Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548972243 Timestamp) CURZON ON STRETCHINESS OF PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS by Andy Curzon I see IQ as the sixth personality dimension. Each one has a ‘stretchiness’, a trainability. 1 – Conscientiousness [the activity & in some cases overlapping into the agency dimension] (the most trainable of all the traits upwards although after 11-12 years old this becomes harder, and increasingly so into one’s 20s and 30s); 2 – Agreeableness [in some sense the agency dimension and separates men as disagreeable and women agreeable] (remarkably stable throughout life, although there are Kuhnian paradigm shifts [huge life-changing events or epiphanies usually] that slide extremely disagreeable people to the other end of the scale or vice versa [I might suggest more often than not through brain trauma/restructuring]); 3 – Neuroticism [the right hemisphere / threat perceiving / negative emotion dimension](immovable upwards in a similar way to IQ [we haven’t found a way other than drugs yet] and bad life events oft make neurotic people hyper-neurotic); 4 – Openness [the creativity dimension, highly correlated with IQ] (the most interesting in that it appears people can train only toward their side of the fence…open people can ‘open the doors of perception’ [to use a Huxlian term] and closed people tend to become even more specialised as they mature, but cases of Kuhnian shifts have not been documented afaik, but there are almost always exceptions); 5 – Extraversion [the left hemisphere / opportunity perceiving / positive emotion dimension] (low-mid range trainability either way but high reversion rate so training has to be maintained); 6 – IQ [pattern recognition] many things bring IQ down (smart professors not doing exercise for example) but nothing is known to raise it, yet. I don’t know if you’re on board with all that but the key is they were all statistically derived….as a parallel to English common law, rather than by ‘fiat’ like the Myers-Briggs. I find the six dimension extremely useful when profiling people.

    ( CD: I use male (compartmental) vs female (integrated) first. then the six dimensions that includes above, which then explains male-female difference in Factor TRAITS, including male vs female in IQ distribution as well. ) METHOD: Gender > Factor(dimension) > Trait (bias)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548986693 Timestamp) —“WHY CAN’T YOU SAY PROPERTARIANISM SIMPLY”– Right, so, I can…. Propertarianism consists of a collection of ideas, the most fundamental of which is the completion of the scientific method and its application to all fields, resulting in a universally commensurable, universally explicable, language of ethics, law, politics, economics, and group evolutionary (survival) strategies. Because of the combination of language and means of testing that language, we can produce a formal law that allows us to complete the jeffersonian project (constitutionalism), restore libel and slander, and extend the prosecution of fraud from commerce to financial, economic, legal, and political speech. With this extremely intolerant law we can restore our civilization to its historic group strategy of high trust and high velocity and high relative prosperity with rule of law under sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, the natural law, and markets in all aspects of life – and purge marxists, postmodernists, feminists from all walks of life as well as depoliticize, definancialize, decentralize, our commons, and restore the civil society. This will, implemented as formal logic of law, within a formal constitution written in that law, use the market incentive to prosecute these information-criminals and rapidly restore our way of life, including the restoration of the laboring, working, and middle classes. If you want me to teach you the technique of how to produce that law as ‘algorithmic law’ then you’re gonna need a class to do it. That’s because you cannot imagine the depth of the rabbit hole that this method results in, and how many ideas roll out of it, or how much you will change by undrestanding it. Otherwise that’s it. ;) Now, what you said about darwin was that organisms survived by adapting to local circumstances. What you didn’t say about Darwin is that (a) it’s undirected (b) it’s reproduction not survival, (c) local adaptation often leads to dead ends. (d) the only direction is increasing complexity. … and a hundred other meaningful things that stop people from misinterpreting it. So that’s the issue. I said above what I said, but god knows what kinda idiocy people will come up with when they read it. Hence “it’s complicated”. lol Cheers and thanks for being ‘demanding’ but intellectually honest.

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    (FB 1548968617 Timestamp) IF YOU PRACTICE EPRIME ALONE YOU WILL NOT BELIEVE WHAT IT WILL DO FOR YOUR REASONING OVER TIME.

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    (FB 1548973779 Timestamp) SHORT VERSION: WE ARE ALL BIOLOGICALLY DRUGGED TO PREFER FEMALE ATTENTION 😉

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548968311 Timestamp) Octogenarian quote of the day: —“You don’t have children because you want to, you have children because the doctor tells you that your expecting.”— 😉

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548973293 Timestamp) USER “PATTERN PRINCIPLE” IS COOL. FYI: I keep getting PM’s on this guy asking about him. Why? For newbies he seems to have come out of nowhere. The user ‘pattern principle’ is a tech guy that’s been around since at least 2014, if not 2013. AFAIK he went dark for biz reasons for a while. He’s always around but now in a position where he can contribute again. He’s solid. Promise. -Curt

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549037552 Timestamp) GOOD POSITIONING —“I usually shorten Propertarianism to the Wilsonian synthesis (if they are academic) or an intellectual project to apply the scientific method to every other area outside of STEM.”–AlcyoneLast Or the completion of the operationalist program. Or the formal logic of social science. Or the natural law…. lol

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548951604 Timestamp) (reset to public)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548972243 Timestamp) CURZON ON STRETCHINESS OF PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS by Andy Curzon I see IQ as the sixth personality dimension. Each one has a ‘stretchiness’, a trainability. 1 – Conscientiousness [the activity & in some cases overlapping into the agency dimension] (the most trainable of all the traits upwards although after 11-12 years old this becomes harder, and increasingly so into one’s 20s and 30s); 2 – Agreeableness [in some sense the agency dimension and separates men as disagreeable and women agreeable] (remarkably stable throughout life, although there are Kuhnian paradigm shifts [huge life-changing events or epiphanies usually] that slide extremely disagreeable people to the other end of the scale or vice versa [I might suggest more often than not through brain trauma/restructuring]); 3 – Neuroticism [the right hemisphere / threat perceiving / negative emotion dimension](immovable upwards in a similar way to IQ [we haven’t found a way other than drugs yet] and bad life events oft make neurotic people hyper-neurotic); 4 – Openness [the creativity dimension, highly correlated with IQ] (the most interesting in that it appears people can train only toward their side of the fence…open people can ‘open the doors of perception’ [to use a Huxlian term] and closed people tend to become even more specialised as they mature, but cases of Kuhnian shifts have not been documented afaik, but there are almost always exceptions); 5 – Extraversion [the left hemisphere / opportunity perceiving / positive emotion dimension] (low-mid range trainability either way but high reversion rate so training has to be maintained); 6 – IQ [pattern recognition] many things bring IQ down (smart professors not doing exercise for example) but nothing is known to raise it, yet. I don’t know if you’re on board with all that but the key is they were all statistically derived….as a parallel to English common law, rather than by ‘fiat’ like the Myers-Briggs. I find the six dimension extremely useful when profiling people.

    ( CD: I use male (compartmental) vs female (integrated) first. then the six dimensions that includes above, which then explains male-female difference in Factor TRAITS, including male vs female in IQ distribution as well. ) METHOD: Gender > Factor(dimension) > Trait (bias)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549036184 Timestamp) PROPERTARIAN LAW AND THE NEW “ABORTION STANDARD” The purpose of the proposed law is to restore euthanasia to babies under the pretense of calling it ‘abortion’. This prevents having to take euthanasia through the court system. Hence operational language. This abuse of the law, would not be possible under Propertarian Law.