Source: Original Site Post

  • Why did y’all encourage me to work on the dating, mating, marrying problem? It’s

    Why did y’all encourage me to work on the dating, mating, marrying problem? It’s depressing.Seriously. But, as in anything, disambiguation(decomposition) of the problem provides insights into females more so than males, as to just how much we’re bots and how simple the algorithm.

    I mean for example, the female instinct is to maximize consumption so she and hers won’t be left behind, just as much as the male instinct is to maximize capital. So in any condition where the female can hyper-consumer without social regulation of it, she will do so on instinct.

    But this understanding still provides just the first principle, the causal axis of her behavior.What it doesn’t tell us is that this hyperconsumption is the result of the infant stage, and is produced by our tendency both male and female to coddle girls and women:infantilization.

    And what this understanding of infantilization doesn’t tell us directly, is that the difference between the classes is biological limitation on development causing infantilization of self regulation – at least on the conscientiousness axis.

    So this is why we see Christians (continuous training in adult responsibility for self, family, commons) producing families across the classes, and conservatives doing it out of instinct and tradition.We see infantilization across the progressive spectrum: responsibility evasion.

    So conservatism (adulting by capitalization) vs progressivism (infantilization by hyperconsumption) are biological intuitionistic and cognitive biases that have sexual origins in cognitive dimorphism, and the competition between them in reciprocity calculating ‘optimums’.

    So, the algorithm for human behavior is extremely simple but because we have such large brains, capable of such exhaustive generalization, we can apply that algorithm endlessly as we can apply language in infinite permutation. But w/o reciprocity we get F:’cancer’ vs M:’aging’

    And I’ll use that Female:Cancer vs Male:Aging as the biological equivalent of the unregulated expression of female hyperconsumption and infatilization vs male hypercapitalization, and …again… reciprocal exchange discovering the continuously moving equilibrium between them


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 23:38:15 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107181788050996589

  • So, this is the hierarchy of factors of increasing the rate of the possibility o

    So, this is the hierarchy of factors of increasing the rate of the possibility of evolutionary computation.

    Evolutionary Computation
    Male-Female (maximum axis of evolutionary computation)
    Dimorphism (Degree of sex Differences)
    Neoteny (Generation(Race) by isolation and speciation)
    Class (Genetic Load)
    Conscientiousness (Neurological maturity)
    Intelligence (Neurological quality)
    Capital


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 21:45:09 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107181343358021466

  • @Xistance Yep

    @Xistance Yep.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 21:34:40 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107181302122955627

  • @75million I am certain I know more about programming than you do, more about ec

    @75million I am certain I know more about programming than you do, more about economics than you do, more about monetary substitutes than you do, more about about BTC than you do, more about economic warfare than you do, and more about how to destroy monetary systems than you do. Sorry. Just is. BTC like I said is functioning as a savings vehicle and everyone is hedging with it to some degree because everyone knows that the central banks are up against a wall, and that as soon as boomers start drawing down savings while at the same time population negative countries retire, that they’re fucked. That just means that they’re going to do exactly what I predicted they will do. Sorry. I explained all this back in 2012 when the BTC folks first asked me to dtermined whether btc was money or not. No, its a tradable, fractional share of the btc network, that is not insured by an insurer of last resort, and it has technological problems, and energy problems, and scale problems that hopefully they will overcome. So all that has to happen is that the state has to act, and drive BTC from one platform to another. It’s easy. The question that’s more interesting is will they drive them to their own federal platform, or to one of the existing alternatives tthat have solved the technological, scale, and cost problems first?


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 21:31:46 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107181290736791795

  • HOW I WOULD CRASH BTC BTC world domination is Wishful Thinking. Sorry. Zero chan

    HOW I WOULD CRASH BTC

    BTC world domination is Wishful Thinking. Sorry. Zero chance I am wrong on long term state action – that states will only ‘tolerate’ BTC until it’s no longer tolerable. At present, given it’s largely used for criminal activity, and therefore consumer funding of criminal activity thru appreciation.

    You can take it to the bank so to speak that if I know how to destroy it, the govt certainly has someone they can call upon to destroy it. And it’s easy. I will never consider myself wrong by the market cap measure. The tipping point will be when the state loses any influence over the economy, or when BTC becomes a risk to the economy.

    The higher the BTC cap, the bigger the problem is. If I were the govt I would learn all I could from it, develop a treasury equivalent that didn’t eat power supplies, and offer a 30day exchange as of date of announcement, before prohibiting all use, under peanalty of asset siezure. I would issue a bounty in the new fed-coin for anyone reporting someone else’s use of BTC, including a percentage of the assets of whom they reported. This would turn into a hacker industry that profited from the collapse of BTC.

    Right now, like I’ve said all along,the private sector is doing off book empirical research for the state. The state will use the fact that BTC is funding criminal organizations at massive scale in order to justify its suppression.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 20:32:09 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107181056318739714

  • Just ask anyone on the left what costs they are not accounting for? The end resu

    Just ask anyone on the left what costs they are not accounting for? The end result is that it’s ok for them to steal in order to get what they percieve (but do not calculate) is their fair (inflated) share of that which they didn’t earn, but ituit that they did by ‘going along’.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 20:31:36 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107181054137792525

  • (from elsewhere). Race Differences in Intermale Violence

    (from elsewhere). Race Differences in Intermale Violence

    (from elsewhere). Race Differences in Intermale Violence.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 19:26:52 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107180799602462408

  • BTW: this is the scientific framing of Nietzche’s ‘master vs slave morality’

    BTW: this is the scientific framing of Nietzche’s ‘master vs slave morality’.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 14:34:24 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107179649578082466

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107179638942061536


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    CRITICAL RACE THEORY IS JUST THE PRESENT APPLICATION OF THOUSANDS OF YEARS OF REBELLION BY THE FEMININE MIDDLE EAST AGAINST THE MASCULINE INDO EUROPEANS. No matter how we describe it or how we name it: 1) “The female method of anti-social behavior, converted to a means of anti-social wafare”, 2) “The Revolutionary Spirit”, 3) Communism, Leninism, Neo-Marxism, Postmodernism, Anti-Male feminism, PC-Woke, Critical Race Theory. These are all the single technique of rallying the margins to destroy cooperation between sexes, classes, ethnicities, and races, by the false promise that “after indo europeans”, “after rome”, or “after white men”, we can violate the laws of the universe: 1) the formal sciences (logic), 2) the physical sciences (scarcity), 3) the behavioral sciences (acquisition, cooperation, division of labor, by sovereignty in demonstrated interestsa and reciprocity within the limits of proportionality) 4) the evolutionary sciences (sex, class, ethnicity, and race differeinces. mutational load is almost always negative, and drifts downward into the lower classes. natural selection by sortition and control of reproduction is necessary to prevent regression to the mean. Markets by internal forces are the substitute for natural selection by external forces. we must always defeat the red queen, and we have a narrow time frame in which to do so before this hostile climate, geology, solar system, and galacy visit upon us another extinction event. It’s a beautiful lie. A desirable lie. It allows the enemies of our people our civlization and human evolution to blame us for the laws of nature, when it is our discovery, adaptation to, application of, and evolution by those laws of nature that allows those of ‘infantilized mind’ to have the privilge to undermine rather than disappear into ashes and dust.

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107179638942061536

  • CRITICAL RACE THEORY IS JUST THE PRESENT APPLICATION OF THOUSANDS OF YEARS OF RE

    CRITICAL RACE THEORY IS JUST THE PRESENT APPLICATION OF THOUSANDS OF YEARS OF REBELLION BY THE FEMININE MIDDLE EAST AGAINST THE MASCULINE INDO EUROPEANS.

    No matter how we describe it or how we name it:

    1) “The female method of anti-social behavior, converted to a means of anti-social wafare”,
    2) “The Revolutionary Spirit”,
    3) Communism, Leninism, Neo-Marxism, Postmodernism, Anti-Male feminism, PC-Woke, Critical Race Theory.

    These are all the single technique of rallying the margins to destroy cooperation between sexes, classes, ethnicities, and races, by the false promise that “after indo europeans”, “after rome”, or “after white men”, we can violate the laws of the universe:

    1) the formal sciences (logic),

    2) the physical sciences (scarcity),

    3) the behavioral sciences (acquisition, cooperation, division of labor, by sovereignty in demonstrated interestsa and reciprocity within the limits of proportionality)

    4) the evolutionary sciences (sex, class, ethnicity, and race differeinces. mutational load is almost always negative, and drifts downward into the lower classes. natural selection by sortition and control of reproduction is necessary to prevent regression to the mean. Markets by internal forces are the substitute for natural selection by external forces. we must always defeat the red queen, and we have a narrow time frame in which to do so before this hostile climate, geology, solar system, and galacy visit upon us another extinction event.

    It’s a beautiful lie. A desirable lie. It allows the enemies of our people our civlization and human evolution to blame us for the laws of nature, when it is our discovery, adaptation to, application of, and evolution by those laws of nature that allows those of ‘infantilized mind’ to have the privilge to undermine rather than disappear into ashes and dust.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 14:31:42 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107179638942061536

  • @Sargonofakkad100 Correct. No matter how we describe it or how we name it: “The

    @Sargonofakkad100 Correct. No matter how we describe it or how we name it: “The female method of anti-social behavior, converted to a means of anti-social wafare”, “The Revolutionary Spirit”, Communism, Leninism, Neo-Marxism, Postmodernism, Anti-Male feminism, PC-Woke, Critical Race Theory. These are all the single technique of rallying the margins to destroy cooperation between sexes, classes, ethnicities, and races, by the false promise that “after indo europeans”, “after rome”, or “after white men”, we can violate the laws of the universe: 1) the formal sciences (logic), 2) the physical sciences (scarcity), 3) the behavioral sciences (acquisition, cooperation, division of labor, by sovereignty in demonstrated interestsa and reciprocity within the limits of proportionality) 4) the evolutionary sciences (sex, class, ethnicity, and race differeinces. mutational load is almost always negative, and drifts downward into the lower classes. natural selection by sortition and control of reproduction is necessary to prevent regression to the mean. Markets by internal forces are the substitute for natural selection by external forces. we must always defeat the red queen, and we have a narrow time frame in which to do so before this hostile climate, geology, solar system, and galacy visit upon us another extinction event..


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 14:29:04 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107179628621912181