Source: Original Site Post

  • INALIENABLE HUMAN RIGHTS ONLY EXIST IF WE PROVIDE THEM TO OURSELVES.

    By Martin Štěpán

    —“Each person has inherent worth, inalienable human rights, and value, but we must not let political correctness dictate reality.”— a friend

    Not quite. Inherent worth is Platonism. Your value, just like value of anything else, is subjective and not necessarily positive. The only way to ensure that our value to others isn’t negative is limiting our display, word and deed to reciprocity. Inalienable human rights only exist if we provide them to ourselves.

  • INALIENABLE HUMAN RIGHTS ONLY EXIST IF WE PROVIDE THEM TO OURSELVES.

    By Martin Štěpán

    —“Each person has inherent worth, inalienable human rights, and value, but we must not let political correctness dictate reality.”— a friend

    Not quite. Inherent worth is Platonism. Your value, just like value of anything else, is subjective and not necessarily positive. The only way to ensure that our value to others isn’t negative is limiting our display, word and deed to reciprocity. Inalienable human rights only exist if we provide them to ourselves.

  • ZEIHAN ON TRUMP AND OUR CONDITION

    ZEIHAN ON TRUMP AND OUR CONDITION

    —“The Beauty, tragedy and irony of Donald Trump – is that he’s right.”—Peter Zeihan

    OTHER QUOTES We don’t need a global trade system, we don’t need and can’t lead, as a global hegemon. You have to be able to provide global maritime security. If the Americans never add another Supercarrier, the rest of the world won’t catch up until 2240. You have to have consumption. If people don’t buy the exports, you can’t do anything. The USA has a consumption based system. (He’s not answering how that’s no longer necessary – it’s what they consume given the demographics. we could consume CONQUEST if we wanted to.) We have milennials (omfg) well at least they can pay taxes – but they are all alone in the night. The first world is now a retirement community. the financialization and redistribution caused a dysgenic population crash i our civilization. But we can’t maintain it all – we haven’t got the population and QUALITY of population to do maintain superpower status. Mexicans are the market – a partner. Canada isn’t a partner it’s a dependent. There is nothing canada can do other than product dumping. Canada is a competitor. You can’t run a first world economy without a work force – you have to automate. Japan did it. So you automate internally ship products and labor externally. and prevent the lower class problem. — end — We have to be the empire AND automate. White government and military . White middle and working class. not-so-white labor and service. Eugneic reproduction. Automation.

  • ZEIHAN ON TRUMP AND OUR CONDITION

    ZEIHAN ON TRUMP AND OUR CONDITION

    —“The Beauty, tragedy and irony of Donald Trump – is that he’s right.”—Peter Zeihan

    OTHER QUOTES We don’t need a global trade system, we don’t need and can’t lead, as a global hegemon. You have to be able to provide global maritime security. If the Americans never add another Supercarrier, the rest of the world won’t catch up until 2240. You have to have consumption. If people don’t buy the exports, you can’t do anything. The USA has a consumption based system. (He’s not answering how that’s no longer necessary – it’s what they consume given the demographics. we could consume CONQUEST if we wanted to.) We have milennials (omfg) well at least they can pay taxes – but they are all alone in the night. The first world is now a retirement community. the financialization and redistribution caused a dysgenic population crash i our civilization. But we can’t maintain it all – we haven’t got the population and QUALITY of population to do maintain superpower status. Mexicans are the market – a partner. Canada isn’t a partner it’s a dependent. There is nothing canada can do other than product dumping. Canada is a competitor. You can’t run a first world economy without a work force – you have to automate. Japan did it. So you automate internally ship products and labor externally. and prevent the lower class problem. — end — We have to be the empire AND automate. White government and military . White middle and working class. not-so-white labor and service. Eugneic reproduction. Automation.

  • Video: John and Curt: Articles 1, 2, 3.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9kNBO7_Y3o&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR3bZfNy636AkLcvNfNOynY708CFUwMerGH8wzJDid6PK_IBdzDFuNzfrFw
  • Video: John and Curt: Articles 1, 2, 3.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9kNBO7_Y3o&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR3bZfNy636AkLcvNfNOynY708CFUwMerGH8wzJDid6PK_IBdzDFuNzfrFw
  • Anti-Abrahamism (ideas) Is Different from Anti Semitism (people)

    Anti-Abrahamism (ideas) Is Different from Anti Semitism (people) – I’m Not Anti-Anyone Except Parasites (thieves, Murderers) Abrahamism is an ideology, philosophy, and theology of sophism and deceit. Semitism is a language, and a genetic distribution. I’m not anti-semitic. I’m not anti-anyone (although everyone wishes I was). I’m against the use of Abrahamism to undermine host civilizations, and especially ours. And I am pro science and evidence not intuition, what passes for common sense. And the science says something that is undesirable to the left’s intuition, ideology, philosophy, secular, theology, and theology. Small ethnocentric nation states provide markets for the commons suitable to the development of people with different genetic intuitions. And the market results of competition between those nation states will tell us whose intuitions, ideologies philosophies, secular theologies, and theologies are harmful to the people who intuit them. I am, absolutely positively in favor of every current civilization except the semitic. Because every civlization except the semitic has chosen productive, reciprocal, and responsible self evolution without imposition of costs upon others using ideology, philosophy, secular theology, or theology as justification for imposition of costs, undermining, invasion, replacement, consumption, destruction, and reduction to ashes. This century is the one in which the world either contains the Abrahamic ideology, philosophy, theology of deceit, or one in which the world continues to lose civilization to the abrahamic disaster of de-civilization that has destroyed every civlization it has touched. … What is abrahamism?Using False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard, Advocated by Pilpul, Defended by Critique, Escaping Liability and Warranty, by Pretense of Plausible Deniability, Despite Deliberate Avoidance of Due Diligence, And Deliberate Evasion of Warranty, Deliberate Escape From Liability, Given the Asymmetry of Knowledge, the Presence of Malincentives by both Agent(s) and Victim(s) – And Pursued for the Purpose of Attention, Reward (profit), Influence (power), Undermining (Power), of the Trust and Cooperation, of a Population in Normal Distribution, Thereby Generating accelerating Cycles of Internal Conflict, Generating Demand for Authority to Control by the Hazard Maker.”

  • Anti-Abrahamism (ideas) Is Different from Anti Semitism (people)

    Anti-Abrahamism (ideas) Is Different from Anti Semitism (people) – I’m Not Anti-Anyone Except Parasites (thieves, Murderers) Abrahamism is an ideology, philosophy, and theology of sophism and deceit. Semitism is a language, and a genetic distribution. I’m not anti-semitic. I’m not anti-anyone (although everyone wishes I was). I’m against the use of Abrahamism to undermine host civilizations, and especially ours. And I am pro science and evidence not intuition, what passes for common sense. And the science says something that is undesirable to the left’s intuition, ideology, philosophy, secular, theology, and theology. Small ethnocentric nation states provide markets for the commons suitable to the development of people with different genetic intuitions. And the market results of competition between those nation states will tell us whose intuitions, ideologies philosophies, secular theologies, and theologies are harmful to the people who intuit them. I am, absolutely positively in favor of every current civilization except the semitic. Because every civlization except the semitic has chosen productive, reciprocal, and responsible self evolution without imposition of costs upon others using ideology, philosophy, secular theology, or theology as justification for imposition of costs, undermining, invasion, replacement, consumption, destruction, and reduction to ashes. This century is the one in which the world either contains the Abrahamic ideology, philosophy, theology of deceit, or one in which the world continues to lose civilization to the abrahamic disaster of de-civilization that has destroyed every civlization it has touched. … What is abrahamism?Using False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard, Advocated by Pilpul, Defended by Critique, Escaping Liability and Warranty, by Pretense of Plausible Deniability, Despite Deliberate Avoidance of Due Diligence, And Deliberate Evasion of Warranty, Deliberate Escape From Liability, Given the Asymmetry of Knowledge, the Presence of Malincentives by both Agent(s) and Victim(s) – And Pursued for the Purpose of Attention, Reward (profit), Influence (power), Undermining (Power), of the Trust and Cooperation, of a Population in Normal Distribution, Thereby Generating accelerating Cycles of Internal Conflict, Generating Demand for Authority to Control by the Hazard Maker.”

  • Inalienable Rights are Inalienable 😉

    —“Regarding: “Inalienable human rights only exist if we provide them to ourselves.” How is this done? Watched John Mark’s recent video with Curt and the topic came up, but it’s not quite sinking in yet. My best guess is it means I am obligated to defend those rights with words, actions, arms, etc., for myself (and perhaps others), otherwise it is a crime.”—Jack Scarbrough

    Correct. None may speak or act to remove them, nor may you by speaking or not, acting or not, surrender them.

  • Inalienable Rights are Inalienable 😉

    —“Regarding: “Inalienable human rights only exist if we provide them to ourselves.” How is this done? Watched John Mark’s recent video with Curt and the topic came up, but it’s not quite sinking in yet. My best guess is it means I am obligated to defend those rights with words, actions, arms, etc., for myself (and perhaps others), otherwise it is a crime.”—Jack Scarbrough

    Correct. None may speak or act to remove them, nor may you by speaking or not, acting or not, surrender them.