Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • REQUEST OF JEWISH MEMBERS OF P-COMMUNITY

    (a) P-law is for everyone, but in the process of teaching it, it’s very much anti the abrahamic method of argument used in judaism, christianity, and islam in the ancient world, and marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, HBD-Denialism, and anti-white sentiment in general in the modern world. (b) This easily comes across as anti-semitic, rather than anti-arguing theologically as in judaism, islam, christianity or pseudo-scientifically as in marxism, postmodernism, feminism and human diversity denialism. (c) Just as in the past Americans blamed everything on the europeans, then the germans, then the Russians during past conflicts – education against the left, because of jewish dominance of left thought leadership, attracts people who want to ‘blame everything on the jews’. It takes a lot of work to pull them into recognizing that ‘rule of law fixes us all’. That means ALL OF US who are not crazy leftists regardless of our ethnicity. So if you are jewish and participate in our movement, in the institute, or in our politics, it will help us and the movement a great deal – but you must endure these people and help us help them them:

    –“We all follow our traditions until we know which of them not to follow – we have no choice.”–

    But we teach:

    –“We can’t change the past. The past doesn’t matter. The future does. And Rule Of Law, Fixes Us All.”–

    That includes the absolutely-crazy science-denying left in every single ethnic group – including the whites. This is why we seem to attract ex muslims, half-jews, and some secular jews. And this group helps Bring everyone along into “Rule of Law Fixes Us All”. So if you sign up with the institute, you have to sign up knowing that this is what you’re going to have to deal with – and what we all need.

  • REQUEST OF JEWISH MEMBERS OF P-COMMUNITY

    (a) P-law is for everyone, but in the process of teaching it, it’s very much anti the abrahamic method of argument used in judaism, christianity, and islam in the ancient world, and marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, HBD-Denialism, and anti-white sentiment in general in the modern world. (b) This easily comes across as anti-semitic, rather than anti-arguing theologically as in judaism, islam, christianity or pseudo-scientifically as in marxism, postmodernism, feminism and human diversity denialism. (c) Just as in the past Americans blamed everything on the europeans, then the germans, then the Russians during past conflicts – education against the left, because of jewish dominance of left thought leadership, attracts people who want to ‘blame everything on the jews’. It takes a lot of work to pull them into recognizing that ‘rule of law fixes us all’. That means ALL OF US who are not crazy leftists regardless of our ethnicity. So if you are jewish and participate in our movement, in the institute, or in our politics, it will help us and the movement a great deal – but you must endure these people and help us help them them:

    –“We all follow our traditions until we know which of them not to follow – we have no choice.”–

    But we teach:

    –“We can’t change the past. The past doesn’t matter. The future does. And Rule Of Law, Fixes Us All.”–

    That includes the absolutely-crazy science-denying left in every single ethnic group – including the whites. This is why we seem to attract ex muslims, half-jews, and some secular jews. And this group helps Bring everyone along into “Rule of Law Fixes Us All”. So if you sign up with the institute, you have to sign up knowing that this is what you’re going to have to deal with – and what we all need.

  • An ex Muslim Woman’s Take on P and Women. (Very Smart)

    Maria gives me perhaps the most important answer I was looking for: as Adam has suggested, if we re-write Aristotle in P, we give humanity across the spectrum what they are looking for. This was an important insight that I kept on the back burner, but now must move to the front.

    by Maria Al Masani Makienko As a Muslim woman, I have to make a comment about ex Muslim women. My issue is when they leave the faith, they cut their hair short, become rad feminists, sleep with every man they can, then they get into their 30s and want to settle down and men are not interested. My issue with ex Muslim men is they enable this behavior, encourage it, but don’t marry them. I think religion is an excellent tool to manage women and prevent them from eating each other and destroying their marriage marketplace value and policing weak beta males who put them on a pedestal and become their slaves when they know better. Female cognition is highly emotional, made to care for infants – something autistic women such as myself are terrible at. Female cognitives and their emotion-based thinking must be managed not to destroy themselves and society. I think for male cognitive with an IQ 115 and above that are not slaves to women, P is excellent. In a way, P creates a cognitive aristocracy and a traditional masculine religion is the only effective tool for cognitive commoner management.The utility of religion is domesticating the slaves of emotion-based thinking. The aristocracy should use philosophy, logic, and reason for decision making. In leading Orthodox, Catholic and Muslim seminaries, Aristotle is studied a lot – as my husband said, why can’t that be updated with P?

    Curt: They Can be (updated with P).

    They, as in ex Muslim women, the men who enable them? As for they can be… my favorite response is Dr Johanthan Haidt on decay. The issue with 6 pronged conservative values is they prevent decay. But every generation of secular women is more degenerate than the next and eats each other. I am a sufi, a moderate who used to go after religious conservatives and moved to Canada .. but then in 15 years I saw the decay of each subsequent generation. Women from when I came to Canada are Audrey Hepburn compared to the blue and green hair tattooed feminist monsters coming out of the schools. And then at 30, they are tired and spent. And the religious immigrant girls who don’t integrate from a patriarchal faith have their pick of men here. If the woman has male cognition, and is an ex Muslim autist, she would agree with me about what happens to female cognitive ex Muslim women over time. Female cognition is a problem: if you give them power they ruin everything! And the way you control them is not the way you think for yourself. When one is motivated by logic and reason, they first go to Aristotle for their thinking, Marcus Aurellius … but its so nice to have something modern and even more relevant like P. P for the aristocracy – a traditional religion for the underclass

    Smart. Very smart. WOMEN Agreed, but In our culture we must state this differently: “We have had centuries to develop many institutional means of controlling men’s bad behavior when they have gained social, economic, and political freedom, but we have not had time to create institutions to control women’s bad behavior when they have social economic and political freedom – and women, just like men, clearly have many bad behaviors we need institutions to control.” ARISTOCRACY: Agreed .. But in our culture, where the majority is in the middle, not the bottom, we use tri-partism and tri-functionalism, so we must have three: “Law for the aristocracy who have power to limit its use, philosophy for the middle have some to use it well, and theology for the bottom, that have least, so that they are not used by others. Limits for the top and bottom and choices for the middle.” WORK: I have so many projects I would like to finish: 1) to rewrite all of Aristotle in propertarian prose. 2) to write a tripartite theology for western peoples 3) to try write one book that tries to reform christianity, islam, judaism, buddhism – if not hinduism (i don’t think I can understand it) so that they are rational as well as spiritual, but not in conflict with the natural law. I will not live long enough to do all these things. But I’ll do the best I can. 😉

  • An ex Muslim Woman’s Take on P and Women. (Very Smart)

    Maria gives me perhaps the most important answer I was looking for: as Adam has suggested, if we re-write Aristotle in P, we give humanity across the spectrum what they are looking for. This was an important insight that I kept on the back burner, but now must move to the front.

    by Maria Al Masani Makienko As a Muslim woman, I have to make a comment about ex Muslim women. My issue is when they leave the faith, they cut their hair short, become rad feminists, sleep with every man they can, then they get into their 30s and want to settle down and men are not interested. My issue with ex Muslim men is they enable this behavior, encourage it, but don’t marry them. I think religion is an excellent tool to manage women and prevent them from eating each other and destroying their marriage marketplace value and policing weak beta males who put them on a pedestal and become their slaves when they know better. Female cognition is highly emotional, made to care for infants – something autistic women such as myself are terrible at. Female cognitives and their emotion-based thinking must be managed not to destroy themselves and society. I think for male cognitive with an IQ 115 and above that are not slaves to women, P is excellent. In a way, P creates a cognitive aristocracy and a traditional masculine religion is the only effective tool for cognitive commoner management.The utility of religion is domesticating the slaves of emotion-based thinking. The aristocracy should use philosophy, logic, and reason for decision making. In leading Orthodox, Catholic and Muslim seminaries, Aristotle is studied a lot – as my husband said, why can’t that be updated with P?

    Curt: They Can be (updated with P).

    They, as in ex Muslim women, the men who enable them? As for they can be… my favorite response is Dr Johanthan Haidt on decay. The issue with 6 pronged conservative values is they prevent decay. But every generation of secular women is more degenerate than the next and eats each other. I am a sufi, a moderate who used to go after religious conservatives and moved to Canada .. but then in 15 years I saw the decay of each subsequent generation. Women from when I came to Canada are Audrey Hepburn compared to the blue and green hair tattooed feminist monsters coming out of the schools. And then at 30, they are tired and spent. And the religious immigrant girls who don’t integrate from a patriarchal faith have their pick of men here. If the woman has male cognition, and is an ex Muslim autist, she would agree with me about what happens to female cognitive ex Muslim women over time. Female cognition is a problem: if you give them power they ruin everything! And the way you control them is not the way you think for yourself. When one is motivated by logic and reason, they first go to Aristotle for their thinking, Marcus Aurellius … but its so nice to have something modern and even more relevant like P. P for the aristocracy – a traditional religion for the underclass

    Smart. Very smart. WOMEN Agreed, but In our culture we must state this differently: “We have had centuries to develop many institutional means of controlling men’s bad behavior when they have gained social, economic, and political freedom, but we have not had time to create institutions to control women’s bad behavior when they have social economic and political freedom – and women, just like men, clearly have many bad behaviors we need institutions to control.” ARISTOCRACY: Agreed .. But in our culture, where the majority is in the middle, not the bottom, we use tri-partism and tri-functionalism, so we must have three: “Law for the aristocracy who have power to limit its use, philosophy for the middle have some to use it well, and theology for the bottom, that have least, so that they are not used by others. Limits for the top and bottom and choices for the middle.” WORK: I have so many projects I would like to finish: 1) to rewrite all of Aristotle in propertarian prose. 2) to write a tripartite theology for western peoples 3) to try write one book that tries to reform christianity, islam, judaism, buddhism – if not hinduism (i don’t think I can understand it) so that they are rational as well as spiritual, but not in conflict with the natural law. I will not live long enough to do all these things. But I’ll do the best I can. 😉

  • Market Demand for Systems of Choice

    —“Law for the aristocracy who have power to limit its use, philosophy for the middle have some to use it well, and theology for the bottom, that have least, so that they are not used by others. Limits for the top and bottom and choices for the middle.”– We need all three. This was one of the first concepts I devoted effort to, back in the 1990’s.

  • Market Demand for Systems of Choice

    —“Law for the aristocracy who have power to limit its use, philosophy for the middle have some to use it well, and theology for the bottom, that have least, so that they are not used by others. Limits for the top and bottom and choices for the middle.”– We need all three. This was one of the first concepts I devoted effort to, back in the 1990’s.

  • The P-Constitution is for USA, European Civ, and Humanity

    —“Is the Propertarian Constitution, only for the United States of America or all of North America and Europe?”—

    [A] general constitution, with customizations for the american reformation. It is for any country in western civilization (Or any civilization) – presuming customizations. The political structure – means of producing acts – will vary most depending upon the tastes of the population. And the possible choices are listed. We tend to think government is the subject we should focus on, but it’s really the law, then the economy, then the government. Hopefully our constitution corrects this problem and refocuses us on the law and economics – even though our concept of economics is balance sheet rather than income statement driven so includes culture etc. It’s structured as: – The Complaint: The reason for the reformation. – Strategy: the ‘tradition’ of european peoples that explains the entire social system. – The Law: the law that expresses that tradition (definitions, the law, rights and obligations) – The Constitution: the constitution proper, that describes the function of every institution political, social, and familial. It’s possible each country(kingdom), or federation(empire) might want to modify these as they see fit. – The Acts: Actions that are specific to the american experiment. Every country or group of countries would replace these and add their own acts – The Restitutions: the “restitutions and punishments for crimes against our people”: Every country would replace and add their own restitutions and punishments.

  • The P-Constitution is for USA, European Civ, and Humanity

    —“Is the Propertarian Constitution, only for the United States of America or all of North America and Europe?”—

    [A] general constitution, with customizations for the american reformation. It is for any country in western civilization (Or any civilization) – presuming customizations. The political structure – means of producing acts – will vary most depending upon the tastes of the population. And the possible choices are listed. We tend to think government is the subject we should focus on, but it’s really the law, then the economy, then the government. Hopefully our constitution corrects this problem and refocuses us on the law and economics – even though our concept of economics is balance sheet rather than income statement driven so includes culture etc. It’s structured as: – The Complaint: The reason for the reformation. – Strategy: the ‘tradition’ of european peoples that explains the entire social system. – The Law: the law that expresses that tradition (definitions, the law, rights and obligations) – The Constitution: the constitution proper, that describes the function of every institution political, social, and familial. It’s possible each country(kingdom), or federation(empire) might want to modify these as they see fit. – The Acts: Actions that are specific to the american experiment. Every country or group of countries would replace these and add their own acts – The Restitutions: the “restitutions and punishments for crimes against our people”: Every country would replace and add their own restitutions and punishments.

  • EXPANSION THIS YEAR

    [W]e’re gonna get crushed with demand for expansion this year. Seriously. The window is over us, John has given us critical mass. Political ‘Organization’ launch. Building out courses, additional content creators, publishing constitution. Now is when we need Megan or someone like that to recruit profs to make courseware and she’s too busy. So we’ll have to work on that too. And on top of it we’ll need to start raising funds to pay for staff to do it all. …. (omg. mercy.)

  • EXPANSION THIS YEAR

    [W]e’re gonna get crushed with demand for expansion this year. Seriously. The window is over us, John has given us critical mass. Political ‘Organization’ launch. Building out courses, additional content creators, publishing constitution. Now is when we need Megan or someone like that to recruit profs to make courseware and she’s too busy. So we’ll have to work on that too. And on top of it we’ll need to start raising funds to pay for staff to do it all. …. (omg. mercy.)