Source: Original Site Post

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548989747 Timestamp) “One Law to Rule Them All One Law to Bind Them One Law to Conquer Them All And in the Truth Bind Them….”

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549037552 Timestamp) GOOD POSITIONING —“I usually shorten Propertarianism to the Wilsonian synthesis (if they are academic) or an intellectual project to apply the scientific method to every other area outside of STEM.”–AlcyoneLast Or the completion of the operationalist program. Or the formal logic of social science. Or the natural law…. lol

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548951604 Timestamp) (reset to public)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548986693 Timestamp) —“WHY CAN’T YOU SAY PROPERTARIANISM SIMPLY”– Right, so, I can…. Propertarianism consists of a collection of ideas, the most fundamental of which is the completion of the scientific method and its application to all fields, resulting in a universally commensurable, universally explicable, language of ethics, law, politics, economics, and group evolutionary (survival) strategies. Because of the combination of language and means of testing that language, we can produce a formal law that allows us to complete the jeffersonian project (constitutionalism), restore libel and slander, and extend the prosecution of fraud from commerce to financial, economic, legal, and political speech. With this extremely intolerant law we can restore our civilization to its historic group strategy of high trust and high velocity and high relative prosperity with rule of law under sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, the natural law, and markets in all aspects of life – and purge marxists, postmodernists, feminists from all walks of life as well as depoliticize, definancialize, decentralize, our commons, and restore the civil society. This will, implemented as formal logic of law, within a formal constitution written in that law, use the market incentive to prosecute these information-criminals and rapidly restore our way of life, including the restoration of the laboring, working, and middle classes. If you want me to teach you the technique of how to produce that law as ‘algorithmic law’ then you’re gonna need a class to do it. That’s because you cannot imagine the depth of the rabbit hole that this method results in, and how many ideas roll out of it, or how much you will change by undrestanding it. Otherwise that’s it. ;) Now, what you said about darwin was that organisms survived by adapting to local circumstances. What you didn’t say about Darwin is that (a) it’s undirected (b) it’s reproduction not survival, (c) local adaptation often leads to dead ends. (d) the only direction is increasing complexity. … and a hundred other meaningful things that stop people from misinterpreting it. So that’s the issue. I said above what I said, but god knows what kinda idiocy people will come up with when they read it. Hence “it’s complicated”. lol Cheers and thanks for being ‘demanding’ but intellectually honest.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549036184 Timestamp) PROPERTARIAN LAW AND THE NEW “ABORTION STANDARD” The purpose of the proposed law is to restore euthanasia to babies under the pretense of calling it ‘abortion’. This prevents having to take euthanasia through the court system. Hence operational language. This abuse of the law, would not be possible under Propertarian Law.

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    (FB 1548951487 Timestamp) MADNESS AND CIVILIZATION by Hanzi Freinacht and Martin Å těpán It seems there’s an intimate relationship between madness and civilization. In recent years, it has become abundantly clear that there is a rising problem of mental health issues among adolescents and young adults in the most advanced economies of the world. We become civilized, and we subtly go batshit crazy. What is it that puts more and more of us, and increasingly often, face to face with madness? On a more general level of analysis, I would argue, it is not so much “civilization” or “modernity”, as many classic scholars have suggested, nor “the postmodern condition” or a variety thereof, as the analysts of today suggest. Rather, it is the staggering increase of complexity itself. As society becomes so much more complex, so quickly, it simply becomes more difficult for the mind to reach a somewhat stable “local maximum” or “equilibrium”. It’s just more difficult to know who I am, what’s right and wrong, and what’s really real in the first place. Even as we are richer and safer than earlier generations, there are also countless social and psychological adaptations that have to be made and the problems we do have are less tangible and direct. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: We’re not built for this kind of complexity. The rewards are too great, the immediate gratifications too readily available, the threats too nebulous, the world and its horizons too vast. The mysterious relationship between madness and civilization has a name: increasing complexity. Late at night we wake up and face the creeping horror: that life itself as we know it is a social construction, one that ultimately cannot be real, only a fragment on top of an infinite abyss. And handling greater complexity in the world requires not only new ideas; it requires a kind of spiritual development of the average person. Hence, it should be a societal goal to develop not only higher subjective states in each of us, but also to help more of us develop and integrate greater inner depths, and—if possible—to develop our ability to think more abstract thoughts, to cognitively grasp and relate to more complex realities. –response– by Martin Å těpán It’s a part of it. Lack of selection pressures is another. We let all sorts of people live here and reproduce, often even incentivize it, regardless of the effect on the superorganism. Thus you get more and more people with various disorders that would under most conditions be selected out. Worse, adapting the same strategy as cancer starts increasing one’s chance of reproductive success. It turns out you can’t stop selection, you can only push it up a level. If an organism is unable to select out its unfit cells, nature deems the whole organism unfit. If a nation fails to select out its unfit members, nature deems the whole nation unfit.

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    (FB 1548973779 Timestamp) SHORT VERSION: WE ARE ALL BIOLOGICALLY DRUGGED TO PREFER FEMALE ATTENTION 😉

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    (FB 1549033326 Timestamp) EXTREME OWNERSHIP: PROPERTY IN TOTO While its the same message as every other self help book, this one is in masculine prose, and uses ownership which is compatible with property in toto – and that’s why I chose it. via Simon Felden YOUTUBE.COM Extreme Ownership | Jocko Willink | TEDxUniversityofNevada

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548973293 Timestamp) USER “PATTERN PRINCIPLE” IS COOL. FYI: I keep getting PM’s on this guy asking about him. Why? For newbies he seems to have come out of nowhere. The user ‘pattern principle’ is a tech guy that’s been around since at least 2014, if not 2013. AFAIK he went dark for biz reasons for a while. He’s always around but now in a position where he can contribute again. He’s solid. Promise. -Curt

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549033095 Timestamp) OWN IT. OWN YOURSELF. OWN THE COMMONS. OWN IT. —“I realized [extreme ownership] was the correct path after listening to John Marks vids back in December. Pop culture has sunk to a state of grand victimhood. Everybody is trying to out-victim everyone else. I’m a victim I’m a victim. No one is taking responsibility for anything. John Mark made me realize this and I have completely changed myself (I am trying anyway LOL).”— Matt Fahnestock 😉 (beautiful)