Nov 25, 2019, 7:51 AM We evolved technology (magic, pseudoscientific), and not astrology(supernatural) and found ourselves with dominion over man (others) and nature (gods), so our natural religion is and always was philosophy(choics is ours to make), with sacrifice and ritual (debt payment) to gods (archetypal forces) as our ‘literature’. The problem we faced is that the church – like Judaism and Islam – closed down our stoic schools and epicurean communes (monasteries), and killed or outcast our philosophers, to DESTROY OUR NATURAL RELIGION of philosophy (vs theology), and archetypes (vs monotheism). There is no evil in this wold remaining other than Abrahamism – I am not sure there ever has been
Source: Original Site Post
-
Our European Natural Religion
Nov 25, 2019, 7:51 AM We evolved technology (magic, pseudoscientific), and not astrology(supernatural) and found ourselves with dominion over man (others) and nature (gods), so our natural religion is and always was philosophy(choics is ours to make), with sacrifice and ritual (debt payment) to gods (archetypal forces) as our ‘literature’. The problem we faced is that the church – like Judaism and Islam – closed down our stoic schools and epicurean communes (monasteries), and killed or outcast our philosophers, to DESTROY OUR NATURAL RELIGION of philosophy (vs theology), and archetypes (vs monotheism). There is no evil in this wold remaining other than Abrahamism – I am not sure there ever has been
-
Nov 25, 2019, 9:21 AM Told you so. —“So has the fact that, whenever women ente
Nov 25, 2019, 9:21 AM Told you so.
—“So has the fact that, whenever women enter a field or profession, that field or profession will start going downhill in terms of both prestige and income.”— Van Creveld
Martin also predicts (as do I) the re-separation of genders in education.
-
Nov 25, 2019, 9:21 AM Told you so. —“So has the fact that, whenever women ente
Nov 25, 2019, 9:21 AM Told you so.
—“So has the fact that, whenever women enter a field or profession, that field or profession will start going downhill in terms of both prestige and income.”— Van Creveld
Martin also predicts (as do I) the re-separation of genders in education.
-
Flawless
Nov 27, 2019, 9:30 AM (At least four people are as good at arguing P. There is at least one person better at P than I am. Look at this. It’s flawless.) by James Krieger Rothbard & Mises extend Mengerian-subjectivism to escape liability (symmetric risk transfer) & consume commons, restricting legal (via negativa) intervention against asymmetric transfer & the production of moral hazard under the guise of Pareto-efficiency. Thus the libertarian corpus reproduces talmudism in economic prose, & this fact is not lost on even the least scrupulous propertarian analyst. That said, praxeology (operationalism: catallactic constructability) is necessary as a means of testing possibility, but is insufficient for the construction & maintenance of a political order i.e. matters of law, contract & liability remain undecidable (discretionary). Therefore, Propertarianism advances warrantied-reciprocity as a necessarily means of producing decidability in political economy (law), thereby subjecting transfers to a test against the following series: … (i) productive … (ii) fully informed … (iii) warrantied … (iv) voluntary … (v) free of externality of the same criteria The Libertarian error stems from a fallacy of composition: conflating subjective-valuation as an input in the determination of prices of goods & capital in consumer markets with a sufficient means of maintaining a cooperative order under a division of labor, perception & reproduction. The latter of which requires careful (objective & decidable) deliberation over the optimal allocation of violence in pursuit of defense & indemnity against imposition of costs. Edit
-
Flawless
Nov 27, 2019, 9:30 AM (At least four people are as good at arguing P. There is at least one person better at P than I am. Look at this. It’s flawless.) by James Krieger Rothbard & Mises extend Mengerian-subjectivism to escape liability (symmetric risk transfer) & consume commons, restricting legal (via negativa) intervention against asymmetric transfer & the production of moral hazard under the guise of Pareto-efficiency. Thus the libertarian corpus reproduces talmudism in economic prose, & this fact is not lost on even the least scrupulous propertarian analyst. That said, praxeology (operationalism: catallactic constructability) is necessary as a means of testing possibility, but is insufficient for the construction & maintenance of a political order i.e. matters of law, contract & liability remain undecidable (discretionary). Therefore, Propertarianism advances warrantied-reciprocity as a necessarily means of producing decidability in political economy (law), thereby subjecting transfers to a test against the following series: … (i) productive … (ii) fully informed … (iii) warrantied … (iv) voluntary … (v) free of externality of the same criteria The Libertarian error stems from a fallacy of composition: conflating subjective-valuation as an input in the determination of prices of goods & capital in consumer markets with a sufficient means of maintaining a cooperative order under a division of labor, perception & reproduction. The latter of which requires careful (objective & decidable) deliberation over the optimal allocation of violence in pursuit of defense & indemnity against imposition of costs. Edit
-
Nov 30, 2019, 2:56 PM —“In the west it’s ” it’s not whether you win or lose it
Nov 30, 2019, 2:56 PM
—“In the west it’s ” it’s not whether you win or lose it’s how you play the game”. In the East ” it’s not how you play the game it’s whether you win or lose”.”—George McJule
-
Nov 30, 2019, 2:56 PM —“In the west it’s ” it’s not whether you win or lose it
Nov 30, 2019, 2:56 PM
—“In the west it’s ” it’s not whether you win or lose it’s how you play the game”. In the East ” it’s not how you play the game it’s whether you win or lose”.”—George McJule
-
Definition: “hazard”, “baiting Into Moral Hazard”
Dec 1, 2019, 8:15 AM (worth repeating) “HAZARD” In old English law. An unlawful game at dice, those who play at it being called ‘hazardors’.�In modern law. Any game of chance or wagering. In insurance law. The risk, danger, or probability that the event Insured against may happen, varying with the circumstances of the particular case. Moral hazard. In fire insurance. The risk or danger of the destruction of the insured property by fire, as measured by the character and interest of the insured owner, his habits as a prudent and careful man or the reverse, his known integrity or his bad reputation, and the amount of loss he would suffer by the destruction of the property or the gain he would make by suffering it to burn and collecting the insurance. “A tiger trap presents a hazard not only to the tiger, but to man.” “BAITING INTO MORAL HAZARD” 1) I lend you money at usurious prices that will entrap you. 2) I lend you money or extend you credit to gamble. 3) I lend you money or extend you credit to buy alcohol or drugs. 4) A woman implies access to friendship, affection, or sex, which she will never deliver. 5) I promise you life after death if you obey and undermine the upper classes. (abrahamism) 6) I promise you power and equality if you undermine the political system (marx) 7) I promise you equality if you undermine men (feminism) 8) I promise you status if you undermine the status hierarchy (postmodernism) 9) I appeal to your morality and pass the hart cellar immigration act. These are all lies that bait you into hazard (risk and loss).
-
Definition: “hazard”, “baiting Into Moral Hazard”
Dec 1, 2019, 8:15 AM (worth repeating) “HAZARD” In old English law. An unlawful game at dice, those who play at it being called ‘hazardors’.�In modern law. Any game of chance or wagering. In insurance law. The risk, danger, or probability that the event Insured against may happen, varying with the circumstances of the particular case. Moral hazard. In fire insurance. The risk or danger of the destruction of the insured property by fire, as measured by the character and interest of the insured owner, his habits as a prudent and careful man or the reverse, his known integrity or his bad reputation, and the amount of loss he would suffer by the destruction of the property or the gain he would make by suffering it to burn and collecting the insurance. “A tiger trap presents a hazard not only to the tiger, but to man.” “BAITING INTO MORAL HAZARD” 1) I lend you money at usurious prices that will entrap you. 2) I lend you money or extend you credit to gamble. 3) I lend you money or extend you credit to buy alcohol or drugs. 4) A woman implies access to friendship, affection, or sex, which she will never deliver. 5) I promise you life after death if you obey and undermine the upper classes. (abrahamism) 6) I promise you power and equality if you undermine the political system (marx) 7) I promise you equality if you undermine men (feminism) 8) I promise you status if you undermine the status hierarchy (postmodernism) 9) I appeal to your morality and pass the hart cellar immigration act. These are all lies that bait you into hazard (risk and loss).