P-Law is to Behavioral Science as Mathematics is to Physical Science. It’s that profound. It’s also work: very much like math and programming, in that there is a limited vocabulary, grammar (disambiguation), and logic (consistency) that requires retraining intuition – especially retraining your moral intution to rely on economic (equlilibrial) logic. Until you try to learn P-Law you will never understand just how unconsious your judgements, how true or false they are, and how little agency you had over your thoughts. P-Law converts intution about the bheavioral world into reason, just as physics converted intution aboug the physical world into reason.
Source: Original Site Post
-
P-Law is to Behavioral Science as Mathematics is to Physical Science
-
I Call Them Luxurtarians: Conspicuous Consumption of Luxury Beliefs
LUXURY BELIEFS By: @LukeWeinhagen The belief that the world is not a dangerous place or the belief that anyone but you is responsible for your safety are luxury beliefs. Even this article will be viewed far too narrowly by most. Compared to the rest of the world, the west are all “rich”. We have insulated ourselves so effectively from the consequences of stupidity and dishonesty, and created such a vast illusion of safety in the west that unless you are actively attempting to falsify your beliefs it is safe to assume they are all luxury beliefs. ‘Luxury beliefs’ are the latest status symbol for rich Americans …
A former classmate from Yale recently told me “monogamy is kind of outdated” and not good for society. So I asked her what her background is and if she planned to marry. She said she comes from an affluent family and works at a well-known technology company. Yes, she personally intends to have a monogamous marriage — but quickly added that marriage shouldn’t have to be for everyone. She was raised by a traditional family. She planned on having a traditional family. But she maintained that traditional families are old-fashioned and society should “evolve” beyond them. What could explain this? In the past, upper-class Americans used to display their social status with luxury goods. Today, they do it with luxury beliefs. https://nypost.com/2019/08/17/luxury-beliefs-are-the-latest-status-symbol-for-rich-americans/
Few apply even a minimal set of tests such as @ThomasSowell’s 3 questions
1. Compared to what? 2. At what cost? 3. What hard evidence do you have? Fewer seek a more robust set of tests such as Propertariansim’s Testimonialism @ThruTheHayes 1. Is it categorically consistent? 2. Is it logically consistent? 3. Is it empirically consistent? 4. Is it existentially possible? 5. Is it reciprocally consistent? 6. Is it fully accounted?
If it is important to you that your beliefs have value, I suggest you test them to make sure they derive their value from their quality rather than their luxury. I Call Them Luxurtarians By: @emblem21CEO My reeducation camp list includes: * middle class white women * academics & intellectuals * libertarians & libertines and liberals * the overeducated * the runaway enlightened They prefer liberty & luxury over reality. “Magic thinking is a luxury, only available to those with a buffer between themselves and the direct contact with a dangerous reality.” — @LukeWeinhagen “Democracy is not an intrinsic good, produces no goods, but is a risky emotional luxury [feeling righteous whilst acting degenerately] made possible by Full Integration into ‘Whiteness’” – @curtdoolittleQ&A: “Curt; Do You Have a Concise Definition for Testimonialism?” Colloquially: “The completion of the scientific method for the purpose of the conduct of law”. Testimonial Truth: Testimony (Speech) that is warrantied by the speaker through the performance of due diligence against imaginary content, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, deception and fraud. The only truth that can exist is that which is spoken. We can never speak the perfect truth because we can never know if we possess it. The most perfect truth we can speak is that which we have performed due diligence, that we do not speak in falsehood: fraud. Testimonialism: A set of tests of due diligence, the satisfaction of which allows us to warranty that to the best of our ability our speech (testimony) is free of the falsehoods: imaginary content, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, deceit, and fraud. Truth: That testimony we would give if we possessed perfect (complete) knowledge, perfect language, and an audience possessed of the same. And, at that point we speak a name, not a description. Everything has a true name. We seek that name. In seeking it we seek truth.
-
I Call Them Luxurtarians: Conspicuous Consumption of Luxury Beliefs
LUXURY BELIEFS By: @LukeWeinhagen The belief that the world is not a dangerous place or the belief that anyone but you is responsible for your safety are luxury beliefs. Even this article will be viewed far too narrowly by most. Compared to the rest of the world, the west are all “rich”. We have insulated ourselves so effectively from the consequences of stupidity and dishonesty, and created such a vast illusion of safety in the west that unless you are actively attempting to falsify your beliefs it is safe to assume they are all luxury beliefs. ‘Luxury beliefs’ are the latest status symbol for rich Americans …
A former classmate from Yale recently told me “monogamy is kind of outdated” and not good for society. So I asked her what her background is and if she planned to marry. She said she comes from an affluent family and works at a well-known technology company. Yes, she personally intends to have a monogamous marriage — but quickly added that marriage shouldn’t have to be for everyone. She was raised by a traditional family. She planned on having a traditional family. But she maintained that traditional families are old-fashioned and society should “evolve” beyond them. What could explain this? In the past, upper-class Americans used to display their social status with luxury goods. Today, they do it with luxury beliefs. https://nypost.com/2019/08/17/luxury-beliefs-are-the-latest-status-symbol-for-rich-americans/
Few apply even a minimal set of tests such as @ThomasSowell’s 3 questions
1. Compared to what? 2. At what cost? 3. What hard evidence do you have? Fewer seek a more robust set of tests such as Propertariansim’s Testimonialism @ThruTheHayes 1. Is it categorically consistent? 2. Is it logically consistent? 3. Is it empirically consistent? 4. Is it existentially possible? 5. Is it reciprocally consistent? 6. Is it fully accounted?
If it is important to you that your beliefs have value, I suggest you test them to make sure they derive their value from their quality rather than their luxury. I Call Them Luxurtarians By: @emblem21CEO My reeducation camp list includes: * middle class white women * academics & intellectuals * libertarians & libertines and liberals * the overeducated * the runaway enlightened They prefer liberty & luxury over reality. “Magic thinking is a luxury, only available to those with a buffer between themselves and the direct contact with a dangerous reality.” — @LukeWeinhagen “Democracy is not an intrinsic good, produces no goods, but is a risky emotional luxury [feeling righteous whilst acting degenerately] made possible by Full Integration into ‘Whiteness’” – @curtdoolittleQ&A: “Curt; Do You Have a Concise Definition for Testimonialism?” Colloquially: “The completion of the scientific method for the purpose of the conduct of law”. Testimonial Truth: Testimony (Speech) that is warrantied by the speaker through the performance of due diligence against imaginary content, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, deception and fraud. The only truth that can exist is that which is spoken. We can never speak the perfect truth because we can never know if we possess it. The most perfect truth we can speak is that which we have performed due diligence, that we do not speak in falsehood: fraud. Testimonialism: A set of tests of due diligence, the satisfaction of which allows us to warranty that to the best of our ability our speech (testimony) is free of the falsehoods: imaginary content, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, deceit, and fraud. Truth: That testimony we would give if we possessed perfect (complete) knowledge, perfect language, and an audience possessed of the same. And, at that point we speak a name, not a description. Everything has a true name. We seek that name. In seeking it we seek truth.
-
Sex Differences in Intuition
As for empathy vs systematizing, female intuition doesn’t scale up and male intuition doesn’t scale down: you cannot judge an individual by the common properties of his class, and you cannot judge a class by the properties of its outlier individuals. But you can judge a class by the common properties of its individuals. We call that ‘stereotypes’ and stereotypes are the most empirically accurate measure in the social sciences – as in all walks of life.
-
Sex Differences in Intuition
As for empathy vs systematizing, female intuition doesn’t scale up and male intuition doesn’t scale down: you cannot judge an individual by the common properties of his class, and you cannot judge a class by the properties of its outlier individuals. But you can judge a class by the common properties of its individuals. We call that ‘stereotypes’ and stereotypes are the most empirically accurate measure in the social sciences – as in all walks of life.
-
A King Is Actually a Check on Oligarchy
–“A king is actually a check on oligarchy.”– Martin Stepan
1. As we increase in complexity and divide and distribute the labor of governance (producing commons), we must maintain rule (policing) in the court and the judge of last resort: a monarchy.
The Laws of the Universe < The Natural Law < The Military < The Law < King < Court < Govt < The People 2. When we conflate the via-positiva and via-negativa functions of political systems ignore and forget their natural division of labor: Military (order), Rule (law), Judgement (king and court), Commons (government), and the People (production, reproduction) 3. This hierarchy Military< Law< King< Court < Government < People isn’t ‘relative’ or ‘arbitrary’ it is the scientifically optimum method of political order given the formal, physical, natural, evolutionary laws. 4. Interference in this government is an act of war against man.
-
A King Is Actually a Check on Oligarchy
–“A king is actually a check on oligarchy.”– Martin Stepan
1. As we increase in complexity and divide and distribute the labor of governance (producing commons), we must maintain rule (policing) in the court and the judge of last resort: a monarchy.
The Laws of the Universe < The Natural Law < The Military < The Law < King < Court < Govt < The People 2. When we conflate the via-positiva and via-negativa functions of political systems ignore and forget their natural division of labor: Military (order), Rule (law), Judgement (king and court), Commons (government), and the People (production, reproduction) 3. This hierarchy Military< Law< King< Court < Government < People isn’t ‘relative’ or ‘arbitrary’ it is the scientifically optimum method of political order given the formal, physical, natural, evolutionary laws. 4. Interference in this government is an act of war against man.
-
There Is No Common Ground
The Right is trying to restore TRUTH. The left practices false promises of freedom from the formal, physical, natural and evolutionary laws by marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, ant-male feminism, pc/woke. WHY? (M)Right Eugenic vs (F)Left Dysgenic. We don’t share fundamental goals. We don’t share foundational definitions. There is no common ground. Separation is necessary. WE HAVE ANSWERS TO A POLITICAL REFORMATION We are the only people with answers to the great problems of our age. Other than the deep state, financial sector, and globalists – LEFT AND RIGHT will benefit from our policies.
-
There Is No Common Ground
The Right is trying to restore TRUTH. The left practices false promises of freedom from the formal, physical, natural and evolutionary laws by marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, ant-male feminism, pc/woke. WHY? (M)Right Eugenic vs (F)Left Dysgenic. We don’t share fundamental goals. We don’t share foundational definitions. There is no common ground. Separation is necessary. WE HAVE ANSWERS TO A POLITICAL REFORMATION We are the only people with answers to the great problems of our age. Other than the deep state, financial sector, and globalists – LEFT AND RIGHT will benefit from our policies.
-
Preventing Civil War: The Demands
Preventing Civil War: The Demands Such that we may have this debate and seek to come to a compromise rather than the bloodiest, longest, most brutal civil war in human history, where tens of millions will certainly die: … a) All Political Speech and Political Affiliation is Protected Speech, and Political Affiliation Protected class. … b) The criminalization of all attempts at suppression of testimonial, truthful, reciprocal, empirical speech, and licensing of extrajudicial punishment to cease them. … c) Enforcement of the Law of Non-Aggression – extending self-defense, standing one’s ground, castle doctrine, and civil defense of the commons – licensing shoot-to-kill on the first demonstration of aggression whether by obstruction, challenge, threat, or force. No more lies. We will choose our destiny by Honest discourse or honest violence, but not by the restraint of violence by tolerance for violence and lies.We are incompatible because the Right’s Eugenics and Left’s Dysgenics are politically incompatible and irreconcilable. So we may grant one another the right of self-determination by political separation, and political enforcement of our differences in right eugenic and evolutionary and left dysgenic strategies. But neither has the right to deprive the other of self-determination.