Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • MISLEADING DNA RESULTS – ALWAYS by Eric Best I’ve had to explain to people so ma

    MISLEADING DNA RESULTS – ALWAYS
    by Eric Best

    I’ve had to explain to people so many times about 23andme’s misleading results. They intentionally display results based on a default level of statistical probability that is pretty damn low, and they do this for the obvious reason that these results look more interesting and specific, but most of it is meaningless.

    The results also change over time as the service’s sample size increases. What I have seen in my own results is that as the sample size has grown, my larger heritage percentages have just grown even more and any of the marginal (and more “exotic” ones) ones that used to show up even with higher levels of statistical probability have disappeared altogether.

    ——

    (CD: Which is precisely what we would expect)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:11:49 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424635553283768

  • All language, in all humans, is produced in the same brain region by the same me

    All language, in all humans, is produced in the same brain region by the same means, most of which consists of successful prediction using what we call ‘grammar’ – that operationally consists of regular rules of continuous recursive disambiguation producing transactions that describe states or changes in state in time. prediction > disambiguation > object, scene, experience > association > valuation.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:11:33 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424634542600976

  • THE RIGHT THAT WON’T FIGHT (they’re dead weight) —“Yeah this is a major proble

    THE RIGHT THAT WON’T FIGHT
    (they’re dead weight)

    —“Yeah this is a major problem with the prepper community on the right. They have tricked themselves into thinking that an economic collapse is coming and that it will grant them an opportunity to obtain sovereignty from the federal government. In reality, as long as the federal government is able to maintain their power and legitimacy, the economy will continue to operate fine. (And we will continue to be conquered) … It’s just a means of coping with their loss. My Dad’s been doing it for the past 10 years.”—Jacob Smith

    Which is the conversation I want to have.
    I see them as just cowering.

    They are pretending that inaction will solve the problem for them.

    Between the churchies who pray to cover their cowering and the peppers who plan cover their to cowering, it’s gotta be just us pagans that want to fight.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:11:20 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424633676271211

  • (…continued) The debates that are open as far as I know, are: (a) whether anat

    (…continued)

    The debates that are open as far as I know, are:

    (a) whether anatolians came counter-clockwise around the black sea, or clockwise. I have assumed that it’s counter-clockwise until evidence otherwise – the reason being their arts.

    (b) And whether the Iranic people went south of the caspian sea, or north into central Asia and then down and back eastward into today’s Iranic lands.

    (c) I don’t think anyone disputes that the turkic people were far eastern edge, and moved southwest under pressure from the east asians. (I generally ignore the central asians because they have’t produced a ‘civilization’ per se.)

    (d) Whether the Mesopotamians, and whether they are indigenous “marsh arabs”, or a mixture of everyone in the region. It sure looks like they are north semites (marsh arabs). And it sure looks like the south west eurasians and northeast africans merged in what is today’s somalia-yemen-red sea -persian gulf basins, and split between river(north semitic) and sea (south semitic) groups.

    (d) whether anatolians or caucasians or arabs (afro-asiatics) occupied the eastern mediterranean but that over time we’ve seen admixture between groups.

    (e) whether the berber (north african) peoples emerged from the north of africa (top of the red sea, egypt, or the east (horn) of africa. I operate under the assumption that they migrated north and the were relatively insulated (they were on and off insulated).

    (f) the timing and mode of the competition between modern east asians, central eurasians, and the same for modern east asians (mongolids) and their fork from broader souther-route negroids (austronesians).

    There are others but they don’t affect my pursuit f the problem of truth and institutions.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:10:39 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424630975094590

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424627484718540

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    CRITICISM OF MY INTERPRETATION OF POPULATION GENETICS I got another supposed criticism last night without explaining what, from fans of population genetics. However, I can’t separate out their bias from anyone else’s. I have three people I can ask, but they have stopped participating, apparently because I won’t conform to their bias. That bias is to limit discussion to pop gen, and not further disambiguate by language, and further disambiguate by group competitive (evolutionary) strategy. In other words, I’m solving for the big questions of (a) where did technological competitiveness, paternalism, heroism and maneuver, truth and duty, sovereignty, reciprocity(property), commons, tort and jury, come from, (b) why, (c) how was it purified(west) or polluted (semitism), hinduism, buddhism. I use the same research everyone else does. I just am solving for ‘the western group evolutionary strategy that produced sovereignty, law, reason, logic, empiricism, science, technology. So I am interested in the civilizations, their technology, means of production, cooperation, and organization, and fighting. Those groups that we think of as caucasian (really: west eurasian) are spread along the lower boundary of the ice from Spain to Mongolia (or even further?) (So does Caucasian mean west eurasian? the people of the caucuses today? the people that spread into the levant? the people north and west of the black sea? I try to avoid the term because it’s useless.) The black sea is fresh water at that point and seems to be where the rapid evolution of west eurasians peaks, beaks into the IE expansion, and that in to north and west (european), south west (old european), from old european to Anatolian. And from caucuses east to the Tocharian, and south to the coastal middle east, and southeast into the Iranic peoples, then further east into the old indus river peoples (india). Where did truth come from and why did we do it, and why didn’t anyone else? A coincidence: tech, animals, territory, economics, strategy (ooda-loop/maneuver), entrepreneurialism, law, debate, argument, reason, contract. (continued…)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424627484718540

  • CRITICISM OF MY INTERPRETATION OF POPULATION GENETICS I got another supposed cri

    CRITICISM OF MY INTERPRETATION OF POPULATION GENETICS

    I got another supposed criticism last night without explaining what, from fans of population genetics. However, I can’t separate out their bias from anyone else’s. I have three people I can ask, but they have stopped participating, apparently because I won’t conform to their bias. That bias is to limit discussion to pop gen, and not further disambiguate by language, and further disambiguate by group competitive (evolutionary) strategy.

    In other words, I’m solving for the big questions of
    (a) where did technological competitiveness, paternalism, heroism and maneuver, truth and duty, sovereignty, reciprocity(property), commons, tort and jury, come from, (b) why, (c) how was it purified(west) or polluted (semitism), hinduism, buddhism.

    I use the same research everyone else does. I just am solving for ‘the western group evolutionary strategy that produced sovereignty, law, reason, logic, empiricism, science, technology.

    So I am interested in the civilizations, their technology, means of production, cooperation, and organization, and fighting.

    Those groups that we think of as caucasian (really: west eurasian) are spread along the lower boundary of the ice from Spain to Mongolia (or even further?) (So does Caucasian mean west eurasian? the people of the caucuses today? the people that spread into the levant? the people north and west of the black sea? I try to avoid the term because it’s useless.)

    The black sea is fresh water at that point and seems to be where the rapid evolution of west eurasians peaks, beaks into the IE expansion, and that in to north and west (european), south west (old european), from old european to Anatolian. And from caucuses east to the Tocharian, and south to the coastal middle east, and southeast into the Iranic peoples, then further east into the old indus river peoples (india).

    Where did truth come from and why did we do it, and why didn’t anyone else? A coincidence: tech, animals, territory, economics, strategy (ooda-loop/maneuver), entrepreneurialism, law, debate, argument, reason, contract.

    (continued…)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:09:46 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424627484718540

  • (ON GAB) Funny but I have to ‘couch’ everything I say on FB etc and so it doesn’

    (ON GAB)

    Funny but I have to ‘couch’ everything I say on FB etc and so it doesn’t come across the same on GAB where I can be explicit…Hmmm.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:06:04 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424612992740642

  • WHEN INTELLECTUAL DISHONESTY FAILS, ONLY VIOLENCE REMAINS (Problem for my “antag

    WHEN INTELLECTUAL DISHONESTY FAILS, ONLY VIOLENCE REMAINS

    (Problem for my “antagonists” on both the left and right is that I don’t really have insecurities to exploit. I am however, easy to frustrate when wasting my time defending against straw men and sophisms. And intellectual dishonesty makes me very angry. The problem is, intellectual dishonesty is the default mode of critique. When intellectual dishonesty fails then there is no means of negotiation to pursue, and only violence remains. So the online and macro environments are in parallel.)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:05:23 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424610287276691

  • WAIT FOR A TRIGGER EVENT OR MAKE A TRIGGER EVENT The left knows we are waiting f

    WAIT FOR A TRIGGER EVENT OR MAKE A TRIGGER EVENT

    The left knows we are waiting for a trigger event, and are trying to win by delay and deceive (chinese style) until it is too late for us to act.

    We are going to act, when enough of us choose to.

    The rest who are more cowardly will follow.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:05:04 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424609084577925

  • “WE FEW, WE HAPPY FEW…” We need very few of us. If We come to your part of the

    “WE FEW, WE HAPPY FEW…”

    We need very few of us. If We come to your part of the world, and get ten, we’ll get a hundred. If we get a hundred we’ll get a thousand. If we get a thousand we”ll get ten thousand. If we get ten then fifty, fifty one hundred.. etc. And at that point the earth will start shaking…

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:04:48 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424608014075374

  • FROM THE PIRATES’ HANDBOOK All y’all need to do is know: a) where are the food w

    FROM THE PIRATES’ HANDBOOK

    All y’all need to do is know:
    a) where are the food warehouses, gun stores and ammo, gasoline, propane, and if possible, construction explosives located.
    b) where are the substations, rail lines, bridges, and underground gas mains, and how to break, disable, or block them.
    c) if possible where are the major data centers, and the nearest bulldozers and backhoes.
    d) ATM Machines, Banks, Depositories, and Central Bank processing.
    e) the number of men necessary to overwhelmingly take each of them and retreat into ‘the mist’. Triple that number of men, triple the time you think, triple the risk.
    f) make a plan for using a small number of guys to down the power, take the cash, warn the first responders to stay home, then start fires until the cows come home.

    The military uses darkness and distance. The revolution will use ‘silence’ (lack of communication, power, transport, resources) and fire, and the ‘proletariat’ so to speak will do the rest

    Then once they’re exposed its house to house. I won’t go into the dark side so to speak. But this isn’t about winning control. It’s about cleaning house.

    If its about cleaning house then maybe the opposition will require less convincing.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:04:33 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424607006900353