Flawless

Nov 27, 2019, 9:30 AM (At least four people are as good at arguing P. There is at least one person better at P than I am. Look at this. It’s flawless.) by James Krieger Rothbard & Mises extend Mengerian-subjectivism to escape liability (symmetric risk transfer) & consume commons, restricting legal (via negativa) intervention against asymmetric transfer & the production of moral hazard under the guise of Pareto-efficiency. Thus the libertarian corpus reproduces talmudism in economic prose, & this fact is not lost on even the least scrupulous propertarian analyst. That said, praxeology (operationalism: catallactic constructability) is necessary as a means of testing possibility, but is insufficient for the construction & maintenance of a political order i.e. matters of law, contract & liability remain undecidable (discretionary). Therefore, Propertarianism advances warrantied-reciprocity as a necessarily means of producing decidability in political economy (law), thereby subjecting transfers to a test against the following series: … (i) productive … (ii) fully informed … (iii) warrantied … (iv) voluntary … (v) free of externality of the same criteria The Libertarian error stems from a fallacy of composition: conflating subjective-valuation as an input in the determination of prices of goods & capital in consumer markets with a sufficient means of maintaining a cooperative order under a division of labor, perception & reproduction. The latter of which requires careful (objective & decidable) deliberation over the optimal allocation of violence in pursuit of defense & indemnity against imposition of costs. Edit