Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Heaping of Undue Praise: All Left Political Behavior Is Expression of Female Cognitive Warfare

    HEAPING OF UNDUE PRAISE: ALL LEFT POLITICAL BEHAVIOR IS FEMALE COGNITIVE WARFARE EXPRESSION

    —“Heaping of undue praise, or “Praise Bombing”. Praise (love) bombing is baiting into hazard. The goal is for the target to lower their defenses. Manipulation and Betrayal only work if trust is first established.”– Andrew M Gilmour

    Again, the female strategy: heaping of undue praise is how women encourage children to continue in the face of failure and adversity. That’s the positive. In the negative, it’s heaping undue praise on that which is undeserving of it, in order to undermine that which is deserving of it. in other words, the female intuition applied to the negative. ===

    Ryan Drummond From a mother to her child, it’s a good thing as long as it doesn’t induce narcissism in the child. In the realm of politics, education, the state, or anything that expands beyond the closed family circle, it is absolutely dangerous. Risking narcissism to one child through misguided motherhood is…managable, because it is just one input that doesn’t hold THAT much weight (beyond the family circle). Risking that narcissism penetrating the volksgeist, through the input of organisations or governments seen as powerful, can simply cause the fall of civilisations. Andrew M Gilmour Genuine praise vs fraudulent praise. Andrew Spivak Conservatives do this appeal to vanity too when you try to argue for positions or actions that would actually be effective. “You’re better than that”. Patrick Smyth This is why I would prefer that boys be educated by men rather than women. I anticipate that we could get rid of a lot of the entitlement issues young people tend to have now if people aren’t educated solely by indulgent females.

  • Heaping of Undue Praise: All Left Political Behavior Is Expression of Female Cognitive Warfare

    HEAPING OF UNDUE PRAISE: ALL LEFT POLITICAL BEHAVIOR IS FEMALE COGNITIVE WARFARE EXPRESSION

    —“Heaping of undue praise, or “Praise Bombing”. Praise (love) bombing is baiting into hazard. The goal is for the target to lower their defenses. Manipulation and Betrayal only work if trust is first established.”– Andrew M Gilmour

    Again, the female strategy: heaping of undue praise is how women encourage children to continue in the face of failure and adversity. That’s the positive. In the negative, it’s heaping undue praise on that which is undeserving of it, in order to undermine that which is deserving of it. in other words, the female intuition applied to the negative. ===

    Ryan Drummond From a mother to her child, it’s a good thing as long as it doesn’t induce narcissism in the child. In the realm of politics, education, the state, or anything that expands beyond the closed family circle, it is absolutely dangerous. Risking narcissism to one child through misguided motherhood is…managable, because it is just one input that doesn’t hold THAT much weight (beyond the family circle). Risking that narcissism penetrating the volksgeist, through the input of organisations or governments seen as powerful, can simply cause the fall of civilisations. Andrew M Gilmour Genuine praise vs fraudulent praise. Andrew Spivak Conservatives do this appeal to vanity too when you try to argue for positions or actions that would actually be effective. “You’re better than that”. Patrick Smyth This is why I would prefer that boys be educated by men rather than women. I anticipate that we could get rid of a lot of the entitlement issues young people tend to have now if people aren’t educated solely by indulgent females.

  • Criminality Is Genetic and Dysgenia Is an Institutional Failure

    CRIMINALITY IS GENETIC AND DYSGENIA IS AN INSTITUTIONAL FAILURE

    —“No. Steven Pinker explained this very well. If parenting had an effect at all, it would turn up in the shared environment. It doesn’t.”—JayMan @JayMan471 —“How do you explain single mothers parenting vastly increasing incarceration and unsocial behaviour.”— tweeter

    1) Mothers do not remarry(control, infantilization) or permit others to parent, fathers do. 2) Single mothers don’t cohabit with grandparents as substitute. 3) Single mothers transfer insecurity to children (instability) 4) Increase in female psychosis under feminism. Tolerance?

    —“None of those things.”—JayMan@JayMan471

    What is it instead? 😉 because those things compensated for class (genetic) differences. Which is what I assume you’re going to say. Add: 5) school environment exacerbates. 6) pharmaceuticals (and drugs) exacerbate. 7) recent evidence (female) social media. 8) increase in under-lower class size. So, one can say: 9) increase in anti social behavior. 10) increase in population with it. 11) increase prosecution of it. Edit: ( 11a. in class sortition bc of colleges, and concentrating dysgenia at the bottom – this one is important. ) or 12) decrease in institutional means of compensating for it, suppressing it, and preventing it with marriage, family, community, norm, tradition, and institution. And we can frame the question: (a) are we more aware of it? (b) is there more of it (decline)? (c) are there more people biasing it (population)? (d) are informal and formal institutions no longer controlling it? (e) environmental factors (as w/ lead) (f) all of the above. I read the same papers everyone else does. the disputes are generally categorized as misinterpretation of the top down correlative and categorical; bottom up constructive and individual; and incentives in the constructive that test both. Unfortunately, full accounting is rare. So, to deal with pinker’s assertion that it’s purely genetic, sure. The question then is whether we are just more aware of it, just prosecute it more, increasing dysgenia, or we are failing to mask it with institutions. ie: My original comment’s suggestion: institutions failing. And again, when Jayman disagrees with me it’s because he jumps to the conclusion that I’m making an argument that I am not. 😉 The argument is: Institutional failure. Because dysgenia at present is caused by institutional failure. All of these causes are institutional failures.

  • Criminality Is Genetic and Dysgenia Is an Institutional Failure

    CRIMINALITY IS GENETIC AND DYSGENIA IS AN INSTITUTIONAL FAILURE

    —“No. Steven Pinker explained this very well. If parenting had an effect at all, it would turn up in the shared environment. It doesn’t.”—JayMan @JayMan471 —“How do you explain single mothers parenting vastly increasing incarceration and unsocial behaviour.”— tweeter

    1) Mothers do not remarry(control, infantilization) or permit others to parent, fathers do. 2) Single mothers don’t cohabit with grandparents as substitute. 3) Single mothers transfer insecurity to children (instability) 4) Increase in female psychosis under feminism. Tolerance?

    —“None of those things.”—JayMan@JayMan471

    What is it instead? 😉 because those things compensated for class (genetic) differences. Which is what I assume you’re going to say. Add: 5) school environment exacerbates. 6) pharmaceuticals (and drugs) exacerbate. 7) recent evidence (female) social media. 8) increase in under-lower class size. So, one can say: 9) increase in anti social behavior. 10) increase in population with it. 11) increase prosecution of it. Edit: ( 11a. in class sortition bc of colleges, and concentrating dysgenia at the bottom – this one is important. ) or 12) decrease in institutional means of compensating for it, suppressing it, and preventing it with marriage, family, community, norm, tradition, and institution. And we can frame the question: (a) are we more aware of it? (b) is there more of it (decline)? (c) are there more people biasing it (population)? (d) are informal and formal institutions no longer controlling it? (e) environmental factors (as w/ lead) (f) all of the above. I read the same papers everyone else does. the disputes are generally categorized as misinterpretation of the top down correlative and categorical; bottom up constructive and individual; and incentives in the constructive that test both. Unfortunately, full accounting is rare. So, to deal with pinker’s assertion that it’s purely genetic, sure. The question then is whether we are just more aware of it, just prosecute it more, increasing dysgenia, or we are failing to mask it with institutions. ie: My original comment’s suggestion: institutions failing. And again, when Jayman disagrees with me it’s because he jumps to the conclusion that I’m making an argument that I am not. 😉 The argument is: Institutional failure. Because dysgenia at present is caused by institutional failure. All of these causes are institutional failures.

  • The Law of Cycles of Political Orders

    THE LAW OF THE CYCLES OF POLITICAL ORDERS (core) [O]rganizations evolve to exploit an opportunity that can only be exploited by organizations. The organizational myth, history, tradition, rules, methods of description, persuasion, and argument expand until all available opportunity, rents, extractions, and predations under it are exhausted and all incentives to persist the organization are exhausted by enough of the population that they are incentivized to seek other opportunities. At that point in the shift of incentives, the opportunity that evolves is radical extra-political reorganization of capital, elites, and institutions, to eliminate the accumulated, rents, extractions, and predations so that incentive to persist organization of the polity, society, community, is restored. This reorganization can consist of three possibilities, including i) retention of strategy but redistribution of capital and restructuring of institutions (best if say, under rule of law), ii) rotation of strategy, elites, and restructuring of institutions (best if say, under rule of legislation), or iii) replacement of strategy, elites, institutions altogether (best if under tyranny). For example Picketty is right in some sense, but it turns out that the aristocracies were actually better than we thought because they had Hoppeian incentives to avoid the tragedy of the commons, and to persist the polity and society while continuously reorganizing the institutions and elites. This is why we ( or at least I) have recommended (in the new constitutional amendments) capital reallocation, institutional reformation, and a shift back to intergenerational elites, on a scale not seen since the roman reforms. We don’t do things too badly. But our 20th century experiments in variations on the ancient tripartite order under rule of law largely didn’t work. There is a reason we evolved so quickly compared to other civilizations despite the dark ages. We already invented perfect government. We just didn’t adapt it correctly in response to the industrial revolution. Because we didn’t understand why we’d been successful. Now we do. Cheers.

  • The Law of Cycles of Political Orders

    THE LAW OF THE CYCLES OF POLITICAL ORDERS (core) [O]rganizations evolve to exploit an opportunity that can only be exploited by organizations. The organizational myth, history, tradition, rules, methods of description, persuasion, and argument expand until all available opportunity, rents, extractions, and predations under it are exhausted and all incentives to persist the organization are exhausted by enough of the population that they are incentivized to seek other opportunities. At that point in the shift of incentives, the opportunity that evolves is radical extra-political reorganization of capital, elites, and institutions, to eliminate the accumulated, rents, extractions, and predations so that incentive to persist organization of the polity, society, community, is restored. This reorganization can consist of three possibilities, including i) retention of strategy but redistribution of capital and restructuring of institutions (best if say, under rule of law), ii) rotation of strategy, elites, and restructuring of institutions (best if say, under rule of legislation), or iii) replacement of strategy, elites, institutions altogether (best if under tyranny). For example Picketty is right in some sense, but it turns out that the aristocracies were actually better than we thought because they had Hoppeian incentives to avoid the tragedy of the commons, and to persist the polity and society while continuously reorganizing the institutions and elites. This is why we ( or at least I) have recommended (in the new constitutional amendments) capital reallocation, institutional reformation, and a shift back to intergenerational elites, on a scale not seen since the roman reforms. We don’t do things too badly. But our 20th century experiments in variations on the ancient tripartite order under rule of law largely didn’t work. There is a reason we evolved so quickly compared to other civilizations despite the dark ages. We already invented perfect government. We just didn’t adapt it correctly in response to the industrial revolution. Because we didn’t understand why we’d been successful. Now we do. Cheers.

  • The Propertarian Question

    (core) [W]hy is western civilization successfully undermined by the marxist, postmodernist, feminist, politically correct, science-denialist ant-western, anti-christian, anti-white, anti-male sequence of movements? Who created those movements? Why are europeans vulnerable to it, but why are Indians and east asians not vulnerable to it? Why is europe’s traditional system of development by incremental suppression of falsehood, free riding, and underclass reproduction, culminating in Darwin and the american eugenics movement so antithetical to the left? Why did the left invent a hierarchy of pseudosciences and lies to deny western civilization and the darwinian explanation for it? Why is the left’s strategy disapproval of truth, undermining through gossiping rallying shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, shrilling, outraging, and reputation destruction? Why is the truth so dangerous? And why has the thought leadership of each of these movements been Jewish? And why don’t Jews, like europeans, stop their own from undermining by creating distributing and reinforcing falsehoods? What do Boas, Freud, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Derrida-Lyotard, Friedan all share in common? And why do they so successfully produce falsehoods: pseudoscience, sophism, denial, and deceit? Answer: groups evolve strategies, and genes adapt relatively rapidly to those strategies, and myths, traditions, and methods warfare and methods of argument replicate, reinforce, and express that strategy: in other words, we don’t know what we’re doing. So, incrementally suppress the female means of undermining and as we have incrementally suppressed all other forms of criminal activity as it has been invented, applied, and discovered. It is possible to construct the law so that the left’s means of undermining lying are illegal – and it turns out to be relatively easy. The only problem is that christianity, judaism, and islam are propagated by the same false means, which is why marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and denialism were produced by the same group strategy as the abrahamic religions. Why aren’t members of the group that claim innocence stopping the members of their group from destroying the host civilization? EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION’S EUGENIC, DARWINIAN, STRATEGY The European peoples have been able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically and scientifically faster than all other peoples in the ancient and modern worlds because of our traditions of: … self determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life; WHERE … the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible, THEREBY … advancing productive innovations in each other’s interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses, THEREBY … allowing us to divert proceeds from our production to the commons, and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, artistic, scientific, technological, economic adaptive and and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it. THEREFORE Western civilization is not the first, but it is the fastest, in the prehistoric, ancient, and modern worlds, sovereignty expands human ability most rapidly for the simple reason that market rule, limited by natural law. creates both the most incentive to innovate and change, and the least resistance to innovation and change, that are possible at any given moment. THE RESTORATION OF EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION AND THE RESISTANCE MOVEMENTS I – The restoration of Aristotle, the restoration of writing, and the Re-separation of Germanic from Latin Civilization. … 1. 1100-1300- The turn of islam to fundamentalism, the flight of islamic scholars, the return of Aristotle by muslim scholars, their translation into latin, … 2. The European Re-Conquest of spain. … 3. The Evolution of the Hansa and the completion under the Holy Roman Empire of the Rule of Law project, contractualism, individual sovereignty, mobile labor, capital concentration, the corporation. … 3. The Ottoman conquest of Byzantium, fall of Constantinople, the muslim blockade, the search for alternate trade routes, the age of sail, the age of muslim piracy, the age of exploration, the age of colonization. II – The First British Scientific Revolution 1600’s+ … 1. Newton 1660, Locke, Smith, Hume. … 2. The defeat of the ottomans, and the final constraint of islam after a thousand years of raids, slaving, piracy, conquest and subjugation. III – The Continental Secular Theological Counter-Revolution … 1. The French Counter-Revolution Rousseau (1700’s) … 2. The German Counter-Revolution Kant et al (1800’s) IV – The Second Anglo-German Scientific Revolution 1830+ (Menger, Darwin, Spencer, Maxwell, Hilbert…)

    1. The Jewish Pseudoscientific Counter- Revolution 1850
      … The anglo enfranchisement of the jews
      … (a) The Marxist and Jewish undermining of the HRE.
      … (a) The Bolshevik overthrow of Russian civilization
      … (b) The Communist Undermining of Germanic civilization
      … (c) The Communist seizure of power in France.
      … (d) The Communist, marxist, postmodernist, invasion and undermining of America.

    V – The Anglo American Technological Revolution (Turing, Edison-N, Telecom, Radio, Transistors, Computers,) 1930+ … (a) (Ongoing.) THE CENTURY OF THE JEWISH COUNTER-REVOLUTION AGAINST DARWIN AND DARWINIAN CIVILIZATION

    1. Marxism(1850+): To cast jewish condition as a universal condition. To undermine cooperation between the classes. To undermine white ascent into capital concentration.
    2. Freudianism(90′-20’s): To undermine Darwin and Instincts
    3. Boasianism(10-20’s): To undermine Darwin and integration
    4. Cantor and Bohr: To undermine mathematical realism.
    5. Neo-Marxism(50’s+): To undermine Darwinian Cultural Homogeneity.
      (Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse, Antonio Gramsci)
    6. Feminism(60’s+): To undermine Darwin and the Family.
    7. Postmodernism(70’s+): To undermine Darwin,Truth, Science, Reason.
    8. HBD-Denialism(80’s+): To blatantly deny Darwin and Evolution
    9. Identitarianism(90’s+): To undermine the Darwinian White Peoples

    THE GROUP STRATEGY OF THE LEFT: DEFEAT DARWIN TO FACILITATE SEPARATISM. The entire ideology of the left is to resist integration, to preserve their parasitic group strategy, to preserve their female means of undermining, to deny the Darwinian revolution and the necessity of paternal, hierarchical, market meritocratic consumption and reproduction. All political conflict is reducible to this question The right practices markets in everything: darwinian evolution. The ideological left denies evolutionary pressure exists. The theological right only debates its cause. This is why the right is ‘right’ even if for the wrong reason. LEFT: Maternal, equalitarian, dysgenic devolutionary -vs- RIGHT: Paternal, meritocratic, eugenic evolutionary. Revolt. Separate. Continue to Speciate. or Return to our ancestral means of conquest, rule, and darwinian domestication of man by markets.THE PURSUIT OF NON-FALSE RELIGION P-Law is compatible with religion. It’s that (a) Abrahamic religion is incompatible with testimonial truth; (b) testimonial truth is necessary to suppress de-civilization, destruction, and conquest by islam, judaism, and jewish marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and evolutionary science denialism – the purpose of which is to prevent continued transcendence of many into gods with european understanding of the language and words of the gods: math, science, the laws of nature, and the natural law of man; (c) nature thanks, ancestor thanks, civilizational-hero thanks, archetype thanks, the stoic method of virtue and mindfulness, and the epicurean philosophy, invented by europeans, constitute the only non-false religion we know of other than east asian ancestor worship, buddhist mindfulness, confucian wisdom, and ethnocentrism: self-love. We cannot produce a body of law free of falsehood, and that restores unification of church and state, with a religion compatible with the physical, natural, and transcendent laws, that closes the door to another body of undermining with the Abrahamic, female method of destruction of civilization by false promise of unwarrantable freedom from laws of nature, natural law of man, and necessity of evolutionary transcendence of man, baiting into hazard, creating conflict between the elites, classes, genders, and generations, destroying the informational, institutional, civil, familial, commons upon which our high trust civilization depends – and profiting from the managed decline. The only difficulty in this process is that christians resist the final reformation of their religion out of abrahamic deceit and into the imitation of Jesus – the invention of the feminine god of those who suffer – compatible with european civilization’s masculine gods, regardless of their names: Washington, Caesar, Jupiter, Dius, Zeus, Ziu, Tyr, Tiwaz, Dayus Pitar “sky father”; Alexander, Mercury, Thor; And the rest – “the gods of those who joy”.

  • The Propertarian Question

    (core) [W]hy is western civilization successfully undermined by the marxist, postmodernist, feminist, politically correct, science-denialist ant-western, anti-christian, anti-white, anti-male sequence of movements? Who created those movements? Why are europeans vulnerable to it, but why are Indians and east asians not vulnerable to it? Why is europe’s traditional system of development by incremental suppression of falsehood, free riding, and underclass reproduction, culminating in Darwin and the american eugenics movement so antithetical to the left? Why did the left invent a hierarchy of pseudosciences and lies to deny western civilization and the darwinian explanation for it? Why is the left’s strategy disapproval of truth, undermining through gossiping rallying shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, shrilling, outraging, and reputation destruction? Why is the truth so dangerous? And why has the thought leadership of each of these movements been Jewish? And why don’t Jews, like europeans, stop their own from undermining by creating distributing and reinforcing falsehoods? What do Boas, Freud, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Derrida-Lyotard, Friedan all share in common? And why do they so successfully produce falsehoods: pseudoscience, sophism, denial, and deceit? Answer: groups evolve strategies, and genes adapt relatively rapidly to those strategies, and myths, traditions, and methods warfare and methods of argument replicate, reinforce, and express that strategy: in other words, we don’t know what we’re doing. So, incrementally suppress the female means of undermining and as we have incrementally suppressed all other forms of criminal activity as it has been invented, applied, and discovered. It is possible to construct the law so that the left’s means of undermining lying are illegal – and it turns out to be relatively easy. The only problem is that christianity, judaism, and islam are propagated by the same false means, which is why marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and denialism were produced by the same group strategy as the abrahamic religions. Why aren’t members of the group that claim innocence stopping the members of their group from destroying the host civilization? EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION’S EUGENIC, DARWINIAN, STRATEGY The European peoples have been able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically and scientifically faster than all other peoples in the ancient and modern worlds because of our traditions of: … self determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life; WHERE … the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible, THEREBY … advancing productive innovations in each other’s interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses, THEREBY … allowing us to divert proceeds from our production to the commons, and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, artistic, scientific, technological, economic adaptive and and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it. THEREFORE Western civilization is not the first, but it is the fastest, in the prehistoric, ancient, and modern worlds, sovereignty expands human ability most rapidly for the simple reason that market rule, limited by natural law. creates both the most incentive to innovate and change, and the least resistance to innovation and change, that are possible at any given moment. THE RESTORATION OF EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION AND THE RESISTANCE MOVEMENTS I – The restoration of Aristotle, the restoration of writing, and the Re-separation of Germanic from Latin Civilization. … 1. 1100-1300- The turn of islam to fundamentalism, the flight of islamic scholars, the return of Aristotle by muslim scholars, their translation into latin, … 2. The European Re-Conquest of spain. … 3. The Evolution of the Hansa and the completion under the Holy Roman Empire of the Rule of Law project, contractualism, individual sovereignty, mobile labor, capital concentration, the corporation. … 3. The Ottoman conquest of Byzantium, fall of Constantinople, the muslim blockade, the search for alternate trade routes, the age of sail, the age of muslim piracy, the age of exploration, the age of colonization. II – The First British Scientific Revolution 1600’s+ … 1. Newton 1660, Locke, Smith, Hume. … 2. The defeat of the ottomans, and the final constraint of islam after a thousand years of raids, slaving, piracy, conquest and subjugation. III – The Continental Secular Theological Counter-Revolution … 1. The French Counter-Revolution Rousseau (1700’s) … 2. The German Counter-Revolution Kant et al (1800’s) IV – The Second Anglo-German Scientific Revolution 1830+ (Menger, Darwin, Spencer, Maxwell, Hilbert…)

    1. The Jewish Pseudoscientific Counter- Revolution 1850
      … The anglo enfranchisement of the jews
      … (a) The Marxist and Jewish undermining of the HRE.
      … (a) The Bolshevik overthrow of Russian civilization
      … (b) The Communist Undermining of Germanic civilization
      … (c) The Communist seizure of power in France.
      … (d) The Communist, marxist, postmodernist, invasion and undermining of America.

    V – The Anglo American Technological Revolution (Turing, Edison-N, Telecom, Radio, Transistors, Computers,) 1930+ … (a) (Ongoing.) THE CENTURY OF THE JEWISH COUNTER-REVOLUTION AGAINST DARWIN AND DARWINIAN CIVILIZATION

    1. Marxism(1850+): To cast jewish condition as a universal condition. To undermine cooperation between the classes. To undermine white ascent into capital concentration.
    2. Freudianism(90′-20’s): To undermine Darwin and Instincts
    3. Boasianism(10-20’s): To undermine Darwin and integration
    4. Cantor and Bohr: To undermine mathematical realism.
    5. Neo-Marxism(50’s+): To undermine Darwinian Cultural Homogeneity.
      (Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse, Antonio Gramsci)
    6. Feminism(60’s+): To undermine Darwin and the Family.
    7. Postmodernism(70’s+): To undermine Darwin,Truth, Science, Reason.
    8. HBD-Denialism(80’s+): To blatantly deny Darwin and Evolution
    9. Identitarianism(90’s+): To undermine the Darwinian White Peoples

    THE GROUP STRATEGY OF THE LEFT: DEFEAT DARWIN TO FACILITATE SEPARATISM. The entire ideology of the left is to resist integration, to preserve their parasitic group strategy, to preserve their female means of undermining, to deny the Darwinian revolution and the necessity of paternal, hierarchical, market meritocratic consumption and reproduction. All political conflict is reducible to this question The right practices markets in everything: darwinian evolution. The ideological left denies evolutionary pressure exists. The theological right only debates its cause. This is why the right is ‘right’ even if for the wrong reason. LEFT: Maternal, equalitarian, dysgenic devolutionary -vs- RIGHT: Paternal, meritocratic, eugenic evolutionary. Revolt. Separate. Continue to Speciate. or Return to our ancestral means of conquest, rule, and darwinian domestication of man by markets.THE PURSUIT OF NON-FALSE RELIGION P-Law is compatible with religion. It’s that (a) Abrahamic religion is incompatible with testimonial truth; (b) testimonial truth is necessary to suppress de-civilization, destruction, and conquest by islam, judaism, and jewish marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and evolutionary science denialism – the purpose of which is to prevent continued transcendence of many into gods with european understanding of the language and words of the gods: math, science, the laws of nature, and the natural law of man; (c) nature thanks, ancestor thanks, civilizational-hero thanks, archetype thanks, the stoic method of virtue and mindfulness, and the epicurean philosophy, invented by europeans, constitute the only non-false religion we know of other than east asian ancestor worship, buddhist mindfulness, confucian wisdom, and ethnocentrism: self-love. We cannot produce a body of law free of falsehood, and that restores unification of church and state, with a religion compatible with the physical, natural, and transcendent laws, that closes the door to another body of undermining with the Abrahamic, female method of destruction of civilization by false promise of unwarrantable freedom from laws of nature, natural law of man, and necessity of evolutionary transcendence of man, baiting into hazard, creating conflict between the elites, classes, genders, and generations, destroying the informational, institutional, civil, familial, commons upon which our high trust civilization depends – and profiting from the managed decline. The only difficulty in this process is that christians resist the final reformation of their religion out of abrahamic deceit and into the imitation of Jesus – the invention of the feminine god of those who suffer – compatible with european civilization’s masculine gods, regardless of their names: Washington, Caesar, Jupiter, Dius, Zeus, Ziu, Tyr, Tiwaz, Dayus Pitar “sky father”; Alexander, Mercury, Thor; And the rest – “the gods of those who joy”.

  • “You’re Confusing Anti-Semitism (genetics) with Anti-Abrahamism (‘argument’)”

    You’re confusing anti-semitism (genetics) with anti-abrahamism (the method of creating and propagating social construction that baits into hazard) and was used to create rabbinical judaism, christianity, islam, and marxism, postmodernism, and feminism. And your making the presumption that we think anyone has any agency over their moral bias, group strategy and means of advocating and pursuing it. We don’t make that mistake. Our position is just the opposite: harmony is achievable by preventing the use of pseudoscience and sophistry to bait people into hazard in matters of the commons, and to end monopoly government so that as we did in Europe, we can separate into groups that produce the normative and social and economic commons desirable by groups, each of whom, thanks to the european system of thought, and the scientific and industrial revolution, has the luxury of pursuing polities and commons best suited to their genetic and cultural preferences. But to federally govern such polities, we must have rule of law that is decidable across polities in matters material (property). That is the propertarian project. To product a constitution of natural law limiting the federal government to its original intent – continental defense and resolution of property conflicts between independent traditional european states. While at the same time allowing the evolution of various states with different and competing interests to serve interests of groups with different interests and needs. When all we are trying to do is solve the great political question of the 21st century. .The point is, that when the population gets to the point of civil war, we will have a solution ready to resolve the crisis. And it’s all online. Now. We work on it publicly.

  • “You’re Confusing Anti-Semitism (genetics) with Anti-Abrahamism (‘argument’)”

    You’re confusing anti-semitism (genetics) with anti-abrahamism (the method of creating and propagating social construction that baits into hazard) and was used to create rabbinical judaism, christianity, islam, and marxism, postmodernism, and feminism. And your making the presumption that we think anyone has any agency over their moral bias, group strategy and means of advocating and pursuing it. We don’t make that mistake. Our position is just the opposite: harmony is achievable by preventing the use of pseudoscience and sophistry to bait people into hazard in matters of the commons, and to end monopoly government so that as we did in Europe, we can separate into groups that produce the normative and social and economic commons desirable by groups, each of whom, thanks to the european system of thought, and the scientific and industrial revolution, has the luxury of pursuing polities and commons best suited to their genetic and cultural preferences. But to federally govern such polities, we must have rule of law that is decidable across polities in matters material (property). That is the propertarian project. To product a constitution of natural law limiting the federal government to its original intent – continental defense and resolution of property conflicts between independent traditional european states. While at the same time allowing the evolution of various states with different and competing interests to serve interests of groups with different interests and needs. When all we are trying to do is solve the great political question of the 21st century. .The point is, that when the population gets to the point of civil war, we will have a solution ready to resolve the crisis. And it’s all online. Now. We work on it publicly.