1) Statistically speaking, women are hyperconsumptive and parasitic on males, and hypergamous both sexually and politically(defectors), spend of 70% of income, and consume 70% of taxes with males the only net tax contributors. Now this might be ok if these costs are borne …
2) … in exchange for sex, children, and care. Otherwise, they aren’t ok, and men must logically privatize taxes, and direct them to their own care, consumption, retirement, and unemployment now that women make up the majority of workers and fail at replacement reproduction.
3) Moreover since women have abandoned replacement reproduction in favor of hyperconsumption, sexual, social, and political hypergamy, then men can only rationally choose to invest in artificial wombs and breed and raise generations – why not buy the best eggs rather than settle?
European success is due to hyper adaptation which in turn is due to the high psychological, emotional, and physical cost of Self-determination. Sovereignty. Reciprocity. Truth Before Face. Adversarial Markets in everything. Reproductive limits on those unfit for those markets.
CRT consists of an indirect war on the fact that western man has MORE discovered, adapted to, and applied the logical, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws of the universe than all other civilizations combined at the cost of SOFT EUGENICS. That’s why far east and west won.
The Jewish, Christian, Muslim old world and marxist, neomarxist, pomo, feminist, pc, woke, anti-white cult repeats the Abrahamic false promises of freedom from the laws of the universe for the destruction of civilization that would force market meritocratic eugenic reproduction.
That’s it: Trading generation one’s cult of supernaturalism and sophistry for pseudoscience and sophistry then using informational propagandism to create social construction of falsehoods that deny the laws of the universe, in order to blame Europeans for acts of god. It’s an act of WAR.
1) American law contains race bias just as every other contains race bias, especially jewish law, islam, Indian castes & Han government.
2) The uncomfortable truth is that there are vast differences between the four primary races and their hybrids.
3) Capitalism alleviated SOME. It cannot alleviate ALL, beause the size of the lower classes in ‘brown’ civilization is so much larger than the middle and upper middle, that it’s not possible to JOIN an advanced economy, even if it might be possible to build an imitation of it as a separate entity. No matter where you go there your genes are and your genes are the issue.
4) Criticism (Jewish Critique) is only not an act of fraud if one is proposing solutions instead of supplying criticism. Otherwise (as is always the case with Jewish Critique), the objective is to undermine the existing society to generate demand for authority – not justice.
5) Europeans are the least racist, the least clannish, the most tolerant race on earth – to their detriment in both the ancient and modern worlds.
6) Europeans are the most empirical, most tolerant, most optimistic people on earth – to their detriment.
7) The evidence is that all attempts at intervention in problem of the vast differences in underclass size between the races have proven worse than the original ‘white’ solution which was to let communities form with their own norms until ready for middle-class majoritarianism.
8) Every single policy enacted in the 60’s integration has failed and worse it destroyed black families, black communities, caused black elites to defect to white communities abandoning their own, and ended the formation of black culture, community, finance, education, and trade.
9) Worse, the problem of the ‘white underclass’ which has been a universal consideration throughout our modern history, has been reversed by forced integration with black communities.
10) and even worse, the black communities have lost incentives to self modify(adapt) to ‘whiteness’ which is just science, rule of law, markets, and middle class majoritarianism.
A 9mm semi-auto has replaced the need for a low cycle rate SMG, largely because it is smaller, lighter, faster and easier to deploy, requires less restrictive posture to aim, is far far more controllable, and is as accurate or better with practice.
A gunfight using 9mm semi-auto for a police officer may require military levels of ammunition: 120+ rounds. ;).
A citizen only needs to break contact, where a policeman needs to capture and detain and a soldier needs to kill quickly.
A revolver is often sufficient for a citizen to break contact with an unarmed opponent that WILL break contact.
A revolver is a great home defense gun for when you’re awakened, or when you’re under duress. Very Simple Mechanism.
A revolver is a ‘safe’ carry. All these idiots who shoot themselves, their boyfriends, or misfire in the house by accident are doing it with semi-autos.
At the other end of the spectrum, a 44magnum revolver with hard cast bullets will stop a grizzly bear. 😉
@Flotsamjetsam Not really translatable. Dharma describes a feeling or experience of awe, when living in accordance with nature and the gods, but it does not say what living in those terms means. Furthermore, it’s not clear that the laws of nature are ‘divine’ or even beneficial, but a constant threat to us, so in living according to the laws of nature, is a scientific or empirical term in the west not a moral or religious. This is a common problem because european thought is not compatible with religious thought which is why we have two vocabularies for religous speech and ‘real’ speech. Example, faith and belief are religious terms, and trust or confidence the ‘real’ terms.
Right: Agency. Self Determination by Sovereignty. Sovereignty by Reciprocity. Reciprocity in display, word, and deed. Reciprocity in Word by Truth before Face always. -vs- Left: Authority. Proportionality, not reciprocity. And Face before Truth: Authoritarian Liars+Thieves.
Conservative: pragmatic, empirical, meritocratic, defending from hazard. Progressive: utopian, theoretical, anti-meritocratic, baiting into hazard.
So why do we study theology, philosophy, ideology, or commentary? Because we feel justified in defense of our intuitions along the way – a constant addictive feedback loop of self-reinforcing falsehoods: incremental, progressive informational drug addition.
The problem with science is that it appears abstract and uninutitive until it’s not – and the entire journey is a bit of a struggle.
This is what we seek to solve with P-law. A complete, consistent, incremental logic of existence,that’s commensurable and explanatory across fields.
