Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Overloading Works. Period.

    —“I know of people who DO know what [Marxian] dialectics means. They have elaborated a dialectical method in the form of an “algorithmic heuristic”, based upon an axiomatized ‘mathematics of dialectics’, which is both a ‘contra-Boolean algebra’ of dialectical logic, and a “non-standard model” of “Natural” Numbers arithmetic.”— Miguel Deton It’s called ‘Pilpul’. (Look it up) Like Numerology, Astrology, Scriptural Interpretation, Legal Interpretation, Marxism-Freudianism-Boazian Pseudoscience, and Postmodernisms, Meaning, the use of overloading to find excuses for any given status quo. Or we have another word for it: “The struggle to produce Fictionalisms”. As marx himself said, (I paraphrase) “If I am wrong, I can blame it on dialectic.” In other words, he was, like freud, boaz, and the entire frankfurt school, a fabricator (fictionalist). A desirable fiction. But a fiction none the less. Those lacking agency desire to create narrative falsehoods that give them the presumption of hope. It’s a mere psychological device. A form of mindfulness that humans have evolved in order to comfort themselves for having been born a failed experiment in evolution’s randomness.

  • ACTION| Actionable > Senseable > Experienceable > Reasonable > Imaginable. |TIME

    |ACTION| Actionable > Senseable > Experienceable > Reasonable > Imaginable. |TIME| always did < did < currently doing > will do > always does. || Unique > Countable > Bunchable > Uncountable > Irrelevant.

  • ACTION| Actionable > Senseable > Experienceable > Reasonable > Imaginable. |TIME

    |ACTION| Actionable > Senseable > Experienceable > Reasonable > Imaginable. |TIME| always did < did < currently doing > will do > always does. || Unique > Countable > Bunchable > Uncountable > Irrelevant.

  • Most of my conflcits come from the religiously inclined, and those who find that

    Most of my conflcits come from the religiously inclined, and those who find that same inclination in fiction. Truth is not merciful to our frames of reference.

  • Most of my conflcits come from the religiously inclined, and those who find that

    Most of my conflcits come from the religiously inclined, and those who find that same inclination in fiction. Truth is not merciful to our frames of reference.

  • Very Few People Pursue Truth. Most Want “True Enough”

    VERY FEW PEOPLE PURSUE TRUTH. MOST WANT “TRUE ENOUGH” The number of people whose primary concern is the discovery of perfect decidability (meaning Truth), and perfect decidability in physical, personal, interpersonal, political, and inter-political matters is very small. What all but a few want is not truth but justification, technique, or opportunity. The value of decidability (truth) to that near complete majority is in denying the opposition arguments, and modifying their justifications so that they are less impossible. But we will never change the human desire to discover a justificationary philosophy that grants them internal license to free ride or steal, in one way or another. Because all we are doing is seeking a means of expressing our evolutionary strategies.

  • Very Few People Pursue Truth. Most Want “True Enough”

    VERY FEW PEOPLE PURSUE TRUTH. MOST WANT “TRUE ENOUGH” The number of people whose primary concern is the discovery of perfect decidability (meaning Truth), and perfect decidability in physical, personal, interpersonal, political, and inter-political matters is very small. What all but a few want is not truth but justification, technique, or opportunity. The value of decidability (truth) to that near complete majority is in denying the opposition arguments, and modifying their justifications so that they are less impossible. But we will never change the human desire to discover a justificationary philosophy that grants them internal license to free ride or steal, in one way or another. Because all we are doing is seeking a means of expressing our evolutionary strategies.

  • “Follow the money” turns out to be about the optimum epistemology one can pursue

    “Follow the money” turns out to be about the optimum epistemology one can pursue. The difference is that both man and nature seek to defeat entropy, man follows property in toto because he can choose to outwit the course of events, and nature can’t choose but take the first opportunity it stumbles upon.

  • “Follow the money” turns out to be about the optimum epistemology one can pursue

    “Follow the money” turns out to be about the optimum epistemology one can pursue. The difference is that both man and nature seek to defeat entropy, man follows property in toto because he can choose to outwit the course of events, and nature can’t choose but take the first opportunity it stumbles upon.

  • The Oath Of Transcendent Man A Pagan, A Christian, An Aryan, A Warrior, A Man Transcendent

    I am a pagan if 1) I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and 2) if I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and 3) I treat the world as something to transform closer to an Eden in whatever ways I can before I die; and 4) if I deny the existence of a supreme being with dominion over the physical laws, and treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors as characters with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so. And 5) if I participate with others of my society in repetition of oaths, repetition of myths, repetition of festivals, repetition of holidays, and the perpetuation of all of the above to my offspring. And 6) if I leave open that synchronicity appears to exist now and then, and that it may be possible that there is a scientific explanation for it, other than just humans subject to similar stimuli producing similar intuitions and therefore similar ends. As far as I know this is all that is required of me to be a Pagan. I am a christian if I have adopted the teaching of christianity: 1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war. As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Christian. I am an Aryan if 1) I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them; 2) I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken; 3) I swear to speak no insult and demand it; 4) I speak the truth and demand it; 5) I take nothing not paid for and demand it; 6) I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it; 7) I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise; 8) to not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and 9) to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe and my people. As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be an Aryan. I am a warrior in that 1) we will prepare for war so perfectly that none dare enter it against us. 2) Once we go to war, we do so with *joy*, with eagerness, and with passion, and without mercy, without constraint, and without remorse; And 3) before ending war, we shall defeat an enemy completely such that no other dares a condition of our enemy, and the memory of the slaughter lives a hundred generations. As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Warrior. As far as I know, if I succeed as a Pagan, as a Christian, as an Aryan, as a Warrior, then I have transcended the animal man, and earned my place among the saints, heroes, demigods, gods, in the memories, histories, and legends of man. And that is the objective of heroes. We leave the rest for ordinary men. Curt Doolittle The Cult of Sovereignty The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Natural Law of Reciprocity The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine