(FB 1548902467 Timestamp) —“Searching for a fancier refutation, but I’ll just cop out and say you’re just too Anglo in your thinking.”— Thank you for the compliment. Not that it affects the argument. 😉 Evidence of all language is that it competes in markets and as such was only slightly weakened by (a)the standardization of spelling during printing, and (b)the development of science as universal language of truth. It is true that we are often limited in ‘meaning’ to methods of reasoning, calculation, and computation by the grammar and vocabulary available to use, but that free association prevails regardless. Language markets continue unabated.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1548891462 Timestamp) —“Once we remove the involuntary/parasitic subsidy of r from the environment (something “No more lies” accomplishes), K will out-compete and out-reproduce r. The only subsidy then available to r will be charity or trade (for example – in return for not reproducing)”—Luke Weinhagen (follow Luke)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1548902313 Timestamp) It’s because I know we are going to win.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1548891393 Timestamp) WHY? —“The argument that the right hasnt been doing it right and needs to learn from the Enemy because they evolve rapidly is outright wrong. The right has known for hundreds of years how to remove enemies. The issue isnt the application of force or the tactics involved. Its the balls to act [in concert at scale]. We suffer from either inaction or over action. People who want to sit around all day and hash and rehash and do nothing, or people who lash out in all directions and only accomplish getting their name on a federal watchlist and local police radars. Utilizing left wing tactics doesn’t give us any ground, it only dilutes any attempts at meaningful change.”—Dylan Knowles Organized. Concerted. Effort.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1548991435 Timestamp) OWN IT – YOURSELF, YOURS, AND ALL COMMONS —“In short – take responsibility for everything, absolutely everything – and good things will happen. Don’t shift blame, don’t talk about how it is the situation’s fault. It is all on you – but in a positive way. This is not to mean that everything that goes wrong is because of you – it means that putting everything on your own shoulders makes good things happen all around. Even when things go badly, take the responsibility – and it makes it easier to deal with.”—-
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1548989747 Timestamp) “One Law to Rule Them All One Law to Bind Them One Law to Conquer Them All And in the Truth Bind Them….”
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1548991173 Timestamp) Bill Joslin IMO korzybski devised a way to enact an essentially relativistic and nihilists position. The brilliance of this tool, again IMO , was grounding e-prime into a standard criteria i.e. operationalism. By doing so it closes the door to the relativistic, nihilistic uses. Further to that, e-prime strongly couples our speech and thought to the operational criteria. But if left at this alone, I think it would suffer the same flaws as logical positivism… By expanding the criteria into multiple dimensions, we don’t reduce our warrant (speech and thought) to overly restrictive limitations (i.e. cherry picking, erroneous or undue dismissiveness.) The last component , acknowledging truth as an approximation (as per Curt’s view) prevents us from undue certainty and dogmatically held assertions of “truth”. So – E-prime eliminates unfounded assertions – Operationalism eliminates relativistic nihilistic application – Expanded operationalism (testimonial criteria) eliminates myopic limitations (undue dismissiveness) – And provisional truth theories eliminate dogmatic assertions of certainty. – The first contributor did the light lifting – nothing really – The second (Bridgeman) cross the major threshold – Curt and his community (assuming other contributed – Curzon etc) the the heavy lifting
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1548986693 Timestamp) —“WHY CAN’T YOU SAY PROPERTARIANISM SIMPLY”– Right, so, I can…. Propertarianism consists of a collection of ideas, the most fundamental of which is the completion of the scientific method and its application to all fields, resulting in a universally commensurable, universally explicable, language of ethics, law, politics, economics, and group evolutionary (survival) strategies. Because of the combination of language and means of testing that language, we can produce a formal law that allows us to complete the jeffersonian project (constitutionalism), restore libel and slander, and extend the prosecution of fraud from commerce to financial, economic, legal, and political speech. With this extremely intolerant law we can restore our civilization to its historic group strategy of high trust and high velocity and high relative prosperity with rule of law under sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, the natural law, and markets in all aspects of life – and purge marxists, postmodernists, feminists from all walks of life as well as depoliticize, definancialize, decentralize, our commons, and restore the civil society. This will, implemented as formal logic of law, within a formal constitution written in that law, use the market incentive to prosecute these information-criminals and rapidly restore our way of life, including the restoration of the laboring, working, and middle classes. If you want me to teach you the technique of how to produce that law as ‘algorithmic law’ then you’re gonna need a class to do it. That’s because you cannot imagine the depth of the rabbit hole that this method results in, and how many ideas roll out of it, or how much you will change by undrestanding it. Otherwise that’s it. ;) Now, what you said about darwin was that organisms survived by adapting to local circumstances. What you didn’t say about Darwin is that (a) it’s undirected (b) it’s reproduction not survival, (c) local adaptation often leads to dead ends. (d) the only direction is increasing complexity. … and a hundred other meaningful things that stop people from misinterpreting it. So that’s the issue. I said above what I said, but god knows what kinda idiocy people will come up with when they read it. Hence “it’s complicated”. lol Cheers and thanks for being ‘demanding’ but intellectually honest.
-
Curt Doolittle posted in The General Staff (The White Law).
(FB 1548989944 Timestamp) HUMOR —“You’ll enjoy this. My son approached me the other day about sharing a meme (the IRS one) from someone who is considered “problematic.” I gently explained that we’d been friends for years and I saw nothing wrong with the post. But it is YOU he was objecting to. At least he’s not throwing a tantrum over it. Just wanted to make sure you realize he is almost 40. He was telling me I shouldn’t share it because you are “problematic.” He then proceeded to quote from the Propertarian website. He knew exactly what he was doing.”— This is one of my long time female followers. lol
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1548973779 Timestamp) SHORT VERSION: WE ARE ALL BIOLOGICALLY DRUGGED TO PREFER FEMALE ATTENTION 😉