:36 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105311457508001769

  • The Choice – Episode 0027 – Prosecution. We Know The Name of the Devil.

    The Choice – Episode 0027 – The Prosecution. We Know The Name of The Devil – I’m Curt Doolittle

    We Know the Name of The Devil

    Europeans Discovered, adapted to, applied, the laws of nature, and nature’s god: the formal(logical), physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and domesticated mankind from animal to human. Europeans speak in the language of the gods, written in the hand of the gods: math, science, physical law, natural law, and testimony. And we used the laws and language of nature and nature’s god to drag mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and victimization by social, political and military superiors, and a planet, solar system, galaxy, and universe all but universally hostile to sentient life. Europeans are, by all the evidence,  the mind, word, and hands of gods, not by the choice of the gods, but by our own will, as men who have taken up the responsibility of the gods. To evolve man from beast into gods, in a narrow window of climatological, geological, solar, and galactic window of opportunity. Abrahamism, in the words of Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Marxism, Postmodernism, Feminism, political correctness, woke-ness, cancel-culture, as well as Libertarianism and Neoconservatism all bait us into hazard – so do Freudianism, Boasianism, Neo-marxism(“Cultural Marxism”, Political Correctness, and Human-Biodiversity-Denialism. They teach us to lie. To Deny the language of the gods, written in the hands of the gods, and our means of transcendence into gods: evolution. If you are a devil what do you seek? To prevent man’s transcendence into gods. To deny evolution: the means by which we transcend into gods ourselves. If you are a devil what language would you speak? What does our foundational myth of the blacksmith and the devil tell us? The devils bait you into hazard with false promise. False promise of life after death, false-promise of freedom from the physical and natural laws, and the demands of evolution that transcend man into gods. Freedom of hyperconsumption without consequence. Freedom from the laws of nature and nature’s god. We know the name of the devil.His name was Abraham.He was from Ur.The Jews and Muslims Are His ServantsThe Abrahamic cults are his worship.And Ignorance, superstition, devolution, decline, destruction, and dysgenia are his works.

  • The Choice – Episode 0027 – Prosecution. We Know The Name of the Devil.

    The Choice – Episode 0027 – The Prosecution. We Know The Name of The Devil – I’m Curt Doolittle

    We Know the Name of The Devil

    Europeans Discovered, adapted to, applied, the laws of nature, and nature’s god: the formal(logical), physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and domesticated mankind from animal to human. Europeans speak in the language of the gods, written in the hand of the gods: math, science, physical law, natural law, and testimony. And we used the laws and language of nature and nature’s god to drag mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and victimization by social, political and military superiors, and a planet, solar system, galaxy, and universe all but universally hostile to sentient life. Europeans are, by all the evidence,  the mind, word, and hands of gods, not by the choice of the gods, but by our own will, as men who have taken up the responsibility of the gods. To evolve man from beast into gods, in a narrow window of climatological, geological, solar, and galactic window of opportunity. Abrahamism, in the words of Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Marxism, Postmodernism, Feminism, political correctness, woke-ness, cancel-culture, as well as Libertarianism and Neoconservatism all bait us into hazard – so do Freudianism, Boasianism, Neo-marxism(“Cultural Marxism”, Political Correctness, and Human-Biodiversity-Denialism. They teach us to lie. To Deny the language of the gods, written in the hands of the gods, and our means of transcendence into gods: evolution. If you are a devil what do you seek? To prevent man’s transcendence into gods. To deny evolution: the means by which we transcend into gods ourselves. If you are a devil what language would you speak? What does our foundational myth of the blacksmith and the devil tell us? The devils bait you into hazard with false promise. False promise of life after death, false-promise of freedom from the physical and natural laws, and the demands of evolution that transcend man into gods. Freedom of hyperconsumption without consequence. Freedom from the laws of nature and nature’s god. We know the name of the devil.His name was Abraham.He was from Ur.The Jews and Muslims Are His ServantsThe Abrahamic cults are his worship.And Ignorance, superstition, devolution, decline, destruction, and dysgenia are his works.