Nov 22, 2019, 8:38 AM by Stephen Phillips (this is a masculine christian speaking of the natural law in christian prose) Hello Curt, I understand what you’re driving at here. I’m a Christian, member of a Calvinist church. I am trying to convince people around me of the same things you were mentioning here. The bible conforms to natural law, as a Christian I would say natural law is God’s will. The heirarchy of God, men, women, children, animals and the environment. Men are the head of the house snd collectively we are the head of our nation/ethnicity. The bible speaks quite plainly about most of these things. Some are not as explicit throughout because I believe it was assumed in both the Greek and Hebrew speaking ancient world. Specifically nationalism but the themes and verses supporting that are there and the rejection of multiracialism is quite evident. The problem I have at this point is not Christianity or anything the bible says. I’m including the OT politics here because Jesus quotes the prophets all the time, I’m not a Marcionist and believe the OT and NT shares the same spirit of the same triune God. My problem is effeminate and cowardly white men. Both characteristics are condemned in the bible, men behaving this way go to hell. My thought on this is the ‘meek shall inherit the earth’ combined with Jewish word magic, the phrase meek and mild. When you read the Greek definition of the word meek, it has nothing to do with weakness. Rather it is what you do to a horse, a big beast but under control, being tempered. Not tyrannical, not soft but patient and not slow to use force. It is a good and proper balance which has been lost on modern white men. In any case, I’m working on it in my small way. I believe more people are going to listen as time goes on so I have hope for the future. Take care and God’s blessings to you and yours.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Another Christian Understands.
Nov 22, 2019, 8:38 AM by Stephen Phillips (this is a masculine christian speaking of the natural law in christian prose) Hello Curt, I understand what you’re driving at here. I’m a Christian, member of a Calvinist church. I am trying to convince people around me of the same things you were mentioning here. The bible conforms to natural law, as a Christian I would say natural law is God’s will. The heirarchy of God, men, women, children, animals and the environment. Men are the head of the house snd collectively we are the head of our nation/ethnicity. The bible speaks quite plainly about most of these things. Some are not as explicit throughout because I believe it was assumed in both the Greek and Hebrew speaking ancient world. Specifically nationalism but the themes and verses supporting that are there and the rejection of multiracialism is quite evident. The problem I have at this point is not Christianity or anything the bible says. I’m including the OT politics here because Jesus quotes the prophets all the time, I’m not a Marcionist and believe the OT and NT shares the same spirit of the same triune God. My problem is effeminate and cowardly white men. Both characteristics are condemned in the bible, men behaving this way go to hell. My thought on this is the ‘meek shall inherit the earth’ combined with Jewish word magic, the phrase meek and mild. When you read the Greek definition of the word meek, it has nothing to do with weakness. Rather it is what you do to a horse, a big beast but under control, being tempered. Not tyrannical, not soft but patient and not slow to use force. It is a good and proper balance which has been lost on modern white men. In any case, I’m working on it in my small way. I believe more people are going to listen as time goes on so I have hope for the future. Take care and God’s blessings to you and yours.
-
Enlightenment Now! – Voltaire on Abrahamism
Nov 22, 2019, 9:05 AM
CHRISTIANITY
“Our religion is assuredly the most ridiculous, the most absurd and the most bloody religion which has ever infected this world. Your Majesty will do the human race an eternal service by extirpating this infamous superstition, I do not say among the rabble, who are not worthy of being enlightened and who are apt for every yoke; I say among honest people, among men who think, among those who wish to think. … My one regret in dying is that I cannot aid you in this noble enterprise, the finest and most respectable which the human mind can point out.”
(Letter to Frederick II of Prussia, 5 January 1767)ISLAM
“”But that a camel-merchant should stir up insurrection in his village; that in league with some miserable followers he persuades them that he talks with the angel Gabriel; that he boasts of having been carried to heaven, where he received in part this unintelligible book, each page of which makes common sense shudder; that, to pay homage to this book, he delivers his country to iron and flame; that he cuts the throats of fathers and kidnaps daughters; that he gives to the defeated the choice of his religion or death: this is assuredly nothing any man can excuse, at least if he was not born a Turk, or if superstition has not extinguished all natural light in him.”
(Letter to Frederick II of Prussia, December 1740)JUDAISM
“In short, we find in them [the Jews] only an ignorant and barbarous people, who have long united the most sordid avarice with the most detestable superstition and the most invincible hatred for every people by whom they are tolerated and enriched.”
(A Philosophical Dictionary)
-
Enlightenment Now! – Voltaire on Abrahamism
Nov 22, 2019, 9:05 AM
CHRISTIANITY
“Our religion is assuredly the most ridiculous, the most absurd and the most bloody religion which has ever infected this world. Your Majesty will do the human race an eternal service by extirpating this infamous superstition, I do not say among the rabble, who are not worthy of being enlightened and who are apt for every yoke; I say among honest people, among men who think, among those who wish to think. … My one regret in dying is that I cannot aid you in this noble enterprise, the finest and most respectable which the human mind can point out.”
(Letter to Frederick II of Prussia, 5 January 1767)ISLAM
“”But that a camel-merchant should stir up insurrection in his village; that in league with some miserable followers he persuades them that he talks with the angel Gabriel; that he boasts of having been carried to heaven, where he received in part this unintelligible book, each page of which makes common sense shudder; that, to pay homage to this book, he delivers his country to iron and flame; that he cuts the throats of fathers and kidnaps daughters; that he gives to the defeated the choice of his religion or death: this is assuredly nothing any man can excuse, at least if he was not born a Turk, or if superstition has not extinguished all natural light in him.”
(Letter to Frederick II of Prussia, December 1740)JUDAISM
“In short, we find in them [the Jews] only an ignorant and barbarous people, who have long united the most sordid avarice with the most detestable superstition and the most invincible hatred for every people by whom they are tolerated and enriched.”
(A Philosophical Dictionary)
-
The Series of Grammars of Psychology
Nov 24, 2019, 11:41 AM (important) (read this)
—”is there any smaller sphere in which you think psychoanalysis is an appropriate method or inquiry? (ie, hopefully the one it is intended for – personal therapy rather than public argumentation).”— Gerard
I think that it is always better to use this series:
- Means: Personality traits and reward systems. (anglo/physical)
- Cause: Acquisitionism and Propertarianism.(masculine/objective)
- Training: Stoicism (Acquisition of virtues by CBT)
- Affect(Heroic): Jungian ( Archetypes as proxies for traits) (german, sympathetic)
Defect:(Victim)Freudian Analysis (feminine conformity) (Jewish feminine)
This series begins with the most precise but least experiential and moves to the least precise but must experiential. Personally I would prefer, that we use the above series just like the series math, physics, chemistry, biology, cooperation (sentience/economics), speech (negotiation), that we all knew the hierarchy of those from the most physical to the most experiential, and as such that we understood how each expresses a more fictional but more experiential grammar as we proceed down that list. This series is as important as: 1. The hierarchy of Measurements (mathematics) 2. The hierarchy of States of Matter (physical science) 3. The hierarchy of Grammars (language) 4. The hierarchy of Knowledge (aristotelian categories) (repost) Edit
-
The Series of Grammars of Psychology
Nov 24, 2019, 11:41 AM (important) (read this)
—”is there any smaller sphere in which you think psychoanalysis is an appropriate method or inquiry? (ie, hopefully the one it is intended for – personal therapy rather than public argumentation).”— Gerard
I think that it is always better to use this series:
- Means: Personality traits and reward systems. (anglo/physical)
- Cause: Acquisitionism and Propertarianism.(masculine/objective)
- Training: Stoicism (Acquisition of virtues by CBT)
- Affect(Heroic): Jungian ( Archetypes as proxies for traits) (german, sympathetic)
Defect:(Victim)Freudian Analysis (feminine conformity) (Jewish feminine)
This series begins with the most precise but least experiential and moves to the least precise but must experiential. Personally I would prefer, that we use the above series just like the series math, physics, chemistry, biology, cooperation (sentience/economics), speech (negotiation), that we all knew the hierarchy of those from the most physical to the most experiential, and as such that we understood how each expresses a more fictional but more experiential grammar as we proceed down that list. This series is as important as: 1. The hierarchy of Measurements (mathematics) 2. The hierarchy of States of Matter (physical science) 3. The hierarchy of Grammars (language) 4. The hierarchy of Knowledge (aristotelian categories) (repost) Edit
-
Foundations of Axial Age Religions:
Nov 24, 2019, 2:15 PM Read chapter 1 “The Axial Peoples” from The Great Transformation (2006) by Karen Armstrong. If you don’t know the foundations – you don’t know anything. Then you will understand the strong and material european gods and the weak and etherial eastern gods. Our Link: https://mega.nz/#!L34mmY7D!PTxst2uDEnAusH0zYWxicVOYiCFQBJGju2h7UdHc4U0
-
Foundations of Axial Age Religions:
Nov 24, 2019, 2:15 PM Read chapter 1 “The Axial Peoples” from The Great Transformation (2006) by Karen Armstrong. If you don’t know the foundations – you don’t know anything. Then you will understand the strong and material european gods and the weak and etherial eastern gods. Our Link: https://mega.nz/#!L34mmY7D!PTxst2uDEnAusH0zYWxicVOYiCFQBJGju2h7UdHc4U0
-
Nov 25, 2019, 7:30 AM —“Just keep following, if I have learned anything at all
Nov 25, 2019, 7:30 AM
—“Just keep following, if I have learned anything at all about Curt it is stick around because as you do things that seemed incomprehensible eventually become stupid simple and beneficial”–Heimdallr Aldafaðir
-
Nov 25, 2019, 7:30 AM —“Just keep following, if I have learned anything at all
Nov 25, 2019, 7:30 AM
—“Just keep following, if I have learned anything at all about Curt it is stick around because as you do things that seemed incomprehensible eventually become stupid simple and beneficial”–Heimdallr Aldafaðir