@Rhodok of course. Yarvin has correct a diagnosis (cathedral), written as jewish

@Rhodok of course. Yarvin has correct a diagnosis (cathedral), written as jewish critique (which is why its fun), but he doesn’t address the cause (jewish war against western civlization for the second time), and he doesn’t have a restorative solution – he recommends a jewish solution – becuase he’s cognitively jewish.

I just do the science. I’ve done it. I know what made us hyper competitive. I know how to restore it, govern it, and continue it. The romans pretty much mastered the need for sliding government: fascism in war, oligarchy in peace, democracy in windfalls, and ‘buying into the franchise by defending it”. The Romans over extended because of the low productivity of ancient agrarianism, and egypt could ‘feed the world’ at that time. They didn’t account for the vast differences in the east – nor the vastly lower intelligence, lower trust, petty tribalism, and superstition of those people. So the ratio of ethnically european (roman)people to the conquered was too thin, and they had to rely on foreigners of alien cultures, and they didn’t have the population sufficient to even administer the territories they’d conquered. And having killed off the celts in the celtic holocaust, the opened the door for the less domesticated germans from the north, at the same time as the huns from the east. Instead if they’d stayed european, they were on the verge of the industrial revolution, and we’d still be romans today.