Source: Original Site Post

  • “Democracy always fails”– I can’t test that statement. I think the correctx ans

    –“Democracy always fails”–

    I can’t test that statement. I think the correctx answer is that women and jews have the same instincts, same intuitions, and same wants, and jews can perform the leadership for women, where women can’t on their own. So the I think the correct interpretation is that democracy is fine for the production of commons, as long as it’s limited to men of the same ethnicity, in a majority middle class population. Otherwise the record of germanic, christian, rule of law, monarchies is far better than the record of 20th century democracy – or even 19th century. Democracy is fit only for the oligarchical classes: upper middle. Because they are the only demographic that has the same interests as the rest of the polity.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-04-18 17:21:56 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106087482402970576

  • @alternative_right I can’t test that statement. I think the correctx answer is t

    @alternative_right I can’t test that statement. I think the correctx answer is that women and jews have the same instincts, same intuitions, and same wants, and jews can perform the leadership for women, where women can’t on their own. So the I think the correct interpretation is that democracy is fine for the production of commons, as long as it’s limited to men of the same ethnicity, in a majority middle class population. Otherwise the record of germanic, christian, rule of law, monarchies is far better than the record of 20th century democracy – or even 19th century. Democracy is fit only for the oligarchical classes: upper middle. Because they are the only demographic that has the same interests as the rest of the polity.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-04-18 17:21:30 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106087480704745431

  • Boost of @alternative_right Almost all of what people complain about as “Jewish”

    Boost of @alternative_right Almost all of what people complain about as “Jewish” is in fact just democracy as usual.

    Even happens without Jews.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-04-18 17:11:34 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106087480900425051

  • Untitled

    https://leakedreality.com/video/7337/trump-supporter-explains-to-anqueefa-the-difference-between-2020-and-2021

    Source date (UTC): 2021-04-18 00:56:07 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106083605985264980

  • @Hail Gab doesn’t allow chaining of posts like twitter, nor does it have a suffi

    @Hail Gab doesn’t allow chaining of posts like twitter, nor does it have a sufficient character limit like facebook. So we are stuck with starting in a post and adding to it with comments.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-04-17 20:50:02 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106082638419285760

  • Boost of @MemeSlinger If you removed black violence from the equation, America w

    Boost of @MemeSlinger If you removed black violence from the equation, America would be just as safe as Scandinavian countries like Finland and Norway. America doesn’t have a gun problem, it has a negro problem.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-04-17 13:32:22 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106163288195807406

  • THE FUTURE OF GLOBALISM VS NATIONALISM In a post-agrarian world, all nations are

    THE FUTURE OF GLOBALISM VS NATIONALISM

    In a post-agrarian world, all nations are compatible, and all empires, and all civilizations, are incompatible. An explicitly nationalist China, Russia, Hungary, India are naturally resistant to two hostile movements: the spread of Islam that has destroyed every great civilization of the ancient world, and the spread of the spectrum of Jewish Cosmopolitanism that has destroyed much of the modern world, and now spreads more softly using Jewish-European liberalism and neo-conservatism, despite managed decline. That is what the world is reacting to in the postwar era. Only Islam and Judaism are globalists. Everyone else is nationalist. I expect this framing to emerge over the next 20 years. It is the natural result of optimum adaptability in the technological age. It is the only means of maintaining peace and prosperity in this age.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-04-17 03:36:13 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106078573282271462

  • Regarding China: The Future of Communsim, Globalism, and Islam vs NATIONALISM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bV7PuqlMOzI In a post-agrarian world, all nations are compatible, and all empires, and all civilizations, are incompatible. An explicitly nationalist China, Russia, Hungary, India are naturally resistant to two hostile movements: the spread of Islam that has destroyed every great civilization of the ancient world, and the spread of the spectrum of Jewish Cosmopolitanism that has destroyed much of the modern world, and now spreads more softly using Jewish-European liberalism and neo-conservatism, despite managed decline. That is what the world is reacting to in the postwar era. Only Islam and Judaism are globalists. Everyone else is nationalist. I expect this framing to emerge over the next 20 years. It is the natural result of optimum adaptability in the technological age. It is the only means of maintaining peace and prosperity in this age.

  • Regarding China: The Future of Communsim, Globalism, and Islam vs NATIONALISM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bV7PuqlMOzI In a post-agrarian world, all nations are compatible, and all empires, and all civilizations, are incompatible. An explicitly nationalist China, Russia, Hungary, India are naturally resistant to two hostile movements: the spread of Islam that has destroyed every great civilization of the ancient world, and the spread of the spectrum of Jewish Cosmopolitanism that has destroyed much of the modern world, and now spreads more softly using Jewish-European liberalism and neo-conservatism, despite managed decline. That is what the world is reacting to in the postwar era. Only Islam and Judaism are globalists. Everyone else is nationalist. I expect this framing to emerge over the next 20 years. It is the natural result of optimum adaptability in the technological age. It is the only means of maintaining peace and prosperity in this age.

  • (… more from post:) 4) The movement of the frankfurt school to the USA in the

    (… more from post:)

    4) The movement of the frankfurt school to the USA in the postwar era was done with intent: having failed to use marxism and Leninism to turn the laboring classes against the middle classes – a class that with their rule of law of commerce (property) would suppress 2000 years of ‘huckstering’ (preying on the underclasses), they sought a new form of huckstering at industrial scale: marxism and Leninism.

    5) But capitalism had proven them wrong and provided benefit to the lower middle, working and laboring classes. So they had to move somewhere that capitalism couldn’t solve. They moved to America to weaponize the African population as they had tried to weaponize the laboring populations. They knew full well that the problem is genetic, and that capitalism couldn’t solve it. We know because they wrote it down, publicized it, and then did it. They stated that they would use the black population, western female sensitivity, democracy, to “…destroy the institutions of cultural production…” that if it continued to evolve, would prevent their continued parasitic existence by huckstering.

    6) For this ‘huckstering’ (lie) to succeed they had to demonize the eugenics movement. That required creating the sequence of anthropological, psychological, social, political, and economic pseudosciences. And they used nepotism and the university system, and the new need for education, given the post-war opportunity for upward class expansion due to the collapse of the world means of production during the wars and devoted every ounce of effort to promote this set of lies.

    7) And that’s where we are today. Although I might mention that this is a repetition of how the Christians destroyed the “institutions of cultural production” in the Roman world.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-04-16 23:21:28 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106077571545818433

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106077569262398868


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    1) The left thas to lie because their entire edifice is predicated on the false promise that people were oppressed rather than incrementally domesticated (genetically pacified) in order to increase the quality of life by the increase in scope of markets, by the increase in the suppression of irreciprocity, by the increase in the scope of law and policing. The painful truth is that there are four to six living generations of humans, of different levels of domestication, leading to different rates of development, leading to differences in normative behavior, leading to conflicts between groups. This is fine within group but it’s not across groups in proximity. Because Domestication syndrome produces people more fit for markets, and failure of domestication syndrome produces people less fit for markets. We call these differences in fitness ‘class differences’. But the primary difference between the races is the size of their underclasses that have not experienced domestication syndrome because the climate wasn’t harsh enough (cold). So in an advanced, technological society, the problem is the shrinking of the unfit for markets at the same rates as shrinking our ignorance of the natural world through innovation adaptation and exploitation of that world. 2) So what are the Left’s Lies? a) the false promise of the end of scarcity, b) the false promise of the nature of man (amoral superpredator), c) the false promise of the malleability of man (we can train some discipline and mindfulness but we can’t improve IQ and conscientiousness which are results of domestication syndrome: decrease in rates of development that increase cognitive development in exchange for a decrease in aggression – producing a virtuous cycle. Roughly speaking IQ is the universal measure of group success at self-domestication. d) and the constant problem of accumulating genetic load, regression the mean, and the problem of defeating the red queen in a narrow window of climatological, geological, stellar, and galatic opportunity. 3) The left blames Europeans for oppression when European success was the result of placing progress over harmony, in exchange for a religion of tragedy (greco-roman-germanic and Christian), where we discovered adapted to and applied the laws of the universe to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality and early death. So the left blames Europeans as a proxy for blaming the universe (or theologically ‘hating god’). (more … in comments…)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106077569262398868