NRX and P originate in the same body of thought but Yarvin is jewish and proposes a typical Jewish universalist administrative solution (libertarian). I propose a typical european rule of law solution (aristocratic). I consider my work part of the reactionary movement – and the reactionary movement the end of the libertarian divergence from conservatism, and the restoration of libertarians (legalists) as the thought leadership of conservatism where conservatism is reciprocal insurance of one another’s self-determination exchange of insurance of one another’s sovereignty by reciprocity in display, word, and deed. And the resulting markets that emerge in all aspects of life: action, association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities, and war. The west has always practiced markets for elites, we call trifunctionalism, with elites in masculine (negative) war, in feminine (positive) faith, and in the (neutral) law to mediate our differences. As such there are and always will be three factions in the west, with the law limiting the extremes of masculine hierarchy, competitiveness, and eugenics, and left equality, communism, and dysgenics. This is my understanding of the change in political forces among the non-semitic (european) right and left. The problem is that the semitic counter revolution against european advancement by the marxist-pomo-feminist-pc/woke movement is the second attempt at the destruction of the west, repeating the destruction of Rome, by taking advantage of the frailty of the martial, legal, and ‘faith’ elites, by the introduction of a false elite with false promises of victory for the bottom – when the bottom cannot rule itself, it’s families, any business, or any polity, or any army. We must restore our intolerance. The fall of our religion because the xians would not reform, opened the door for a false religion just as the failure of the romans to reform their religion to include the newly emergent working classes opened the door for a false religion (judaism, xianity, islam). intolerance must return.
Source: Original Site Post
-
The Dysgenic Revolt Against the West
by Wokal Distance @wokal_distance from Twitter A huge mistake people make is to think of postmodernism, post-structuralism, intersectionality, Critical Legal Studies, Critical Race Theory, 4th wave feminism, and Critical Theory as being separate and distinct, having nothing to do with each other This is a massive mistake. These disciplines are connected. They are not like individual academic factories producing different theories. The fact is that the ideas that are produced in various disciplines cross-pollinate and influence each other. The theorists make use of and share each others ideas. These fields are akin to ingredients used by activists to make the stew of Critical Social Justice. Mix some postmodernism here with some intersectionality there, add Critical Race Theory and 4th wave feminist post-structuralism and *taste test* YUMMY…Social Justice!Man cook Take a look through the activist literature and you’ll see that they pull from all these theorists as they see fit and as they find it useful. An excellent example of this is the book/website: “Beautiful Trouble.” You can see how this dynamic works in that book. You all know the old trick about how “postmoderns” and Marxists are totally different? Well that was true at one time, but woke activists will gladly take ideas from both the Postmodern philosopher Michel Foucault (1st pic) and the Marxist Antonio Gramsci (2nd pic) We also have: -feminists challenging patriarchy -decolonizing performance art and, -Anti-oppression (with information from Feminist English prof Peggy Macintosh, and bell hooks, author of “Postmodern Blackness”) That’s feminism, Post-colonial Theory, English and postmodernism Do you see how this works? The Critical Social Justice practitioners take the *theories* created in the academy and they begin applying them in real life. The theories that work get kept, the ones that do not work get tossed aside. And so it goes. Part of the game that gets played by the “CRITICAL RACE THEORY ISN’T POSTMODERNISM YOU GUYS DON’T DO THE READING” is to act as though each of the disciplines that feeds into Critical Social Justice is separate and discreet, unrelated to the others. This is not the case. That doesn’t mean there are no fights over territory and no boundary lines, It means the theories are ALWAYS being shared and repurposed across disciplinary lines. So, insisting on and appealing to ultra-strict readings will render one unable to see how these theories evolve. Here’s an example. Follow along and the payoff is worth it. This is a review of Gayatyari Spivaks’ new translation of Jacques Derrida’s “Of Grammatology” with a forward by the famed theorist Judith Butler. The review Is done by Geoffrey Bennington.
Embarrassing Ourselves – The Introduction to the new translation of “On Grammatology,” the Afterword, and the revisions to the translation all represent significant steps backward…. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/embarrassing-ourselves/ lareviewofbooks.org To set this up, Gayatyari Spivak is one of the most well known and well-published Post-Colonial theorists and is considered a foundational theorist in postcolonial theory., Judith Butler is just as famous and just as foundational in what is now called Queer theory…. The book being reviewed is Spivaks updated version of her translation of Derrida’s “Of Grammatology” which she first translated in 1976. Spivak and Judith Butler both used Derrida’s theories a LOT. They talk about Derrida *constantly* in their work. The reviewer is Geoffrey Bennington, Derrida’s greatest American protege. Derrida and Bennington worked so closely that they wrote a book together. Bennington is considered to be the worlds foremost expert on Derrida. He is also fluent in french, the language Derrida wrote in Bennington proceeds to point out that Judith Butler doesn’t seem to know what Derrida was actually saying, and that Spivak seems to be mistranslating Derrida on nearly every page. Remember, Bennington is fluent in French and wrote a book with Derrida, he knows the work… Bennington points out Butlers many errors in her forward to the book and then says the Translation itself is deeply flawed. If you want to know how terrible the translation is, the name of his review is “Embarrassing ourselves.” It’s that bad. So why does this matter? Because the Butler (who apparently doesn’t actually understand Derrida) and Spivak (who spoke neither french nor english perfectly) used their incomplete and flawed understanding of Derrida’s work to become foundational Scholars in Queer Theory and Postcolonial Theory… I’m sure Spivak and Butler understand some of Derrida, or even most of Derrida. The problem is they became foundational Scholars in their field’s using an incomplete understanding of his work and Spivak’s flawed translation will be used by many people studying Derrida…. But, if you want to look at what influenced Queer theory and you look at a proper and full account of exactly what Derrida was really arguing and then compare that to modern Queer theory your going to miss the way that his work was appropriated and used by Butler… And in the “Critical Race Theory, Postmodern, Queer Theory, Gender Studies” cluster of disciplines this is common. Imperfect translations, misinterpretations, misapplications, are all over the place. Those disciplines take whatever they want and use it however they want… Students were taught deconstruction, and they worked in television, and began to apply deconstruction in their own way to things like sitcoms. When Derrida was asked about this he said “deconstruction as I understand it does not produce any sitcom.” See the problem? This happens all the time in the academic fields that feed Critical Social Justice. Ideas get misused, pulled out of context, and contorted in ways that were never intended because in many cases the scholars doing the work are not held to rigorous standards. So the next time someone says that Critical Social justice isn’t really using postmodernism, you can be charitable and say yeah, they likely are mixing in several ideas from a wide variety of sources. (This is how we get “deconstructive” T.V.) But the mix and match is no excuse to avoid the inevitable: that they really are using postmodern ideas fashioned into social weapons that they wish to use in the name of their vision of social justice. /fin Finally, A word about Derrida and Foucault: The nature of their ideas is such that even if you do get them exactly right, it is very hard to see how you follow their ideas the whole way without ending up with an anti-realist epistemology. PPS/ When I said Bennington is Derrida’s greatest American protege I meant most active protege currently in America (he teaches at Emory University) but I made it sound like he an American citizen when Bennington is actually British. I should have been more clear.
-
The Dysgenic Revolt Against the West
by Wokal Distance @wokal_distance from Twitter A huge mistake people make is to think of postmodernism, post-structuralism, intersectionality, Critical Legal Studies, Critical Race Theory, 4th wave feminism, and Critical Theory as being separate and distinct, having nothing to do with each other This is a massive mistake. These disciplines are connected. They are not like individual academic factories producing different theories. The fact is that the ideas that are produced in various disciplines cross-pollinate and influence each other. The theorists make use of and share each others ideas. These fields are akin to ingredients used by activists to make the stew of Critical Social Justice. Mix some postmodernism here with some intersectionality there, add Critical Race Theory and 4th wave feminist post-structuralism and *taste test* YUMMY…Social Justice!Man cook Take a look through the activist literature and you’ll see that they pull from all these theorists as they see fit and as they find it useful. An excellent example of this is the book/website: “Beautiful Trouble.” You can see how this dynamic works in that book. You all know the old trick about how “postmoderns” and Marxists are totally different? Well that was true at one time, but woke activists will gladly take ideas from both the Postmodern philosopher Michel Foucault (1st pic) and the Marxist Antonio Gramsci (2nd pic) We also have: -feminists challenging patriarchy -decolonizing performance art and, -Anti-oppression (with information from Feminist English prof Peggy Macintosh, and bell hooks, author of “Postmodern Blackness”) That’s feminism, Post-colonial Theory, English and postmodernism Do you see how this works? The Critical Social Justice practitioners take the *theories* created in the academy and they begin applying them in real life. The theories that work get kept, the ones that do not work get tossed aside. And so it goes. Part of the game that gets played by the “CRITICAL RACE THEORY ISN’T POSTMODERNISM YOU GUYS DON’T DO THE READING” is to act as though each of the disciplines that feeds into Critical Social Justice is separate and discreet, unrelated to the others. This is not the case. That doesn’t mean there are no fights over territory and no boundary lines, It means the theories are ALWAYS being shared and repurposed across disciplinary lines. So, insisting on and appealing to ultra-strict readings will render one unable to see how these theories evolve. Here’s an example. Follow along and the payoff is worth it. This is a review of Gayatyari Spivaks’ new translation of Jacques Derrida’s “Of Grammatology” with a forward by the famed theorist Judith Butler. The review Is done by Geoffrey Bennington.
Embarrassing Ourselves – The Introduction to the new translation of “On Grammatology,” the Afterword, and the revisions to the translation all represent significant steps backward…. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/embarrassing-ourselves/ lareviewofbooks.org To set this up, Gayatyari Spivak is one of the most well known and well-published Post-Colonial theorists and is considered a foundational theorist in postcolonial theory., Judith Butler is just as famous and just as foundational in what is now called Queer theory…. The book being reviewed is Spivaks updated version of her translation of Derrida’s “Of Grammatology” which she first translated in 1976. Spivak and Judith Butler both used Derrida’s theories a LOT. They talk about Derrida *constantly* in their work. The reviewer is Geoffrey Bennington, Derrida’s greatest American protege. Derrida and Bennington worked so closely that they wrote a book together. Bennington is considered to be the worlds foremost expert on Derrida. He is also fluent in french, the language Derrida wrote in Bennington proceeds to point out that Judith Butler doesn’t seem to know what Derrida was actually saying, and that Spivak seems to be mistranslating Derrida on nearly every page. Remember, Bennington is fluent in French and wrote a book with Derrida, he knows the work… Bennington points out Butlers many errors in her forward to the book and then says the Translation itself is deeply flawed. If you want to know how terrible the translation is, the name of his review is “Embarrassing ourselves.” It’s that bad. So why does this matter? Because the Butler (who apparently doesn’t actually understand Derrida) and Spivak (who spoke neither french nor english perfectly) used their incomplete and flawed understanding of Derrida’s work to become foundational Scholars in Queer Theory and Postcolonial Theory… I’m sure Spivak and Butler understand some of Derrida, or even most of Derrida. The problem is they became foundational Scholars in their field’s using an incomplete understanding of his work and Spivak’s flawed translation will be used by many people studying Derrida…. But, if you want to look at what influenced Queer theory and you look at a proper and full account of exactly what Derrida was really arguing and then compare that to modern Queer theory your going to miss the way that his work was appropriated and used by Butler… And in the “Critical Race Theory, Postmodern, Queer Theory, Gender Studies” cluster of disciplines this is common. Imperfect translations, misinterpretations, misapplications, are all over the place. Those disciplines take whatever they want and use it however they want… Students were taught deconstruction, and they worked in television, and began to apply deconstruction in their own way to things like sitcoms. When Derrida was asked about this he said “deconstruction as I understand it does not produce any sitcom.” See the problem? This happens all the time in the academic fields that feed Critical Social Justice. Ideas get misused, pulled out of context, and contorted in ways that were never intended because in many cases the scholars doing the work are not held to rigorous standards. So the next time someone says that Critical Social justice isn’t really using postmodernism, you can be charitable and say yeah, they likely are mixing in several ideas from a wide variety of sources. (This is how we get “deconstructive” T.V.) But the mix and match is no excuse to avoid the inevitable: that they really are using postmodern ideas fashioned into social weapons that they wish to use in the name of their vision of social justice. /fin Finally, A word about Derrida and Foucault: The nature of their ideas is such that even if you do get them exactly right, it is very hard to see how you follow their ideas the whole way without ending up with an anti-realist epistemology. PPS/ When I said Bennington is Derrida’s greatest American protege I meant most active protege currently in America (he teaches at Emory University) but I made it sound like he an American citizen when Bennington is actually British. I should have been more clear.
-
Please, We Beg You, Join Us In Settlement of Our Difference Before We Enjoin One Another In Civil War
THE CAUSE OF OUR CONFLICT The Simple Reality: The Jewish Marxist, Neo-Marxist, Libertarian, Neocon, Pomo, Feminist, Woke, Anti-White, and the Christian Liberal, Progressive, PC, movements are REVOLTS against the Darwinian explanation for the competitive success of Europe’s Eugenic Adversarial, Martial, Rule of Law Markets & Trifunctionalism. The Jewish Christian Muslim and barbarian invasion caused a thousand year dark age of superstitious deceit. The Marxist, Pomo, Woke, Islamic and third-world invasion seeks to cause a second dark age by pseudoscientific, sophistry, and supernatural fundamentalism. Both Ancient and Modern World revolts were counter-revolutions against the development of inegalitarian, hierarchical, meritocratic, eugenic, markets that had recently lifted the bottom classes into opportunity. Only Europeans are biologically evolved, demographically distributed, culturally indoctrinated, and institutionally habituated, to compete in and therefore are exclusively fit for, hyper adaptive, evolutionary, eugenic, adversarial, Self Determinant, Reciprocally Insured, Truth before Face, Rule of Law by the natural law of reciprocity, the markets in all aspects of life that result, and the trifunctional competition between elites that results, and the Universal Military Service for purchase of Franchise, Status, and Respect, and Christianity to tolerate the high cost of all the above. Even so, there are many unfit among europeans who failed the five thousand years of european cultural and institutional domestication. REVOLUTION COMES (a) We have no civil order. (b) No defense of life, property, or commons (c) no rule of law (d) no equal protection under the law (e) Ne have a non-neutral policing, (f) No juridical defense, right to petition grievances, or equal representation (g) Our govt is not organized for total war in an era of total war. (h) Our taxation, economy, and academy favor 35% at the expense of all the rest (i) Our financial system isn’t sovereign, delivers us to predatory parasitic globalists, impoverishes our middle, working, and laboring classes, and deprives us of +$1T per year in potential commons. (j) We are forcibly involuntarily associated in polities, politics, business, community, education, and neighborhood, against our will, against our interests, preventing us from customizing commons, to the division and detriment of all, in the greatest failed policy in history. (k) The government attempts to succeed at its secondary objective: the production of commons for the worst but fails at its first objective: protecting the good people from the bad – even when the behavior of the bad is the result of unfitness for the private and common the natural law of cooperation by reciprocity demands, and the market the fit can survive competition within but the unfit cannot. (k) We need and demand incompatible commons and polities must sort by demand for different Commons. WE ARE INCOMPATIBLE The Dysgenic Equalitarian Left is incompatible with the Eugenic Meritocratic Right Our strategies are irreconcilable. We don’t share fundamental goals or values. We don’t share foundational definitions. There is no common ground. Compromise is impossible Separation is necessary We must separate or War We repeat the Cycle:
1. Revolutionary War to Separate 2. Civil War 1 to Centralize 3. Civil War 2 to Decentralize (Separate) WE CAN WIN – TOGETHER The enemy is the Global Financial sector (globalists), the government that they pay off, the academy that sells false promise, and the media that baits us into hazard and entertainment complex that influences us by subterfuge, and together manage our dysgenic decline into a second dark age for profit. We the people despite our diversity are not our people. We can separate. We can create governments, societies, and norms, suitable for all. But to separate we must sacrifice our existing parasitic elites, institutionally for certain, economically with likelihood, and with their existence if necessary. If you are center-left, centrist, center-right, or right, and whether you are constitutionalist (traditionalist), Christian, or authoritarian, you should follow me (us). We are the only people with an explanation for and solution to the great crisis of the age. Join us in a political solution that satisfies right and left at the expense of the globalists, the deep state, the financial sector, media, and the academy that prey upon our people through false promises and false fears. Delay a turnover of government by shutdown of government while the court does its work. There is no harm shutting down the government that isn’t intentional – harming the people as retaliation – and Belgium saw the value of going years without government. Work on Solution by Separation – Not Civil War Join us.
-
Please, We Beg You, Join Us In Settlement of Our Difference Before We Enjoin One Another In Civil War
THE CAUSE OF OUR CONFLICT The Simple Reality: The Jewish Marxist, Neo-Marxist, Libertarian, Neocon, Pomo, Feminist, Woke, Anti-White, and the Christian Liberal, Progressive, PC, movements are REVOLTS against the Darwinian explanation for the competitive success of Europe’s Eugenic Adversarial, Martial, Rule of Law Markets & Trifunctionalism. The Jewish Christian Muslim and barbarian invasion caused a thousand year dark age of superstitious deceit. The Marxist, Pomo, Woke, Islamic and third-world invasion seeks to cause a second dark age by pseudoscientific, sophistry, and supernatural fundamentalism. Both Ancient and Modern World revolts were counter-revolutions against the development of inegalitarian, hierarchical, meritocratic, eugenic, markets that had recently lifted the bottom classes into opportunity. Only Europeans are biologically evolved, demographically distributed, culturally indoctrinated, and institutionally habituated, to compete in and therefore are exclusively fit for, hyper adaptive, evolutionary, eugenic, adversarial, Self Determinant, Reciprocally Insured, Truth before Face, Rule of Law by the natural law of reciprocity, the markets in all aspects of life that result, and the trifunctional competition between elites that results, and the Universal Military Service for purchase of Franchise, Status, and Respect, and Christianity to tolerate the high cost of all the above. Even so, there are many unfit among europeans who failed the five thousand years of european cultural and institutional domestication. REVOLUTION COMES (a) We have no civil order. (b) No defense of life, property, or commons (c) no rule of law (d) no equal protection under the law (e) Ne have a non-neutral policing, (f) No juridical defense, right to petition grievances, or equal representation (g) Our govt is not organized for total war in an era of total war. (h) Our taxation, economy, and academy favor 35% at the expense of all the rest (i) Our financial system isn’t sovereign, delivers us to predatory parasitic globalists, impoverishes our middle, working, and laboring classes, and deprives us of +$1T per year in potential commons. (j) We are forcibly involuntarily associated in polities, politics, business, community, education, and neighborhood, against our will, against our interests, preventing us from customizing commons, to the division and detriment of all, in the greatest failed policy in history. (k) The government attempts to succeed at its secondary objective: the production of commons for the worst but fails at its first objective: protecting the good people from the bad – even when the behavior of the bad is the result of unfitness for the private and common the natural law of cooperation by reciprocity demands, and the market the fit can survive competition within but the unfit cannot. (k) We need and demand incompatible commons and polities must sort by demand for different Commons. WE ARE INCOMPATIBLE The Dysgenic Equalitarian Left is incompatible with the Eugenic Meritocratic Right Our strategies are irreconcilable. We don’t share fundamental goals or values. We don’t share foundational definitions. There is no common ground. Compromise is impossible Separation is necessary We must separate or War We repeat the Cycle:
1. Revolutionary War to Separate 2. Civil War 1 to Centralize 3. Civil War 2 to Decentralize (Separate) WE CAN WIN – TOGETHER The enemy is the Global Financial sector (globalists), the government that they pay off, the academy that sells false promise, and the media that baits us into hazard and entertainment complex that influences us by subterfuge, and together manage our dysgenic decline into a second dark age for profit. We the people despite our diversity are not our people. We can separate. We can create governments, societies, and norms, suitable for all. But to separate we must sacrifice our existing parasitic elites, institutionally for certain, economically with likelihood, and with their existence if necessary. If you are center-left, centrist, center-right, or right, and whether you are constitutionalist (traditionalist), Christian, or authoritarian, you should follow me (us). We are the only people with an explanation for and solution to the great crisis of the age. Join us in a political solution that satisfies right and left at the expense of the globalists, the deep state, the financial sector, media, and the academy that prey upon our people through false promises and false fears. Delay a turnover of government by shutdown of government while the court does its work. There is no harm shutting down the government that isn’t intentional – harming the people as retaliation – and Belgium saw the value of going years without government. Work on Solution by Separation – Not Civil War Join us.
-
The Reason Revolution Comes
THE REASON REVOLUTION COMES (a) We have no civil order. (b) No defense of life, property, or commons (c) no rule of law (d) no equal protection under the law (e) we have a non-neutral policing, (f) no juridical defense (g) and our govt is not organized for total war in an era of total war. (h) Our taxation, economy, and academy favor 35% at the expense of all the rest (i) Our financial system isn’t sovereign, delivers us to predatory parasitic globalists, impoverishes our middle, working, and laboring classes, and deprives us of +1T per year in commons. (j) We are forcibly involuntarily associated in polities, politics, business, community, education, and neighborhood, against our will, against our interests, preventing us from customizing commons, to the division and detriment of all, in the greatest failed policy in history. What’s the difference between right and left? Right, Generative Adversarial, Capitalizing(meritocratic) Eugenic Adaptation of Quality, versus Left, Consensus Harmonious, Parasitic(equalitarian) Dysgenic Devolution of Quantity. We are incompatible because our first causes (moral intuitions and reproductive strategies) are polar opposites. They are the extremes of the male hierarchical and female equalitarian reproductive strategies. The Left’s entire doctrine is science denial: a revolt against the Darwinian explanation for the success of western civ: a revolt against truth, formal, physical, and evolutionary laws. The Religious Rights only pseudoscience is only of natural law’s origin not its content.We are incompatible because the technological innovations of european modernity created the wealth and therefore the opportunity for individual pursuit of INSTINCTS – which was the opposite of convergence the (feminine) left predicted. The right continues convergence to evolutionary adaptability, and the left rebels by attempting to converge on evolutionary non-adaptability (regression). The right to harmony in adaptive duty by the production of agency, and the left to harmony in avoidance of adaptive duty by avoidance of the production of agency. The result is the parasitic elite, a parasitic underclass who escape or cannot compete in evolutinary markets, against the productive, laboring, working, and middle classes who successfully compete in markets.We’re incompatible because Right Merit Eugenic vs Left Equal Dysgenic are incompatible, and irreconcilable.We’re incompatible and we must Separate or War.We Have a Thorough Constitutional Reform Ready It will appease the vast majority of center-left, center, and center-right, at the cost of the globalists, the financial sector, and the deep state. It is as great an innovation in natural law and rights and obligations under natural law over our existing constitution as our existing constitution was over the unwritten english constitution, and it reverses the errors of the French Revolution. It has taken 20 years of tireless effort. And it will be done early in the new year. Bring about a political revolution instead of a bloody one. Join Us: https://propertarianinstitute.com/the-book/revolution/introduction-to-the-declaration-of-reformation/
-
The Reason Revolution Comes
THE REASON REVOLUTION COMES (a) We have no civil order. (b) No defense of life, property, or commons (c) no rule of law (d) no equal protection under the law (e) we have a non-neutral policing, (f) no juridical defense (g) and our govt is not organized for total war in an era of total war. (h) Our taxation, economy, and academy favor 35% at the expense of all the rest (i) Our financial system isn’t sovereign, delivers us to predatory parasitic globalists, impoverishes our middle, working, and laboring classes, and deprives us of +1T per year in commons. (j) We are forcibly involuntarily associated in polities, politics, business, community, education, and neighborhood, against our will, against our interests, preventing us from customizing commons, to the division and detriment of all, in the greatest failed policy in history. What’s the difference between right and left? Right, Generative Adversarial, Capitalizing(meritocratic) Eugenic Adaptation of Quality, versus Left, Consensus Harmonious, Parasitic(equalitarian) Dysgenic Devolution of Quantity. We are incompatible because our first causes (moral intuitions and reproductive strategies) are polar opposites. They are the extremes of the male hierarchical and female equalitarian reproductive strategies. The Left’s entire doctrine is science denial: a revolt against the Darwinian explanation for the success of western civ: a revolt against truth, formal, physical, and evolutionary laws. The Religious Rights only pseudoscience is only of natural law’s origin not its content.We are incompatible because the technological innovations of european modernity created the wealth and therefore the opportunity for individual pursuit of INSTINCTS – which was the opposite of convergence the (feminine) left predicted. The right continues convergence to evolutionary adaptability, and the left rebels by attempting to converge on evolutionary non-adaptability (regression). The right to harmony in adaptive duty by the production of agency, and the left to harmony in avoidance of adaptive duty by avoidance of the production of agency. The result is the parasitic elite, a parasitic underclass who escape or cannot compete in evolutinary markets, against the productive, laboring, working, and middle classes who successfully compete in markets.We’re incompatible because Right Merit Eugenic vs Left Equal Dysgenic are incompatible, and irreconcilable.We’re incompatible and we must Separate or War.We Have a Thorough Constitutional Reform Ready It will appease the vast majority of center-left, center, and center-right, at the cost of the globalists, the financial sector, and the deep state. It is as great an innovation in natural law and rights and obligations under natural law over our existing constitution as our existing constitution was over the unwritten english constitution, and it reverses the errors of the French Revolution. It has taken 20 years of tireless effort. And it will be done early in the new year. Bring about a political revolution instead of a bloody one. Join Us: https://propertarianinstitute.com/the-book/revolution/introduction-to-the-declaration-of-reformation/
-
Finally, A Bullpup Rifle For The Alien Robot Age 😉
The GM6 Lynx .50-cal Reciprocating Bullpup
The Robot dog movies this year have made a better case than the bugs did in Starship Troopers: we are gonna need more firepower for the robot age. This bullpup can fire armor-piercing incendiary ammo from a standing, and even a one-handed position. For sci-fi fans, other than the trusty RPG7 (the best anti-alien weapon of all), this is the only way to be sure. 😉
GM6 Lynx: $14,750.00
.50 BMG Armor Piercing Incendiary Rounds ~$3.00 Each.
Product Info & Specs The GM6 ‘Lynx’ is a semi-automatic anti-material rifle. The rifle was designed to be compact, lightweight, accurate, low-recoil, portable and easily deployable for immediate use. Most rifles chambered in .50 BMG are heavy, long, bulky, heavily recoiling and are of a slowly operated bolt action. Many not even magazine fed. Due to the bullpup configuration, most of the weight is re-distributed to the rear of the rifle allowing for the possibility of off hand firing. This is near impossible with most other .50 BMG rifles. Thanks to the unique barrel recoil technology, the rifle’s recoil is less than the other rifles in the same category. This design also allows the rifle to be transported at a length of only 915mm/36.5″. It weighs just 25lbs, with a slight rear bias weight distribution. Assembled with match grade barrels, capable of sub-MOA accuracy with match grade ammunition. Comes with spare magazine, pair of 34mm 50 BMG scope rings, spare barrel spring, bi-pod, cleaning kit, Pelican 1750 hard case and manual. Features: • Durable mil-spec design and construction • Unique barrel recoil technology dissipates most recoil energy • Semi automatic design • Magazine fed for ease of reloading • Bullpup design for compact size and optimum weight distribution • Sub-MOA with match grade ammunition • Barrel capable of retracting for transportation at an overall length of just 36.5″ • Lightweight, just 25 lbs Specifications:
Caliber .50 BMG Effective Range 1500m/1640 Yards Magazine Capacity 5 Method of Operation Long Recoil Action Operating Length 1126mm/44.3″ Transportation Length 928mm/36.5″ Barrel Length 730mm/28.7″ Barrel Twist 1 in 15 Picatinny Rail built-in Elevation 10.6 mils/36.2 MOA Weight, Empty 11500g/25.3 lbs -
Finally, A Bullpup Rifle For The Alien Robot Age 😉
The GM6 Lynx .50-cal Reciprocating Bullpup
The Robot dog movies this year have made a better case than the bugs did in Starship Troopers: we are gonna need more firepower for the robot age. This bullpup can fire armor-piercing incendiary ammo from a standing, and even a one-handed position. For sci-fi fans, other than the trusty RPG7 (the best anti-alien weapon of all), this is the only way to be sure. 😉
GM6 Lynx: $14,750.00
.50 BMG Armor Piercing Incendiary Rounds ~$3.00 Each.
Product Info & Specs The GM6 ‘Lynx’ is a semi-automatic anti-material rifle. The rifle was designed to be compact, lightweight, accurate, low-recoil, portable and easily deployable for immediate use. Most rifles chambered in .50 BMG are heavy, long, bulky, heavily recoiling and are of a slowly operated bolt action. Many not even magazine fed. Due to the bullpup configuration, most of the weight is re-distributed to the rear of the rifle allowing for the possibility of off hand firing. This is near impossible with most other .50 BMG rifles. Thanks to the unique barrel recoil technology, the rifle’s recoil is less than the other rifles in the same category. This design also allows the rifle to be transported at a length of only 915mm/36.5″. It weighs just 25lbs, with a slight rear bias weight distribution. Assembled with match grade barrels, capable of sub-MOA accuracy with match grade ammunition. Comes with spare magazine, pair of 34mm 50 BMG scope rings, spare barrel spring, bi-pod, cleaning kit, Pelican 1750 hard case and manual. Features: • Durable mil-spec design and construction • Unique barrel recoil technology dissipates most recoil energy • Semi automatic design • Magazine fed for ease of reloading • Bullpup design for compact size and optimum weight distribution • Sub-MOA with match grade ammunition • Barrel capable of retracting for transportation at an overall length of just 36.5″ • Lightweight, just 25 lbs Specifications:
Caliber .50 BMG Effective Range 1500m/1640 Yards Magazine Capacity 5 Method of Operation Long Recoil Action Operating Length 1126mm/44.3″ Transportation Length 928mm/36.5″ Barrel Length 730mm/28.7″ Barrel Twist 1 in 15 Picatinny Rail built-in Elevation 10.6 mils/36.2 MOA Weight, Empty 11500g/25.3 lbs -
P-Law is to Behavioral Science as Mathematics is to Physical Science
P-Law is to Behavioral Science as Mathematics is to Physical Science. It’s that profound. It’s also work: very much like math and programming, in that there is a limited vocabulary, grammar (disambiguation), and logic (consistency) that requires retraining intuition – especially retraining your moral intution to rely on economic (equlilibrial) logic. Until you try to learn P-Law you will never understand just how unconsious your judgements, how true or false they are, and how little agency you had over your thoughts. P-Law converts intution about the bheavioral world into reason, just as physics converted intution aboug the physical world into reason.