Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Advanced P-Law of Commons: Responsibility

    Mar 7, 2020, 5:35 PM

    —” I’m curious how P-law would handle the harmful nature drugs involve, without stamping on freedom of the individual to grow and learn from making mistakes… and what about drugs that stradle a line between medical necessity, and potential for abuse like opioids or amphetamine. … And the third aspect of the question would be: what about drugs like psychedelics, that might hold great value for both therapeutics and also potential for cognitive and spiritual enhancement without much risk to physical health? ….How would a propertarian society manage these risks and issues with adult maturity and intelligence, while avoiding descending into the unproductive chaos like we have in the current drug laws? Just curious if an answer to these questions has yet been formulated…”— NJ Gregory

    If it’s not in the commons it’s not a problem OF the commons.If it becomes a problem of the commons then it’s a problem of the commons. Drug use itself is a commons (common property of demonstrated interest) for those who use drugs. If users constrain each other such that the users’ commons doesn’t influence the broader commons then that’s not a problem. If not then it is. In other words, it’s up to the ‘market’ to control its effect on the commons or to lose their commons for having not done so. This is the answer to almost every seemingly difficult question. The problem is the unwillingness of members of risky commons to police their property. That’s why drugs are outlawed. Because they remove the agency of the user, and produce malincentives for the distributor. This is another way of saying all groups in which one has an interest and obtains a value also transfers to one a liability for the group one sustains. Ergo: collective punishment exists, we just don’t speak of it honestly. If we did, then we would cause say, certain religions to control their members or lose the entire religion and all members.

  • Advanced P-Law of Commons: Responsibility

    Mar 7, 2020, 5:35 PM

    —” I’m curious how P-law would handle the harmful nature drugs involve, without stamping on freedom of the individual to grow and learn from making mistakes… and what about drugs that stradle a line between medical necessity, and potential for abuse like opioids or amphetamine. … And the third aspect of the question would be: what about drugs like psychedelics, that might hold great value for both therapeutics and also potential for cognitive and spiritual enhancement without much risk to physical health? ….How would a propertarian society manage these risks and issues with adult maturity and intelligence, while avoiding descending into the unproductive chaos like we have in the current drug laws? Just curious if an answer to these questions has yet been formulated…”— NJ Gregory

    If it’s not in the commons it’s not a problem OF the commons.If it becomes a problem of the commons then it’s a problem of the commons. Drug use itself is a commons (common property of demonstrated interest) for those who use drugs. If users constrain each other such that the users’ commons doesn’t influence the broader commons then that’s not a problem. If not then it is. In other words, it’s up to the ‘market’ to control its effect on the commons or to lose their commons for having not done so. This is the answer to almost every seemingly difficult question. The problem is the unwillingness of members of risky commons to police their property. That’s why drugs are outlawed. Because they remove the agency of the user, and produce malincentives for the distributor. This is another way of saying all groups in which one has an interest and obtains a value also transfers to one a liability for the group one sustains. Ergo: collective punishment exists, we just don’t speak of it honestly. If we did, then we would cause say, certain religions to control their members or lose the entire religion and all members.

  • Reason for Western Decline

    Mar 8, 2020, 10:29 AM 1) Western genetic, cultural, institutional, and technical advantage has been redistributed to most of the world. 2) Our internal redistributive politics have ended our genetic advantage because e have stopped breeding in sufficient numbers. 3) Our civil war (World Wars) destroyed our aggression and willpower. 4) Immigration of postwar Jewish intellectuals created the second abrahamic dark age with the false promises of marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and HBD-Denialism, and sold them to immigrants, the underclass and enough of white women, through the university system, consumer marketing, entertainment and media – undermining our cultural advantage. 5) Immigration and underclass reproduction have eroded our institutional advantage.

  • Reason for Western Decline

    Mar 8, 2020, 10:29 AM 1) Western genetic, cultural, institutional, and technical advantage has been redistributed to most of the world. 2) Our internal redistributive politics have ended our genetic advantage because e have stopped breeding in sufficient numbers. 3) Our civil war (World Wars) destroyed our aggression and willpower. 4) Immigration of postwar Jewish intellectuals created the second abrahamic dark age with the false promises of marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and HBD-Denialism, and sold them to immigrants, the underclass and enough of white women, through the university system, consumer marketing, entertainment and media – undermining our cultural advantage. 5) Immigration and underclass reproduction have eroded our institutional advantage.

  • The Reason for Western Excellence Is Simple and Ancient – And Decline, Recent

    Mar 8, 2020, 10:42 AM Western people’s military technology during the western indo european expansion from 2500-1200BC, required (a) a fully militarized polity (b) a voluntarily militarized social order with self funded warriors using expensive hose, bronze, and wheel (entrepreneurial),(c) the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity we call ‘tort’ or “property”, and the Jury, and the larger version of the jury “democracy”. WIth the combination of military epistemology, military meritocracy, a military social order where everyone has value and earns respect if they just do their duty regardless of rank, and a judicial system predicted on nothing other than evidence, produced a social order that (a) with the least falsehood, (b) with the greatest opportunity for adaptation, (c) with the greatest possible rate of adaptation, (d) with the greatest incentive for technological and organizational innovation. These people used these traditions to conquer all of northern europe, then to expand southward into southern europe, most likely contributing to or causing the bronze age collapse, and then, rebuilding greece, rome, defeating rome, and rebuilding germania, scandinavia, the baltics, russia. When the turks conquered byzantium, and entered europe tey barricaded trade and the europeans developed the age of sail to circumvent the muslims, and discovered the world. They used the world’s new resources (technological advantage) and remoteness (exclusivity) to bring resources to europe, transform them, and sell them to the world, to finance the huge cost of their imperial expansions. The only mistakes they made were not crushing france entirely, so that the holy roman empire, (germany) could control the continent, and russia the steppe; and stopping russia from reconquering byzantium (orthodoxy), and instead having a civil war that ruined it all. Had the west completed the job of colonization, and dragged the whole world into modernity without world wars, abandonment of the colonies, the wars against communism, the current civil war against jewish-abrhamimsm and immigration, and the wars against islam would never have been necessary. Instead we left the world half domesticated and having to catch up to us on their own. The primary difference between the west and the rest is truth and honesty and no-cheating, and no corruption, and rule of law of sovereignty and property because we were equal in respect as a military people, even if unequal in economic ability – we were all in our ‘rank’ and if we do our duty we are due respect. This is also why we win wars, and other people do not. REASON FOR WESTERN DECLINE 1) Western genetic, cultural, institutional, and technical advantage has been redistributed to most of the world. 2) Our internal redistributive politics have ended our genetic advantage because e have stopped breeding in sufficient numbers. 3) Our civil war (World Wars) destroyed our aggression and willpower. 4) Immigration of postwar Jewish intellectuals created the second abrahamic dark age with the false promises of marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and HBD-Denialism, and sold them to immigrants, the underclass and enough of white women, through the university system, consumer marketing, entertainment and media – undermining our cultural advantage. 5) Immigration and underclass reproduction have eroded our institutional advantage.

  • The Reason for Western Excellence Is Simple and Ancient – And Decline, Recent

    Mar 8, 2020, 10:42 AM Western people’s military technology during the western indo european expansion from 2500-1200BC, required (a) a fully militarized polity (b) a voluntarily militarized social order with self funded warriors using expensive hose, bronze, and wheel (entrepreneurial),(c) the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity we call ‘tort’ or “property”, and the Jury, and the larger version of the jury “democracy”. WIth the combination of military epistemology, military meritocracy, a military social order where everyone has value and earns respect if they just do their duty regardless of rank, and a judicial system predicted on nothing other than evidence, produced a social order that (a) with the least falsehood, (b) with the greatest opportunity for adaptation, (c) with the greatest possible rate of adaptation, (d) with the greatest incentive for technological and organizational innovation. These people used these traditions to conquer all of northern europe, then to expand southward into southern europe, most likely contributing to or causing the bronze age collapse, and then, rebuilding greece, rome, defeating rome, and rebuilding germania, scandinavia, the baltics, russia. When the turks conquered byzantium, and entered europe tey barricaded trade and the europeans developed the age of sail to circumvent the muslims, and discovered the world. They used the world’s new resources (technological advantage) and remoteness (exclusivity) to bring resources to europe, transform them, and sell them to the world, to finance the huge cost of their imperial expansions. The only mistakes they made were not crushing france entirely, so that the holy roman empire, (germany) could control the continent, and russia the steppe; and stopping russia from reconquering byzantium (orthodoxy), and instead having a civil war that ruined it all. Had the west completed the job of colonization, and dragged the whole world into modernity without world wars, abandonment of the colonies, the wars against communism, the current civil war against jewish-abrhamimsm and immigration, and the wars against islam would never have been necessary. Instead we left the world half domesticated and having to catch up to us on their own. The primary difference between the west and the rest is truth and honesty and no-cheating, and no corruption, and rule of law of sovereignty and property because we were equal in respect as a military people, even if unequal in economic ability – we were all in our ‘rank’ and if we do our duty we are due respect. This is also why we win wars, and other people do not. REASON FOR WESTERN DECLINE 1) Western genetic, cultural, institutional, and technical advantage has been redistributed to most of the world. 2) Our internal redistributive politics have ended our genetic advantage because e have stopped breeding in sufficient numbers. 3) Our civil war (World Wars) destroyed our aggression and willpower. 4) Immigration of postwar Jewish intellectuals created the second abrahamic dark age with the false promises of marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and HBD-Denialism, and sold them to immigrants, the underclass and enough of white women, through the university system, consumer marketing, entertainment and media – undermining our cultural advantage. 5) Immigration and underclass reproduction have eroded our institutional advantage.

  • The Uniqueness of The West

    Mar 8, 2020, 10:52 AM by Martin Štěpán West is unique due to genetics of people that comprise it. Martial culture, harsh winters, plagues, manorialism, ban on cousin marriage and executions of 2% of the population every year left around only intelligent conscientious entrepreneurial cooperative people who, very much unlike the rest of the world, feel telling the truth is more important than saving their face and maintaining harmony. The result of this has been faster adaptation to every situation, having geniuses that discover new laws of nature and invent new technology, propelling the whole civilization forward. Answers from everyone else aren’t really explanations but various symptoms of this. Unfortunately, we took some terribly wrong turns in the last two centuries, enfranchising too many people, letting in foreigners and letting the decisions be done by majority despite terrible historical record. This will have to be reverted or else we’re heading into the second dark age.

  • The Uniqueness of The West

    Mar 8, 2020, 10:52 AM by Martin Štěpán West is unique due to genetics of people that comprise it. Martial culture, harsh winters, plagues, manorialism, ban on cousin marriage and executions of 2% of the population every year left around only intelligent conscientious entrepreneurial cooperative people who, very much unlike the rest of the world, feel telling the truth is more important than saving their face and maintaining harmony. The result of this has been faster adaptation to every situation, having geniuses that discover new laws of nature and invent new technology, propelling the whole civilization forward. Answers from everyone else aren’t really explanations but various symptoms of this. Unfortunately, we took some terribly wrong turns in the last two centuries, enfranchising too many people, letting in foreigners and letting the decisions be done by majority despite terrible historical record. This will have to be reverted or else we’re heading into the second dark age.

  • The Banning of Cousin Marriage as The Creation of Subservience

    Mar 8, 2020, 12:05 PM THE BANNING OF COUSIN MARRIAGE IN THE WEST BEGAN EARLY – BAN COUSIN MARRIAGE, USE PROPERTY RIGHTS, CREATE A UNIVERSAL MILITIA

    —“In September 506 C.E., the fathers of what would later become the Roman Catholic Church gathered in southern France to draw up dozens of new laws. Some forbade clergy from visiting unrelated women. Others forbade Christians from marrying anyone more closely related than their third cousin. The authors of a sweeping new study say that last, seemingly trivial prohibition may have given birth to Western civilization as we know it. “If the authors are right, or even in the vicinity of being right, it couldn’t be bigger,” says Stephen Stich, a philosopher and cognitive scientist at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey, who wasn’t involved in the work. “What they are offering to explain is the emergence of democratic institutions, of individualism in the West.” The church’s early ban on incest and cousin marriage, the researchers say, weakened the tight kinship structures that had previously defined European populations, fostering new streaks of independence, nonconformity, and a willingness to work with strangers. And as the church’s influence spread, those qualities blossomed into a suite of psychological traits common today across Western industrialized nations, they argue.”—

  • The Banning of Cousin Marriage as The Creation of Subservience

    Mar 8, 2020, 12:05 PM THE BANNING OF COUSIN MARRIAGE IN THE WEST BEGAN EARLY – BAN COUSIN MARRIAGE, USE PROPERTY RIGHTS, CREATE A UNIVERSAL MILITIA

    —“In September 506 C.E., the fathers of what would later become the Roman Catholic Church gathered in southern France to draw up dozens of new laws. Some forbade clergy from visiting unrelated women. Others forbade Christians from marrying anyone more closely related than their third cousin. The authors of a sweeping new study say that last, seemingly trivial prohibition may have given birth to Western civilization as we know it. “If the authors are right, or even in the vicinity of being right, it couldn’t be bigger,” says Stephen Stich, a philosopher and cognitive scientist at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey, who wasn’t involved in the work. “What they are offering to explain is the emergence of democratic institutions, of individualism in the West.” The church’s early ban on incest and cousin marriage, the researchers say, weakened the tight kinship structures that had previously defined European populations, fostering new streaks of independence, nonconformity, and a willingness to work with strangers. And as the church’s influence spread, those qualities blossomed into a suite of psychological traits common today across Western industrialized nations, they argue.”—