Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • IT IS ONE THING TO SHAME THE ABSENCE OF ARGUMENT, AND ANOTHER TO SHAME BECAUSE O

    IT IS ONE THING TO SHAME THE ABSENCE OF ARGUMENT, AND ANOTHER TO SHAME BECAUSE OF ITS ABSENCE.

    —“Haven’t you used the same ‘feminine’ approaches consistently to vilify the left.”—@adamszequi

    —“We don’t seek to undermine their arguments, because they don’t have any. We seek to expose their lack of arguments. We don’t need to vilify them, their actions when brought to light condemn them better then anything we could ever do.”—Noah Revoy @noahrevoy

    Adam, (All);

    1) It is one thing to shame the absence of argument, and another to shame because of its absence.

    2) If you encounter GSRRM (avoidance of argument) then respond with it, then repeat the central argument.

    3) Use their shaming as a vehicle for distributing information: illustration of their lack of argument, their inability to provide one, and the counter argument in Propertarian (natural law) to demonstrate their attempted fraud or deceit..

    4) Repeat this cycle until they give up, or all opportunity to spread the argument has been exhausted.

    – Cheers

    ( cc @stefanmolyneux
    Stefan uses the tolerant British(anglo) Technique of Wit.
    I use the intolerant technique of Prosecution.
    I have little ‘christian’ left in me.
    It’s suicidal.
    )

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-04 21:16:11 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102560784120723231

  • THE DEAD DON”T RESIST, AND THEY DON”T HAVE TO BE SENT HOME. 😉 So go home

    THE DEAD DON”T RESIST, AND THEY DON”T HAVE TO BE SENT HOME. 😉

    So go home.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-04 21:04:49 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102560739441629925

  • THE CYCLES OF HISTORY History does demonstrate a set of cycles, and it’s rather

    THE CYCLES OF HISTORY
    History does demonstrate a set of cycles, and it’s rather obvious and many people have written about them and they tend to be the great syntopical historians. Economics has made history more intelligible. And most of us study economic history – not literary – because of it.

    So, (a) we began local speciation , (b) the end of the ice age provided a food advantage (c) cows provided a 40% food advantage, (d) horse, bronze, and wheel with cows provided an extraordinary competitive advantage – at least across the eurasian plain with high production per square mile at high cost of defense and high cost of transport. Conversely, the flood river valleys provided an advantage with high concentration of production per square mile, at low cost of defense and low cost of transport. And the desert, steppe, and tundra provided low productivity per square mile, high cost of transport, and because of that the inability to produce concentrations of capital necessary for state formation, and the returns on capital commons.

    While this describes only a triangular model of geographic dependence, all others fit on this triangle somewhere, sufficiently to explain the differences.

    If we add homogeneity and heterogeneity of populations we see that homogeneous populations in the far east and far west were more successful than heterogenous populations in the center – although most of the races and cultures of the middle east have been eradicated over time, the Arab, Iranic, and North african remain. The turks arrived from mongolia fairly recently, the original caucasians and anatolians are almost lost to us.

    And it is rational and demonstrable that between the geography, demography, and social order at the Age of Transformation (state formation, empire formation, religion formation, civilization formation) that we developed at that point and persisted various grammars (paradigms, and attendant logics) that are expressions of our strategies, our laws that enforce them, and the narratives that justify them.

    MAN REMAINS A DARWINIAN ANIMAL
    We all follow Racial, civilizational, national, class, gender, and individual moral intuitions, which are nothing more than our genetic demand for persistence at lowest cost to us: greatest return in the shortest time at the lowest cost at the least risk with the greatest certainty.

    Now, a simpleton like you might come here and expect to learn everything from a drive by but the purpose of my work is to end the industrialization of lying, and the second attempt at an abrahamic dark age, thereby repeating the past.

    TRUTH IS ENOUGH
    Truth is enough.
    Reciprocity is enough.
    The law is enough.
    We are enough.

    The semi-domesticated animals are found not worth domesticating.

    Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate.

    If this cannot be done peacefully.
    We will do it by non peaceful means.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-04 21:02:07 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102560728772667563

  • “CURT DOESN’T KNOW HISTORY, HE NEEDS TO READ A BOOK” to: @Gareth Martin I though

    “CURT DOESN’T KNOW HISTORY, HE NEEDS TO READ A BOOK”

    to: @Gareth Martin

    I thought you were going to present some counterfactuals. But no.

    I’m tracing the evolution of truthful speech on the one hand and competing forms of speech on the other. The premise is that this is because of accidents of western origin.

    Now, you can try to make some argument or other, but in general you’ve made two false ones.

    THE CODE OF HAMMURABI
    The code of hammurabi like the inquisition for that matter, were attempts to standardize punishments between heterogeneous groups within the “empire”, so that retaliation cycles (feuds) did not scale between those groups.

    THE PHOENICIAN GROUP STRATEGY
    The phoenicians originated either as southern semites on the southern persian gulf, or in situ from earlier northern semitic survivors of the climate crisis. It appears the latter but it is nearly impossible to separate out their genetics, other than to say that lebanese are an old people. same problem with greek aristocracy. We don’t have samples from enough individuals yet to know.

    As far as we know they survived by pastoralism and fishing, but because they had the location and sufficient skill and organization, they were able to discount the shipping cost of Tin from the afghanistan route, and copper from the european route, and there is some evidence of local tin mining. So they capitalized in the ‘arms trade’ of the day (bronze was to the ancient world what oil is today. Waterways are still the cheapest method of transportation of heavy goods. They leveraged this wealth to create a coastal trading empire of city states.

    Agrarian societies are more expensive to tovern than naval (as the romans discovered when expanding into europe) because land is slow and costly to cover quickly but can be covered by foot soldiers rather rapidly (at 20m per day).

    So phoenicians like athenians and the british and unlike the persians and the germans and the spartans could concentrate wealth in capital with higher returns. But like jews, palestinians, and gypsies today they could not resist armies. They played Switzerland for the ancient empires precisely because they DIDN”T have capable armies, but were too useful as transporters. This utility ended when they competed with rome, that was, like the USA a combined marine and army power engaging in trade where possible, rule where possible, and predation where possible.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-04 21:01:38 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102560726882592405

  • Go for the guns. We’re begging you. Give us the trigger event we desperately wan

    Go for the guns. We’re begging you. Give us the trigger event we desperately want.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-04 21:00:55 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102560724148585663

  • WE USE “GRRSM: AGAINST THE LEFT TO REMIND EACH OTHER IT IS OK TO BE DISGUSTED BY

    WE USE “GRRSM: AGAINST THE LEFT TO REMIND EACH OTHER IT IS OK TO BE DISGUSTED BY THAT BEHAVIOR.
    by Luke Weinhagen

    The left used these feminine techniques only because the techniques have proven effective against their opponents. Not because the left possesses any of the feminine virtues these manipulation techniques are effective at leveraging.

    We can not guilt the left, they feel no guilt.
    We can not shame the left, they feel no shame.
    We can not moralize the left, they hold no moral to leverage.

    Every manifestation of GRRSM shows up for the left as an alert to possible ostracism from the herd (why they always end up finding their way from all the others to “rally”).

    We do not use GRRSM to manipulate the left. We have absolutely no expectation of them changing their behavior.

    We use GRRSM against the left to remind each other it is ok to be disgusted by that behavior.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-04 21:00:42 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102560723273656121

  • RECIPROCITY: WE WILL BURN IT INTO THE STONE OF HISTORY SO THAT YOUR IRRECIPROCIT

    RECIPROCITY: WE WILL BURN IT INTO THE STONE OF HISTORY SO THAT YOUR IRRECIPROCITY NEVER OCCURS AGAIN.

    —“There are no laws of nature. Irreciprocity is not a law of nature. How do you explain the implacable irreciprocity of a consuming black hole”—

    (Yes, I realize this is too stupid for words, but let’s use it as a vehicle for an important lesson on the Natural Law of Cooperation: Reciprocity, which is an extension of the Law of Nature: Entropy, Naturalism, Realism.)

    The physical world equilibrates (Entropy). It does not engage in reciprocity. The reason being it cannot choose to cooperate or not.

    Humans can choose always to (a) evade, (b) cooperate with, (c) prey upon, one another.

    Because of this ability we can (a)obtain the benefits of cooperation, (b) prey upon one another if we cannot, and (c) avoid those who would defeat us if we cannot survive the conflict.

    But because we have these wonderful things called memories we can also engage in credit and debt relations, presuming that minor ir-reciprocities accumulate in reciprocity. And we willingly participate in the production of commons within the limits of proportionality.

    But because we can be easily deceived, by abrahamic prose, with false promises of credit or debit, reward or punishment, then we can also cheat one another – fooling some people some of the time, for a short time, and many people most of the time for a long time – and everything in between.

    This is why we demonstrate altruistic punishment: we punish irreciprocity, and disproportionality, and we do so no matter the cost, no matter how high the cost, because the possibility of a cheater amongst our midst the imitation of whom would lead to collapse of cooperation and the returns on cooperation is untenable for any cooperative (social) population.

    What do you think the means of retaliation for attempted genocide, politicide culture-cide, civlization-cide will be?

    Because you do not get to CHOOSE the value other people attach to race, nation, clan and kin, or political order, or civilizational or strategy for dragging mankind out of ignorance, poverty, mysticism, disease, hard labor, and dysgenia.

    There is only a common good until there isn’t.
    There isn’t
    So separate or war.
    I prefer war.
    Because I want to make certain that we burn it into the stone of history SO that your irreciprocity never occurs again.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-04 21:00:24 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102560722037210093

  • THREE MAJOR RESPONSES – FLIGHT, FREEZE OR FIGHT. by James Dmitro Makienko —“Co

    THREE MAJOR RESPONSES – FLIGHT, FREEZE OR FIGHT.
    by James Dmitro Makienko

    —“Cooperation is only valuable until it isn’t. … Humans can choose always to (a) evade, (b) cooperate with, (c) prey upon, one another.”— CD

    Just like in danger there are three major responses – FLIGHT, FREEZE or FIGHT.

    A small minority would choose to escape the situation or circumstances

    A larger minority would try to confront it, make the most out of it for themselves

    A majority would simply go along and cooperate with each other to ensure their Maslov and status needs are met

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-04 21:00:02 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102560720620491540

  • THE LEFT AND “DOPAMINE HARVESTING” —“I started noticing these trite, snide lef

    THE LEFT AND “DOPAMINE HARVESTING”

    —“I started noticing these trite, snide lefty phrases appearing in comment threads. It’s how shitty people harvest dopamine from each other. Thankfully, mostly in private.”–Dylan Boswell

    (Awesome New Term!)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-04 20:59:47 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102560719652502262

  • JOHN MARK ON CONTENT STRATEGY by John Mark I’ve been primarily building a “catal

    JOHN MARK ON CONTENT STRATEGY
    by John Mark

    I’ve been primarily building a “catalog” of (explain, connect-the-dots) content that people can go back through and learn from once their interest is piqued, interspersed with a handful of “audience gaining” vids (targeted at popular keywords).

    I’m getting toward the tail end of that phase (though there is so much insight opened up by Curt/P that it can be mined for a long time).

    As things accelerate I may shift to more frequency of new-audience-gathering vids targeted at keywords etc (and then point to back catalog of vids so people can learn more).

    I can see a few ways to utilize shorter vids:

    1. Outline a policy, basic “why” behind it and basic “how it would work”.

    2. Hot keywords/news events to gain new audience with related insight(s) that point people to explore the rest of the info funnel we offer.

    3. Briefly outline a concept and point people to a previous vid and/or P.com article/search term etc. (Or, combining this with hot news item & how concept relates to it, as in #2 above.)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-04 20:59:36 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102560718944900745