Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • The Fate of Civilizations (really)

    Coercion (Organization): There are only three means of human coercion:

    1. Political: Force/Defense, 2. Remunerative: Bribe-Trade/Boycott-Deprivation, 3. Social: Insurance(Inclusion)/Ostracization(Canceling)Institutions(Scale): All civilizations develop those institutions in one order or another:

    1. Europe (Oligarchy and Law): Militia -> Empirical Law -> State -> (Philosophy, but Fail at underclass religion) 2. China (State and Bureaucracy):   Military(State) -> Philospophy(Religion) -> Fail At Empirical Law – Stagnation 4. India: (Caste and Culture) Military -> Informal Religion -> Fail At State Formation -> Fail at Empirical Law (Stagnation) 3. Middle East: (Tribes and Formal Religion) Religion -> Military(State) ->Fail at Law – Tribalism (Regression) (African empire formation and American continental empire formations were truncated – they were behind. )

    And each civilization naturally produced excellence in its original or core institutions.  The problem is the long-term consequences of those foundational institutions are extremely different. Because the rate of evolution depends on the rate of experimentation, and the possibility of retention of improvements because of the possibility of eliminating regression to the mean – continuing natural selection). You can reduce the difference in group evolutionary strategies, and choice of their first institution, between civilizations to their use of the underclasses:

    4. Exploitation(middle east) – reversing natural selection 3. Limiting their Damage(India) – castes for natural selection 2. Reducing their Number(China) – bureaucracy for natural selection 1. Or sifting them via merit, limiting the reproduction of the rest (Europe). – markets for natural selection So, yes. Ouch: That one hurt a bit. Because it’s so simple. Peasant “Domesticated Human Animal” treatment drives demand for institutions. You would naturally get bias to each culture’s institutions, by that choice alone. This means civilizational differences originate in how the military (ruling classes)  demarcated ‘humans’ and other domesticated animals:

    1. Law (Europe @100): Rational: Empiricism, Science, Law: Europeans (market) achieved it from a position of middle neoteny. 2. State (China @105 ): Reasonable: Wisdom and State: Chinese (bureaucracy) achieved it from a position of greater neoteny. 3. Culture(India @100/85), Allegorical: Myth and Culture (unorganized religion). The Indians used a caste system because of the sheer number of the underclass – which is why the Indian upper class has such startling IQ numbers despite national averages. 4. Religion (middle east @85 ): Fictional: Falsehood and Religion (organized religion). The middle east – from a position of lower neoteny – particularly Islam – went the opposite direction, of lionizing and creating a religious monopoly for the underclasses – that they can’t escape.

    5. ( ?? ) Africa (@75) Delayed formation because of west African geographic isolation. And in the face of lowest neoteny 6. ( ?? ) Americas (@85) Delayed formation because of geographic isolation. And (Get ready for another ouch) This appears to have been necessary given the homogeneity or heterogeneity of the regional populations, and the degree of evolutionary neoteny (we call IQ and aggression of the populations). Ergo, we the institutions evolved that needed to evolve for the degree of evolution of the regional population AND its means of production AND means of warfare.

    Africans: Africa = East African Urheimat and Coastal Dispersion (@75) South Eurasians: East Africa To Dry Persian Gulf Urheimat dispersion from north Africa to India (@85) East Asians: Persian gulf, to India to Tibet and Tibetan Plateau Urheimat – East Asia north to south (@105) Sout Eurasian hybridization (@90) Europeans: Europe to Urals, Europeans, Ancestral North Eurasian, Anatolian Farmer Hybridization)  (really to china) (@100) (aggressive selection pressure in Europe for 3000+ yrs) SiberianAmericans: East Asian and ancestral north Eurasian hybridization. (@85) (Eskimo peoples (@90) In other words, world choices and consequences were deterministic in the absence of knowledge of evolutionary pressures and the consequences. Now that we know, what’s our excuse? 😉    

  • The Fate of Civilizations (really)

    Coercion (Organization): There are only three means of human coercion:

    1. Political: Force/Defense, 2. Remunerative: Bribe-Trade/Boycott-Deprivation, 3. Social: Insurance(Inclusion)/Ostracization(Canceling)Institutions(Scale): All civilizations develop those institutions in one order or another:

    1. Europe (Oligarchy and Law): Militia -> Empirical Law -> State -> (Philosophy, but Fail at underclass religion) 2. China (State and Bureaucracy):   Military(State) -> Philospophy(Religion) -> Fail At Empirical Law – Stagnation 4. India: (Caste and Culture) Military -> Informal Religion -> Fail At State Formation -> Fail at Empirical Law (Stagnation) 3. Middle East: (Tribes and Formal Religion) Religion -> Military(State) ->Fail at Law – Tribalism (Regression) (African empire formation and American continental empire formations were truncated – they were behind. )

    And each civilization naturally produced excellence in its original or core institutions.  The problem is the long-term consequences of those foundational institutions are extremely different. Because the rate of evolution depends on the rate of experimentation, and the possibility of retention of improvements because of the possibility of eliminating regression to the mean – continuing natural selection). You can reduce the difference in group evolutionary strategies, and choice of their first institution, between civilizations to their use of the underclasses:

    4. Exploitation(middle east) – reversing natural selection 3. Limiting their Damage(India) – castes for natural selection 2. Reducing their Number(China) – bureaucracy for natural selection 1. Or sifting them via merit, limiting the reproduction of the rest (Europe). – markets for natural selection So, yes. Ouch: That one hurt a bit. Because it’s so simple. Peasant “Domesticated Human Animal” treatment drives demand for institutions. You would naturally get bias to each culture’s institutions, by that choice alone. This means civilizational differences originate in how the military (ruling classes)  demarcated ‘humans’ and other domesticated animals:

    1. Law (Europe @100): Rational: Empiricism, Science, Law: Europeans (market) achieved it from a position of middle neoteny. 2. State (China @105 ): Reasonable: Wisdom and State: Chinese (bureaucracy) achieved it from a position of greater neoteny. 3. Culture(India @100/85), Allegorical: Myth and Culture (unorganized religion). The Indians used a caste system because of the sheer number of the underclass – which is why the Indian upper class has such startling IQ numbers despite national averages. 4. Religion (middle east @85 ): Fictional: Falsehood and Religion (organized religion). The middle east – from a position of lower neoteny – particularly Islam – went the opposite direction, of lionizing and creating a religious monopoly for the underclasses – that they can’t escape.

    5. ( ?? ) Africa (@75) Delayed formation because of west African geographic isolation. And in the face of lowest neoteny 6. ( ?? ) Americas (@85) Delayed formation because of geographic isolation. And (Get ready for another ouch) This appears to have been necessary given the homogeneity or heterogeneity of the regional populations, and the degree of evolutionary neoteny (we call IQ and aggression of the populations). Ergo, we the institutions evolved that needed to evolve for the degree of evolution of the regional population AND its means of production AND means of warfare.

    Africans: Africa = East African Urheimat and Coastal Dispersion (@75) South Eurasians: East Africa To Dry Persian Gulf Urheimat dispersion from north Africa to India (@85) East Asians: Persian gulf, to India to Tibet and Tibetan Plateau Urheimat – East Asia north to south (@105) Sout Eurasian hybridization (@90) Europeans: Europe to Urals, Europeans, Ancestral North Eurasian, Anatolian Farmer Hybridization)  (really to china) (@100) (aggressive selection pressure in Europe for 3000+ yrs) SiberianAmericans: East Asian and ancestral north Eurasian hybridization. (@85) (Eskimo peoples (@90) In other words, world choices and consequences were deterministic in the absence of knowledge of evolutionary pressures and the consequences. Now that we know, what’s our excuse? 😉    

  • FOR PHILOSOPHY NERDS: The Solution To The Liar’s Paradox. (Really)

    FOR PHILOSOPHY NERDS:

    The Solution To The Liar’s Paradox. (Really)

    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2021/04/18/the-solution-to-the-liars-paradox-is-simple-its-a-lie-heres-why/

    Source date (UTC): 2021-04-18 21:02:07 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106088348196623472

  • Staying on Message: Chastizing the Losing Right

    I’m still here. I’ll always be here. And I’ll continue to ridicule you dumb fucks for being dumb fucks, because you give a shit about optics generated by the enemy, to bait you once again, into continuing to destroy your leadership, as you wait for Jesus or Hitlers who will never and can never come.
     
    I did, we did, what needed doing. We got crashed by BLM, we didn’t take the bait. I did the smart thing, and we didn’t have a Charlottesville, didn’t even get bad press, but you morons let the left take videos, edit them, and fool you dumb fuks.
     
    The only thing that went wrong is that I failed to understand just how f–king stupid, shallow, emotional, and ignorant you idiots are. Which was an eye opener for me. It’s why we gave up on you. It’s why your elites gave up on you. It’s why your government gave up on you. It’s why the whole world laughs at you for being the losers you are.
     
    Then you ass-clowns raid the capitol building and justify your oppression because you had no plan, gave no speech, issued no demands, didn’t launch a political movement, didn’t seize the conversation, I mean, the right really is the dumb fucks of the universe. Seriously. The minute I knew who was running that sh-t show I knew what would happen.
     
    You think what you want or that your approval matters – as if you’re hot chicks. But you’re the anal leakage of the world political movements. No one wants you. They’re letting you die off. Because You aren’t GOOD ENOUGH to get a leader. You want everything your way but every one of you wants something different. You won’t team up. You won’t shut up. You tear down anyone who gets ahead becaus nazis, nats, civnats, catholics, and fundamentalists are spoiled little fucks who want everything their way despite having nothing to trade, no courage, no money, no effort.
     
    You don’t donate money to leadership. You don’t show up. You don’t hold the line. You want petty violence that only justifies your further oppression. You always fall for the enemy’s bait. You don’t defend your leaders when they stand up no matter what they do. You’re shit. Because white privileges is true. You think you’re deserving. You aren’t. Your ancestors might have been. But you aren’t. You have to DEMONSTRATE your deserving by paying the costs of revolutionary action.
     
    We took responsibility for you. We tried to make you losers into a viable political movement. It wasn’t my idea, it was John and Others. It was John’s populist movement. It was just my work he built it on. But you wouldn’t donate to him so he couldn’t take over as the face of his own movement.
     
    We were imitating the founders. It’s legal. They couldn’t stop us. We had a strategy, a plan, we had a message, we had policies, we had the timing – and it would have worked. Instead, Trump lost, the enemy is in power, you’re silenced, and they’re running the clock down on your genetics.
     
    You’re the problem. So shut up, man up, pay up, show up, and support any and every leader with any and every plan that can move the needle. Or continue to get owned by every non-white and every white liberal and their enabling men-without-chests.
     
     

  • Staying on Message: Chastizing the Losing Right

    I’m still here. I’ll always be here. And I’ll continue to ridicule you dumb fucks for being dumb fucks, because you give a shit about optics generated by the enemy, to bait you once again, into continuing to destroy your leadership, as you wait for Jesus or Hitlers who will never and can never come.
     
    I did, we did, what needed doing. We got crashed by BLM, we didn’t take the bait. I did the smart thing, and we didn’t have a Charlottesville, didn’t even get bad press, but you morons let the left take videos, edit them, and fool you dumb fuks.
     
    The only thing that went wrong is that I failed to understand just how f–king stupid, shallow, emotional, and ignorant you idiots are. Which was an eye opener for me. It’s why we gave up on you. It’s why your elites gave up on you. It’s why your government gave up on you. It’s why the whole world laughs at you for being the losers you are.
     
    Then you ass-clowns raid the capitol building and justify your oppression because you had no plan, gave no speech, issued no demands, didn’t launch a political movement, didn’t seize the conversation, I mean, the right really is the dumb fucks of the universe. Seriously. The minute I knew who was running that sh-t show I knew what would happen.
     
    You think what you want or that your approval matters – as if you’re hot chicks. But you’re the anal leakage of the world political movements. No one wants you. They’re letting you die off. Because You aren’t GOOD ENOUGH to get a leader. You want everything your way but every one of you wants something different. You won’t team up. You won’t shut up. You tear down anyone who gets ahead becaus nazis, nats, civnats, catholics, and fundamentalists are spoiled little fucks who want everything their way despite having nothing to trade, no courage, no money, no effort.
     
    You don’t donate money to leadership. You don’t show up. You don’t hold the line. You want petty violence that only justifies your further oppression. You always fall for the enemy’s bait. You don’t defend your leaders when they stand up no matter what they do. You’re shit. Because white privileges is true. You think you’re deserving. You aren’t. Your ancestors might have been. But you aren’t. You have to DEMONSTRATE your deserving by paying the costs of revolutionary action.
     
    We took responsibility for you. We tried to make you losers into a viable political movement. It wasn’t my idea, it was John and Others. It was John’s populist movement. It was just my work he built it on. But you wouldn’t donate to him so he couldn’t take over as the face of his own movement.
     
    We were imitating the founders. It’s legal. They couldn’t stop us. We had a strategy, a plan, we had a message, we had policies, we had the timing – and it would have worked. Instead, Trump lost, the enemy is in power, you’re silenced, and they’re running the clock down on your genetics.
     
    You’re the problem. So shut up, man up, pay up, show up, and support any and every leader with any and every plan that can move the needle. Or continue to get owned by every non-white and every white liberal and their enabling men-without-chests.
     
     

  • The Solution to The Liar’s Paradox is Simple. It’s a Lie. Here’s Why.

    Summary: The liar’s paradox, like all paradoxes, and most if not all philosophical claims of depth, complexity, or undecidability consists of nothing but malformed statements in the grammar of continuous recursive disambiguation that violate the contract of suggestion (truthful speech) and due diligence against error, bias, and deceit, between speaker and audience. Given the Liar’s Paradox (And all the historical equivalents):

    “[ everything in this box is false ]” 1. Langauge consists of “Incremental suggestion by Continuous Recursive Disambiguation”, and grammar the rules of continuous recursive disambiguation. 2. The liar’s paradox is grammatically incorrect because it calls for recursion without supplying additional(continuous) information – in algorithmic logic this is called an infinite loop: a malformed statement that violates the rules of continuous recursive disambiguation. 3. Human Cognition: Consists of the series: Sensation, Logic (constancy of relations in time frame), Predictive Memory (elements), Episodic Memory (location, place(space), direction, turn direction, head direction, eye direction, objects, landmarks, boundaries, exits), Auto-Association, Wayfinding (Recursion), Adversarial Prediction, Thalmic Awareness, Attention-Recursion, Choice, Action, Repeat (recurse). 4. Human Grammatical Capacity is just an application of the primitive hierarchy of movement: Continuous Recursive Disambiguation. 5. Human Speech consists of minor variations in phonetics and grammars of continuous recursive disambiguation. 6. Human Speech organized by Grammarof Continuous Recursive Disambiguation consists of Names(Referents), statements(transformations), sentences (transactions), narratives(ledgers), and consent/not(balances) in communication, with additional continuous recursive disambiguation as due diligence against error, bias, deceit both parties. 7. All Paradigms (disciplines) from logic and math to Ordinary Language to the fictionalisms (occult->theology, sophistry->idealism, magic-pseudoscience) consist of either deflationary elimination of dimensions of human perceptible constant relations or inflationary removal of constraints on observables open to human sense perception and increases in permissible dimensions of fictions. 8. Words don’t mean things people do. People fail to communicate, or we fail to interpret their failure of communication, or we err in interpretation. 9. The only intent (meaning) of a paradox is to deceive (or create an illusion) – because it was created by intent – just as are optical illusions. Humans find very few natural conditions that can ‘fool’ human sense perception for more than a few moments -including such complex imagery as zebras. 10. Success of these illusions that exploit human intuition is dependent on human ignorance of their construction. We can learn to detect and correct for them just as we can learn to detect and correct for mirages. 11. The example of the liar’s paradox illustrates operational (algorithmic) vs set logic and why the foundations of mathematics, philosophy, and the philosophy of language movements failed to produce the sciences they sought – and even physics to economics suffer from this continued failure. 12. I have been unable to discover any pretense of philosophical undecidability that isn’t a malformed statement (as in mathematical grammar), that violates a variation of the promise of continuous recursive disambiguation, producing a transaction for meaning plus due diligence. 13. We call this failure of the philosophical and logical movments ‘mathiness‘ or the failure to grasp the operational foundations of mathematics, vs the verbal, set, or symbolic reduction of mathematics for ease of human use. (In particular that the computational reducibility of mathematics is far smaller than the computational possibility of operations.) 14. The failure of thought leadership in western civilization in the 20th is due to the failure of Babbage (or his peers) to generalize his discovery of computation, allowing a century of innumeracy, sophistry, and pseudoscience, to crate what Hayek called ‘the new mysticism’. 15. It has taken the Turing revolution, the computational revolution, the neuroimaging revolution, and the AI revolution (and one simple insight of Chomsky’s application of Turning) to solve a problem that never should have occurred, and now we must reverse the better part of two centuries of sophistry and pseudoscience, producing a third scientific revolution that corrects them. [End of Document]

  • The Solution to The Liar’s Paradox is Simple. It’s a Lie. Here’s Why.

    Summary: The liar’s paradox, like all paradoxes, and most if not all philosophical claims of depth, complexity, or undecidability consists of nothing but malformed statements in the grammar of continuous recursive disambiguation that violate the contract of suggestion (truthful speech) and due diligence against error, bias, and deceit, between speaker and audience. Given the Liar’s Paradox (And all the historical equivalents):

    “[ everything in this box is false ]” 1. Langauge consists of “Incremental suggestion by Continuous Recursive Disambiguation”, and grammar the rules of continuous recursive disambiguation. 2. The liar’s paradox is grammatically incorrect because it calls for recursion without supplying additional(continuous) information – in algorithmic logic this is called an infinite loop: a malformed statement that violates the rules of continuous recursive disambiguation. 3. Human Cognition: Consists of the series: Sensation, Logic (constancy of relations in time frame), Predictive Memory (elements), Episodic Memory (location, place(space), direction, turn direction, head direction, eye direction, objects, landmarks, boundaries, exits), Auto-Association, Wayfinding (Recursion), Adversarial Prediction, Thalmic Awareness, Attention-Recursion, Choice, Action, Repeat (recurse). 4. Human Grammatical Capacity is just an application of the primitive hierarchy of movement: Continuous Recursive Disambiguation. 5. Human Speech consists of minor variations in phonetics and grammars of continuous recursive disambiguation. 6. Human Speech organized by Grammarof Continuous Recursive Disambiguation consists of Names(Referents), statements(transformations), sentences (transactions), narratives(ledgers), and consent/not(balances) in communication, with additional continuous recursive disambiguation as due diligence against error, bias, deceit both parties. 7. All Paradigms (disciplines) from logic and math to Ordinary Language to the fictionalisms (occult->theology, sophistry->idealism, magic-pseudoscience) consist of either deflationary elimination of dimensions of human perceptible constant relations or inflationary removal of constraints on observables open to human sense perception and increases in permissible dimensions of fictions. 8. Words don’t mean things people do. People fail to communicate, or we fail to interpret their failure of communication, or we err in interpretation. 9. The only intent (meaning) of a paradox is to deceive (or create an illusion) – because it was created by intent – just as are optical illusions. Humans find very few natural conditions that can ‘fool’ human sense perception for more than a few moments -including such complex imagery as zebras. 10. Success of these illusions that exploit human intuition is dependent on human ignorance of their construction. We can learn to detect and correct for them just as we can learn to detect and correct for mirages. 11. The example of the liar’s paradox illustrates operational (algorithmic) vs set logic and why the foundations of mathematics, philosophy, and the philosophy of language movements failed to produce the sciences they sought – and even physics to economics suffer from this continued failure. 12. I have been unable to discover any pretense of philosophical undecidability that isn’t a malformed statement (as in mathematical grammar), that violates a variation of the promise of continuous recursive disambiguation, producing a transaction for meaning plus due diligence. 13. We call this failure of the philosophical and logical movments ‘mathiness‘ or the failure to grasp the operational foundations of mathematics, vs the verbal, set, or symbolic reduction of mathematics for ease of human use. (In particular that the computational reducibility of mathematics is far smaller than the computational possibility of operations.) 14. The failure of thought leadership in western civilization in the 20th is due to the failure of Babbage (or his peers) to generalize his discovery of computation, allowing a century of innumeracy, sophistry, and pseudoscience, to crate what Hayek called ‘the new mysticism’. 15. It has taken the Turing revolution, the computational revolution, the neuroimaging revolution, and the AI revolution (and one simple insight of Chomsky’s application of Turning) to solve a problem that never should have occurred, and now we must reverse the better part of two centuries of sophistry and pseudoscience, producing a third scientific revolution that corrects them. [End of Document]

  • “Since the universe is deterministic and people are just bots, we can call every

    –“Since the universe is deterministic and people are just bots, we can call everything involuntary and be done with it.”- WorMartin

    Source date (UTC): 2021-04-18 19:16:21 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106087932329115344

  • @DenisetheKelt I did what needed doing. We got crashed by BLM, didn’t have a cha

    @DenisetheKelt I did what needed doing. We got crashed by BLM, didn’t have a charlottesville, didn’t even get bad press, but you morons let the left take videos, edit them, and fool you dumb fuks.

    I’m still here. I’ll always be here. And I’ll continue to ridicule you dumb fucks for being dumb fucks, because you give a shit about optics generated by the enemy to continue to destroy your leadership, as you waith for jesus or hitlers who will never and can never come.

    The only thing that went wrong is that I failed to understand just how fucking stupid, shallow, emotional, and ignornat you idiots are. Which was an eye opener for me. It’s why we gave up on you. It’s why your elites gave up on you. It’s why your government gave up on you. It’s why the whole world laughs at you for being the losers you are.

    You aren’t GOOD ENOUGH to get a leader. You want everything your way but every one of you wants somethign different. You dont shut up. You tear down anyone who gets ahead becaus nazis, nats, civnats, and fundamentalists are spoliled little fucks who want everything their way despite having nothing to trade, no courage, no money, no effort You don’t donate money to leadership. You don’t show up. You don’t hold the line. You want petty violence that only justifies your oppression. You always fall for teh enemy’s bait. You don’t defend your leaders when they stand up no matter what they do. You’re shit. Because white privilges is true. You think yiu’re deserving. You aren’t. Your ancestors might have been. But you arent. You have to DEMONSTRATE your deserving by paying the costs of revolutionary action.

    You think your approval matters – as if your hot chicks. But you’re the anal leakage of the world political movements. No one wants you. They’re letting you die off.

    We took responsibility for you., It wasn’t my idea, it was John and Others. We were imitating the founders. It’s legal. They can’t stop us. We had a strategy, a plan, we had a message, we had policies, we had the timing – and it would have worked. Instead Trump lost, the enemy is in power, you’re silenced, and they’re running the clock down on your genetics.

    But You dumb fucks can’t hold formation in the face of leftist ridicule. I mean, you’re just spoiled little schoolgirls whining ’cause you cant’ get a date. You cancelled us because the left BAITING YOU DUMB FUCKS into cancelling us.

    You’re the problem. So shut up, man up, pay up, show up, and support any and every leader with any and every plan that can move the needle.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-04-18 19:14:59 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106087926973055818

  • @Rhodok of course. Yarvin has correct a diagnosis (cathedral), written as jewish

    @Rhodok of course. Yarvin has correct a diagnosis (cathedral), written as jewish critique (which is why its fun), but he doesn’t address the cause (jewish war against western civlization for the second time), and he doesn’t have a restorative solution – he recommends a jewish solution – becuase he’s cognitively jewish.

    I just do the science. I’ve done it. I know what made us hyper competitive. I know how to restore it, govern it, and continue it. The romans pretty much mastered the need for sliding government: fascism in war, oligarchy in peace, democracy in windfalls, and ‘buying into the franchise by defending it”. The Romans over extended because of the low productivity of ancient agrarianism, and egypt could ‘feed the world’ at that time. They didn’t account for the vast differences in the east – nor the vastly lower intelligence, lower trust, petty tribalism, and superstition of those people. So the ratio of ethnically european (roman)people to the conquered was too thin, and they had to rely on foreigners of alien cultures, and they didn’t have the population sufficient to even administer the territories they’d conquered. And having killed off the celts in the celtic holocaust, the opened the door for the less domesticated germans from the north, at the same time as the huns from the east. Instead if they’d stayed european, they were on the verge of the industrial revolution, and we’d still be romans today.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-04-18 19:04:16 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106087884793569776