Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • September 21st, 2018 1:55 PM —“In 100 years we have gone from teaching Latin a

    September 21st, 2018 1:55 PM

    —“In 100 years we have gone from teaching Latin and Greek in High School to teaching remedial English in college.” — Joe Sobran

    (h/t:Bill Kaplan )

  • The Correct Answer: Our Women Were Recruited and Converted

    September 21st, 2018 4:01 PM THE CORRECT ANSWER: OUR WOMEN WERE RECRUITED AND CONVERTED (a) genetics (we have higher neoteny), (b) homogeneity developed low clannishness although we maintain high disgust sensitivity, (c) commercial societies develop liberalism since everyone is a customer for either marriage, cooperation, business, or politics (d) christianity pushed universalism in there as well which caused the really bad consequences (e) WORSE women cause the openness to suicide by immigration. Men have voted consistently against it. So OUR WOMEN WERE RECRUITED AND DEFECTED JUST AS THEY DID UNDER CHRISTIANITY.

  • September 21st, 2018 1:26 PM THE THIRD QUESTION OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY [T]he qu

    September 21st, 2018 1:26 PM THE THIRD QUESTION OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY [T]he question isn’t how we get along, it’s Genghis Khan’s question: “Why should the strong refrain from decimation, enslavement, enserfment, or rule for maximum profit?” The only incentive for the strong is whether cooperation is preferable to conquest. It is only preferable for conquest if it is sufficiently preferable to conquest to refrain from conquest. So, as the Great Khan said: “Given that cooperation is not preferable or possible, and serfdom and slavery are costly, that leaves decimation, or rule for the maximization of profit.” “We might prefer the former or the latter. However the enemy would undoubtedly prefer separation to decimation or rule under out maximization of profit. And this is the wise choice. Since we can still cooperate indirectly by trade while having no influence over one another within the same polity.” The problem the Khan faced is that he lacked the ability to produce institutions capable of sustained rule, just as expansionary aryans lacked the ability to produce institutions of sustained rule for maximum profit. The Indo-Aryans succeeded only under decimation and replacement in europe, not by any other means. So the Khan was wrong. Decimation was actually the right answer.

  • September 21st, 2018 3:26 PM A MORE PRODUCTIVE APPROACH by Carl Onni I think thi

    September 21st, 2018 3:26 PM A MORE PRODUCTIVE APPROACH
    by Carl Onni I think this is more productive:

    • Most if them do not know they are engaging in female behaviour. They are children not opponents.


    • Some of them will change to male behaviour if this is understood.

    -Those who never will change, will only gain by having an opponent they feel is easy to demonise. The goal of every interaction with these people should therefore be to simultaneously accomplish the following:

    • Demonstrate moral high ground, because we actually hold it, and it makes demonisation of us a more costly strategy and it makes conversion or productive communication more likely.


    • Shame and ridicule those that will never change, but only as a means to increase the odds of change in the subset that are capable of change.

    As with all children truth must be administered in manageable doses. Cant tell a 5 year old his paintings are terrible. But perhaps its most productive to just go full force Team Truth (TM)? But i have the suspicion it is only preaching to the choir.

  • September 21st, 2018 1:55 PM —“In 100 years we have gone from teaching Latin a

    September 21st, 2018 1:55 PM

    —“In 100 years we have gone from teaching Latin and Greek in High School to teaching remedial English in college.” — Joe Sobran

    (h/t:Bill Kaplan )

  • September 21st, 2018 1:55 PM —“In 100 years we have gone from teaching Latin a

    September 21st, 2018 1:55 PM

    —“In 100 years we have gone from teaching Latin and Greek in High School to teaching remedial English in college.” — Joe Sobran

    (h/t:Bill Kaplan )

  • September 21st, 2018 12:11 PM Ok. I woke up late. It’s noon. And now I have to w

    September 21st, 2018 12:11 PM Ok. I woke up late. It’s noon. And now I have to work on Tort Reform for the rest of the day. which means I’m going to get into another bad mood from contemplating how our people are abused.

  • September 21st, 2018 1:26 PM THE THIRD QUESTION OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY [T]he qu

    September 21st, 2018 1:26 PM THE THIRD QUESTION OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY [T]he question isn’t how we get along, it’s Genghis Khan’s question: “Why should the strong refrain from decimation, enslavement, enserfment, or rule for maximum profit?” The only incentive for the strong is whether cooperation is preferable to conquest. It is only preferable for conquest if it is sufficiently preferable to conquest to refrain from conquest. So, as the Great Khan said: “Given that cooperation is not preferable or possible, and serfdom and slavery are costly, that leaves decimation, or rule for the maximization of profit.” “We might prefer the former or the latter. However the enemy would undoubtedly prefer separation to decimation or rule under out maximization of profit. And this is the wise choice. Since we can still cooperate indirectly by trade while having no influence over one another within the same polity.” The problem the Khan faced is that he lacked the ability to produce institutions capable of sustained rule, just as expansionary aryans lacked the ability to produce institutions of sustained rule for maximum profit. The Indo-Aryans succeeded only under decimation and replacement in europe, not by any other means. So the Khan was wrong. Decimation was actually the right answer.

  • September 21st, 2018 12:08 PM —“I hope everyone who reads these posts on natur

    September 21st, 2018 12:08 PM

    —“I hope everyone who reads these posts on natural law realizes how precious this wisdom is.”— John Mark

    [T]he idea that natural law is discovered science the result of which produces a formal logic of decidability in all matters of sentience is very hard to grasp given our history of moral variation in relation to geography, demographics, and economy, and the multitude of falsehoods we have invented to justify one order or another given those same constraints.

  • September 21st, 2018 1:55 PM —“In 100 years we have gone from teaching Latin a

    September 21st, 2018 1:55 PM

    —“In 100 years we have gone from teaching Latin and Greek in High School to teaching remedial English in college.” — Joe Sobran

    (h/t:Bill Kaplan )