Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • The Correct Answer: Our Women Were Recruited and Converted

    September 21st, 2018 4:01 PM THE CORRECT ANSWER: OUR WOMEN WERE RECRUITED AND CONVERTED (a) genetics (we have higher neoteny), (b) homogeneity developed low clannishness although we maintain high disgust sensitivity, (c) commercial societies develop liberalism since everyone is a customer for either marriage, cooperation, business, or politics (d) christianity pushed universalism in there as well which caused the really bad consequences (e) WORSE women cause the openness to suicide by immigration. Men have voted consistently against it. So OUR WOMEN WERE RECRUITED AND DEFECTED JUST AS THEY DID UNDER CHRISTIANITY.

  • The Correct Answer: Our Women Were Recruited and Converted

    September 21st, 2018 4:01 PM THE CORRECT ANSWER: OUR WOMEN WERE RECRUITED AND CONVERTED (a) genetics (we have higher neoteny), (b) homogeneity developed low clannishness although we maintain high disgust sensitivity, (c) commercial societies develop liberalism since everyone is a customer for either marriage, cooperation, business, or politics (d) christianity pushed universalism in there as well which caused the really bad consequences (e) WORSE women cause the openness to suicide by immigration. Men have voted consistently against it. So OUR WOMEN WERE RECRUITED AND DEFECTED JUST AS THEY DID UNDER CHRISTIANITY.

  • September 21st, 2018 3:26 PM A MORE PRODUCTIVE APPROACH by Carl Onni I think thi

    September 21st, 2018 3:26 PM A MORE PRODUCTIVE APPROACH
    by Carl Onni I think this is more productive:

    • Most if them do not know they are engaging in female behaviour. They are children not opponents.


    • Some of them will change to male behaviour if this is understood.

    -Those who never will change, will only gain by having an opponent they feel is easy to demonise. The goal of every interaction with these people should therefore be to simultaneously accomplish the following:

    • Demonstrate moral high ground, because we actually hold it, and it makes demonisation of us a more costly strategy and it makes conversion or productive communication more likely.


    • Shame and ridicule those that will never change, but only as a means to increase the odds of change in the subset that are capable of change.

    As with all children truth must be administered in manageable doses. Cant tell a 5 year old his paintings are terrible. But perhaps its most productive to just go full force Team Truth (TM)? But i have the suspicion it is only preaching to the choir.

  • September 20th, 2018 2:00 PM THE DAILY CIRCADIAN RHYTHM —“On average, after th

    September 20th, 2018 2:00 PM THE DAILY CIRCADIAN RHYTHM

    —“On average, after the workday begins, employees take a few hours to reach their peak levels of alertness and energy – and that peak does not last long. Not long after lunch, those levels begin to decline, hitting a low at around 3pm. We often blame this on lunch, but in reality this is just a natural part of the circadian process. After the 3pm dip, alertness tends to increase again until hitting a second peak at approximately 6pm. Following this, alertness tends to then decline for the rest of the evening and throughout the early morning hours until hitting the very lowest point at approximately 3:30am. After hitting that all-time low, alertness tends to increase for the rest of the morning until hitting the first peak shortly after noon the next day.”—

  • September 20th, 2018 8:14 AM [T]he distribution isn’t quite even. I love how the

    September 20th, 2018 8:14 AM [T]he distribution isn’t quite even. I love how they take from 85-115 as average. that’s ridiculous. 106 should be the dividing line, so that we talk about quality more so than the flatness of the distribution. Really 95-105 is average and we need 100-110 to be average.

  • September 20th, 2018 8:14 AM [T]he distribution isn’t quite even. I love how the

    September 20th, 2018 8:14 AM [T]he distribution isn’t quite even. I love how they take from 85-115 as average. that’s ridiculous. 106 should be the dividing line, so that we talk about quality more so than the flatness of the distribution. Really 95-105 is average and we need 100-110 to be average.

  • September 20th, 2018 8:10 AM [W]ell, if parents are spending disproportionately

    September 20th, 2018 8:10 AM

    [W]ell, if parents are spending disproportionately more time with children but children are getting WORSE, then what does that mean?

  • September 20th, 2018 8:10 AM [W]ell, if parents are spending disproportionately

    September 20th, 2018 8:10 AM

    [W]ell, if parents are spending disproportionately more time with children but children are getting WORSE, then what does that mean?

  • September 20th, 2018 8:09 AM [F]un conversation last night with folks on the Pro

    September 20th, 2018 8:09 AM [F]un conversation last night with folks on the Propertarian Discord Server. Need to be more careful when I complain about keynesianism because I’m complaining about the Saltwater School and it’s abuse of Keynesianism to destroy human capital, and obtain power, in favor of expanding the socialist state. Still was interesting that you can’t have a conversation about political economy with people who have a monetary education, because ‘well we don’t consider that’ which is my whole criticism: cherry picking. Political Economy, Research and development economy, Entrepreneurial Economy, Investment economy (wealth preservation), and monetary economy. From the long to the short term.

  • September 20th, 2018 8:09 AM [F]un conversation last night with folks on the Pro

    September 20th, 2018 8:09 AM [F]un conversation last night with folks on the Propertarian Discord Server. Need to be more careful when I complain about keynesianism because I’m complaining about the Saltwater School and it’s abuse of Keynesianism to destroy human capital, and obtain power, in favor of expanding the socialist state. Still was interesting that you can’t have a conversation about political economy with people who have a monetary education, because ‘well we don’t consider that’ which is my whole criticism: cherry picking. Political Economy, Research and development economy, Entrepreneurial Economy, Investment economy (wealth preservation), and monetary economy. From the long to the short term.