¿Es necesario que tengamos un gobierno? Necesitamos mercados para la producción de bienes y servicios, y necesitamos un sistema legal. Todavía no está claro si necesitamos un gobierno. Yo diría que “no”. La sociedad podría ser privatizada, pero necesitamos aplicar nuevas leyes que promuevan la cooperación, el intercambio y prevengan el parasitismo. Una ley, una ley natural, prohibición total del parasitismo: físico, verbal y por exterioridad negativa. Un mercado que regule la producción de los bienes y servicios. Y hasta donde yo sé, no hay gobierno allí. Es útil tener un departamento de estado con el cual las naciones extranjeras puedan intentar negociar. Pero es aún más útil que dichas negociaciones sean del dominio público.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Booked Events
[event_auth_my_account]
-
Booked Events
[event_auth_my_account]
-
So, Do We Need A Government?
–“So we **do** need a government?”– We need a market for the production of commons. And we need a legal system. Whether we need government is still unsettled. But I would argue ‘no’. –“So it could still be privatized society, but we need to apply new laws to promote cooperation, trade, and prevent parasitism.”–
Correct. One law, natural law, total prohibition on parasitism: physical, verbal, and by externality. A market for the production of commons. And as far as I know there is no ‘government’. It is useful to have a state department that foreign nations try to negotiate with. But even this is better conducted in public. -
So, Do We Need A Government?
–“So we **do** need a government?”– We need a market for the production of commons. And we need a legal system. Whether we need government is still unsettled. But I would argue ‘no’. –“So it could still be privatized society, but we need to apply new laws to promote cooperation, trade, and prevent parasitism.”–
Correct. One law, natural law, total prohibition on parasitism: physical, verbal, and by externality. A market for the production of commons. And as far as I know there is no ‘government’. It is useful to have a state department that foreign nations try to negotiate with. But even this is better conducted in public. -
Terrorists Use Drama, Revolutionaries Use Attrition
[H]OW THEY TAKE OUT A POLICE DEPARTMENT A molotov cocktail on a moving vehicle. A molotov cocktail to the side of a stopped vehicle. A distraction across the street. A rifle at a distance. It’s a 3 man job.
Two motorcycles. One is backup. Patience. Follow. A along side at stop light A Pistol. Wingman with suppressing fire if needed. it’s a two man job. A Road. Roofing nails. Patience. A rifle. it’s a one man job. Attrition. This is how they do it in the ‘developing’ world. -
Terrorists Use Drama, Revolutionaries Use Attrition
[H]OW THEY TAKE OUT A POLICE DEPARTMENT A molotov cocktail on a moving vehicle. A molotov cocktail to the side of a stopped vehicle. A distraction across the street. A rifle at a distance. It’s a 3 man job.
Two motorcycles. One is backup. Patience. Follow. A along side at stop light A Pistol. Wingman with suppressing fire if needed. it’s a two man job. A Road. Roofing nails. Patience. A rifle. it’s a one man job. Attrition. This is how they do it in the ‘developing’ world. -
Islam: We Are Competitors, Not Allies, Not Friends, Not Kin
[W]E ARE COMPETITORS NOT ALLIES, NOT FRIENDS, NOT KIN 1) we are competitors not allies. We cooperate economically for mutual gain. But if cooperation requires that we sacrifice to increase the numbers of our competitors then this is not beneficial but parasitic and suicidal. 2) you do not understand economics. To move every human in a network requires the application of marginal differences in incentives. This requires vast capital. It is through vast capital applied as incentives that we produce the voluntary organization of production.
3) The mistakes you are making are a) that we are kin rather than competitors, b) that it is possible to organize by any other means c) that the world poor would not continually breed us into perpetual poverty d) that the objective we must pursue is the prevention of the poor from reproducing. 4) Islam is a cancer that the west, the Russians, the Africans, the Hindus, and the East Asians need eradicate from this earth. Muslims are the only remaining uncivilized people on earth – and outside of Africa’s good christians, the dumbest people on earth. We must end Islam forever. Is that clear enough? -
Islam: We Are Competitors, Not Allies, Not Friends, Not Kin
[W]E ARE COMPETITORS NOT ALLIES, NOT FRIENDS, NOT KIN 1) we are competitors not allies. We cooperate economically for mutual gain. But if cooperation requires that we sacrifice to increase the numbers of our competitors then this is not beneficial but parasitic and suicidal. 2) you do not understand economics. To move every human in a network requires the application of marginal differences in incentives. This requires vast capital. It is through vast capital applied as incentives that we produce the voluntary organization of production.
3) The mistakes you are making are a) that we are kin rather than competitors, b) that it is possible to organize by any other means c) that the world poor would not continually breed us into perpetual poverty d) that the objective we must pursue is the prevention of the poor from reproducing. 4) Islam is a cancer that the west, the Russians, the Africans, the Hindus, and the East Asians need eradicate from this earth. Muslims are the only remaining uncivilized people on earth – and outside of Africa’s good christians, the dumbest people on earth. We must end Islam forever. Is that clear enough? -
The Next Era of Domestication: Ending Islam and the Religion of Ignorance
—“Curt Doolittle, Humans are not businesses; we’re interdependent for survival. Even cooperations across the world have stop competing to complement each others weaknesses in the business space… not to talk about humans.”— [W]e are -because we evolved to be – super-predators that choose to cooperate ONLY when it is MORE beneficial to cooperate than to enslave, or exterminate.
The west advocates meritocratic trade because as a more advanced society and can compete better than others on the basis of merit. So it is to the west’s advantage to advocate trade and commercialism and consumer capitalism. But if cooperation by trade (or any other method) has become parasitic, then it is to our advantage to return to rule. If not rule enslavement. If not enslavement, extermination. Invasion of our lands by semi-human, ignorant, mystical animals is enough of a reason to return to rule, if not rule, enslavement, if not enslavement, extermination. Since all societies want to exterminate muslims EXCEPT the west, if the west stops protecting freedom of religion then all societies will justifiable exterminate islam and mulsims. The muslim is teaching the wetsern man that he must not tolerate freedom of religion, since muslims do not practice a religoin, but a law, and a law is a political system not a religion. End the west’s protection of islam, and we end much of world conflict. Islam is the source of world conflict. It is a cancer that infects the west, Africa, hindus, and east asians. #NewRight