Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Rule of Law No Longer Exists!

    Rule of Law No Longer Exists! The Federal Government is demonstrably unwilling and unable to govern, to protect life and property, cultural arts and assets, provide equal protection under the laws, protect freedom of political discourse, or the most basic of civil order. If this Government Refuses To Rule, To Govern, to protect life, property, and commons; If this government has abandoned us; Our Law, and Gods Law; Then we have no choice but to declare this Government incompetent and unmade; And to set about restoring our Rule of Law, under our Constitution of Rule of Law by Natural Law, our rights within it, and those institutions to defend our life, property, and commons – restoring rule by the People For the People as our Declaration and Constitution, our ancestors, Nature, and Natures’ God Demand.

  • Preventing Civil War: The Three Demands

    Preventing Civil War: The Three Demands We are no longer compatible. The experiment with…. has failed. We must separate so that … Such that we may have this debate and seek to come to a compromise rather than the bloodiest, longest, most brutal civil war in human history, where tens of millions will certainly die: … a) All Political Speech and Political Affiliation is Protected Speech, and Political Affiliation Protected class. … b) The criminalization of all attempts at suppression of testimonial, truthful, reciprocal, empirical speech, and licensing of extrajudicial punishment to cease them. … c) Enforcement of the Law of Non-Aggression – extending self-defense, standing one’s ground, castle doctrine, and civil defense of the commons – licensing shoot-to-kill on the first demonstration of aggression whether by obstruction, challenge, threat, or force. No more lies. We will choose our destiny by Honest discourse or honest violence, but not by the restraint of violence by tolerance for violence and lies.We are incompatible because the Right’s Eugenics and Left’s Dysgenics are politically incompatible and irreconcilable. So we may grant one another the right of self-determination by political separation, and political enforcement of our differences in right eugenic and evolutionary and left dysgenic strategies. But neither has the right to deprive the other of self-determination.

  • Preventing Civil War: The Three Demands

    Preventing Civil War: The Three Demands We are no longer compatible. The experiment with…. has failed. We must separate so that … Such that we may have this debate and seek to come to a compromise rather than the bloodiest, longest, most brutal civil war in human history, where tens of millions will certainly die: … a) All Political Speech and Political Affiliation is Protected Speech, and Political Affiliation Protected class. … b) The criminalization of all attempts at suppression of testimonial, truthful, reciprocal, empirical speech, and licensing of extrajudicial punishment to cease them. … c) Enforcement of the Law of Non-Aggression – extending self-defense, standing one’s ground, castle doctrine, and civil defense of the commons – licensing shoot-to-kill on the first demonstration of aggression whether by obstruction, challenge, threat, or force. No more lies. We will choose our destiny by Honest discourse or honest violence, but not by the restraint of violence by tolerance for violence and lies.We are incompatible because the Right’s Eugenics and Left’s Dysgenics are politically incompatible and irreconcilable. So we may grant one another the right of self-determination by political separation, and political enforcement of our differences in right eugenic and evolutionary and left dysgenic strategies. But neither has the right to deprive the other of self-determination.

  • NOTES ON: Making Sense of Race by Edward Dutton

    Making Sense of Race by Edward Dutton (2020) (kindle edition) Nits

    • No TOC. A TOC explains the thesis. It’s sort of ‘unfair’ to the reader to not include one. 😉

    The Formation of Races

    • Speciation: AFAIK species refers to geographic isolation and variation producing reproductive specialization.
    • Speciation: AFAIK humans evolved hyper adaptivity and hyper opportunism, and so will have sex with anything.

    Understanding Life History Strategy

    • The most important ‘tell’ is only suggested here with the high incidence of dementia in east Asians.  In general, it’s not clear that east Asians are more K selected so much as that they are dramatically more neotenous and k selected, with neoteny likely passing optimum levels.
    • In general the R/K theory (Female vs Male Strategy) is overplayed when the CAUSAL axis is more one of neoteny first (universal), and then sexual dimorphism second(particular). This is a better (scientifically causal) framing of race and subrace (species and subspecies) differences.
    • So far I think the primary difference between past and present or between Rushton and Dutton’s analysis is that we know a great deal more about brain development and its consequences than we did in the past – and I”m pretty much current on that subject.

    What It Means To Be Smart

    • Again, causally, intelligence is best understood as the continuation of human evolution of hyper adaptability, and intelligence a measure of RATE of adaptability.
    • This rate of adaptability is the first reason for western success, because our institutions are the most hyper adaptive (law not state or religion).

    Religion and Intelligence

    • I dunno about this chapter. As far as I know religiosity is dependent on four factors, in order: 1) familial indoctrination, 2) empathic personality (demand for mindfulness) 3) stresses (demand for mindfulness) 4) intelligence and I’m not sure intelligence matters except above 115.

    Jews

    • It’s better to consider the Ashkenazim the most recent hybrid subrace that achieved isolation and speciation by about 500 years ago. They just isolated within host peoples rather than geographically. And were persecuted rather than subject to climate and resource pressure, and it APPEARS that they either narrowed or reversed cognitive sexual dimorphism which is painfully obvious in the data.
    • The Gypsies, Jews, and Muslims are best seen as a spectrum of parasitic strategies targeting escalating scale of predation on competitors because they take advantage of the IE world’s trifunctionalism and erroneous categorization of war as physical, where the gypsies practice petty theft and undermining virtues, the jews theft from the commons undermining eugenic virtues, and the Muslims inverting eugenic to dysgenic virtues.  Everyone ELSE practices TOTAL WAR. Europeans practice our traditional ritual war limited to violence. We are WRONG.  The future requires the abandonment of our ‘domestication of warfare’, and return as the Semites and the Chinese, to total war.

    Taboos

    • Well, since we have the science and I have the law it is possible to increase the scope of our laws to prohibit baiting people into hazards with the false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. Then we are at least forced to trade with one another.

    SUMMARY

    • Dutton is an excellent author. Very readable. Complete. Best current summary available.
    • Nothing new here other than the full spectrum coverage of current knowledge.
    • Doesn’t really take on the evidence of cog sci. (I’m overly sensitive since this is one of my areas)
    • No solution (we have solutions – that’s what we do)
    • Doesn’t identify the left’s techniques of lying and denying (see my upcoming podcast)
    • Should clearly address (as we do) the Urheimats, timing, and direction of evolution, AND the three-axis of human variation in cognitive development (Aggression/Neoteny, dimorphism, longitudinal development/agency.

  • NOTES ON: Making Sense of Race by Edward Dutton

    Making Sense of Race by Edward Dutton (2020) (kindle edition) Nits

    • No TOC. A TOC explains the thesis. It’s sort of ‘unfair’ to the reader to not include one. 😉

    The Formation of Races

    • Speciation: AFAIK species refers to geographic isolation and variation producing reproductive specialization.
    • Speciation: AFAIK humans evolved hyper adaptivity and hyper opportunism, and so will have sex with anything.

    Understanding Life History Strategy

    • The most important ‘tell’ is only suggested here with the high incidence of dementia in east Asians.  In general, it’s not clear that east Asians are more K selected so much as that they are dramatically more neotenous and k selected, with neoteny likely passing optimum levels.
    • In general the R/K theory (Female vs Male Strategy) is overplayed when the CAUSAL axis is more one of neoteny first (universal), and then sexual dimorphism second(particular). This is a better (scientifically causal) framing of race and subrace (species and subspecies) differences.
    • So far I think the primary difference between past and present or between Rushton and Dutton’s analysis is that we know a great deal more about brain development and its consequences than we did in the past – and I”m pretty much current on that subject.

    What It Means To Be Smart

    • Again, causally, intelligence is best understood as the continuation of human evolution of hyper adaptability, and intelligence a measure of RATE of adaptability.
    • This rate of adaptability is the first reason for western success, because our institutions are the most hyper adaptive (law not state or religion).

    Religion and Intelligence

    • I dunno about this chapter. As far as I know religiosity is dependent on four factors, in order: 1) familial indoctrination, 2) empathic personality (demand for mindfulness) 3) stresses (demand for mindfulness) 4) intelligence and I’m not sure intelligence matters except above 115.

    Jews

    • It’s better to consider the Ashkenazim the most recent hybrid subrace that achieved isolation and speciation by about 500 years ago. They just isolated within host peoples rather than geographically. And were persecuted rather than subject to climate and resource pressure, and it APPEARS that they either narrowed or reversed cognitive sexual dimorphism which is painfully obvious in the data.
    • The Gypsies, Jews, and Muslims are best seen as a spectrum of parasitic strategies targeting escalating scale of predation on competitors because they take advantage of the IE world’s trifunctionalism and erroneous categorization of war as physical, where the gypsies practice petty theft and undermining virtues, the jews theft from the commons undermining eugenic virtues, and the Muslims inverting eugenic to dysgenic virtues.  Everyone ELSE practices TOTAL WAR. Europeans practice our traditional ritual war limited to violence. We are WRONG.  The future requires the abandonment of our ‘domestication of warfare’, and return as the Semites and the Chinese, to total war.

    Taboos

    • Well, since we have the science and I have the law it is possible to increase the scope of our laws to prohibit baiting people into hazards with the false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. Then we are at least forced to trade with one another.

    SUMMARY

    • Dutton is an excellent author. Very readable. Complete. Best current summary available.
    • Nothing new here other than the full spectrum coverage of current knowledge.
    • Doesn’t really take on the evidence of cog sci. (I’m overly sensitive since this is one of my areas)
    • No solution (we have solutions – that’s what we do)
    • Doesn’t identify the left’s techniques of lying and denying (see my upcoming podcast)
    • Should clearly address (as we do) the Urheimats, timing, and direction of evolution, AND the three-axis of human variation in cognitive development (Aggression/Neoteny, dimorphism, longitudinal development/agency.

  • Sex Differences In Demonstrated Intelligence

    Sex differences in demonstrated intelligence are due to:

    • (a) a minor advantage to males due to larger body and brain size,
    • (b) sex differences in cognitive bias(interest),
    • (c) the cumulative effect of exercising sex differences, manifesting in minor task variation, some career, and vast political deltas.

    Sex differences in cognitive bias are:

    • (d) empathizing (children, relationships) vs systematizing (politics), and
    • (e) submission(fear) vs dominance(aggression)
    • (f) magical thinking (threat avoidance) vs paranoia-conspiracy (threat obsession)

    And are an expression of sex differences in reproductive costs:

    • (g) bearing the cost of adaptation to reproductive-social vs political-military stresses.

    Intelligence Tests were designed to measure potential academic and workforce performance (near-tasks),  and NOT test adult economic, social, and political judgments (far-judgments).  Yet it is Political Prediction, not Task Performance where we differ most. And it is political prediction and political choice where our reproductive interests are most demonstrably in conflict.  And it is our admission of women into the franchise without investing our laws and institutions with the rules by which we limit female malincentivs just as we have invested in our laws and institutions to limit male malincentives. Domesticating the female’s hyperconsumption, hypergamy,  hyper-aggression and social superpredation was just as important as domesticating male aggression and violence.  

  • Sex Differences In Demonstrated Intelligence

    Sex differences in demonstrated intelligence are due to:

    • (a) a minor advantage to males due to larger body and brain size,
    • (b) sex differences in cognitive bias(interest),
    • (c) the cumulative effect of exercising sex differences, manifesting in minor task variation, some career, and vast political deltas.

    Sex differences in cognitive bias are:

    • (d) empathizing (children, relationships) vs systematizing (politics), and
    • (e) submission(fear) vs dominance(aggression)
    • (f) magical thinking (threat avoidance) vs paranoia-conspiracy (threat obsession)

    And are an expression of sex differences in reproductive costs:

    • (g) bearing the cost of adaptation to reproductive-social vs political-military stresses.

    Intelligence Tests were designed to measure potential academic and workforce performance (near-tasks),  and NOT test adult economic, social, and political judgments (far-judgments).  Yet it is Political Prediction, not Task Performance where we differ most. And it is political prediction and political choice where our reproductive interests are most demonstrably in conflict.  And it is our admission of women into the franchise without investing our laws and institutions with the rules by which we limit female malincentivs just as we have invested in our laws and institutions to limit male malincentives. Domesticating the female’s hyperconsumption, hypergamy,  hyper-aggression and social superpredation was just as important as domesticating male aggression and violence.  

  • Race is not a social construct it is a scientific observation of the four main speciation events as groups isolated, adapted, and expanded.

    Causes of Race: Regional Speciation “Race” was and is, the term we use for the observation that present humans (sapiens) were speciating by geography as all animals speciate by geography. Except in human case, distance from Rift Valley Urheimat led to a decrease in aggression and increase in domestication: intelligence, agency, neoteny Evolutionary speciation occurred in four Urheimats: 1) East African Rift Valley through 60k ybp 2) Pre-flood Persian Gulf through 50k ybp 3) North East-Asia through 40k ybp 4) North Eurasia (Russia) 24k ybp. All groups were speciating. And each was as different as Euro and Asians. Evolutionary Hierarchy:

    Most Evolved: East Asian < Europeans < South Eurasians (Afro Asiatic: North African, Semitic, and Iranic: Iranic, Indian) < Africans (east and the rest) : Least Evolved As such ‘race’ accurately describes the evolutionary stages of humans as we once again speciated by geography, with later hybrids ‘replacing’ earlier versions. The Agrarian expansion, then IE (horse) Expansions, the arab expansion, created hybrids today. The European ‘unification of the world’ during the age of sale and the Darwinian revolution explained this history for us.

    • The Han have mastered local hybridization but at high cost.
    • The Koreans and Japanese have resisted it successfully and maintained the gains.
    • The Iranics failed in both India, and to resist the Arabs in Persia.
    • The Indian upper caste and the european upper ‘caste’ succeeded.

    Hybridization of a less evolved people by greater numbers of a more evolved people can produce gains. Hybridization of a more evolved people by greater numbers of a less evolved people produces harms. This ‘harm’ of hybridization as we have seen in the rest of the world, is what the Masculine East and West are trying to prevent. Domestication Race is genetic, meaningful, and more meaningful because of pervasive kin preference in all walks of life, and the VAST differences in sexual, social, economic, political, and military cooperative market value of the different races and subraces. So no, humans are, like every other domesticated animal – with our nearest behavioral relation, wolf-to-dog, that shares our predatory strategy, the closest example. So, can we please stop the social construction of false promise of freedom from physical(scarcity), natural(amorality, reciprocity, kin selection), evolutionary(genetic load, regression to the mean, natural selection) laws by virtue signaling to appeal to female magical-thinking? The Left’s Lies:

    • False promise of the end of scarcity by endless growth
    • False promise of the nature of man – when he is amoral, reciprocal, and kin preferential
    • False promise of the malleability of man – genetic determinism, vast differences in group genetic evolution, vast differences in cognitive, social, and institutional evolution.
    • False promise of the end of natural selection – from genetic load, regression to the mean, and necessity of natural selection – especially the constraint heterogeneity places on natural selection.

    Dating of the Death of the Left’s Lies

    • IQ equality died by 2000,
    • Sex equality died by 2012,
    • Race Equality Died by 2018.

    There are material biological differences between the races, that are due to increasing rates of self-domestication as each geographic race isolated, evolved, and expanded in the territory. While our upper classes (above 115 – potential for self study) are commensurable, our classes increase in incommensurability below it. Curing The World of the Left’s Second Dark Age We can ‘cure’ social construction by fake news, political deceit, academic pseudoscience, with one constitutional amendment, but we need to gain political power to implement that amendment. We can impose a warranty of public speech in matters public treating it as COURT TESTIMONY. The false promises of the enlightenment and the Marxist Pomo woke counter-revolution against darwin are over. The left is the impediment to achieving any sense of equality of opportunity. STOP LYING. No more science denial. Stop Lying. Stop the social construction of false promise of freedom from physical(scarcity), natural(amorality, reciprocity, kin selection), evolutionary(genetic load, regression to the mean, natural selection) laws by virtue signaling to appeal to female magical-thinking? All you evil people accomplish with your lies is to prevent creating policy that will produce commons suitable for the VAST DIFFERENCES in cognitive, emotional, normative, and traditional differences between groups. The only solution to equality is to continue european and East Asian suppression of the reproduction of the unproductive (bottom) such that proceeds from production can be devoted to the production of commons.  

  • Race is not a social construct it is a scientific observation of the four main speciation events as groups isolated, adapted, and expanded.

    Causes of Race: Regional Speciation “Race” was and is, the term we use for the observation that present humans (sapiens) were speciating by geography as all animals speciate by geography. Except in human case, distance from Rift Valley Urheimat led to a decrease in aggression and increase in domestication: intelligence, agency, neoteny Evolutionary speciation occurred in four Urheimats: 1) East African Rift Valley through 60k ybp 2) Pre-flood Persian Gulf through 50k ybp 3) North East-Asia through 40k ybp 4) North Eurasia (Russia) 24k ybp. All groups were speciating. And each was as different as Euro and Asians. Evolutionary Hierarchy:

    Most Evolved: East Asian < Europeans < South Eurasians (Afro Asiatic: North African, Semitic, and Iranic: Iranic, Indian) < Africans (east and the rest) : Least Evolved As such ‘race’ accurately describes the evolutionary stages of humans as we once again speciated by geography, with later hybrids ‘replacing’ earlier versions. The Agrarian expansion, then IE (horse) Expansions, the arab expansion, created hybrids today. The European ‘unification of the world’ during the age of sale and the Darwinian revolution explained this history for us.

    • The Han have mastered local hybridization but at high cost.
    • The Koreans and Japanese have resisted it successfully and maintained the gains.
    • The Iranics failed in both India, and to resist the Arabs in Persia.
    • The Indian upper caste and the european upper ‘caste’ succeeded.

    Hybridization of a less evolved people by greater numbers of a more evolved people can produce gains. Hybridization of a more evolved people by greater numbers of a less evolved people produces harms. This ‘harm’ of hybridization as we have seen in the rest of the world, is what the Masculine East and West are trying to prevent. Domestication Race is genetic, meaningful, and more meaningful because of pervasive kin preference in all walks of life, and the VAST differences in sexual, social, economic, political, and military cooperative market value of the different races and subraces. So no, humans are, like every other domesticated animal – with our nearest behavioral relation, wolf-to-dog, that shares our predatory strategy, the closest example. So, can we please stop the social construction of false promise of freedom from physical(scarcity), natural(amorality, reciprocity, kin selection), evolutionary(genetic load, regression to the mean, natural selection) laws by virtue signaling to appeal to female magical-thinking? The Left’s Lies:

    • False promise of the end of scarcity by endless growth
    • False promise of the nature of man – when he is amoral, reciprocal, and kin preferential
    • False promise of the malleability of man – genetic determinism, vast differences in group genetic evolution, vast differences in cognitive, social, and institutional evolution.
    • False promise of the end of natural selection – from genetic load, regression to the mean, and necessity of natural selection – especially the constraint heterogeneity places on natural selection.

    Dating of the Death of the Left’s Lies

    • IQ equality died by 2000,
    • Sex equality died by 2012,
    • Race Equality Died by 2018.

    There are material biological differences between the races, that are due to increasing rates of self-domestication as each geographic race isolated, evolved, and expanded in the territory. While our upper classes (above 115 – potential for self study) are commensurable, our classes increase in incommensurability below it. Curing The World of the Left’s Second Dark Age We can ‘cure’ social construction by fake news, political deceit, academic pseudoscience, with one constitutional amendment, but we need to gain political power to implement that amendment. We can impose a warranty of public speech in matters public treating it as COURT TESTIMONY. The false promises of the enlightenment and the Marxist Pomo woke counter-revolution against darwin are over. The left is the impediment to achieving any sense of equality of opportunity. STOP LYING. No more science denial. Stop Lying. Stop the social construction of false promise of freedom from physical(scarcity), natural(amorality, reciprocity, kin selection), evolutionary(genetic load, regression to the mean, natural selection) laws by virtue signaling to appeal to female magical-thinking? All you evil people accomplish with your lies is to prevent creating policy that will produce commons suitable for the VAST DIFFERENCES in cognitive, emotional, normative, and traditional differences between groups. The only solution to equality is to continue european and East Asian suppression of the reproduction of the unproductive (bottom) such that proceeds from production can be devoted to the production of commons.  

  • Sex Differences in Intelligence Testing

    @curtdoolittle could you help me understand why men and women don’t show differences in general intelligence at the average, despite the fact that differences in brain size & brain structure between the sexes are greater (and more extreme) than those between races?”—James W. @kenationalist__

    1) Men and women do show TASK differences, avg of ~1/2 standard deviation. 2) Why? ~10% bigger brains. 3) Men mature later than women, and are men are more widely distributed and so produce nearly all outliers. Women are (far) more neurotic, and men (far) more criminal. 4) Most tests that I know of have been skewed to put greater emphasis on verbal to limit the delta male and female differences – even further masking differences than comparison by same-age testing. 5) Intelligence tests use age, and do not measure sexual maturity, cognitive bias, predictive error, predictive error under controversy. This means that tests measure average workforce performance (near-tasks), NOT adult economic social and political judgements (far-judgements).  Yet it is Political Prediction, not Task Performance where we differ most. 6) First rule of economic reasoning always applies in behavioral sciences: account for the seen and unseen. Or as well say ‘Full Accounting”. Always ask, What is the full spectrum they claim to measure, what are its limits, and what’s not being measured? Most lies: cherrypicking. 7) Race-differences in AVERAGE intelligence (big) are greater than in-group sex-differences in intelligence (small).