Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Fascism was an attempt to solve both the cancer of communism by intentions, and

    Fascism was an attempt to solve both the cancer of communism by intentions, and the cancer of capitalism by externality.

  • “Market Fascism” Provides the only sovereignty. Rule of Natural Law of Reciproci

    “Market Fascism” Provides the only sovereignty. Rule of Natural Law of Reciprocity, Judiciary, Militia, Monarchy. Everyone else just rides on the market, and that market pays for all of the above.

  • “Market Fascism” Provides the only sovereignty. Rule of Natural Law of Reciproci

    “Market Fascism” Provides the only sovereignty. Rule of Natural Law of Reciprocity, Judiciary, Militia, Monarchy. Everyone else just rides on the market, and that market pays for all of the above.

  • Shock And Confrontation Awareness

    by William L. Benge I’m not sure I would describe myself as one of the brightest. Having said that, I still was able to grasp at every point how **Curt is using shock value as a vehicle for confrontation.*** Of course, I came to the table with an appreciation for these sorts of tools. So rather than be reactionary I found myself aware of the context, discerned the utility in the tactic, and, not seeing need to emote, continued contemplating the content. Western adult males cannot be coddled and if the few feel entitled to naps and safe spaces, you can be assured no one here is going to accommodate that. Will we eventually drop the shock and awe tactic? Of course. But tthink of it in terms of a test of sincerity for the time being. You see, I did pass that test. I asked no one to lower standards in my behalf. But perhaps I am unduly advantaged. You see, I inherited my western ethos from my father, as he did his. I simply come from stock who are strong and willing to tough it out, prove themselves and fight their way through. This do or die persistence, selflessness, cannot help but always prevail to some gain, because it is evidence by action of a man’s fitness for the times, for this time or anytime. Can we say the same for those who await coddling and softness?

  • Shock And Confrontation Awareness

    by William L. Benge I’m not sure I would describe myself as one of the brightest. Having said that, I still was able to grasp at every point how **Curt is using shock value as a vehicle for confrontation.*** Of course, I came to the table with an appreciation for these sorts of tools. So rather than be reactionary I found myself aware of the context, discerned the utility in the tactic, and, not seeing need to emote, continued contemplating the content. Western adult males cannot be coddled and if the few feel entitled to naps and safe spaces, you can be assured no one here is going to accommodate that. Will we eventually drop the shock and awe tactic? Of course. But tthink of it in terms of a test of sincerity for the time being. You see, I did pass that test. I asked no one to lower standards in my behalf. But perhaps I am unduly advantaged. You see, I inherited my western ethos from my father, as he did his. I simply come from stock who are strong and willing to tough it out, prove themselves and fight their way through. This do or die persistence, selflessness, cannot help but always prevail to some gain, because it is evidence by action of a man’s fitness for the times, for this time or anytime. Can we say the same for those who await coddling and softness?

  • “True Enough” gets ya survival and some successes. “Truth” gets ya transcendence

    —“True Enough” gets ya survival and some successes. “Truth” gets ya transcendence.”— Nick Heywood

  • “True Enough” gets ya survival and some successes. “Truth” gets ya transcendence

    —“True Enough” gets ya survival and some successes. “Truth” gets ya transcendence.”— Nick Heywood

  • Are You Sure That’s A Philosophy?

    What most people call a ‘philosophy’ is just a personal marketing statement of the criteria necessary for their voluntary cooperation: “here is my ideal social contract”. The problem is, that if their voluntary cooperation were desirable they would not need a philosophy as such. Champagne taste and swill pocketbook.

  • Are You Sure That’s A Philosophy?

    What most people call a ‘philosophy’ is just a personal marketing statement of the criteria necessary for their voluntary cooperation: “here is my ideal social contract”. The problem is, that if their voluntary cooperation were desirable they would not need a philosophy as such. Champagne taste and swill pocketbook.

  • Overloading Works. Period.

    —“I know of people who DO know what [Marxian] dialectics means. They have elaborated a dialectical method in the form of an “algorithmic heuristic”, based upon an axiomatized ‘mathematics of dialectics’, which is both a ‘contra-Boolean algebra’ of dialectical logic, and a “non-standard model” of “Natural” Numbers arithmetic.”— Miguel Deton It’s called ‘Pilpul’. (Look it up) Like Numerology, Astrology, Scriptural Interpretation, Legal Interpretation, Marxism-Freudianism-Boazian Pseudoscience, and Postmodernisms, Meaning, the use of overloading to find excuses for any given status quo. Or we have another word for it: “The struggle to produce Fictionalisms”. As marx himself said, (I paraphrase) “If I am wrong, I can blame it on dialectic.” In other words, he was, like freud, boaz, and the entire frankfurt school, a fabricator (fictionalist). A desirable fiction. But a fiction none the less. Those lacking agency desire to create narrative falsehoods that give them the presumption of hope. It’s a mere psychological device. A form of mindfulness that humans have evolved in order to comfort themselves for having been born a failed experiment in evolution’s randomness.