poster….
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:31:15 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424712006002093
Source: Original Site Post
-
A NATIONAL SOCIALIST, A FASCIST, AN AUTHORITARIAN, A MONARCHIST? —“Also I saw
A NATIONAL SOCIALIST, A FASCIST, AN AUTHORITARIAN, A MONARCHIST?
—“Also I saw an earlier post of yours, do you disavow NS? if so, why?”—
I am absolutely a national socialist in the french sense, (real) but not the fascist sense (nonsense ideology.)
I am a fascist in the intolerant and economic and rule of law sense, not in the ideological (stupid) sense.
I am an authoritarian in the rule of law of natural law sense, not the discretionary sense.
I am a monarchist in the production of commons sense under veto by the people OR the veto over commons production by the people sense.
in other words i think the time where people had lost religion but could adopt a hokey ideological religion has past.
ancestors are enough if you have worthy ancestors.
we do.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:30:31 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424709136506064
-
WE ALREADY HAVE THE GREATEST THEOLOGY IN MANKIND —“[ideology] becomes a stand-
WE ALREADY HAVE THE GREATEST THEOLOGY IN MANKIND
—“[ideology] becomes a stand-in for religion in the hands of weak men.”—
Religion is for the weakest,
Ideology for weak,
Philosophy for merely powerless.
Truth and Law for the strong and able.(Yes, really)
Truth and Law for the strong and able.
Everything else is a substitute for the weak, and unable.
Transcendence of many from animal to the gods we imagined by the continuous production of Agency, by continuous competition in continuous markets producing continuous eugenics, producing continuous evolution.Excellence and Heroism, Truth and Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Rule of Law and Jury, and Markets In Everything: Association, Cooperation, Production, Reproduction, Commons, Policies.
We have a religion: thanks to the debt of our ancestors, our achievement of individual agency, our transcendence into gods, our gardening of the planet, our capture of the stars.
The rest is for the weak to be left behind as the animals that they are.
— More by Micah Pezdirtz —
To reiterate in reverse order:
– Rules and enforcement
– Rules and musings
– Hypothetical rules
– Fictional rules
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:30:13 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424707962895756
-
“There is nothing wrong with Hartford that bullets, fire, and bulldozers won’t f
—“There is nothing wrong with Hartford that bullets, fire, and bulldozers won’t fix.”—
Yes, well, that applies to most urban toilets.
.
.
.
(FYI: it’s how napoleon made paris a beautiful city from a slum. Which the french have no returned to slum…)
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:29:57 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424706898818210
-
More by Igor Rogov — One of the major (theoretical) dividing lines between Fas
— More by Igor Rogov —
One of the major (theoretical) dividing lines between Fascism of and National Socialism is that Fascist doctrine openly proclaimed that democratic majority (which at the time meant proletariat+peasantry) could not rule the human society. Instead, aristocratic, progressive, intellectual minority of the best people nation could produce has an obligation to rule benevolently, listening to the concerns of the masses and negating all the ills that gave rise to Social-democratic doctrines, Marxism and alike.
Not quite so with National Socialists, who engaged in lengthy party building process and came to power as a result of democratic elections, mobilizing and expressing the popular opinions of majority, not the daring march on Rome of some upstarts. For National Socialists it is vital to channel the will of the national masses, – not via slow and inefficient democratic institutions, but by the leader, who is “man of the people” and perfectly accessible. As such, he gives an example to his party comrades, who are also required to be friends of the people.
This distinction was apparent not only in theoretical constructs, but in practical arrangements in Italy, – fascists were closely engaged with an old European aristocracy, while German National socialists were assembling in Beer Gardens among the simplest folks and preferred to promote the loyal upstarts from the lower classes. The division between Mussolini and Hitler is also clear – first positioned himself as an intellectual and expressed his scorn about simple-mindedness of Hitler’s writings and the low culture of Nazi party and Germany itself, while Mussolini and the Fascists were later seen as too conservative by the National Socialists and too attached to superficial theatricality instead of radical social reforms.
(CD: yep)
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:28:48 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424702347752616
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424701403641068
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
—” CAN YOU DEFINE THE DIFFERENCES IN NATIONAL SOCIALISM AND FASCISM?”— Let’s put fascism in series so that we can disambiguate it. Market Meritocracy: the anglo and dutch method of civil organization (made possible by extensive trade in the absence of a strong state, and presence of talented economic classes, and endless opportunity for all.) Communism: state seizure of the means of production by the underclasses and equidistribution of production by ‘need’. (Jewish – Envious, destructive ) National Socialism: state intervention in internal production, and direction of returns to the commons for kin: via positiva care. (french – pragmatic) Fascism: Defense of the commons from non-kin – via-negativa defense. (Italian – ideological ) Combination of both national socialism and fascism (Germany – Secular Theological ) Technological advancement had made possible the direction of new wealth from the industrial revolution to the advancement of groups. The debate was over: … empires (successfully transformed nations (britain, america) -vs- … the old backward nations (continental europe) -vs- ….classes (the failed nations (jewish – universalist)). Which we can see as not terribly complicated in retrospect: the rational choice of peoples to respond to change in material circumstances dependent upon their extant condition. Fascism consists in the pursuit of Autarky (economic and resource independence) under a corporation called the state, which represents an extended tribe of people (nation) by direct intervention with industry and trade to give preference to autarkic exchanges and prevention of externalization of gains of resources and production despite pricing signals that would normally instruct members of any given industry to operate efficiently by buying by price alone. Fascism provides a merger of the state and industry such that industry adopts autarkic pricing, buying within the country, rather than market pricing. National Socialism was a response to Market Meritocracy, where the same opportunities were not available to all, in an historically authoritarian state with vast bureaucratic organs both secular and theological. Fascism was and is EXPLICITLY racial national tribal because it arose in RESPONSE to communism. Germany was exceptionally talented in all aspects but needed to defend herself, and direct new wealth to the expansion of commons. Communism(Socialism) was a response to both given the backwardness of the classes and states, and gave jews, ‘intellectuals’ and underclasses a means of using the bottom to gain power against the middle which they envied. in particular communism was a means by which jewish minority could replace the nobility, seize power in the russian empire, which was the most backward, with the largest poor population, and was in turmoil because of the war, and the need to use ‘bodies’ in that war to compensate for the backwardness of industry and state.
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424701403641068
-
” CAN YOU DEFINE THE DIFFERENCES IN NATIONAL SOCIALISM AND FASCISM?”— Let’s pu
—” CAN YOU DEFINE THE DIFFERENCES IN NATIONAL SOCIALISM AND FASCISM?”—
Let’s put fascism in series so that we can disambiguate it.
Market Meritocracy: the anglo and dutch method of civil organization (made possible by extensive trade in the absence of a strong state, and presence of talented economic classes, and endless opportunity for all.)
Communism: state seizure of the means of production by the underclasses and equidistribution of production by ‘need’. (Jewish – Envious, destructive )
National Socialism: state intervention in internal production, and direction of returns to the commons for kin: via positiva care. (french – pragmatic)
Fascism: Defense of the commons from non-kin – via-negativa defense. (Italian – ideological )
Combination of both national socialism and fascism (Germany – Secular Theological )
Technological advancement had made possible the direction of new wealth from the industrial revolution to the advancement of groups.
The debate was over:
… empires (successfully transformed nations (britain, america)
-vs-
… the old backward nations (continental europe)
-vs-
….classes (the failed nations (jewish – universalist)).Which we can see as not terribly complicated in retrospect: the rational choice of peoples to respond to change in material circumstances dependent upon their extant condition.
Fascism consists in the pursuit of Autarky (economic and resource independence) under a corporation called the state, which represents an extended tribe of people (nation) by direct intervention with industry and trade to give preference to autarkic exchanges and prevention of externalization of gains of resources and production despite pricing signals that would normally instruct members of any given industry to operate efficiently by buying by price alone.
Fascism provides a merger of the state and industry such that industry adopts autarkic pricing, buying within the country, rather than market pricing.
National Socialism was a response to Market Meritocracy, where the same opportunities were not available to all, in an historically authoritarian state with vast bureaucratic organs both secular and theological.
Fascism was and is EXPLICITLY racial national tribal because it arose in RESPONSE to communism. Germany was exceptionally talented in all aspects but needed to defend herself, and direct new wealth to the expansion of commons.
Communism(Socialism) was a response to both given the backwardness of the classes and states, and gave jews, ‘intellectuals’ and underclasses a means of using the bottom to gain power against the middle which they envied.
in particular communism was a means by which jewish minority could replace the nobility, seize power in the russian empire, which was the most backward, with the largest poor population, and was in turmoil because of the war, and the need to use ‘bodies’ in that war to compensate for the backwardness of industry and state.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:28:34 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424701403641068
-
A SHARP DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN AND LEVANTINE TRADITIONS by Tim Beckley
A SHARP DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN AND LEVANTINE TRADITIONS
by Tim Beckley-Spillane(“The next levantine tide on the rise: [Islamism, Marxism, Feminism, Postmodernism”: every form of lie possible.)
I always turn back to Joseph Campbell on the topic of Abrahamism and the West. He draws a sharp distinction between the European and Levantine traditions in “Occidental Mythology” (1964), summarizing their 2.5 thousand year-long antagonism thus:
—“By and large, the recent history of Occidental mythology can be described in terms of a grandiose interplay of these two contrary pieties; specifically a violent tidal seesaw of exchanges, East to West, West to East, East to West, West to East again, commencing with the first serious Persian attempt against Greece in 490 B.C. Alexander’s conquest of the Levant turned the Levantine tide and was followed by the victories of Rome… Christianity followed, after which the European empire fell, and Levantine Byzantium assumed both its name and its role as the New or Second Rome. Next, Mohammed’s revelation burst upon the world, in 622 A.D., and through the following millennium bade fair to become the ultimate religion of mankind- until, once again, the tide turned. For as Persia had been stopped at Marathon (490 B.C.), so at Pontiers (732 A.D.) was Islam; and thereafter the stirring desert cry of the muezzin to communal prayer was year by year forced back. Within Christianized Europe itself, furthermore, the absolute authority of One Church was dissolved through the irresistible return to force of the native European principles of individual judgement and the worth of rational man. The Reformation, Renaissance, Enlightenment, and present Age of Science followed, culminating, as of now, in the European spiritual conquest of world- with, however, the next Levantine tide already on the rise [Marxism/Feminism/Postmodernism].”—
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:27:14 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424696184226696
-
A SHORT COURSE ON ABRAHAMISM AND THE JEWISH QUESTION – ONE DOC. Explanation of t
A SHORT COURSE ON ABRAHAMISM AND THE JEWISH QUESTION – ONE DOC.
Explanation of the war between oriental and occidental that has raged since persia first attacked the hellenes.
(FB problem with Long Notes, so must be published on site.)
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:26:57 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424695083709230
-
ARCHAIC PROSE IS FOR THOSE WHO DO NOT GRASP ITS CONTENTS, ONLY MIMIC ITS INTUITI
ARCHAIC PROSE IS FOR THOSE WHO DO NOT GRASP ITS CONTENTS, ONLY MIMIC ITS INTUITIONS.
If you have to argue in literary analogy it’s because you can’t argue in math, science, operations, incentives, actions and economics.
The past is only as useful as the science we derive from it.
Archaic prose is for those who do not grasp its contents, only mimic its intuitions.
If you can’t disambiguate it, you don’t undrestand it.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:26:21 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424692763926613
-
Untitled Image Post
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:25:48 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424690389698219