Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Selling False Promises

    The purpose of Selling False Promise is creating a professional class of parasitic liars who keep the people dependent and submissive by falsepromise of freedom from natural selection, while the military preys and commercial (legal) produces. Producers(Law), Parasites(Faith-False Promise), Predators(War)Left wing Public Intellectuals like priests they evolved from, profit from the attention, persuasive power, opportunity, and revenue, by selling falsepromises of freedom from the laws of nature, esp. natural selection, and criticizing people of merit for ‘oppressing’ people who lack it.Abrahamic religions whether supernatural, pseudoscientific, or sophomoric use the novel invention of the Abrahamic method of deceit, which uses the female social superpredator strategy of evade, delay, deceive, and undermine by the use of falsepromise of unwarrantable returns advanced by pilpul, defended by critique and GSRRM.Abrahamic Strategy and Method of Warfare: Invasion, Sedition by Social Construction of FalsePromise of freedom from formal, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, by casting host elites as oppressors rather than evolving in prosperity by adherence to those laws: natural selection.Those unwarrantable returns consist of False Promise of the end of scarcity(Physical). Falsepromise of the nature of man(Natural). Falsepromise of the malleability of man(evolutionary), And together, the falsepromise of freedom from regression to the mean, genetic load, dysgenia, and failure to maintain demographic distribution within the market limits of competitive innovations. The Abrahamic Marxist Pomo Feminist PC Woke Anti-White movement is just a repetition of the Jewish Christian Undermining of the Romans by exactly the same means – and Islamism a repetition of the Islamic conquests that followed. Darwin provided the explanation for “Whiteness”, where Whiteness consists of eugenics of natural selection, and eugenics of natural selection consists of markets under selfdetermination by sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, and duty, under physical, natural, and evolutionary law.The West strategy provides optimum production, innovation and adaptation at the cost of testimony regardless of cost, market self-sufficiency, and limiting reproduction of the unfit, continuing natural selection. The Abrahamic Deciets undermines the west by falsepromise of freedom from it.The west’s unique success was a product of bypassing the religion and state phases of development, jumping right to rule of law, and resulting self–determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, and hyper innovation and adaptivity.The economics of information distribution are problematic because lying by falsepromise of freedom from the laws of the universe is cheaper than the truth that allows us to take advantage of the laws of the universe – if we pay the cost of adapting to them. Faith in false promises is a cheap lie. So No More Lies. No more Abrahamic lies. no more emphasis on suppression of male extra-market conflict without equal suppression of female extra-market conflict: undermining, sedition, false promise, baiting into hazard, denying formal physical natural and evolutionary laws. No More Lies. No more undermining of our nation and civilization from within by propaganda, deceit, falsepromise, baiting into hazard, using media, entertainment, education, academy state, and financialization, repeating Under P-Law seditious propaganda against the laws of nature, the natural law our constitution of natural law and the velocity of our adaptation, the wealth tat results, and harmony between the classes that results,  is an act of war. Under P-Law, Falsehoods, Falsepromise (fraud), Defamation, Conspiracy, Sedition, and Treason are testable propositions and there is no room for ‘wiggling’ out of it. P-Law is pretty fascist – if you’re a criminal. 😉 It’s inspiring if you’re normal.

  • Selling False Promises

    The purpose of Selling False Promise is creating a professional class of parasitic liars who keep the people dependent and submissive by falsepromise of freedom from natural selection, while the military preys and commercial (legal) produces. Producers(Law), Parasites(Faith-False Promise), Predators(War)Left wing Public Intellectuals like priests they evolved from, profit from the attention, persuasive power, opportunity, and revenue, by selling falsepromises of freedom from the laws of nature, esp. natural selection, and criticizing people of merit for ‘oppressing’ people who lack it.Abrahamic religions whether supernatural, pseudoscientific, or sophomoric use the novel invention of the Abrahamic method of deceit, which uses the female social superpredator strategy of evade, delay, deceive, and undermine by the use of falsepromise of unwarrantable returns advanced by pilpul, defended by critique and GSRRM.Abrahamic Strategy and Method of Warfare: Invasion, Sedition by Social Construction of FalsePromise of freedom from formal, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, by casting host elites as oppressors rather than evolving in prosperity by adherence to those laws: natural selection.Those unwarrantable returns consist of False Promise of the end of scarcity(Physical). Falsepromise of the nature of man(Natural). Falsepromise of the malleability of man(evolutionary), And together, the falsepromise of freedom from regression to the mean, genetic load, dysgenia, and failure to maintain demographic distribution within the market limits of competitive innovations. The Abrahamic Marxist Pomo Feminist PC Woke Anti-White movement is just a repetition of the Jewish Christian Undermining of the Romans by exactly the same means – and Islamism a repetition of the Islamic conquests that followed. Darwin provided the explanation for “Whiteness”, where Whiteness consists of eugenics of natural selection, and eugenics of natural selection consists of markets under selfdetermination by sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, and duty, under physical, natural, and evolutionary law.The West strategy provides optimum production, innovation and adaptation at the cost of testimony regardless of cost, market self-sufficiency, and limiting reproduction of the unfit, continuing natural selection. The Abrahamic Deciets undermines the west by falsepromise of freedom from it.The west’s unique success was a product of bypassing the religion and state phases of development, jumping right to rule of law, and resulting self–determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, and hyper innovation and adaptivity.The economics of information distribution are problematic because lying by falsepromise of freedom from the laws of the universe is cheaper than the truth that allows us to take advantage of the laws of the universe – if we pay the cost of adapting to them. Faith in false promises is a cheap lie. So No More Lies. No more Abrahamic lies. no more emphasis on suppression of male extra-market conflict without equal suppression of female extra-market conflict: undermining, sedition, false promise, baiting into hazard, denying formal physical natural and evolutionary laws. No More Lies. No more undermining of our nation and civilization from within by propaganda, deceit, falsepromise, baiting into hazard, using media, entertainment, education, academy state, and financialization, repeating Under P-Law seditious propaganda against the laws of nature, the natural law our constitution of natural law and the velocity of our adaptation, the wealth tat results, and harmony between the classes that results,  is an act of war. Under P-Law, Falsehoods, Falsepromise (fraud), Defamation, Conspiracy, Sedition, and Treason are testable propositions and there is no room for ‘wiggling’ out of it. P-Law is pretty fascist – if you’re a criminal. 😉 It’s inspiring if you’re normal.

  • The Choice – Episode 0033 – The Prosecution. What Is To Be Done?

    How Can We End Abrahamic Deceit Forever?

    Restore our requirement that all public speech, to the public, in matters public be limited to testimony.  Really. That’s it. It’s quite simple. We already prohibit false speech in commerce, regarding products, services, and information. We Need only extend that demand from the MORE immediate goods, of products, services, and information, to that of the less immediate goods, services, and especially information. Especially that information that while perhaps imaginable and preferable, purports to be possible, “good” or True that is neither possible, nor good, nor true. How? Involuntary Warranty of Tests of Due Diligence 1 – Categorical consistency 2 – Logical consistency 3 – Empirical consistency 4 – Operational consistency 5 – Rational consistency (incentives of a rational actor) 6 – Moral consistency (perfect reciprocity) 7 – Scope Consistency (Limits.) 8 – Full accounting of content and consequence within those limits. While this might seem difficult to you at first blush, it is not something that courts will have difficulty with, and within a decade and certainly a generation, the body of law will evolve into common practice. And all the culture along with it. And all of mankind as a consequence. End the invention of lying.

    The Truth Is Enough to Restore the West

    Truth is enough. End the lies. End The Entire Abrahamic Program of Lies: False Reality, False History, False Promise (Moral Hazard), Pilpul (via positiva sophism), Critique (via negativa sophism), Straw Manning, and the Dysgenic Strategy of the Herd fearing being left behind by their betters. Ethnocentrism; Nationalism; Nature, Ancestor, and Monarchical Thanks (worship), and the inheritance that they have left us as Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Merit, The Natural Law, A Jury of our Peers, The Militia of Sovereign Men, Markets In everything, and the science and technology that has provided in the present, what Those Who Lie had promised them. No More Lies. Restore Our Natural Law, and Our Natural Religion, to our Natural Peoples. We Must Rule, if Not for The Sake of All Mankind, but Out of Self Defense.

    No More Books Of Lies

    The Vedas were invented to control The Avesta invented to divide The Talmud invented to deceive. The Bible invented to enslave. The Koran invented to conquer. Das Capital to steal. The General Theory to Impoverish. The Truth to set us free. NO MORE LIES.

    What is to be done?

    I operate under these presumptions (women, Jews, the success of institutions and law), and that man can be heroic in his reproductive sacrifices, and that we must separate and let the left create a record in history that is undeniable: that they will self destruct but they cannot take the only moral working class in the world down with them.  Instead, they make take all their kind down with them and in doing so, achieve greater evolution of man by the culling of the dysfunctional, than the european project has been able to achieve with its five ages of evolutions:

    • The indo-european expansion of aristocratic egalitarianism,
    • The Mediterranean expansion of the Greco Romans,
    • The continual continental expansion of the Germanics,
    • And the worldwide expansion of the Atlantic Europeans during the age of sail,
    • And culminating in the european postwar attempt to civilize the globe – at a profit of course.

    In fact, the only thing that stopped the european transformation of man was Judaism-Christianity-Islam in the ancient world and marxism-neo-marxism-postmodernism in the modern world’s beginning of the current dark age. No More Lies The Truth made the west: the incremental evolution of testimony according to logical, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe. It is the most costly commons a people can develop – no one else has. And with that truth comes another uncomfortable truth: Man evolved as a self domesticating animal. First by neoteny, second socially, third institutionally, fourth technologically, and fifth scientifically. So No More Lies For those that are too vulgar for high culture, too vulgar for safe, beautiful, high trust commons, too vulgar for dedication to family and society, too vulgar for control of animal impulse, to vulgar to save for the future, then you are welcome to go your own way and pay the costs of doing so. For those of us that desire high culture, a homogenous polity, low power distance, elegant commons, low crime, safe streets, and a political order devoted to the family, friends, commercial, scientific, and artistic innovation, and voluntary association and disassociation to create a market for normative behavior –  the vulgar peoples prevent us from having it, so we may go our own way and pay the costs and reap the benefits of doing so. My proposal, my organization’s proposal, is this – to reverse the crimes of the Jews and their accomplices in the media, academy, state, and finance by the following acts:

    • To restore the constitution to its original design as a declaration of the natural law of self-determination by universal reciprocal exchange and insurance of sovereignty and reciprocity, administered a government of defense, finance and trade, and court, for the resolution of disputes between the states, and to restore the sovereignty of the states, and the self-determination of the states, free of federal involvement.
    • To formalize the constitution as a declaration of the natural law of self-determination by sovereignty and reciprocity – as a non-arbitrary, nature-made law of the universe that is inviolable by man.
    • To restore the differences between universal juridical defense, universal political defense from appropriation, and the demonstrated competence for application of political offense (force);
    • To restore the difference in juridical defense and political offense between prisoner, visitor, resident, ward, citizen, and sovereign.
    • And to restore the market for commons between the classes by the addition of ‘houses’ for middle classes.
    • To restore the purpose of the government and the state to the citizens of the nation and the nation alone, not the globe.
    • To restore rights to association and disassociation, cooperation and non, cohabitation and non, cooperative production and not, cooperative commons and non – thereby ending the failed experiments of the french revolt against empiricism, and the Jewish pre and postwar undermining of our people by taking advantage of their trust.
    • To restore individual responsibility and liability for the zero-tolerance defense of the self, family, and citizens and for the physical, normative, and informational commons, by force, by constraint, and zero tolerance for all crimes of challenge, aggression against life and property.
    • To end plausible deniability, escape from warranty, escape from due diligence, and to demand exhaustive due diligence in demonstration of truthful, reciprocal, testimonial speech, consistent with logical, physical, natural, evolutionary laws, in public, to the public, in matters public.
    • To restore the prohibition on, and liability for, interference in family, employment, business, or organization – forcing all of us to compete in the market for consumption or market for dispute resolution in the course, rather than by undermining by deceit. (end doxxing, effectively protect political identity and speech.)
    • To restore the prohibition on libel and slander (unjustifiable or falsehoods) regardless of harm.
    • To restore liability and punishment for legislative proposal or discussion of doing so;
    • To restore liability and punishment for sedition and treason by the organized undermining of these laws.
    • To restore loser-pays, prejudicial punishment for any attempt at circumventing these laws.
    • To insert the role of barrister and pursuit of the truth between them, to counter the pervasive deception in the legal profession.
    • To restore zero tolerance for perjury in court.
    • ( TAXATION HERE )
    • ( TOTAL DEBT FORGIVENESS HERE )
    • ( ECONOMY HERE )
    • ( EDUCATION HERE )
    • To restore the family not the individual to the purpose of policy.
    • To end incentives to divorce by restoring liability for interference in a marriage.
    • To end the criminalization of fatherhood, ending common property, child support, and alimony for all.
    • To restore penal colonies, the requirement they’re self-supporting, and the punishment of hard labor. To restore capital punishment for three strikes.

    And to once again constrain all people to rule of law of reciprocity: the self-determination of every individual by the exchange of individual sovereignty, reciprocity in display word and deed, duty to the law,  the capital of the commons, and citizens. These policies will restore our ancient common law prohibitions that the jews artfully undermined in our law, by the pretense of moral ambitions, followed by saturation of the informational commons with propagada, followed by fostering dissent, and proposing legislative action, followed by selective prosecution of marginal cases before the court – all of which were designed to (a) undermine or civilization, (b) prevent Jewish acculturalization, prevent Jewish integration, and to foster Jewish separatism and nepotism, so that through aggressive nepotism the Anglo Saxon elites and germanic majority, would be displaced, and with them the intergenerational transfer of western civilization. To do this required they change the education system and the student body to assist them in undermining the civilization, and used continuous degradation of education and increasing numbers, taking advantage of the employment promise of a degree, and the high cost of that degree to fund their academic, media, propaganda campaigns. This got them access to women who are more easily subject to the Jewish method of deception. Then they undermined the family, sold women on the falsehood that they were oppressed rather than that marriage and family is the optimum compromise between the sexes, and the family the optimum purpose of policy, and the continuity of this tradition over the generation the purpose of our legal, philosophical, and religious traditions, whose primary function was to preserve our group advantage in high trust and the continuous production of commons and continuous commercial and technological innovation. The result was a demographic collapse in reproduction and the use of the fact that white women alone defect from their race under the pressure of conformity by Jewish undermining. And that  ( … ) they worked very hard to reverse the American criteria for citizenship and again through women, We can restore …. () No more lies will make sense-making possible. European natural religion has no devil, only demons. And we know the name of the worst of them all. His name was Abraham, he was from Ur, and The Jews and Muslims are his followers. And their weapon is lies. NO MORE LIES But every argument this complex requires evidence. The best method of producing that evidence is through the prosecution of ‘cases’ that the ‘jury’ is familiar will. So I will use current intellectuals both Jewish and european to illustrate who is engaging in Abrahamic deceit and undermining and who isn’t. Over the course of those videos of ‘popular’ pundits, you’ll begin to understand and identify the use of the Abrahamic method of deceit, and their industrialization of lying. Closing Neither I nor members of our organization seek power other than to deny power to those who would circumvent the universal demand for reciprocity in display, word, and deed, according to logical, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and continue the domestication, evolution, and transcendence of man into the gods and the universe into the heavens we imagine. The law of God and nature’s God wills it – or the expression of that will would not have written the laws of the universe for all of us who are not liars to see. You see – it’s not just that Europeans and our civilization are superior. It’s that our superiority is the natural order, because our people an our institutions are least different from the laws of the universe. And those that seek irreciprocity and deceit seek to not only deny, but also resist adaptation to, and prevent the application of those laws, by those of us who discover them – surviving by parasitism – despite the short, medium, and long term destruction of humanity that results from their actions. In effect, anyone who disagrees is by definition immoral, a threat to our people, and a threat to mankind. So in closing, we have then but one ambition: No More Lies.   ADD:  pursuit of power under protection of our power.

  • The Choice – Episode 0033 – The Prosecution. What Is To Be Done?

    How Can We End Abrahamic Deceit Forever?

    Restore our requirement that all public speech, to the public, in matters public be limited to testimony.  Really. That’s it. It’s quite simple. We already prohibit false speech in commerce, regarding products, services, and information. We Need only extend that demand from the MORE immediate goods, of products, services, and information, to that of the less immediate goods, services, and especially information. Especially that information that while perhaps imaginable and preferable, purports to be possible, “good” or True that is neither possible, nor good, nor true. How? Involuntary Warranty of Tests of Due Diligence 1 – Categorical consistency 2 – Logical consistency 3 – Empirical consistency 4 – Operational consistency 5 – Rational consistency (incentives of a rational actor) 6 – Moral consistency (perfect reciprocity) 7 – Scope Consistency (Limits.) 8 – Full accounting of content and consequence within those limits. While this might seem difficult to you at first blush, it is not something that courts will have difficulty with, and within a decade and certainly a generation, the body of law will evolve into common practice. And all the culture along with it. And all of mankind as a consequence. End the invention of lying.

    The Truth Is Enough to Restore the West

    Truth is enough. End the lies. End The Entire Abrahamic Program of Lies: False Reality, False History, False Promise (Moral Hazard), Pilpul (via positiva sophism), Critique (via negativa sophism), Straw Manning, and the Dysgenic Strategy of the Herd fearing being left behind by their betters. Ethnocentrism; Nationalism; Nature, Ancestor, and Monarchical Thanks (worship), and the inheritance that they have left us as Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Merit, The Natural Law, A Jury of our Peers, The Militia of Sovereign Men, Markets In everything, and the science and technology that has provided in the present, what Those Who Lie had promised them. No More Lies. Restore Our Natural Law, and Our Natural Religion, to our Natural Peoples. We Must Rule, if Not for The Sake of All Mankind, but Out of Self Defense.

    No More Books Of Lies

    The Vedas were invented to control The Avesta invented to divide The Talmud invented to deceive. The Bible invented to enslave. The Koran invented to conquer. Das Capital to steal. The General Theory to Impoverish. The Truth to set us free. NO MORE LIES.

    What is to be done?

    I operate under these presumptions (women, Jews, the success of institutions and law), and that man can be heroic in his reproductive sacrifices, and that we must separate and let the left create a record in history that is undeniable: that they will self destruct but they cannot take the only moral working class in the world down with them.  Instead, they make take all their kind down with them and in doing so, achieve greater evolution of man by the culling of the dysfunctional, than the european project has been able to achieve with its five ages of evolutions:

    • The indo-european expansion of aristocratic egalitarianism,
    • The Mediterranean expansion of the Greco Romans,
    • The continual continental expansion of the Germanics,
    • And the worldwide expansion of the Atlantic Europeans during the age of sail,
    • And culminating in the european postwar attempt to civilize the globe – at a profit of course.

    In fact, the only thing that stopped the european transformation of man was Judaism-Christianity-Islam in the ancient world and marxism-neo-marxism-postmodernism in the modern world’s beginning of the current dark age. No More Lies The Truth made the west: the incremental evolution of testimony according to logical, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe. It is the most costly commons a people can develop – no one else has. And with that truth comes another uncomfortable truth: Man evolved as a self domesticating animal. First by neoteny, second socially, third institutionally, fourth technologically, and fifth scientifically. So No More Lies For those that are too vulgar for high culture, too vulgar for safe, beautiful, high trust commons, too vulgar for dedication to family and society, too vulgar for control of animal impulse, to vulgar to save for the future, then you are welcome to go your own way and pay the costs of doing so. For those of us that desire high culture, a homogenous polity, low power distance, elegant commons, low crime, safe streets, and a political order devoted to the family, friends, commercial, scientific, and artistic innovation, and voluntary association and disassociation to create a market for normative behavior –  the vulgar peoples prevent us from having it, so we may go our own way and pay the costs and reap the benefits of doing so. My proposal, my organization’s proposal, is this – to reverse the crimes of the Jews and their accomplices in the media, academy, state, and finance by the following acts:

    • To restore the constitution to its original design as a declaration of the natural law of self-determination by universal reciprocal exchange and insurance of sovereignty and reciprocity, administered a government of defense, finance and trade, and court, for the resolution of disputes between the states, and to restore the sovereignty of the states, and the self-determination of the states, free of federal involvement.
    • To formalize the constitution as a declaration of the natural law of self-determination by sovereignty and reciprocity – as a non-arbitrary, nature-made law of the universe that is inviolable by man.
    • To restore the differences between universal juridical defense, universal political defense from appropriation, and the demonstrated competence for application of political offense (force);
    • To restore the difference in juridical defense and political offense between prisoner, visitor, resident, ward, citizen, and sovereign.
    • And to restore the market for commons between the classes by the addition of ‘houses’ for middle classes.
    • To restore the purpose of the government and the state to the citizens of the nation and the nation alone, not the globe.
    • To restore rights to association and disassociation, cooperation and non, cohabitation and non, cooperative production and not, cooperative commons and non – thereby ending the failed experiments of the french revolt against empiricism, and the Jewish pre and postwar undermining of our people by taking advantage of their trust.
    • To restore individual responsibility and liability for the zero-tolerance defense of the self, family, and citizens and for the physical, normative, and informational commons, by force, by constraint, and zero tolerance for all crimes of challenge, aggression against life and property.
    • To end plausible deniability, escape from warranty, escape from due diligence, and to demand exhaustive due diligence in demonstration of truthful, reciprocal, testimonial speech, consistent with logical, physical, natural, evolutionary laws, in public, to the public, in matters public.
    • To restore the prohibition on, and liability for, interference in family, employment, business, or organization – forcing all of us to compete in the market for consumption or market for dispute resolution in the course, rather than by undermining by deceit. (end doxxing, effectively protect political identity and speech.)
    • To restore the prohibition on libel and slander (unjustifiable or falsehoods) regardless of harm.
    • To restore liability and punishment for legislative proposal or discussion of doing so;
    • To restore liability and punishment for sedition and treason by the organized undermining of these laws.
    • To restore loser-pays, prejudicial punishment for any attempt at circumventing these laws.
    • To insert the role of barrister and pursuit of the truth between them, to counter the pervasive deception in the legal profession.
    • To restore zero tolerance for perjury in court.
    • ( TAXATION HERE )
    • ( TOTAL DEBT FORGIVENESS HERE )
    • ( ECONOMY HERE )
    • ( EDUCATION HERE )
    • To restore the family not the individual to the purpose of policy.
    • To end incentives to divorce by restoring liability for interference in a marriage.
    • To end the criminalization of fatherhood, ending common property, child support, and alimony for all.
    • To restore penal colonies, the requirement they’re self-supporting, and the punishment of hard labor. To restore capital punishment for three strikes.

    And to once again constrain all people to rule of law of reciprocity: the self-determination of every individual by the exchange of individual sovereignty, reciprocity in display word and deed, duty to the law,  the capital of the commons, and citizens. These policies will restore our ancient common law prohibitions that the jews artfully undermined in our law, by the pretense of moral ambitions, followed by saturation of the informational commons with propagada, followed by fostering dissent, and proposing legislative action, followed by selective prosecution of marginal cases before the court – all of which were designed to (a) undermine or civilization, (b) prevent Jewish acculturalization, prevent Jewish integration, and to foster Jewish separatism and nepotism, so that through aggressive nepotism the Anglo Saxon elites and germanic majority, would be displaced, and with them the intergenerational transfer of western civilization. To do this required they change the education system and the student body to assist them in undermining the civilization, and used continuous degradation of education and increasing numbers, taking advantage of the employment promise of a degree, and the high cost of that degree to fund their academic, media, propaganda campaigns. This got them access to women who are more easily subject to the Jewish method of deception. Then they undermined the family, sold women on the falsehood that they were oppressed rather than that marriage and family is the optimum compromise between the sexes, and the family the optimum purpose of policy, and the continuity of this tradition over the generation the purpose of our legal, philosophical, and religious traditions, whose primary function was to preserve our group advantage in high trust and the continuous production of commons and continuous commercial and technological innovation. The result was a demographic collapse in reproduction and the use of the fact that white women alone defect from their race under the pressure of conformity by Jewish undermining. And that  ( … ) they worked very hard to reverse the American criteria for citizenship and again through women, We can restore …. () No more lies will make sense-making possible. European natural religion has no devil, only demons. And we know the name of the worst of them all. His name was Abraham, he was from Ur, and The Jews and Muslims are his followers. And their weapon is lies. NO MORE LIES But every argument this complex requires evidence. The best method of producing that evidence is through the prosecution of ‘cases’ that the ‘jury’ is familiar will. So I will use current intellectuals both Jewish and european to illustrate who is engaging in Abrahamic deceit and undermining and who isn’t. Over the course of those videos of ‘popular’ pundits, you’ll begin to understand and identify the use of the Abrahamic method of deceit, and their industrialization of lying. Closing Neither I nor members of our organization seek power other than to deny power to those who would circumvent the universal demand for reciprocity in display, word, and deed, according to logical, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and continue the domestication, evolution, and transcendence of man into the gods and the universe into the heavens we imagine. The law of God and nature’s God wills it – or the expression of that will would not have written the laws of the universe for all of us who are not liars to see. You see – it’s not just that Europeans and our civilization are superior. It’s that our superiority is the natural order, because our people an our institutions are least different from the laws of the universe. And those that seek irreciprocity and deceit seek to not only deny, but also resist adaptation to, and prevent the application of those laws, by those of us who discover them – surviving by parasitism – despite the short, medium, and long term destruction of humanity that results from their actions. In effect, anyone who disagrees is by definition immoral, a threat to our people, and a threat to mankind. So in closing, we have then but one ambition: No More Lies.   ADD:  pursuit of power under protection of our power.

  • The Choice – Episode 0022 – The Prosecution. Introduction to the Prosecution of the Enemy – and My Apologia

    Welcome to The Choice – Episode 0022 – Introduction to the Prosecution of the Enemy – and My Apologia –  I’m Curt Doolittle

    Introduction I research and teach the scientific method, the universal vocabulary grammar and logic of the formal, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and the natural law of reciprocity in display, word, and deed. This program – The natural law – is the completion of the greek, roman, germanic, anglo program. And it re-harmonizes our religion, philosophy, law, science, and mathematics into a single consistent coherent correspondent formal operational logic of the universe. It provides complete explanatory power. Really. And the consequences are as vast as the empirical and scientific revolutions. My work seeks to solve the great problems of the 20th century, the origins of which in large part are reducible to the most recent counter-revolution against western truth, reason, science, law, markets, adversarialism, and subsequent rate of evolution of European civilization, European people, and a reluctant world that wants nothing of it on the one hand while desperately seeking its proceeds on the other. While I had worked on artificial intelligence as a means of understanding mankind through most of the 80’s, it wasn’t until I decided to produce a value-neutral language of ethics and politics to compete with the Jewish left’s industrialization of lying, around 1990 – that I began this project. I was terribly ill throughout the 80’s and 90’s, despite building companies, which made progress difficult. But I discovered Hans Hoppe’s work just prior to 2000. And I felt I had found an answer to the problem of value-neutral commensurability. By 2006 I had an admittedly terrible first draft. It served the purpose of illustrating just how much I didn’t yet know. By 2009 I had a second draft. But it serves to help me  understand that I needed to solve the problem of demarcation between truth, falsehood, and deceit. I’d solved most of those problems by 2014, with a third draft. And by 2016 I had the full outline of the completed work. But it took until about last year to resolve the outstanding issues-particularly religion – and it was only over this past summer’s work on evolutionary history that I felt the project was complete and inescapable as a system of thought dependent entirely on first causes – the formal logic of all the sciences. Why Do We Need Truth and Universal Decidability Because the greater our numbers, the greater our scale of cooperation, the greater our division of labor, the more fragmentary our knowledge and information, the more free we are to pursue our individual and group interests, the more divergent those interests, and therefore the more necessity for positive markets for consumption, positive markets for commons, and negative markets we call courts for the resolution of our disputes, and the greater the demand for decidability in our law to both construct those consumptions and commons and resolve those differences. In other words, our law like our logics and sciences incrementally progresses to a single most parsimonious most universal logic and science decidability and universal explanatory power across all fields of human behavior. Taboos But some subjects are more controversial than others. Some evoke differences at the political level, some at the economic, some at the social, and some at the interpersonal, and even some among family members. The most contentious of those subjects are what we call taboos. But taboos both the most difficult and necessary subjects to resolve. So of necessity, the logic and science of universal decidability will answer those taboos, and those taboos generate the greatest demand for decidability so that societies, and polities and the world can move beyond them. A taboo is a subject we try not to discuss. Taboos can fulfill one or more of three purposes: in the positive, taboos assist in the normative suppression of human impulses that if satisfied would export costs directly or indirectly, and by that suppression forcing the development of people’s agency. In the Neutral, to prevent conflict between individuals and groups that may have similar cooperative interpersonal or market interests but different group, social, economic, and political interests. Or in the negative, to force ignorance in order to conduct a deceit, fraud, theft, parasitism, or predation. Taboo Breakers Pay A Cost European people, for accidental historical reasons, deep in pre-history, developed rule of law as their first institution, instead of religion or state. This is the ‘first cause’ of european civilization. Skipping the underclass religion phase, and the upper-class state phase and developing an upper-middle-class entrepreneurial civilization – the corporation. In the absence of authority only demonstrated interest provides decidability in matters of conflict. The logic of Demonstrated interests is what we call the law of tort. And testimony the method of investigating it. For this reason testimonial speech and military reporting, evolved into the normative language of the people. For this institutional reason and this reason alone, Europeans incrementally discovered, adapted to, and applied the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, creating their competitive advantage of initiative, adaptability, maneuver, and technology, despite small numbers and lesser wealth on the edge of the bronze age revolution. But Socrates was killed for heresy. Aristotle nearly. The Christians used virtue signaling to obtain office, allied to produce political power, and eventually killed or deported the philosophers (the european equivalent of an intellectual priesthood), destroyed the Greco-roman arts and letters, ended roman religion – which wasn’t religion as we understand it but an expression of loyalty to the state and the people, one’s city, ancestors, the laws of nature, and various natural spirits that were compatible with physical natural and evolutionary laws. The Christians ended literacy and prevented the restoration of the western roman aristocracy, greek and roman reason, and rule of law. They brought about underclass rule.  It wasn’t until the later middle ages that under primogeniture the church became a holding company for the aristocracy, and the aristocracy used the church leadership as a corporation for non-inheriting sons to manage aristocratic lands. This is what kept the church in check, the people ignorant and servile peasants, and the civilization in ignorance and poverty, during the Semitic Dark Ages of Ignorance. It wasn’t the church that rescued Europe from darkness but middle-income northern Italians translating the works of the greeks, returned to Europe by the flight of intellectuals from the middle east as Islam experienced the most recent of its exhaustions and declines and the natural determinism of fundamentalism – meaning law – replaced wisdom literature – meaning advice.  And it was the spread of ancient literature through the middle class seeking escape from the corruption of the church that led to centuries of war to escape it. So like Socrates, Aristotle and the Philosophers, Galileo was imprisoned for breaking a taboo, Darwin reviled for it, and the eugenicists removed from the historical record, and postwar social science converted to sophistry for it.  And I expect similar treatment. Because my work is the latest attempt to suppress pseudoscientific, philosophical, legal, economic, political, and theological deceits, and to once again free western civilization and western people to continue their long march to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, pseudoscience, sophistry, deceits, conflict, poverty, starvation, disease,  suffering, and the victimization by a nature, planet, solar system, and universe all but hostile to life. I love my work but I don’t like my job. It’s a moral duty and a nearly unbearable personal cost.  So some of us must prevail against those taboos that prevent necessary conflict and that in turn prevents the discourse, accusation, prosecution and restitution for informational, social, and political crimes. And instead, to use the truth in discourse to cause conflict to bring about the end to those crimes, so that mankind once again can leap into a future of transcendence rather than continue down the current path to another dark age. So, I will, and history will judge your reaction to the following argument by whether you are stating it is true or false, or whether you’re stating that it’s a taboo, or that you merely disapprove. Worse, if you choose taboo or disapproval, and/or some sort of fraudulent argument, then you have by that demonstration selected yourself out of the jury as incapable of juridical decidability, political participation, and selected yourself for prosecution as well. The only question is whether the argument is true or not. And if it is true then what to do about it. No more lies

  • The Choice – Episode 0022 – The Prosecution. Introduction to the Prosecution of the Enemy – and My Apologia

    Welcome to The Choice – Episode 0022 – Introduction to the Prosecution of the Enemy – and My Apologia –  I’m Curt Doolittle

    Introduction I research and teach the scientific method, the universal vocabulary grammar and logic of the formal, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and the natural law of reciprocity in display, word, and deed. This program – The natural law – is the completion of the greek, roman, germanic, anglo program. And it re-harmonizes our religion, philosophy, law, science, and mathematics into a single consistent coherent correspondent formal operational logic of the universe. It provides complete explanatory power. Really. And the consequences are as vast as the empirical and scientific revolutions. My work seeks to solve the great problems of the 20th century, the origins of which in large part are reducible to the most recent counter-revolution against western truth, reason, science, law, markets, adversarialism, and subsequent rate of evolution of European civilization, European people, and a reluctant world that wants nothing of it on the one hand while desperately seeking its proceeds on the other. While I had worked on artificial intelligence as a means of understanding mankind through most of the 80’s, it wasn’t until I decided to produce a value-neutral language of ethics and politics to compete with the Jewish left’s industrialization of lying, around 1990 – that I began this project. I was terribly ill throughout the 80’s and 90’s, despite building companies, which made progress difficult. But I discovered Hans Hoppe’s work just prior to 2000. And I felt I had found an answer to the problem of value-neutral commensurability. By 2006 I had an admittedly terrible first draft. It served the purpose of illustrating just how much I didn’t yet know. By 2009 I had a second draft. But it serves to help me  understand that I needed to solve the problem of demarcation between truth, falsehood, and deceit. I’d solved most of those problems by 2014, with a third draft. And by 2016 I had the full outline of the completed work. But it took until about last year to resolve the outstanding issues-particularly religion – and it was only over this past summer’s work on evolutionary history that I felt the project was complete and inescapable as a system of thought dependent entirely on first causes – the formal logic of all the sciences. Why Do We Need Truth and Universal Decidability Because the greater our numbers, the greater our scale of cooperation, the greater our division of labor, the more fragmentary our knowledge and information, the more free we are to pursue our individual and group interests, the more divergent those interests, and therefore the more necessity for positive markets for consumption, positive markets for commons, and negative markets we call courts for the resolution of our disputes, and the greater the demand for decidability in our law to both construct those consumptions and commons and resolve those differences. In other words, our law like our logics and sciences incrementally progresses to a single most parsimonious most universal logic and science decidability and universal explanatory power across all fields of human behavior. Taboos But some subjects are more controversial than others. Some evoke differences at the political level, some at the economic, some at the social, and some at the interpersonal, and even some among family members. The most contentious of those subjects are what we call taboos. But taboos both the most difficult and necessary subjects to resolve. So of necessity, the logic and science of universal decidability will answer those taboos, and those taboos generate the greatest demand for decidability so that societies, and polities and the world can move beyond them. A taboo is a subject we try not to discuss. Taboos can fulfill one or more of three purposes: in the positive, taboos assist in the normative suppression of human impulses that if satisfied would export costs directly or indirectly, and by that suppression forcing the development of people’s agency. In the Neutral, to prevent conflict between individuals and groups that may have similar cooperative interpersonal or market interests but different group, social, economic, and political interests. Or in the negative, to force ignorance in order to conduct a deceit, fraud, theft, parasitism, or predation. Taboo Breakers Pay A Cost European people, for accidental historical reasons, deep in pre-history, developed rule of law as their first institution, instead of religion or state. This is the ‘first cause’ of european civilization. Skipping the underclass religion phase, and the upper-class state phase and developing an upper-middle-class entrepreneurial civilization – the corporation. In the absence of authority only demonstrated interest provides decidability in matters of conflict. The logic of Demonstrated interests is what we call the law of tort. And testimony the method of investigating it. For this reason testimonial speech and military reporting, evolved into the normative language of the people. For this institutional reason and this reason alone, Europeans incrementally discovered, adapted to, and applied the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, creating their competitive advantage of initiative, adaptability, maneuver, and technology, despite small numbers and lesser wealth on the edge of the bronze age revolution. But Socrates was killed for heresy. Aristotle nearly. The Christians used virtue signaling to obtain office, allied to produce political power, and eventually killed or deported the philosophers (the european equivalent of an intellectual priesthood), destroyed the Greco-roman arts and letters, ended roman religion – which wasn’t religion as we understand it but an expression of loyalty to the state and the people, one’s city, ancestors, the laws of nature, and various natural spirits that were compatible with physical natural and evolutionary laws. The Christians ended literacy and prevented the restoration of the western roman aristocracy, greek and roman reason, and rule of law. They brought about underclass rule.  It wasn’t until the later middle ages that under primogeniture the church became a holding company for the aristocracy, and the aristocracy used the church leadership as a corporation for non-inheriting sons to manage aristocratic lands. This is what kept the church in check, the people ignorant and servile peasants, and the civilization in ignorance and poverty, during the Semitic Dark Ages of Ignorance. It wasn’t the church that rescued Europe from darkness but middle-income northern Italians translating the works of the greeks, returned to Europe by the flight of intellectuals from the middle east as Islam experienced the most recent of its exhaustions and declines and the natural determinism of fundamentalism – meaning law – replaced wisdom literature – meaning advice.  And it was the spread of ancient literature through the middle class seeking escape from the corruption of the church that led to centuries of war to escape it. So like Socrates, Aristotle and the Philosophers, Galileo was imprisoned for breaking a taboo, Darwin reviled for it, and the eugenicists removed from the historical record, and postwar social science converted to sophistry for it.  And I expect similar treatment. Because my work is the latest attempt to suppress pseudoscientific, philosophical, legal, economic, political, and theological deceits, and to once again free western civilization and western people to continue their long march to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, pseudoscience, sophistry, deceits, conflict, poverty, starvation, disease,  suffering, and the victimization by a nature, planet, solar system, and universe all but hostile to life. I love my work but I don’t like my job. It’s a moral duty and a nearly unbearable personal cost.  So some of us must prevail against those taboos that prevent necessary conflict and that in turn prevents the discourse, accusation, prosecution and restitution for informational, social, and political crimes. And instead, to use the truth in discourse to cause conflict to bring about the end to those crimes, so that mankind once again can leap into a future of transcendence rather than continue down the current path to another dark age. So, I will, and history will judge your reaction to the following argument by whether you are stating it is true or false, or whether you’re stating that it’s a taboo, or that you merely disapprove. Worse, if you choose taboo or disapproval, and/or some sort of fraudulent argument, then you have by that demonstration selected yourself out of the jury as incapable of juridical decidability, political participation, and selected yourself for prosecution as well. The only question is whether the argument is true or not. And if it is true then what to do about it. No more lies

  • Why The CDC Failed, And Why Our System of Government Failed

    All non-military, ‘professional’, independent bureaucracies, like all large companies, maximize employee rent-seeking at the cost of core mission, until subject to competition or shocks leaving them lacking incentives and capital to reorganize. Always. This is why organizations fail, and why they fail by scale, with states failing last and hardest.  Only ADVERSARIALISM (competition) falsifies rent-seeking. Forces regular reorganization to preserve core mission. And only wargames provide bureaucratic Adversarialism. And only wargames that seek to cause the organization to fail. The CDC doesn’t run war games that falsify the organization’s readiness and competence, nor does the treasury or any bureaucracy other than the military. The military was superior at every crisis for this reason. Laundering the military from society has vast consequences. The CDC failed hard. The WHO failed hard. They failed because our classical liberal, liberal, Marxist, and postmodernists thought leadership was a catastrophe on the scale of the Christianization of Rome. The postwar era has desperately tried to replicate german professional bureaucracy without realizing it’s origins in Prussian military bureaucracy. Our experiment with ‘civilian’ bureaucracy has been a catastrophic failure because professional means UNACCOUNTABLE. In my work on Constitutional reforms the CDC, Medicine, Emergency Services, Homeland Security, Borders, Research, and ‘food, water, transportation, energy, and communications’ workers are rolled under defense, require all employees, and all vendors ‘sign’ as reservists, with ranks, and so are mobilizable under crisis as a military organization, with military rights to all assets. Fukuyama was right in his documentation but wrong in his prediction. The entire 2oth century experiment with human optimism was a catastrophe. Nothing has changed. And the larger our institutions and the greater the demographic decline, the worse the staffing of those organizations, and the less responsive they can be. There is not an infinite pool of people above 125 to draw from and every point of IQ loss in a population dramatically affects the ratio of those people to the population and therefore the The optimum social order is Rule of Law of reciprocity, monarchy as a judge of last resort, a militia of every able-bodied soul, and every useful asset, that can be militarily organized to respond to every crisis across the spectrum.  A republican government with houses for the classes is adequate for going concerns in peacetime, but not for crises. And the direct redistribution of windfalls to the people instead of the state, produce the proper incentives at the bottom. This government allows, as did the Romans, transition from crisis to going concern to windfalls without reorganization of the entire government into a monopoly of one condition or the other under the pretense that the nature of men, cooperation, nature, and the universe has changed. It hasn’t. All we have done in the past 200k years is adapt physically, then socially, and finally intellectually then lastly adapt by converting more energy by the gradual harnessing of increasingly rewarding returns on energy that demands increasingly complex social and political organization to produce and distribute – with the uncomfortable truth that eugenic limits on the reproduction of the lower classes by West and Far East, and the failure by every other civilization, That optimum government and we had it until the late 19th century when the industrial revolution seems to have converted the church’s supernatural  lies into the academy and state’s pseudoscientific lies,

  • Why The CDC Failed, And Why Our System of Government Failed

    All non-military, ‘professional’, independent bureaucracies, like all large companies, maximize employee rent-seeking at the cost of core mission, until subject to competition or shocks leaving them lacking incentives and capital to reorganize. Always. This is why organizations fail, and why they fail by scale, with states failing last and hardest.  Only ADVERSARIALISM (competition) falsifies rent-seeking. Forces regular reorganization to preserve core mission. And only wargames provide bureaucratic Adversarialism. And only wargames that seek to cause the organization to fail. The CDC doesn’t run war games that falsify the organization’s readiness and competence, nor does the treasury or any bureaucracy other than the military. The military was superior at every crisis for this reason. Laundering the military from society has vast consequences. The CDC failed hard. The WHO failed hard. They failed because our classical liberal, liberal, Marxist, and postmodernists thought leadership was a catastrophe on the scale of the Christianization of Rome. The postwar era has desperately tried to replicate german professional bureaucracy without realizing it’s origins in Prussian military bureaucracy. Our experiment with ‘civilian’ bureaucracy has been a catastrophic failure because professional means UNACCOUNTABLE. In my work on Constitutional reforms the CDC, Medicine, Emergency Services, Homeland Security, Borders, Research, and ‘food, water, transportation, energy, and communications’ workers are rolled under defense, require all employees, and all vendors ‘sign’ as reservists, with ranks, and so are mobilizable under crisis as a military organization, with military rights to all assets. Fukuyama was right in his documentation but wrong in his prediction. The entire 2oth century experiment with human optimism was a catastrophe. Nothing has changed. And the larger our institutions and the greater the demographic decline, the worse the staffing of those organizations, and the less responsive they can be. There is not an infinite pool of people above 125 to draw from and every point of IQ loss in a population dramatically affects the ratio of those people to the population and therefore the The optimum social order is Rule of Law of reciprocity, monarchy as a judge of last resort, a militia of every able-bodied soul, and every useful asset, that can be militarily organized to respond to every crisis across the spectrum.  A republican government with houses for the classes is adequate for going concerns in peacetime, but not for crises. And the direct redistribution of windfalls to the people instead of the state, produce the proper incentives at the bottom. This government allows, as did the Romans, transition from crisis to going concern to windfalls without reorganization of the entire government into a monopoly of one condition or the other under the pretense that the nature of men, cooperation, nature, and the universe has changed. It hasn’t. All we have done in the past 200k years is adapt physically, then socially, and finally intellectually then lastly adapt by converting more energy by the gradual harnessing of increasingly rewarding returns on energy that demands increasingly complex social and political organization to produce and distribute – with the uncomfortable truth that eugenic limits on the reproduction of the lower classes by West and Far East, and the failure by every other civilization, That optimum government and we had it until the late 19th century when the industrial revolution seems to have converted the church’s supernatural  lies into the academy and state’s pseudoscientific lies,

  • Criticism of “Postmodernism Debate: Russell v. Rectenwald” on the (excellent) Tom Woods Show Ep. 1784

    Regarding: https://tomwoods.com/ep-1784-postmodernism-debate-russell-v-rectenwald/ The conversation degenerated. Here are answers to the not-big questions that were not answered. 😉 1) THE COMMON THREAD: The Marxists, Neo-Marxist(Frankfurt), Postmodernists, Feminists, HBD-Denialists, PC Woke sequence is a revolt against the Darwinian explanation for the success of western civilization’s long history of soft eugenics given the pervasive scarcity and limited availability of incentives with which to prevent the spread of the decline of the ancient (Semitic) world. That’s the causality behind the long history of revolt in order to restore a parasitic priesthood that sedates the people. This revolt relies on a set of lies and a set of movements to advance those lies. Those movements are nothing more than the pseudoscientific equivalent of the supernatural revolt in the ancient world by Judaism Christianity and Islam creating the dark ages and destroying the arts, letters, institutions, and genetics of five great civilizations of the ancient world, The Left depends on selling three great lies: … i – Endless growth: ending scarcity, markets. … ii – Nature of man: ending amorality, reciprocity, and ethnocentrism … iii – Malleability of man: ending genetic determinism, inequality, regression to the mean, and dysgenia. All of these are simply revolts against Darwinism – and Darwin’s explanation for the disproportionate success of western civilization. 2) Regarding Postmodernism … 2.11) Yes the source of cultural warfare is the frankfurt school … 2.2) But: The postmodern movement builds upon that school with an attack on truth and reason. … 2.3) The postmodern tenets are: … … (a) reality is not perceived by the human mind (false) … … (b) the scientific revolution is ‘evil’ (for the reasons stated above) … … (c) race, sex, etc are state dogma not fact – (False: to limit freedom rather than to suppress dysgenia.) … … (d) Postmodernists insist that all, or nearly all, aspects of human psychology are completely socially determined, and we know this (scientifically) to be false. What we do use is training as all animals train young, for the perpetuation (natural selection). … … (e) there is no truth, no appeal to facts, no personal, social, POLITICAL DECIDABILITY for the good and bad – no means of CONTINUING NATURAL SELECTION by market adversarialism in association/disassociation, cooperation, production, reproduction, the production of commons (govt), polities (states) and war (intergroup conflict). 3) Science isn’t systemic (false). Science is the process of producing court testimony. that’s what empiricism means: testifiable. Science evolved in the west because we extended our court to all subjects of debate. That is the causal origin of the uniqueness of the west – we normalized testimony (truth before face) and no other people did. 4) Science has NOT changed its position, scientists produce a market and that market has progressed by trial and error, by verisimilitude, toward a most parsimonious universal explanation for the entirety of all disciplines. 5) Science doesn’t have to produce truth it needs to eliminate ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, the fictionalisms frauds, and deceits. Science claims only to incrementally eliminate error leaving truth candidates standing. (Africans are in fact biologically inferior as a set, not all Africans are biologically inferior. We are in the process of refuting the pseudoscience of the Marxists.) 6) We do evolve closer and closer correspondence with the most parsimonious truth because … (this guy’s is a moron)… language isn’t closed. It’s infinite (Chomsky, Godel et al). All language is a measurement. It has to be. Our measurements increase in precision. Most other civilizations failed because they didn’t pay the cost of testimonial truth in all aspects of l ife. So that’s why we evolve faster than all other civilizations combined. (I would eat your guest alive. You need stronger thinkers on the grand subjects.) 6) Yes our beliefs about people change because it is a reproductive, social, economic, and political necessity to construct norms – especially those norms that continue natural selection. And we cannot escape regression to the mean. That’s the problem for ALL civilizations. The big crime wasn’t the world wars, but the false promise of freedom from the laws of nature, in particular the regression to the mean, and the necessary relationship between the mean, the norms, commons, politics and ECONOMY that are possible. Genetic load is THE problem of social orders, NOT political or economic model. Political and economic models are a deterministic result of genetic load. (Go ahead and try to falsify that). 7) Mises half solved the problem and Rothbard ruined his legacy. Mises discovered operationalism (intuitionism) in economics, as did Brouwer in math and Bridgman in physics, Ruring in logic, and Chomsky in grammar. Hoppe half-corrected rothbard, but was stuck in that ridiculous sophistry of kantian and marxist rationalism. He solve the problem of commensurability and demonstrated it but then justified it with nonsense. 8) The entire series consists of the extension of the female intuition due to the female instinct to defend her children regardless of cost to the commons or value to the commons, the lower female cognitive agency over her impulses, and higher incidence of female magical thinking because of it -all evolutionary necessities – it’s an appeal to non-discipline, non-correspondence, inconsistency, of the formal (logical), physical, natural(cooperative), and evolutionary laws of the universe. In other words, it’s a set of frauds to perpetuate a theft from the commons, and through the state, upon the people OF merit. 9) The only solution is separation into micro states as the founders intended, as the holy roman empire demonstrated, as the entirety of the world practiced throughout history – that created markets for genetic differences. The postmodern apologist is simply the same as a Christian or Muslim using pseudoscience and sophistry. This is not worth the audience’s time. At this point, the conversation is just nonsense. Roughly thirty years behind.

  • Criticism of “Postmodernism Debate: Russell v. Rectenwald” on the (excellent) Tom Woods Show Ep. 1784

    Regarding: https://tomwoods.com/ep-1784-postmodernism-debate-russell-v-rectenwald/ The conversation degenerated. Here are answers to the not-big questions that were not answered. 😉 1) THE COMMON THREAD: The Marxists, Neo-Marxist(Frankfurt), Postmodernists, Feminists, HBD-Denialists, PC Woke sequence is a revolt against the Darwinian explanation for the success of western civilization’s long history of soft eugenics given the pervasive scarcity and limited availability of incentives with which to prevent the spread of the decline of the ancient (Semitic) world. That’s the causality behind the long history of revolt in order to restore a parasitic priesthood that sedates the people. This revolt relies on a set of lies and a set of movements to advance those lies. Those movements are nothing more than the pseudoscientific equivalent of the supernatural revolt in the ancient world by Judaism Christianity and Islam creating the dark ages and destroying the arts, letters, institutions, and genetics of five great civilizations of the ancient world, The Left depends on selling three great lies: … i – Endless growth: ending scarcity, markets. … ii – Nature of man: ending amorality, reciprocity, and ethnocentrism … iii – Malleability of man: ending genetic determinism, inequality, regression to the mean, and dysgenia. All of these are simply revolts against Darwinism – and Darwin’s explanation for the disproportionate success of western civilization. 2) Regarding Postmodernism … 2.11) Yes the source of cultural warfare is the frankfurt school … 2.2) But: The postmodern movement builds upon that school with an attack on truth and reason. … 2.3) The postmodern tenets are: … … (a) reality is not perceived by the human mind (false) … … (b) the scientific revolution is ‘evil’ (for the reasons stated above) … … (c) race, sex, etc are state dogma not fact – (False: to limit freedom rather than to suppress dysgenia.) … … (d) Postmodernists insist that all, or nearly all, aspects of human psychology are completely socially determined, and we know this (scientifically) to be false. What we do use is training as all animals train young, for the perpetuation (natural selection). … … (e) there is no truth, no appeal to facts, no personal, social, POLITICAL DECIDABILITY for the good and bad – no means of CONTINUING NATURAL SELECTION by market adversarialism in association/disassociation, cooperation, production, reproduction, the production of commons (govt), polities (states) and war (intergroup conflict). 3) Science isn’t systemic (false). Science is the process of producing court testimony. that’s what empiricism means: testifiable. Science evolved in the west because we extended our court to all subjects of debate. That is the causal origin of the uniqueness of the west – we normalized testimony (truth before face) and no other people did. 4) Science has NOT changed its position, scientists produce a market and that market has progressed by trial and error, by verisimilitude, toward a most parsimonious universal explanation for the entirety of all disciplines. 5) Science doesn’t have to produce truth it needs to eliminate ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, the fictionalisms frauds, and deceits. Science claims only to incrementally eliminate error leaving truth candidates standing. (Africans are in fact biologically inferior as a set, not all Africans are biologically inferior. We are in the process of refuting the pseudoscience of the Marxists.) 6) We do evolve closer and closer correspondence with the most parsimonious truth because … (this guy’s is a moron)… language isn’t closed. It’s infinite (Chomsky, Godel et al). All language is a measurement. It has to be. Our measurements increase in precision. Most other civilizations failed because they didn’t pay the cost of testimonial truth in all aspects of l ife. So that’s why we evolve faster than all other civilizations combined. (I would eat your guest alive. You need stronger thinkers on the grand subjects.) 6) Yes our beliefs about people change because it is a reproductive, social, economic, and political necessity to construct norms – especially those norms that continue natural selection. And we cannot escape regression to the mean. That’s the problem for ALL civilizations. The big crime wasn’t the world wars, but the false promise of freedom from the laws of nature, in particular the regression to the mean, and the necessary relationship between the mean, the norms, commons, politics and ECONOMY that are possible. Genetic load is THE problem of social orders, NOT political or economic model. Political and economic models are a deterministic result of genetic load. (Go ahead and try to falsify that). 7) Mises half solved the problem and Rothbard ruined his legacy. Mises discovered operationalism (intuitionism) in economics, as did Brouwer in math and Bridgman in physics, Ruring in logic, and Chomsky in grammar. Hoppe half-corrected rothbard, but was stuck in that ridiculous sophistry of kantian and marxist rationalism. He solve the problem of commensurability and demonstrated it but then justified it with nonsense. 8) The entire series consists of the extension of the female intuition due to the female instinct to defend her children regardless of cost to the commons or value to the commons, the lower female cognitive agency over her impulses, and higher incidence of female magical thinking because of it -all evolutionary necessities – it’s an appeal to non-discipline, non-correspondence, inconsistency, of the formal (logical), physical, natural(cooperative), and evolutionary laws of the universe. In other words, it’s a set of frauds to perpetuate a theft from the commons, and through the state, upon the people OF merit. 9) The only solution is separation into micro states as the founders intended, as the holy roman empire demonstrated, as the entirety of the world practiced throughout history – that created markets for genetic differences. The postmodern apologist is simply the same as a Christian or Muslim using pseudoscience and sophistry. This is not worth the audience’s time. At this point, the conversation is just nonsense. Roughly thirty years behind.