THERE ISN”T A DEFINITION OF FASCISM (REALLY)
Fascism doesn’t actually have a definition. Look it up. What it’s reducible to is the application of total war (national organization for military and political conflict) to economics (national organization for economic and political conflict). The Nazis even took it all the way to aesthetics. (Which was one of their principal innovations.)
If we look at what the fascists did and their incentives it’s just an attempt to resist the twin cosmopolitan strategies of communism and capitalism.
In rough colloquial terms it means little more than suppression of the market for opposition. Or rather, intolerance for opposition.
Source: Original Site Post
-
You Can’t Get Around Reciprocity. Politics Is Solved.
I mean, you can’t get around reciprocity as the measure of morality. You can’t get around property in toto as the test and limit of reciprocity. You can’t get around natural law of reciprocity as the means of dispute resolution. You can’t get around markets under natural law of reciprocity. You can’t get around the fact that goods services and information can be used to conduct thefts directly, indirectly, and by externality. You can’t get around the fact that you can only warranty what you can perform restitution for, and therefore what you can warranty limits the goods, services, and information that you can bring to market. You can’t get around the fact that even proposing an alternative to a market order is something you cannot warranty, and something that is de facto an attempted theft. You can’t get around the fact that no matter what order you want to produce can be produced through exchange. What you can’t get around and none of us can get around, is that the least able have behavior to trade – what they may not do, and the most able have talents to trade – what they may do. You can’t get around these things. Ever. As far as I know political science is solved. It will just require us to suppress parasitism in this world by political means the same way we have suppressed parasitism by violence, theft, fraud in goods and services. And the principle means of doing so is suppression of advocacy of parasitism by information. And to do that requires only that we publish the requirements for reciprocity in all speech. And it turns out, that is possible, and not all that difficult. -
You Can’t Get Around Reciprocity. Politics Is Solved.
I mean, you can’t get around reciprocity as the measure of morality. You can’t get around property in toto as the test and limit of reciprocity. You can’t get around natural law of reciprocity as the means of dispute resolution. You can’t get around markets under natural law of reciprocity. You can’t get around the fact that goods services and information can be used to conduct thefts directly, indirectly, and by externality. You can’t get around the fact that you can only warranty what you can perform restitution for, and therefore what you can warranty limits the goods, services, and information that you can bring to market. You can’t get around the fact that even proposing an alternative to a market order is something you cannot warranty, and something that is de facto an attempted theft. You can’t get around the fact that no matter what order you want to produce can be produced through exchange. What you can’t get around and none of us can get around, is that the least able have behavior to trade – what they may not do, and the most able have talents to trade – what they may do. You can’t get around these things. Ever. As far as I know political science is solved. It will just require us to suppress parasitism in this world by political means the same way we have suppressed parasitism by violence, theft, fraud in goods and services. And the principle means of doing so is suppression of advocacy of parasitism by information. And to do that requires only that we publish the requirements for reciprocity in all speech. And it turns out, that is possible, and not all that difficult. -
What Does “Market Fascism” Mean?
WHAT DOES “MARKET FASCISM” MEAN? It means nothing other than the prohibition on any alternative to voluntary and reciprocal orders, because even advocacy of an alternative is to engage in conspiracy to commit theft. Militia > Sovereignty > Rule of Law > Markets In Everything -
What Does “Market Fascism” Mean?
WHAT DOES “MARKET FASCISM” MEAN? It means nothing other than the prohibition on any alternative to voluntary and reciprocal orders, because even advocacy of an alternative is to engage in conspiracy to commit theft. Militia > Sovereignty > Rule of Law > Markets In Everything -
Western Man Does Not Ask The Capitalism Vs Socialism Question: It”s A Cosmopolitan Dichotomy.
WESTERN MAN DOES NOT ASK THE CAPITALISM VS SOCIALISM QUESTION: IT”S A COSMOPOLITAN DICHOTOMY. The question of capitalism vs socialism is not a western question – It’s a Cosmopolitan Question. Westerners have always been homogenous and therefore could afford to be communitarian but we have done so by tripartism: classes. The agrarian and industrial revolutions made it possible to shift vast numbers between the economic classes even if we maintained our genetic and social classes. The automation and information revolution is to some degree, reversing this trend. And the wealth made possible by that shift created the illusion of difference between the classes in ability, rather than in consumption. The western question is not capitalism vs communism. The western question is the limits of discretion. We have all preferred the results of aristocratic production of commons, as long as aristocracy limited itself to rule of law by natural law. We had only tradition, not science, to explain it to us. And we lacked the economics to measure it. We don’t any longer. So quite the opposite from what we intuit, we are in an even better position today to restore the optimum political order: a large number of monarchies competing for status and revenue produced by creating optimum markets to attract different distributions of classes of citizens. It is extremely difficult to produce a single poly economic order. It is very simple to produce a market for economic orders. The reason being that peoples with different abilities require different political orders. Hence my concern with what I call ‘nationalism’ or ‘homogeneity’. Meaning: people with common kin class and economic interests. -
Western Man Does Not Ask The Capitalism Vs Socialism Question: It”s A Cosmopolitan Dichotomy.
WESTERN MAN DOES NOT ASK THE CAPITALISM VS SOCIALISM QUESTION: IT”S A COSMOPOLITAN DICHOTOMY. The question of capitalism vs socialism is not a western question – It’s a Cosmopolitan Question. Westerners have always been homogenous and therefore could afford to be communitarian but we have done so by tripartism: classes. The agrarian and industrial revolutions made it possible to shift vast numbers between the economic classes even if we maintained our genetic and social classes. The automation and information revolution is to some degree, reversing this trend. And the wealth made possible by that shift created the illusion of difference between the classes in ability, rather than in consumption. The western question is not capitalism vs communism. The western question is the limits of discretion. We have all preferred the results of aristocratic production of commons, as long as aristocracy limited itself to rule of law by natural law. We had only tradition, not science, to explain it to us. And we lacked the economics to measure it. We don’t any longer. So quite the opposite from what we intuit, we are in an even better position today to restore the optimum political order: a large number of monarchies competing for status and revenue produced by creating optimum markets to attract different distributions of classes of citizens. It is extremely difficult to produce a single poly economic order. It is very simple to produce a market for economic orders. The reason being that peoples with different abilities require different political orders. Hence my concern with what I call ‘nationalism’ or ‘homogeneity’. Meaning: people with common kin class and economic interests. -
MARKETS ARE MADE BY INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION OF PARASITISM
MARKETS ARE MADE BY INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION OF PARASITISM. -
MARKETS ARE MADE BY INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION OF PARASITISM
MARKETS ARE MADE BY INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION OF PARASITISM. -
Fascism was an attempt to solve both the cancer of communism by intentions, and
Fascism was an attempt to solve both the cancer of communism by intentions, and the cancer of capitalism by externality.