Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • The Next Era of Domestication: Ending Islam and the Religion of Ignorance

    —“Curt Doolittle, Humans are not businesses; we’re interdependent for survival. Even cooperations across the world have stop competing to complement each others weaknesses in the business space… not to talk about humans.”— [W]e are -because we evolved to be – super-predators that choose to cooperate ONLY when it is MORE beneficial to cooperate than to enslave, or exterminate.

    The west advocates meritocratic trade because as a more advanced society and can compete better than others on the basis of merit. So it is to the west’s advantage to advocate trade and commercialism and consumer capitalism. But if cooperation by trade (or any other method) has become parasitic, then it is to our advantage to return to rule. If not rule enslavement. If not enslavement, extermination. Invasion of our lands by semi-human, ignorant, mystical animals is enough of a reason to return to rule, if not rule, enslavement, if not enslavement, extermination. Since all societies want to exterminate muslims EXCEPT the west, if the west stops protecting freedom of religion then all societies will justifiable exterminate islam and mulsims. The muslim is teaching the wetsern man that he must not tolerate freedom of religion, since muslims do not practice a religoin, but a law, and a law is a political system not a religion. End the west’s protection of islam, and we end much of world conflict. Islam is the source of world conflict. It is a cancer that infects the west, Africa, hindus, and east asians. ‪#‎NewRight‬

  • Governments are All Corrupt. It is the Nature of Government. But…

    [G]overnments are all corrupt. It is the nature of government to contain corruption, because it is the nature of men to contain corruption. The only savior of the west has been our true priesthood: our judges for who the law is sacred, and their status obtained by the preservation of its sacredness. Remove corruption from the law, and it is a weapon against those who lie, cheat, defraud, deceive, conspire, invade, prevaricate, propagandize.

    kill their words, we kill their ideas, we kill their ideas we kll them.

  • Governments are All Corrupt. It is the Nature of Government. But…

    [G]overnments are all corrupt. It is the nature of government to contain corruption, because it is the nature of men to contain corruption. The only savior of the west has been our true priesthood: our judges for who the law is sacred, and their status obtained by the preservation of its sacredness. Remove corruption from the law, and it is a weapon against those who lie, cheat, defraud, deceive, conspire, invade, prevaricate, propagandize.

    kill their words, we kill their ideas, we kill their ideas we kll them.

  • Q&A: How Long to Raise IQ?

    —Q&A: “How long does it take to raise IQ?”— Well line 1M people by their IQ. Shoot everyone with an IQ below 100. IQ raised Instantly.

    [T]ake 100M people.
    Sterilize everyone with an IQ below 100.
    The effect will be almost immediate,
    but over two or three generations the IQ will consistently raise.
     
    Take 100M people.
    Pay people with IQ below 100 who are also unemployed
    or consistently unemployable, not to have children.
    The effect will appear within one generation, and continue to improve.
     
    Take 100M people.
    Hang all 3 strikes criminals every year without exception.
    Sterilize all with IQ below 90 before they are 16.
    Pay people with 100IQ or below who are unemployed
    or consistently unemployable not to have children,
    or to have only one child.
    Pay people with IQ over 125 to have children, and a lot if they have many.
     
    I mean, I can create scenarios all day long. I’ve done quite a few models and it depends on the initial distribution, the age range of reproduction, the number of children .. etc. Basically it happens as fast or slow as you want it to. Myself I just recommend the Chinese solution: punish the hell out of people who export costs and who have more than one kid, and reward people at the top who have more than one kid. Then let time do its thing.

  • Q&A: How Long to Raise IQ?

    —Q&A: “How long does it take to raise IQ?”— Well line 1M people by their IQ. Shoot everyone with an IQ below 100. IQ raised Instantly.

    [T]ake 100M people.
    Sterilize everyone with an IQ below 100.
    The effect will be almost immediate,
    but over two or three generations the IQ will consistently raise.
     
    Take 100M people.
    Pay people with IQ below 100 who are also unemployed
    or consistently unemployable, not to have children.
    The effect will appear within one generation, and continue to improve.
     
    Take 100M people.
    Hang all 3 strikes criminals every year without exception.
    Sterilize all with IQ below 90 before they are 16.
    Pay people with 100IQ or below who are unemployed
    or consistently unemployable not to have children,
    or to have only one child.
    Pay people with IQ over 125 to have children, and a lot if they have many.
     
    I mean, I can create scenarios all day long. I’ve done quite a few models and it depends on the initial distribution, the age range of reproduction, the number of children .. etc. Basically it happens as fast or slow as you want it to. Myself I just recommend the Chinese solution: punish the hell out of people who export costs and who have more than one kid, and reward people at the top who have more than one kid. Then let time do its thing.

  • The Contract of Aristocratic Cooperation

    (repost thx to a friend) [W]e prefer to cooperate morally – meaning beneficially – with you.

    If we cannot cooperate beneficially with you on fully moral terms – meaning without parasitism, then we have only four choices: 1) Pay the cost of your parasitism and suffer the consequences, in exchange for avoiding the cost of defending against your parasitism. 2) Boycott you and bearing the costs of boycotting you in exchange for avoiding the cost of transforming you into a moral individual or group. 3) Colonize you and bear the cost of evolving you, in exchange for creating a valued member of mankind. 4) Conquering you and bearing the cost of exterminating you in exchange for freedom from your parasitism. So, you have a choice: limit your actions to productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, constrained to externalities under the same conditions. Or we will eventually colonize and reform you, or conquer and exterminate you. You may have the ambition of mere survival. Our ambition is to make mankind moral. For it is only in moral mankind that the evil and immoral are exterminated forever. – Aristocratia –

  • The Contract of Aristocratic Cooperation

    (repost thx to a friend) [W]e prefer to cooperate morally – meaning beneficially – with you.

    If we cannot cooperate beneficially with you on fully moral terms – meaning without parasitism, then we have only four choices: 1) Pay the cost of your parasitism and suffer the consequences, in exchange for avoiding the cost of defending against your parasitism. 2) Boycott you and bearing the costs of boycotting you in exchange for avoiding the cost of transforming you into a moral individual or group. 3) Colonize you and bear the cost of evolving you, in exchange for creating a valued member of mankind. 4) Conquering you and bearing the cost of exterminating you in exchange for freedom from your parasitism. So, you have a choice: limit your actions to productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, constrained to externalities under the same conditions. Or we will eventually colonize and reform you, or conquer and exterminate you. You may have the ambition of mere survival. Our ambition is to make mankind moral. For it is only in moral mankind that the evil and immoral are exterminated forever. – Aristocratia –

  • Conservatism is Empirical. So is Our Group Strategy.

    [C]onservatism is Empirical (critical). SO it is natural for us to patiently let some idea fail, and then outlaw it via the common law once it’s become obvious. We can outlaw the abuse of free speech and return to the oath of truth telling. We can require the warranty of due diligence. We can punish offenders. This behavior is consistent with the preservation of sovereignty by preventing rule.

    It is also consistent with our lack of a written philosophy other than the law, and truth. It is easy to write down trivial methods of producing social order. It is hard to write down indirect methods of social order. We evolved an indirect social order. So just as it was easiest to produce mathematics, harder to produce physics, and harder to produce social science (economics), it was harder to write down the western political model. Physical law, Natural Law, Common law, truth, testimony, jury, judge, property and sovereignty. This is extremely difficult for people to undrestand. Why? Becuase like truth, it is a critical system of operation: we know not what is right, we only discover what is wrong. This is the west. We invented science in all fields because we practiced it in heart, hearth, home, myth, legend, thang, and jury.

  • Conservatism is Empirical. So is Our Group Strategy.

    [C]onservatism is Empirical (critical). SO it is natural for us to patiently let some idea fail, and then outlaw it via the common law once it’s become obvious. We can outlaw the abuse of free speech and return to the oath of truth telling. We can require the warranty of due diligence. We can punish offenders. This behavior is consistent with the preservation of sovereignty by preventing rule.

    It is also consistent with our lack of a written philosophy other than the law, and truth. It is easy to write down trivial methods of producing social order. It is hard to write down indirect methods of social order. We evolved an indirect social order. So just as it was easiest to produce mathematics, harder to produce physics, and harder to produce social science (economics), it was harder to write down the western political model. Physical law, Natural Law, Common law, truth, testimony, jury, judge, property and sovereignty. This is extremely difficult for people to undrestand. Why? Becuase like truth, it is a critical system of operation: we know not what is right, we only discover what is wrong. This is the west. We invented science in all fields because we practiced it in heart, hearth, home, myth, legend, thang, and jury.

  • Economic Thinking = Full Accounting

    [E]conomic thinking (equilibrialism), which can also be referred to as ‘full accounting’, is unnatural since humans minds evolved a bias toward recalling ‘what worked last time’, not ‘what is true” or “what is complete”. We are pretty good at moral intuitions – not imposing costs physically (crimes), interpersonally (Ethics) or by externality (morals). But we are not able to explain those intuitions in rational terms as other than feelings taht physical (criminal), interpersonal (ethical) and external (moral) costs are somehow bad. Economics gives us this language.

    However, economics can be used to IMPROVE this information, or it can be used to DISTORT this information. The difference between mainstream economics(rule-by-credit) and austrian economics (institutions of cooperation) is that the way Austrians seek to improve our lot is by improving information without criminal, unethical, or immoral policy. While mainstream economics forgives criminal, unethical, and immoral policy if it suits socialistic (collectivist) ends. Full accounting of costs tell us that the net balance of mainstream economics is dysgenia, and the net balance of Austrian economics is eugenic. For obvious reasons it is not possible under democracy to make use of the traditional western eugenic policies. Whereas democracy mandates that dysgenic policies will be followed – nothing else is possible. Democracy = Dysgenia, Aristocracy (meritocracy) = Eugenia. It’s not complicated. But the consequences are profound.