Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • KNOWLEDGE THAT WE DONT ALWAYS WANT TO HAVE 😉 Why did y’all encourage me to work

    KNOWLEDGE THAT WE DONT ALWAYS WANT TO HAVE 😉

    Why did y’all encourage me to work on the dating, mating, marrying problem? It’s depressing.Seriously. But, as in anything, disambiguation(decomposition) of the problem provides insights into females more so than males, as to just how much we’re bots and how simple the algorithm.

    I mean for example, the female instinct is to maximize consumption so she and hers won’t be left behind, just as much as the male instinct is to maximize capital. So in any condition where the female can hyper-consumer without social regulation of it, she will do so on instinct.

    But this understanding still provides just the first principle, the causal axis of her behavior.What it doesn’t tell us is that this hyperconsumption is the result of the infant stage, and is produced by our tendency both male and female to coddle girls and women:infantilization.

    And what this understanding of infantilization doesn’t tell us directly, is that the difference between the classes is biological limitation on development causing infantilization of self regulation – at least on the conscientiousness axis.

    So this is why we see Christians (continuous training in adult responsibility for self, family, commons) producing families across the classes, and conservatives doing it out of instinct and tradition.We see infantilization across the progressive spectrum: responsibility evasion.

    So conservatism (adulting by capitalization) vs progressivism (infantilization by hyperconsumption) are biological intuitionistic and cognitive biases that have sexual origins in cognitive dimorphism, and the competition between them in reciprocity calculating ‘optimums’.

    So, the algorithm for human behavior is extremely simple but because we have such large brains, capable of such exhaustive generalization, we can apply that algorithm endlessly as we can apply language in infinite permutation. But w/o reciprocity we get F:’cancer’ vs M:’aging’

    And I’ll use that Female: Cancer vs Male: Aging as the biological equivalent of the unregulated expression of female hyperconsumption and infatilization vs male hypercapitalization, and …again… reciprocal exchange discovering the continuously moving equilibrium between them.

    At some point, ‘sciencing’ mankind is increasingly depressing. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 14:03:51 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107179529449730144

  • P-COGNITIVE FILTERING by Brandon Hayes We focus on removing ignorance, error, bi

    P-COGNITIVE FILTERING
    by Brandon Hayes

    We focus on removing ignorance, error, bias, & deceit. This is a filtering process not a process of agreement, association, nor approval.

    This is a difficult shift for most. As disagreement, disassociation, & disapproval provides reasonable virtue signals.

    Shifting from good/bad, right/wrong, & approval/disapproval to true/false, decidable/undecidable, & reciprocal/irreciprocal [innocent/guilty] affords the removal of error in judgement as such.

    Most say don’t judge; they say so cause their judgment criteria provides poor results.

    Most use good/bad [association] when they believe you biased; approval/disapproval [approval] when they believe you ignorant; right/wrong [agreement] when they believe you in error. All of which are errors in judgment.

    We don’t look for non-judgment but proper judgment. No conflict avoidance; only settlement (resolution). Not judging doesn’t make one kind but merely demonstrates them as incapable of judgment. This shift in frame forces participation or illuminates the inability to participate.

    So, to come back around: you asked Dr. Brad if thought the audience would understand some explanation; his response was he couldn’t tell because the advancement gifted to him in cognitive filtering can’t be overwritten.

    Most use good/bad [association] when they believe you biased; approval/disapproval [approval] when they believe you ignorant; right/wrong [agreement] when they believe you in error. All of which are errors in judgment.

    He basically said: “I don’t know if it’s because it’s understandable or because I understand you now.”

    Which even if no one else could understand (not the case) it’d still be profound because it’s a demonstrable leap in cognition after working with someone for merely months.

    P is a cooperative, cognitive, & instrumental leap in adaptability: it provides the entirety of an evolutionary step-function. Affording for the increased precision in conflict resolution by constraining negotiation to value-neutral propositions.

    Affording resolutions of disputes to be ultimately decidable (by including undecidability) removes conflict-avoidance and thusly the storage of violent debts (retaliatory cycles).

    Education(indoctrination) of the past required memorization; abstract routinization which is path-dependent due to the disconcordance with reality as such. Where proper disambiguation & serialization only strengthens one’s ties to worldly phenomena deepening understanding.

    Tackling the taboos conditions people against biased responses; reducing all claims to first principles removes ignorance; building from those principles, faithfully, avoids error.

    We can gift entire polities the equivalent of an SD in IQ.

    Truth doesn’t suffer deceit.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 00:10:24 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107176252144773857

  • @a This is why I love Andrew Torba. 😉

    @a This is why I love Andrew Torba. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-27 22:30:28 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107175859228787105

  • Boost of @FrancisParker

    Boost of @FrancisParker

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-26 21:50:00 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107181727738022319

  • EXAMPLES OF TRIFUNCTIONALISM A positive and negative charge either produce a sta

    EXAMPLES OF TRIFUNCTIONALISM

    1. A positive and negative charge either produce a stable equilibrium (particle) or they dissipate. So a triangle with negative at the bottom left, positive at the bottom right, and the height of the triangle the amount of energy or mass captured in the stable relation.
    2. In any opportunity for exchange two people will only voluntarily do so if they both increase their capital (have more than they did before hand).
    3. There are two sexes, the hyperconsumptive female (bottom left negative) and the hyperproductive male (bottom right positive) with voluntary exchange “marriage” the compromise between them that produces reproduction (the hight of the triangle).
    4. There are three methods of coercion: force (defense), undermining (care), bribery (trade). Undermining the negative bottom left, force the positive bottom right, and trade the energy captured by reciprocal exchange.
    5. Humans specialize in these means of coercion producing elites in that master these means of coercion, we call them right bottom feminine priesthoods offering false promises in exchange for inclusion, masuline warriros producing states offering defense in exchange for taxation, and craftsmen, scientists, entrepreneurs, and lawyers who master cooperation and the law of cooperation, that satisfies the equilibrium between the male and female interests.
    6. There are three possible formal institutions, of coercion, the bottom right force(defense) and the state, and the bottom left undermining (inclusion) and Religion, and the law (cooperation, dispute resolution, trade). Only trade captures energy as a voluntary exchange (stable equilibrium) between male (force) and female (undermining).
    7. Given the three means of coercion and the three possible institutions of coercion, humans evolve them in different sequences. Some develop force and state first (china) some religion first (middle east) and some law first (europeans). ANd this initial foundation creates a path-dependence (hierarchy of priority) meaning the first institution is strongest, the second institution is less so, and the third institution is weakest.
    8. The rate of evolutionary adaptation of any people is determiend by their first institution, where religion is the slowest, the state the medium, and the law the fastest means of discovery, innovation, and adaptation. This explains the difference btweeen the rates of evolution of all civilizations. It explains teh chrsitian dark ages. It explains the failure of islam. It explains the success but stagnation of china. It explains the rate of evolution of europeans. It even explains why india was unable to produce formal institutions at scale, and why african produced no institutions.

    This is a brief overview of the most simple examples that we can use to illustrate that the universe operates by a very simple rule of increasing the base of the triangle and the height of the triangle by computing via cooperating, the capture of increasing energy and mass.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-26 02:31:57 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107165484129089321

  • @hankbmartin @Tayai ( I listen to me at 1.5 to 1.7 when I’m reviewing. But I kno

    @hankbmartin@Tayai ( I listen to me at 1.5 to 1.7 when I’m reviewing. But I know the terminology)

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-26 02:28:17 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107165469729746998

  • @hankbmartin 1) A positive and negative charge either produce a stable equilibri

    @hankbmartin
    1) A positive and negative charge either produce a stable equilibrium (particle) or they dissipate. So a triangle with negative at the bottom left, positive at the bottom right, and the height of the triangle the amount of energy or mass captured in the stable relation.

    2) There are two sexes, the hyperconsumptive female (bottom left negative) and the hyperproductive male (bottom right positive) with voluntary exchange “marriage” the compromise between them that produces reproduction (the hight of the triangle).

    3) There are three methods of coercion: force (defense), undermining (care), bribery (trade). Undermining the negative bottom left, force the positive bottom right, and trade the energy captured by reciprocal exchange.

    4) Humans specialize in these means of coercion producing elites in that master these means of coercion, we call them right bottom feminine priesthoods offering false promises in exchange for inclusion, masuline warriros producing states offering defense in exchange for taxation, and craftsmen, scientists, entrepreneurs, and lawyers who master cooperation and the law of cooperation, that satisfies the equilibrium between the male and female interests.

    5) There are three possible formal institutions, of coercion, the bottom right force(defense) and the state, and the bottom left undermining (inclusion) and Religion, and the law (cooperation, dispute resolution, trade). Only trade captures energy as a voluntary exchange (stable equilibrium) between male (force) and female (undermining).

    6) Given the three means of coercion and the three possible institutions of coercion, humans evolve them in different sequences. Some develop force and state first (china) some religion first (middle east) and some law first (europeans). ANd this initial foundation creates a path-dependence (hierarchy of priority) meaning the first institution is strongest, the second institution is less so, and the third institution is weakest.

    7) The rate of evolutionary adaptation of any people is determiend by their first institution, where religion is the slowest, the state the medium, and the law the fastest means of discovery, innovation, and adaptation. This explains the difference btweeen the rates of evolution of all civilizations. It explains teh chrsitian dark ages. It explains the failure of islam. It explains the success but stagnation of china. It explains the incredible rate of discovery adaptation and evolution of europeans. It even explains why india was unable to produce formal institutions at scale, and why african produced no institutions, other than the four types of families.

    This is a brief overview of the most simple examples that we can use to illustrate that the universe operates by a very simple rule of increasing the base of the triangle and the height of the triangle by computing via cooperating, the capture of increasing energy and mass.

    That’s about as simple as I can make it.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-26 02:27:35 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107165466962151956

  • @DaughterofEuropa hugs

    @DaughterofEuropa hugs

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-26 01:49:23 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107165316777470371

  • @DaughterofEuropa ( I See. This is an old thread.)

    @DaughterofEuropa ( I See. This is an old thread.)

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-26 01:35:12 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107165261021668674

  • @JaredMacKay I’m producing a lot of content. And the ‘work’ is mostly done. Just

    @JaredMacKay I’m producing a lot of content. And the ‘work’ is mostly done. Just trying to make it accessible.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-26 01:34:24 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107165257851234303