Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:25:18 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424688651054115
Source: Original Site Post
-
Untitled Image Post
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:24:37 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424685934690644
-
Untitled Image Post
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:24:10 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424684147654849
-
Untitled Image Post
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:23:55 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424683161132608
-
Sure, the Italians and germans were trying to save western civilization – and th
Sure, the Italians and germans were trying to save western civilization – and they were right. Because the core of western civilization is Lotharingia and the north and baltic seas.
France in her despotic feminine monopoly ambitions to rule all of europe, has always been the enemy of all. She gave birth to, protection to, and support of rousseu and the anti-aristocratic movement that culminated in marxism and communism.
Russian ambitions imposed on german territorial and cultural expansion. The powers sought to maintain the balance of powers and continue corporatism of the atlantics rather than the aristocracy of the central europeans.
The jews were successful in defeating the weakest government in europe – the Russians, by rallying the most backward people in europe, by false promise of worker’s utopia.
Then europe resisted the Lotharingian attempt to defend europe from the communists.
Sorry but you know, people do what they can with the knowledge and recourses they have arguing in the traditional moral grammar they have.
That’s what was different in the movements.
However al movements were doing similar things
Advancing their group strategies.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:23:24 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424681123476053
-
MANAGING FUTURE DYSGENIA Last century <85 was dead weight. Right now <95 is dead
MANAGING FUTURE DYSGENIA
Last century <85 was dead weight. Right now <95 is dead weight. In the future < 105 will be dead weight. [1]
One child policy is enough.
[1] these are absolute measures, at current standing, not normative, where 105 is the desired minimum median of the distribution, established by the ability to learn from instructions rather than imitation.
This means we will move from 15-30-50% if we are not careful, and then we will end up like south america or the middle east….
—“Aren’t there ways to make them not dead weight? Mediating structures?”—Moritz Bierling
Multiple economies with multiple currencies, where those who cannot serve consumption market ends can work to serve commons (aesthetic) ends. In other words, the market for voluntary organization of production and a non-market of involuntary organization of production (how unions operate today).
In other words, absorb a lot of labor making the commons the worlds greatest garden of eden, including restoration of the use of hand-build construction techniques that have millennia long durability rather than current nonsense.
There is a particular problem in economics under which one currency drives up all prices and wages. This isn’t necessary.
There is a similar problem in the theoretical basis of most digital currencies….
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:23:09 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424680124160661
-
“Russian Military Plans Swarms Of Lethal ‘Jihadi-Style’ Drones Carrying Explosiv
—“Russian Military Plans Swarms Of Lethal ‘Jihadi-Style’ Drones Carrying Explosives”— Peter Zeihan
Yeah, but I mean, what is the difference between lots of cluster bombs and lots of autonomous grenades except the ability to ‘wait?’
Well, the ability to wait around, fly indoors, etc is pretty useful.
The russian method is saturation with artillery first and always has been. Only brits and germans depend on maneuver.
This just provides portable mines, pursuit mines, and piloted grenades.
Artillery, then cleanup (this new tech), then tanks with infantry.
Nobody does land war like Russians.
I wrote about this in the 80’s and thought I might make a career out of it, but the tech wasn’t there yet. Mostly because of battery power and material weight.
We have the tech now so it’s just going to happen.
Land mines that can:
1. explode if touched or exhausted;
2. wait until they see an opportunity and still have energy
2. or hunt opportunity, until they conserve energy.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:22:56 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424679289266993
-
WE DON’T USE THE TERM “FREE WILL” We don’t really use the term ‘Free Will’, beca
WE DON’T USE THE TERM “FREE WILL”
We don’t really use the term ‘Free Will’, because it is an ideal, and so tainted that it’s meaningless.
Instead, we use the terms…
1. Agency (via positiva) and;
2. Sovereignty (via negativa) and;
3. Reciprocity (via voluntary, productive);
…and we state operationally what those mean.If you cant disambiguate it and operationalize it then you don’t understand it.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:22:39 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424678176895590
-
INTOLERANT RATHER THAN FASCIST OR FACISM —“So I get the idea from your above d
INTOLERANT RATHER THAN FASCIST OR FACISM
—“So I get the idea from your above definitions that Propertarianism is Fascism without calling it that?”—Roy Baehr
Well, you know, the problem is I don’t know what that means to you. And if I said that, then some group of assholes would start claiming equivalency between dictatorship regardless of rule of law and monarchy under rule of law.
Lets just stay that my path to ethnocentrism and intolerance for parasitism is legal, logical and scientific, rather than wishful thinking, ideological or supernatural.
I don’t blame the people in the past for being ignorant. I blame people in the present for trying to repeat what was done in ignorance rather than adopt what is done by science, logic, and law. 😉
P-law is intolerant as hell. It’s more intolerant than sharia. It’s just an expression of the productive group strategy of europeans rather than the parasitic group strategy of the semites.
Transcendence of many from animal to the gods we imagined by the continuous production of Agency, by continuous competition in continuous markets producing continuous eugenics, producing continuous evolution.
Excellence and Heroism, Truth and Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Rule of Law and Jury, and Markets In Everything: Association, Cooperation, Production, Reproduction, Commons, Policies.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:22:24 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424677183428850
-
“Genuine question…If men don’t like to be criticized, etc by their women (GRSS
—“Genuine question…If men don’t like to be criticized, etc by their women (GRSSM), how do women let them know they’re slipping and need to step up? Or is this left to the men’s circle and considered a man’s job to keep himself in check (so to speak)?”— Michelle German
It’s fine if its not argument. GSRRM = disapproval. argument = true/false, reciprocal/not. you can disapprove of behavior, but not truth.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:21:38 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424674220334270